Re: Proposal: changes to "default application functionality" release criteria

On Tue, 2022-05-03 at 19:37 -0500, Michael Catanzaro wrote: > On Tue, May 3 2022 at 05:14:53 PM -0700, Adam Williamson > wrote: > > Stable releases of core components of a major desktop should never > > contain bugs like "deleting contacts sometimes doesn't work" or "you > > can't add photos to a

Re: Proposal: changes to "default application functionality" release criteria

On Tue, 2022-05-03 at 18:13 -0400, Matthew Miller wrote: > Time to talk about > https://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_36_Final_Release_Criteria#Default_application_functionality > again! > > Lots of desktop-app-related blockers this time around, and last time too. I > think we're hitting a sym

Proposal: changes to "default application functionality" release criteria

Time to talk about https://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_36_Final_Release_Criteria#Default_application_functionality again! Lots of desktop-app-related blockers this time around, and last time too. I think we're hitting a symptom-of-our-success problem here: increasing popularity and reviews

Fedora-36-20220503.n.0 compose check report

No missing expected images. Failed openQA tests: 7/229 (x86_64), 12/161 (aarch64) New failures (same test not failed in Fedora-36-20220501.n.0): ID: 1252415 Test: x86_64 KDE-live-iso desktop_login URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1252415 ID: 1252431 Test: x86_64 Silverblue-dvd

Fedora-Rawhide-20220503.n.0 compose check report

Missing expected images: Minimal raw-xz armhfp Compose FAILS proposed Rawhide gating check! 3 of 43 required tests failed openQA tests matching unsatisfied gating requirements shown with **GATING** below Failed openQA tests: 23/231 (x86_64), 22/161 (aarch64) New failures (same test not failed

Fedora 36 compose report: 20220503.n.0 changes

OLD: Fedora-36-20220501.n.0 NEW: Fedora-36-20220503.n.0 = SUMMARY = Added images:1 Dropped images: 0 Added packages: 0 Dropped packages:0 Upgraded packages: 6 Downgraded packages: 0 Size of added packages: 0 B Size of dropped packages:0 B Size of upgraded

Fedora-IoT-36-20220503.0 compose check report

No missing expected images. Failed openQA tests: 3/15 (aarch64) New failures (same test not failed in Fedora-IoT-36-20220429.0): ID: 1252295 Test: aarch64 IoT-dvd_ostree-iso podman@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1252295 ID: 1252301 Test: aarch64 IoT-dvd_ostree-iso podma

Re: F36 Upgraded, But Now: Failed to resolve allow statement

On Tuesday, May 3, 2022 6:55:45 AM EDT Kamil Paral wrote: > On Tue, May 3, 2022 at 12:58 AM Garry T. Williams > wrote: > > Thanks, Adam. But reinstalling already failed to fix the problem for > > me. > > Gary, have you tried reinstalling just selinux-policy, or have you tried > the exact command

Fedora rawhide compose report: 20220503.n.0 changes

OLD: Fedora-Rawhide-20220502.n.0 NEW: Fedora-Rawhide-20220503.n.0 = SUMMARY = Added images:1 Dropped images: 0 Added packages: 9 Dropped packages:9 Upgraded packages: 78 Downgraded packages: 0 Size of added packages: 49.19 MiB Size of dropped packages

Re: F36 Upgraded, But Now: Failed to resolve allow statement

On Tue, May 3, 2022 at 12:58 AM Garry T. Williams wrote: > Thanks, Adam. But reinstalling already failed to fix the problem for > me. Gary, have you tried reinstalling just selinux-policy, or have you tried the exact command as suggested by Adam? Because the problem was most probably in flatpa

Fedora-IoT-37-20220503.0 compose check report

Missing expected images: Iot dvd aarch64 Iot dvd x86_64 Failed openQA tests: 4/15 (aarch64) ID: 1251815 Test: aarch64 IoT-dvd_ostree-iso iot_clevis@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1251815 ID: 1251817 Test: aarch64 IoT-dvd_ostree-iso podman@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedora