Hi,
I installed a f23 server (fedora server only) and I configured 2
bridged interfaces.
Now I allow forward traffic between br0 and br1:
[root@s ~]# firewall-cmd --direct --add-rule ipv4 filter FORWARD 0 -i
br0 -o br1 -j ACCEPT
success
[root@s ~]# firewall-cmd --direct --add-rule ipv4 filter
On Fri, 2015-10-30 at 11:31 +0200, Cristian Sava wrote:
> On Fri, 2015-10-30 at 11:06 +0200, Cristian Sava wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I installed a f23 server (fedora server only) and I configured 2
> > bridged interfaces.
> > Now I allow forward traffic betw
On Fri, 2015-10-30 at 11:06 +0200, Cristian Sava wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I installed a f23 server (fedora server only) and I configured 2
> bridged interfaces.
> Now I allow forward traffic between br0 and br1:
>
> [root@s ~]# firewall-cmd --direct --add-rule ipv4 filter FORWARD
On Wed, 2015-09-16 at 04:20 -0400, Joerg Lechner wrote:
> Hi,
> - installed F23 Beta 1 Workstation x86_64 on external disk from usb
> flash medium
> - dnf update
> - installation of about 20 user programs
> - Gnome SW utility update was requested by the system
> - Gnome SW utility update started
>
Tried Fedora server (cli, no graphics) and it does not shutdown nor
> > I
> > can get root rights even I am root!
>
>
> Does it work if as root you do "setenforce 0; reboot"
Yes, it works! Thank you for the tip.
After reboot is ok.
But ...
Fedora 23 beta rc1 seems ok and after updates appeared
On Tue, 2014-10-28 at 08:28 -0400, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
Whoops, I forgot to CC the QA list on this. If you wish to volunteer for
any part of this, PLEASE make sure that ser...@lists.fedoraproject.org
is listed in the TO: or CC: lines, or we will probably miss it.
I'm using Fedora for
On Thu, 2013-07-04 at 17:26 +0300, Cristian Sava wrote:
On Wed, 2013-07-03 at 11:37 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
On 2013-07-03 1:47, Cristian Sava wrote:
I have a server with two NICs (on-board and attached).
HW: ASRock H67M-GE + I3-2120 + 8GB + 1TB (hdd, sata)
1) Why route shows
On Wed, 2013-07-03 at 11:37 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
On 2013-07-03 1:47, Cristian Sava wrote:
I have a server with two NICs (on-board and attached).
HW: ASRock H67M-GE + I3-2120 + 8GB + 1TB (hdd, sata)
1) Why route shows iface=p4p1, p5p1 instead enp4s0, enp5s0 ?
This will likely
On Wed, 2013-07-03 at 11:37 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
On 2013-07-03 1:47, Cristian Sava wrote:
I have a server with two NICs (on-board and attached).
HW: ASRock H67M-GE + I3-2120 + 8GB + 1TB (hdd, sata)
1) Why route shows iface=p4p1, p5p1 instead enp4s0, enp5s0 ?
This will likely
I have a server with two NICs (on-board and attached).
HW: ASRock H67M-GE + I3-2120 + 8GB + 1TB (hdd, sata)
[root@physics network-scripts]# cat ifcfg-enp4s0
IPV6_PEERDNS=yes
IPV6INIT=yes
UUID=b43c0128-ec02-4793-98c9-f396fb9438d2
IPADDR1=192.168.1.1
IPADDR0=172.16.0.1
PREFIX1=24
PREFIX0=16
On Wed, 2013-07-03 at 11:47 +0300, Cristian Sava wrote:
After updating aujour:
The external network is not reachable anymore but the internal network
is ok if NM is enabled and working.
This setup does not work with network service anymore.
Any advice how to fix (not downgrade-ing
What is
kde-plasma-networkmanagement-openconnect-0.9.0.8-3.fc19.x86_64.r
in Fedora-19-x86_64-DVD.iso (.../Packages)?
My download does not seem wrong?
C. Sava
--
test mailing list
test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
On Tue, 2013-06-18 at 23:01 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
On Wed, 2013-06-19 at 08:51 +0300, Cristian Sava wrote:
After recent updates fail2ban was broken again.
For this kind of thing, the appropriate thing to do is file a bug
report. It doesn't make much sense to post it to the mailing
fail2ban-server[2086]:
fail2ban.jail : ...
Jun 19 08:33:09 s198.xx.yy.ro systemd[1]: Started Fail2ban Service.
Cristian Sava
--
test mailing list
test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
sgid=0 fsgid=0 ses=4294967295 tty=(none)
comm=accounts-daemon exe=/usr/libexec/accounts-daemon
subj=system_u:system_r:accountsd_t:s0 key=(null)
Hash: accounts-daemon,accountsd_t,var_log_t,dir,read
Cristian Sava
--
test mailing list
test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe:
https
Trying to install F19-tc3-x64 on VirtualBox-4.2.12 on Win7_x64 with
success. Sssd trouble on anaconda.
I succeeded to install TC2 on VBox on F18-x64.
Cristian Sava
--
test mailing list
test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
On Thu, 2013-06-13 at 14:48 +0300, Cristian Sava wrote:
Trying to install F19-tc3-x64 on VirtualBox-4.2.12 on Win7_x64 with
success. Sssd trouble on anaconda.
I succeeded to install TC2 on VBox on F18-x64.
Typo error, I want to say no cuccess
C. Sava
--
test mailing list
test
!
Cristian Sava
--
test mailing list
test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
:5C:09
BOOTPROTO=dhcp
IPV6_DEFROUTE=yes
IPV6_AUTOCONF=yes
IPV6_FAILURE_FATAL=no
IPV6_PEERROUTES=yes
TYPE=Ethernet
ONBOOT=yes
NAME=enp0s3
[cristi@localhost network-scripts]$
Cristian Sava
--
test mailing list
test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman
On Tue, 2013-06-11 at 10:59 +0300, Cristian Sava wrote:
I am testing F19-TC2 LXDE in a VirtualBox.
Now network instead NM is working as expected.
We do not have the device mentioned in
/etc/sysconfig/network-scripts/ifcfg-enp0s3
How is advised to add an alias interface?
Do we have
I can also confirm that something like DEVICE=p2p1:0 in ifcfg-enp0s3:0 is now
working with both NetworkManager or network!!!
Congrats! Great work done!
Cristian Sava
--
test mailing list
test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
It should do.
Anyway you will have to make ifcfg-... by hand and do things
accordingly.
ip link ... is for use in rc.local.
Cristian Sava
--
test mailing list
test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
/429440.html
After all, why to get rid of this way of dual boot capability for non
UEFI systems, for non encrypted dual boot?
What is the big advantage to not have that?
Cristian Sava
--
test mailing list
test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman
discovered that my old grub
install (other partition) was used. Do you mind to check?
Cristian Sava
--
test mailing list
test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
to avoid the requirement for sane
multiboot behavior (sane being, it's possible and does no harm to the
existing system) as Chris Murphy stated.
Fedora have to just install, work and do not harm.
And NO, IT IS NOT A GOOD IDEA. The user have to be able to choose what
and how to install on his PC.
Cristian
files need
it
There are some related bugs already reported
(https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=964139)
Cristian Sava
--
test mailing list
test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
On Sat, 2013-06-08 at 22:34 +0200, Lars Seipel wrote:
It took me a while to figure out you're not talking about Fedora
packages but RPMs/specfiles provided by some 3rd party. Please make this
a bit clearer next time.
Well, our server is somehow similar to
On Wed, 2013-06-05 at 09:41 -0400, Daniel J Walsh wrote:
On 06/05/2013 01:59 AM, Cristian Sava wrote:
On Tue, 2013-06-04 at 11:40 -0400, Daniel J Walsh wrote:
On 06/04/2013 05:06 AM, Cristian Sava wrote:
I am trying to activate selinux for my mailserver. It is F19
postfix_courier_amavisd
On Wed, 2013-06-05 at 07:57 -0500, Bruno Wolff III wrote:
On Wed, Jun 05, 2013 at 09:18:51 +0300,
Cristian Sava cs...@central.ucv.ro wrote:
I will consider your suggestion but this may take time and testing. It
is not for today or tomorrow and not all the people will agree with us.
Courier
to default and let people use their desired
software. Sometimes a very simple option can make miracles.
And now a very very good thing:
Fedora 19 seems to me a rock solid distribution!
Congrats to all of you!
Cristian Sava
--
test mailing list
test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe:
https
On Tue, 2013-06-04 at 08:08 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
On Tue, 2013-06-04 at 12:06 +0300, Cristian Sava wrote:
I am trying to activate selinux for my mailserver.
It is F19 postfix_courier_amavisd-new_clamav_squirrelmail install in a
virtual environment. All needed is stock
On Wed, 2013-06-05 at 00:23 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
On Wed, 2013-06-05 at 09:18 +0300, Cristian Sava wrote:
On Tue, 2013-06-04 at 08:08 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
On Tue, 2013-06-04 at 12:06 +0300, Cristian Sava wrote:
I am trying to activate selinux for my mailserver
I am trying to activate selinux for my mailserver.
It is F19 postfix_courier_amavisd-new_clamav_squirrelmail install in a
virtual environment. All needed is stock or was packaged on F19
(rpmbuild -ta ... / rpmbuild -ba ...) and all is working fine (selinux
disabled). No tar.gz directly installed.
On Tue, 2013-06-04 at 11:40 -0400, Daniel J Walsh wrote:
On 06/04/2013 05:06 AM, Cristian Sava wrote:
I am trying to activate selinux for my mailserver. It is F19
postfix_courier_amavisd-new_clamav_squirrelmail install in a virtual
environment. All needed is stock or was packaged on F19
On Tue, 2013-05-28 at 10:57 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
I don't recall seeing reports of anything in particular being changed in
this area. Are you sure this behaviour differs from previous releases?
--
I am saying that something similar to
# cd /var/spool/postfix
# mkdir etc
# cd etc
On Tue, 2013-05-28 at 05:16 +0800, Ed Greshko wrote:
On 05/28/13 00:09, Cristian Sava wrote:
My F19 mail server shows messages with wrong time (UTC instead EEST),
ntpd is enabled and is working. The date command is showing the correct
time. Is it a bug somewhere or I am missing something
: 1369731412.11701.0.ca...@s194.central.xxx.yy
Subject: [Fwd: Re: F19 - server, no graphics - time problem]
From: Cristian Sava cs...@central.xxx.yy
To: ph_mailad...@physics.xxx.yy
Date: Tue, 28 May 2013 11:56:52 +0300
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary==-XX34RGoQ0rDub4EPs5g1
X-Mailer: Evolution 3.6.4
On Tue, 2013-05-28 at 12:33 +0300, Cristian Sava wrote:
Partial solution found:
# cd /var/spool/postfix
# mkdir etc
# cd etc
# cp /usr/share/zoneinfo/Europe/Bucharest localtime
# postfix check
# postfix reload
We also need to edit php.ini and set
date.timezone = Europe/Bucharest
for ph_mailad...@physics.xxx.yy; Mon, 27 May 2013 18:40:50 +0300
Message-ID: 1369669750.3121.1.ca...@s194.central.xxx.yy
Subject: [Fwd: Corectii privind adresa privind solicitarea de
informatii.]
From: Cristian Sava cs...@central.xxx.yy
To: ph_mailad...@physics.xxx.yy
Date: Mon, 27 May 2013 18:49:10
On Tue, 2013-05-21 at 12:20 +0300, Cristian Sava wrote:
On Tue, 2013-05-21 at 09:21 +0300, Cristian Sava wrote:
Hi all,
I need to have alias network interfaces.
What is the desired way to do this in F19?
My actual setup (without alias):
[root@physics sysconfig]# ls network-scripts
Hi all,
I need to have alias network interfaces.
What is the desired way to do this in F19?
My actual setup (without alias):
[root@physics sysconfig]# ls network-scripts/ifcfg-*
network-scripts/ifcfg-enp4s0 network-scripts/ifcfg-enp5s0
network-scripts/ifcfg-lo
[root@physics sysconfig]# cat
On Tue, 2013-05-21 at 09:21 +0300, Cristian Sava wrote:
Hi all,
I need to have alias network interfaces.
What is the desired way to do this in F19?
My actual setup (without alias):
[root@physics sysconfig]# ls network-scripts/ifcfg-*
network-scripts/ifcfg-enp4s0 network-scripts/ifcfg
Hi, all
I reported here
http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/test/2013-May/115379.html
the missing /etc/sysconfig/network causing problems to amavis (solved in
amavis).
Now NetworkManager ignore ip_forward and I switched to network
(NM_CONTROLLED=no).
No network after systemctl restart
On Mon, 2013-05-20 at 17:07 +0300, Cristian Sava wrote:
Hi, all
I reported here
http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/test/2013-May/115379.html
the missing /etc/sysconfig/network causing problems to amavis (solved in
amavis).
Now NetworkManager ignore ip_forward and I switched
On Fri, 2013-05-17 at 21:36 +0100, Sérgio Basto wrote:
On Sex, 2013-05-17 at 17:03 +0300, Cristian Sava wrote:
On Fri, 2013-05-17 at 15:59 +0300, Cristian Sava wrote:
Installing F19 mail server ... clamupdate user/group problem:
[root@physics ~]# yum install amavisd-new spamassassin
and I do not see the reason why UID=992 GID=989 for clamupdate
On the other install, real box without graphics install, such thing
fail, so my hand fix with UID=992 and GID=992.
Hope this helps.
Sorry for this mistake.
On the working install (F19 alpha updates) we have
[root@s198 ~]# cat
Installing F19 mail server ... clamupdate user/group problem:
[root@physics ~]# yum install amavisd-new spamassassin clamav
clamav-data clamav-server clamav-server-sysvinit clamav-update unzip
bzip2 pax
...
Running transaction check
Running transaction test
Transaction test succeeded
Running
On Fri, 2013-05-17 at 15:59 +0300, Cristian Sava wrote:
Installing F19 mail server ... clamupdate user/group problem:
[root@physics ~]# yum install amavisd-new spamassassin clamav
clamav-data clamav-server clamav-server-sysvinit clamav-update unzip
bzip2 pax
...
Running transaction check
On Fri, 2013-05-10 at 10:35 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
On Fri, 2013-05-10 at 09:44 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
On Fri, 2013-05-10 at 13:28 +0300, Cristian Sava wrote:
Hi all,
Amavis does not start because it does not find /etc/sysconfig/network
# yum install amavis
Hi all,
Amavis does not start because it does not find /etc/sysconfig/network
# yum install amavis
# systemctl start amavis.service
...
# journalctl -xn
...
/etc/rc.d/init.d/amavisd: line 16: /etc/sysconfig/network: No such file
or directory
I am testing a postfix based mailserver on F19
On Fri, 2013-05-10 at 13:28 +0300, Cristian Sava wrote:
Hi all,
Amavis does not start because it does not find /etc/sysconfig/network
# yum install amavis
# systemctl start amavisd.service
...
# journalctl -xn
...
/etc/rc.d/init.d/amavisd: line 16: /etc/sysconfig/network: No such file
Hi all,
Webalizer is enabled via /etc/sysconfig/webalizer but I don't understand
why /etc/cron.daily/00webalizer has this line:
[ z$WEBALIZER_CRON != zyes ] exit 0
that I think it should be (and it is working this way)
[ $WEBALIZER_CRON != yes ] exit 0
What is the mistery?
C.Sava
--
On Fri, 2013-04-26 at 09:09 -0400, Jonathan Kamens wrote:
On 04/26/2013 08:58 AM, Cristian Sava wrote:
Webalizer is enabled via /etc/sysconfig/webalizer but I don't understand
why /etc/cron.daily/00webalizer has this line:
[ z$WEBALIZER_CRON != zyes ] exit 0
that I think it should
On Fri, 2013-04-26 at 08:30 -0500, Chris Adams wrote:
Once upon a time, Jonathan Kamens j...@kamens.us said:
This, however, is fine:
[ $WEBALIZER_CRON != yes ]
because the quotes ensure that the statement will be evaluated with an
expression to the left of the != even if the
Hi all,
I tried to see how would be F15_x32 to F16_x64_RC4 upgrade. I expected
to fail but it would be nice for average user to see a warning, an
explanation.
He does not know why it has failed. Warn him: x32 cannot be upgraded to
x64.
All was ok on testing F16_x64_RC4 on virtual machine (qemu)
55 matches
Mail list logo
