On 01/29/2015 06:29 AM, Sudhir Khanger wrote:
On Wednesday, January 28, 2015 08:53:42 AM Brian C. Lane wrote:
This Friday's build of Anaconda will no longer allow you to use weak
passwords and click done twice. In order to promote more secureish
default systems I have increased the password
On 09/24/2014 08:41 AM, Lawrence E Graves wrote:
Forwarded Message
Subject:Re: Installing btrfs file system on Fedora 21 Workstation
Date: Wed, 24 Sep 2014 21:33:11 +0800
From: Ed Greshko ed.gres...@greshko.com
Reply-To: Community support for Fedora users
On Tue, 2013-11-05 at 23:33 +0100, Mateusz Marzantowicz wrote:
Is it intentional that there is no mount point suggestion in manual
partitioning in Anaconda? I can only see plain text filed where I should
enter desired partition mount point manually. It's not a problem but I'm
worried that I
On Tue, 2013-06-11 at 09:06 -0400, Tom Horsley wrote:
Anyone know if there are plans to provide an option to
anaconda so I can have it install all the needed files
in /boot, but don't screw with the MBR?
There is no option to install the bootloader to /boot, but there is an
option to not
On Fri, 2013-04-05 at 14:31 +0200, Michael Schwendt wrote:
In short, I've not let this version of Anaconda perform an actual
installation. The list of how it wanted to modify my partitions appeared
too dangerous to me to let it continue.
Install scenario: Fedora-19-Alpha-TC4-x86_64-DVD.iso
On Tue, 2013-01-08 at 11:35 +0100, Mateusz Marzantowicz wrote:
So, I think now it is time to ask for help. I've been unable to
reproduce specific partition layout for 3 day in new F18 that I have
created in F17 without any problems. I'm asking if it is still possible
to do such partitioning.
On Tue, 2012-12-11 at 07:33 -0500, Gene Czarcinski wrote:
On 12/11/2012 07:10 AM, Gene Czarcinski wrote:
On 12/10/2012 06:37 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
On Mon, 2012-12-10 at 16:22 -0700, Chris Murphy wrote:
3. Handle predefined pools and subvolumes.
This is working in current
On Tue, 2012-12-11 at 15:40 -0500, Gene Czarcinski wrote:
On 12/11/2012 01:56 PM, David Lehman wrote:
On Tue, 2012-12-11 at 07:33 -0500, Gene Czarcinski wrote:
On 12/11/2012 07:10 AM, Gene Czarcinski wrote:
On 12/10/2012 06:37 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
On Mon, 2012-12-10 at 16:22 -0700
On Sat, 2012-12-08 at 09:13 -0800, Adam Williamson wrote:
On Sat, 2012-12-08 at 10:17 -0500, Claude Jones wrote:
snip
and there is no running total of space left on individual drives as you
create partitions
This part is correct, yeah.
Incorrect. Click on the blue disk space text on
On Sun, 2012-12-09 at 11:48 -0500, Gene Czarcinski wrote:
3. Using my newly created F18-beta-livecd, I attempted to install into
a predefined LV .. this worked BUT /boot/grub2/grub.cfg did not exist
and grub2 was not installed into /dev/vda ... manually fixed it from
rescue. This appears
On Mon, 2012-12-10 at 09:47 -0600, Ian Pilcher wrote:
On 12/10/2012 06:20 AM, Mateusz Marzantowicz wrote:
Yes. I was able to reuse lvm volumes on LUKS encrypted partition on bare
hardware.
That's different. I'm talking about the LV itself (not the PV) being
LUKS-encrypted.
You can
On Mon, 2012-12-10 at 16:55 -0500, Gene Czarcinski wrote:
On 12/10/2012 02:33 PM, Gene Czarcinski wrote:
As I see it, the problem with btrfs is that you cannot really reuse
a btrfs subvolume in every circumstance. In some cases such as /home,
it should be and better be) possible ... have
On Fri, 2012-12-07 at 15:38 -0600, Ian Pilcher wrote:
As of smoke 4 it looks like I am finally able to install Fedora 18
onto a new LV within an existing VG (a VG built from 2 separate software
RAID devices no less)!
I did this in a test VM, and I'm darn glad that I did, because it looks
On Mon, 2012-12-03 at 01:10 -0600, Michael Cronenworth wrote:
expecting that) and I found them under the F18 beta partitioning without
a mount point. When I added a mount point the partition was duplicated
so for example I had a 500MB ext4 partition and gave it a /boot mount
point, which
On Fri, 2012-11-30 at 19:39 +0100, Michael Schwendt wrote:
On Fri, 30 Nov 2012 11:30:53 -0600, David Lehman wrote:
It defaults to automatic partitioning, complaining about not enough free
space. I've searched for a way to tell it that I want to reuse an existing
logical partition. One
On Sun, 2012-11-11 at 11:06 +, Jóhann B. Guðmundsson wrote:
On 11/11/2012 10:39 AM, Chris Murphy wrote:
On Nov 10, 2012, at 8:09 PM, John Reiser jrei...@bitwagon.com wrote:
36 partitions? Really? I thought GPT's 128+ partitions is actually an
inside joke, ergo you know if we give
On Tue, 2012-10-16 at 17:55 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
On Wed, 2012-10-10 at 22:31 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
Hey, folks. So it became clear over the course of the last few blocker
reviews that the new partitioning criteria need a bit of refinement.
Here is my proposal for altering
On Thu, 2012-10-25 at 16:47 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
On Thu, 2012-10-25 at 18:22 -0500, David Lehman wrote:
On Tue, 2012-10-16 at 17:55 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
On Wed, 2012-10-10 at 22:31 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
Hey, folks. So it became clear over the course of the last
On Thu, 2012-09-20 at 16:28 +0200, Joachim Backes wrote:
Hi testers,
I tried to install f18 alpha (inside VirtualBox) using a prepartitioned
disk (12 GB). During partitioning, I selected the review/customize
toggle button.
The upcoming dialog presents two possibilities: New Fedora
On Thu, 2012-09-20 at 15:59 +0100, Frank Murphy wrote:
On 20/09/12 15:28, Joachim Backes wrote:
Hi testers,
I tried to install f18 alpha (inside VirtualBox) using a prepartitioned
disk (12 GB). During partitioning, I selected the review/customize
toggle button.
Where is the
On Thu, 2012-09-13 at 15:00 +0200, Mateusz Marzantowicz wrote:
Hey!
I've been playing with new Anaconda since Alpha RC2 and I have some
doubts about whole concept of this sub pages with configuration options
and jumping around them.
You can indulge your doubts or you can adapt. It's up to
On Thu, 2012-09-13 at 23:08 +0200, Mateusz Marzantowicz wrote:
On 13.09.2012 22:02, David Lehman wrote:
On Thu, 2012-09-13 at 15:00 +0200, Mateusz Marzantowicz wrote:
Hey!
I've been playing with new Anaconda since Alpha RC2 and I have some
doubts about whole concept of this sub pages
On Mon, 2012-09-10 at 14:07 -0700, Chuck Forsberg WA7KGX N2469R wrote:
Had a frustrating experience with the fat cow installer.
Something in one of the selections I made had a
missing dependency (or whatever). Missing dependencies
are a part of developmental installs.
What was most
On Tue, 2012-09-11 at 10:24 -0700, Chuck Forsberg WA7KGX N2469R wrote:
On 09/11/2012 08:07 AM, David Lehman wrote:
On Mon, 2012-09-10 at 14:07 -0700, Chuck Forsberg WA7KGX N2469R wrote:
Had a frustrating experience with the fat cow installer.
Something in one of the selections I made had
On Tue, 2012-09-11 at 10:24 -0700, Chuck Forsberg WA7KGX N2469R wrote:
Then there is a question of prominently showing substandard
software to the public. We all know about first impressions
in social settings. In operating systems it is the installer that
makes the first impressions.
You
On Sun, 2012-07-08 at 07:49 -0600, Christopher A. Williams wrote:
Agreed. And I fear the universe, in this case, may be winning by
producing bigger idiot developers.
Indeed -- bigger idiot developers who seek to simplify their software
by eliminating limited-value features that bring needless
On Mon, 2012-07-09 at 07:31 +0200, Petr Schindler wrote:
On So, 2012-07-07 at 09:15 +, Jóhann B. Guðmundsson wrote:
On 07/06/2012 07:10 PM, Andre Robatino wrote:
I attempted installation using Fedora-20120703-x86_64-916dfe7-netinst.iso
and
found that it only allows choosing one
On Sat, 2012-07-07 at 08:14 -0600, Dariusz J. Garbowski wrote:
On 07/07/12 03:15 AM, Jóhann B. Guðmundsson wrote:
On 07/06/2012 07:10 PM, Andre Robatino wrote:
I attempted installation using Fedora-20120703-x86_64-916dfe7-netinst.iso
and
found that it only allows choosing one desktop. I
On Mon, 2012-07-09 at 10:21 -0600, Christopher A. Williams wrote:
And I would further posit that, since the position has been taken that
you can override all of this post-install, the potential complexity is
only reduced in the installation process. The installed system remains
just as complex
On Mon, 2012-07-09 at 23:59 +0800, Ed Greshko wrote:
On 07/09/2012 11:43 PM, David Lehman wrote:
On Sun, 2012-07-08 at 07:49 -0600, Christopher A. Williams wrote:
Agreed. And I fear the universe, in this case, may be winning by
producing bigger idiot developers.
Indeed -- bigger idiot
On Mon, 2012-07-09 at 11:23 -0600, Christopher A. Williams wrote:
On Mon, 2012-07-09 at 11:52 -0500, David Lehman wrote:
Exactly what is so bad with that practice (of installing both desktops)
as to frown upon it?
I am a KDE user and yet I still install Gnome on my machine. Exactly
On Mon, 2012-07-09 at 12:12 -0600, Christopher A. Williams wrote:
On Mon, 2012-07-09 at 12:49 -0500, David Lehman wrote:
On Mon, 2012-07-09 at 11:23 -0600, Christopher A. Williams wrote:
On Mon, 2012-07-09 at 11:52 -0500, David Lehman wrote:
Exactly what is so bad with that practice
On Mon, 2012-07-09 at 15:57 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
On Mon, 2012-07-09 at 14:50 -0500, David Lehman wrote:
Please show researched statistics to support your claim and
implication
that this is a minority group. I question and doubt you actually have
statistics on any
On Fri, 2012-07-06 at 15:22 -0400, Timothy Davis wrote:
Same here, crashed at disk selection/partitioning in qemu vm
storage.log at fpaste.org/1ywE/
You're going to need to initialize your disks before running the
install. This will most likely be handled in the very next image, but
On Thu, 2012-04-12 at 11:08 +0530, Kashyap Chamarthy wrote:
On 04/12/2012 06:41 AM, David Lehman wrote:
On Wed, 2012-04-11 at 11:08 +0530, Kashyap Chamarthy wrote:
I'm going give it a try w/ btrfs partitioning. Meanwhile, I wasn't
keeping up. Can someone
confirm, does /boot still need
On Wed, 2012-04-11 at 11:08 +0530, Kashyap Chamarthy wrote:
I'm going give it a try w/ btrfs partitioning. Meanwhile, I wasn't keeping
up. Can someone
confirm, does /boot still need to be ext3/ext4 for btrfs to work?
Ok, I gave it a try w/ the below command line, and an error you
On Fri, 2012-04-06 at 21:12 +0200, gaelic wrote:
Hello.
I know that anaconda is having a bug in terms of installing to btrfs
Partitions and btrfs is generally disabled for now. Anybody knows if a
installation of F17 to btrfs is possible if it already exists?
Almost anything will be possible
On Wed, 2012-02-29 at 12:47 +0200, Zoltan Szecsei wrote:
Hi,
Just trying out the new i386 Alpha.
I have now tried several different HDs, doing a full install
(repartitioning the entire HD) and once all the partitions have been
formatted, the install process crashes every time whilst trying
this will be addressed for FC17 for
my next go around!
This is fixed on rawhide/f17, but it was too late in the f16 cycle to
include the fix there:
commit 2ce467fe4802672d41926a4b4753b6e501acf038
Author: David Lehman dleh...@redhat.com
Date: Fri Nov 4 13:28:15 2011 -0500
Cap new /boot/efi partitions
On Fri, 2011-11-18 at 09:59 -0500, Clyde E. Kunkel wrote:
On 11/16/2011 08:50 AM, David Lehman wrote:
Yaboot and grub1 can only do RAID1 as far as software RAID goes. grub2
can do 0, 1, or 5.
Dave
Will raid 10 be supported?
I'm not saying that it will be supported in Fedora
On Tue, 2011-11-15 at 14:20 -0800, Adam Williamson wrote:
Hey, everyone. So, right now, the Beta criteria include:
The installer must be able to create and install to software, hardware
or BIOS RAID-0, RAID-1 or RAID-5 partitions for anything except /boot
We specifically excepted /boot at
On Fri, 2011-11-11 at 05:25 -0800, Chuck Forsberg WA7KGX N2469R wrote:
I prepped an old 20 GB IDE drive with a 500 MB FreeDOS partition.
Anaconds 25 refused to use this disk unless it wiped out existing
partition table (and FreeDOS with it).
Details, please. Refused to use it in exactly what
On Tue, 2011-10-18 at 21:57 -0500, Chris Adams wrote:
Once upon a time, David Lehman dleh...@redhat.com said:
I just tried it and it worked fine. If you put your ks.cfg and
the /tmp/storage.log from your install somewhere I can take a look and
tell you what went wrong.
Okay, I'm probably
On Wed, 2011-10-19 at 11:00 -0500, Chris Adams wrote:
Once upon a time, David Lehman dleh...@redhat.com said:
You found a bug. We don't honor fsprofile when --useexisting is passed
to the logvol command. If you file a bug it can be fixed pretty easily.
Or, if you just let anaconda create
On Tue, 2011-10-18 at 16:41 -0500, Chris Adams wrote:
Once upon a time, David Lehman dleh...@redhat.com said:
I will be fixing kickstart when I get the chance to make this
requirement consistent. If your root filesystem is ext[234], see 'man
mke2fs.conf' and create yourself a profile
On Thu, 2011-10-06 at 18:11 +0200, Michael Schwendt wrote:
On Thu, 6 Oct 2011 17:37:44 +0200, I wrote:
Just a brief look, trying to learn a little bit prior to the decision
whether I want to keep GRUB2:
The package doesn't contain /boot/grub/ but /boot/grub2/ - sigh.
We've had years
On Thu, 2011-10-06 at 22:09 +0200, Michael Schwendt wrote:
On Thu, 6 Oct 2011 19:25:19 + (UTC), J (JB) wrote:
I think you criticize him unjustly.
Perhaps. I am getting tired of the protests to grub2 and every other
thing that changes.
grub2-mkconfig is just a brute-force shell script
On Fri, 2011-09-30 at 09:50 +0100, Frank Murphy wrote:
I have Branched boxes with have stayed as Branched since F14 with grub
Now I try install grub2 - conflict.
How do I install without losing the 8 kernel entries in grub\menu.lst
Worried that yum uninstall grub will remove the entries.
On Thu, 2011-09-08 at 17:28 -0400, Clyde E. Kunkel wrote:
On 09/08/2011 01:57 PM, Tim Flink wrote:
Who's ready for some pre-betaTC2 installer testing fun?
I built a custom boot.iso that could use some testing and karma before
we kick off the F16 Beta TC2 (hopefully later today). If you
On Wed, 2011-08-31 at 23:35 -0400, Marty Felkler wrote:
My first post as a new thread to this list.
Using'grub2-mkconfig -o /boot/grub2/grub.cfg' which as I said on
the FedoraForums is the correct way to create a boot grub.cfg
I read your post on the forums. The simplest solution to
On Tue, 2011-08-30 at 07:39 +0530, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
On 08/26/2011 10:01 PM, David Lehman wrote:
We added code to automatically generate entries using os-prober, but
apparently os-prober is not available if you install from DVD without
enabling network repos. It's probably also
On Fri, 2011-08-26 at 17:18 +0200, Michael Schwendt wrote:
On Thu, 25 Aug 2011 15:20:54 -0700, AW (Adam) wrote:
On Thu, 2011-08-25 at 15:59 -0500, David Lehman wrote:
On Thu, 2011-08-25 at 22:56 +0200, Michael Schwendt wrote:
Between TC1 and release of F16 Alpha, something must have
On Fri, 2011-08-26 at 19:22 -0400, Marty Felkler wrote:
I could not isntall GRUB to the boot partition on my second drive
/dev/sdb2. The only way was to install to MBR on /dev/sda. This was
This will no longer be an issue as of the first beta test compose. To
get grub2 installed on sdb2 you
On Thu, 2011-08-25 at 22:56 +0200, Michael Schwendt wrote:
Between TC1 and release of F16 Alpha, something must have changed to the
worse with regard to installing GRUB to a partition's primary sector.
Partitioning hasn't changed. TC1 managed to install GRUB to /dev/sda3.
Anaconda now reports
On Thu, 2011-08-11 at 21:29 +0200, Jurgen Kramer wrote:
If I see a grub.conf file on my EFI partition under /EFI/redhat/, does
it mean anaconda installed grub instead of grub2?
(the other files there are device.map and grub.efi, the syntax of
grub.conf looks like normal grub 1 syntax instead
On Wed, 2011-03-16 at 15:18 -0400, Gregory Woodbury wrote:
On Wed, Mar 16, 2011 at 1:47 PM, Tim Flink tfl...@redhat.com wrote:
On 03/16/2011 11:36 AM, Gregory Woodbury wrote:
No traceback or messages that I can see, just a notification that i can't
put
a partition on root.
Just
56 matches
Mail list logo
