Thanks Andre! So far RC5 works fine for me, it fixes the selinux issue
on x86_64[1] and saving traceback to bugzilla problem[2]. So anyone
wants to try it, go ahead and help testing!
Thanks!
Hurry
[1] https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=730863
[2]
It's probably by design as I looked up the anaconda/changes page[1] and
found two features related:
* x86 uses GPT disklabels by default on all machines, even non-EFI.
* If a GPT boot disk is used on a non-EFI machine, a warning will be
displayed.
[1]
On Tue, 2011-08-09 at 12:46 -0400, Andre Robatino wrote:
skip
Security Lab:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Test_Results:Current_Security_Lab_Test
Thanks Andre. I noticed the security lab test page doesn't contain a
link to the spins for testing ever since TC1 cycle. Anyone knows please
add
On Wed, 2011-08-03 at 12:01 +0200, Michael Schwendt wrote:
Downloaded Fedora 16 Alpha TC1 netinstall iso x86_64 for a first brief
look. Booted the included isolinux kernel+initrd. Cancelled the first
LUKS passphrase prompt, but entered the passphrase for an experimental
/home LV, which is
On Fri, 2011-07-29 at 00:31 +, Andre Robatino wrote:
After discussing with smooge and nirik on #fedora-admin, decided to change the
16 Alpha TC1 test matrix pages to use dl.fp.o instead of serverbeach1.fp.o and
alt.fp.o for download links. If no problems are seen, the template pages can
On Tue, 2011-07-26 at 08:05 -0400, James Laska wrote:
On Tue, 2011-07-26 at 18:45 +0800, He Rui wrote:
On Tue, 2011-07-26 at 11:30 +0300, Frederick William New wrote:
Comment:
Replying to [comment:1 rhe]:
Agree. add a expected result in each kickstart test like
On Fri, 2011-07-22 at 16:08 -0400, James Laska wrote:
Greetings,
During the second Alpha blocker review meeting [1], I took an action
item to propose several adjustments to the release criteria.
Because of bug#723144, it was agreed that the existing installer
partitioning-related Alpha
On Tue, 2011-07-12 at 17:38 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
Hey, folks. Today's validation testing extension day: I've put the base
validation process into 'production', and Athmane's done the same for
the security lab spin validation process. Changes involve the SOP:
On Thu, 2011-06-23 at 15:39 -0400, James Laska wrote:
Thanks for the feedback! Some follow-up below...
On Thu, 2011-06-23 at 09:12 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
On Thu, 2011-06-23 at 10:46 -0400, James Laska wrote:
Greetings testers,
I've been playing with some ideas on how to
Oh, I noticed it yesterday as well. I just modified the 'name' a bit to
include letters. It seems work now.:)
Thanks,
Hurry
On Fri, 2011-06-17 at 01:15 +0100, Athmane Madjoudj wrote:
Hello testers,
Mediawiki 1.16 ref tag syntax has changed a bit [1], this breaks
Result template see[2]
On Mon, 2011-06-06 at 18:26 -0400, John Dulaney wrote:
I am working on a draft btrfs test case (1) under the assumption
that it will be default for F16. I'd appreciate any additions or
suggestions for addition. Note that it isn't finished yet, I'm just
done for the day.
John.
(1)
On Wed, 2011-06-01 at 18:57 +, Athmane Madjoudj wrote:
On 06/01/2011 01:51 PM, James Laska wrote:
On Wed, 2011-06-01 at 14:04 +, Athmane Madjoudj wrote:
On 06/01/2011 02:00 PM, Athmane Madjoudj wrote:
... SNIP ...
I've made those changes to the pages you highlighted. Thanks for
On Sun, 2011-05-29 at 13:44 -0400, Garry T. Williams wrote:
I upgraded to F15 from F14 using the DVD yeterday. I experienced a
few glitches:
1. I was not asked to include the updates repository during the
update process. Sad. Now I will have to do an update after first
boot.
2. This
On Sun, 2011-05-29 at 13:50 -0400, Garry T. Williams wrote:
On Sunday, May 29, 2011 13:44:56 Garry T. Williams wrote:
I upgraded to F15 from F14 using the DVD yeterday. I experienced a
few glitches:
6. Oh, I forgot to mention that there was no operating system log after
the upgrade.
Greetings testers,
Three Final Release candidates were posted recently, and validation
tests were heavily executed from RC1 to RC3 to verify that they meet the
final release criteria[1]. The FINAL Go/No-Go Meeting will be held later
today based on the status of RC3, whose validation test
On Mon, 2011-05-16 at 01:46 +0530, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
On 05/16/2011 01:02 AM, BeartoothHOS wrote:
After several false tries, I did get a DVD which upgraded my
previous release candidate (from preupgrade on F140, or said it had. Fwiw,
the situation is unchanged, despite that an
On Sun, 2011-05-15 at 00:27 +0100, Athmane Madjoudj wrote:
Hello,
Here's my test result of PreUpgrading from F13 to F15, I've also updated
F15RC3 test result wiki page.
System: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Athmane/Fedora_Testing
Test case:
On Sun, 2011-05-15 at 09:23 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
On Sun, 2011-05-15 at 08:42 +0300, cornel panceac wrote:
Following up on my post:
I booted into run level 3 and did a yum update. It found 12
packages
to install, 184 to update, and 12
On Fri, 2011-05-13 at 04:33 -0400, Gregory Woodbury wrote:
On Thu, May 12, 2011 at 8:30 PM, Andre Robatino
robat...@fedoraproject.org wrote:
As per the Fedora 15 schedule [1], Fedora 15 Final Release
Candidate 2
(RC2) is now available for testing. Please see the
Thanks, and notice that X would fail to start after DVD default install,
see the bug for more info:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=704042
Hurry
On Thu, 2011-05-12 at 05:51 -0400, Vitezslav Humpa wrote:
Great! I will do some desktop testing like last time.
- Original
On Sun, 2011-05-08 at 12:26 +0530, Pratyush Sahay wrote:
Hello,
Tried installing F15 TC1 from a USB DVD media, created using
UNetBootin from F15-i386-dvd.iso image.
The installer exits after the Boot Loader OS list step, the error
being shown :
No Network Available.. some of the
Greetings testers,
Final TC1 was online at the beginning of this week, and validation tests
were under executing during the week. It's exciting to see that less and
less issues were identified from previous candidates to the current,
hereby the test results were summarized as below:
Hi Andre,
Thanks for the deltaiso executable, it works great. From the notes on
'what to test' part[1], I spent some time reading the explanation from
the two mails you linked to finally find these executables. Then I think
if it would be more convenient if there's a direct link to them saying
Greetings testers,
As you've known that Beta has been declared gold, validation tests were
being executed to guarantee that Beta RC2 could finally meet the beta
release criteria[1]. During the tests, as expected, no beta blockers
were found and the results were summarized as below:
On Mon, 2011-04-11 at 03:48 +, Andre Robatino wrote:
1) In the boot menu, there is a Verify and Boot option, but I didn't see any
evidence of a verify being done. I know that the netinst install disc no
longer
has a mediacheck. Is this also true for live images? If a verify is being
On Fri, 2011-04-08 at 12:40 +0600, Angel wrote:
On Fri, Apr 8, 2011 at 9:38 AM, Andre Robatino
robat...@fedoraproject.org wrote:
As per the Fedora 15 schedule [1], Fedora 15 Beta RC1 is now
available
for testing.
Did this version include the latest GNOME 3 which
Thank you, Andre.
On Thu, 2011-04-07 at 23:38 -0400, Andre Robatino wrote:
As per the Fedora 15 schedule [1], Fedora 15 Beta RC1 is now available
for testing. Please see the following pages for download links and
testing instructions.
Installation:
On Thu, 2011-04-07 at 22:39 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
On Thu, 2011-04-07 at 23:38 -0400, Andre Robatino wrote:
As per the Fedora 15 schedule [1], Fedora 15 Beta RC1 is now available
for testing. Please see the following pages for download links and
testing instructions.
Heads up on
Greetings testers,
Thanks for your involvement and attention on this test event. During
that day preupgrade-1.1.9-1 was built on time for testing, for most
testers, preupgrading went on smoothly before encountering the lorax
issue[1]. The bugs filed were summarized here:
Bug 688761 - NEW -
On Thu, 2011-03-17 at 05:02 -0400, Gregory Woodbury wrote:
On Thu, Mar 17, 2011 at 4:57 AM, Gregory Woodbury redwo...@gmail.com
wrote:
On Wed, Mar 16, 2011 at 11:26 AM, He Rui r...@redhat.com
wrote:Let me point to Bugzilla #684054
On Thu, 2011-03-17 at 18:30 +0800, He Rui wrote:
On Thu, 2011-03-17 at 05:02 -0400, Gregory Woodbury wrote:
On Thu, Mar 17, 2011 at 4:57 AM, Gregory Woodbury redwo...@gmail.com
wrote:
On Wed, Mar 16, 2011 at 11:26 AM, He Rui r...@redhat.com
Greetings everyone,
Preupgrade test day is coming up tomorrow! It's available at:
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Test_Day:Current
As you've noticed that install.img is included in initrd.img From F-15
builds, the procedure of preupgrade need be changed accordingly.
Therefore, packages with
On Mon, 2011-03-14 at 16:23 -0400, James Laska wrote:
On Fri, 2011-03-11 at 17:06 +0800, He Rui wrote:
On Thu, 2011-03-10 at 10:19 -0500, James Laska wrote:
On Thu, 2011-03-10 at 18:01 +0800, He Rui wrote:
On Wed, 2011-03-09 at 14:43 -0500, James Laska wrote:
snip
I meant
Hi Danqing,
Many thanks for replying this mail.
On Fri, 2011-03-11 at 16:59 +0800, Danqing Li wrote:
Hi ,thank you very much for this great feature requirement list.
On Mar 10, 2011, at 6:01 PM, He Rui wrote:
On Wed, 2011-03-09 at 14:43 -0500, James Laska wrote:
On Wed, 2011-03-09
On Mon, 2011-03-14 at 16:23 -0400, Andrew Ross wrote:
Sorry ,I am not clear about the necessity of import result form
another test run,is it mean those test run very similar, so why make
a
new run?Do you explain some more detail about this feature's
scenario ?
Okay, take F15
Greetings,
Now let's continue the discussion[1] about TCMS management. After the
feature comparison between wiki and nitrate, the features which are
supported in current wiki, but not in nitrate have been identified[2].
Among these, I priorized some of them as Must-have features, which were
On Wed, 2011-03-09 at 15:19 -0300, Igor Pires Soares wrote:
Hello,
I'm really glad we successfully finished our internationalization and
localization testing marathon for these release cycle. I'm also glad to
see that some bugs are already closed or modified. For Fedora 15 the
intention was
Greetings,
F-15-Alpha-RC2 was recently online and tested. As expected, the keyboard
layout issue, firstboot crash and mesa 32-bit were confirmed fixed in
this build. Later Go/No-Go meeting will be held to determine if it meets
Alpha release criteria[1]. Here installation and desktop bugs are
On 03/02/2011 08:58 AM, Steven Haigh wrote:
This should also be listed as an F15Beta issue:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=678689
In a nutshell, you can't install F15Alpha RC1/2 to an intel IMSM RAID.
There should be more F15Beta/F15Blocker install bugs than listed. This
Greetings everyone!
Tomorrow we will continue the localization and internationalization test
day focusing on: I18n Desktop[1]. Tests on this day will mainly cover
the yum langpack, font/rendering in applications as well as the input
method.
If you are interested, feel free to post your results
Greetings,
Thanks for your attention on F-15 Alpha RC#1 test event. Alpha priority
tests and most of other test cases against installation and desktop have
been executed and a list of bugs are classified as below:
Installation *
*
On Fri, 2011-02-11 at 15:39 -0700, Tim Flink wrote:
On 02/11/2011 03:35 PM, Orion Poplawski wrote:
On 02/11/2011 03:32 PM, Orion Poplawski wrote:
Has anyone been able to boot the F15 Alpha TC1 image as a kvm guest? On my
CentOS 5.5 host I get some kind of kernel crash.
Ah, looks like
On Wed, 2011-02-09 at 23:52 -0600, John Watzke wrote:
Should we expect to still be hooked up to the rawhide repo for TC1
or should we manually change over to updates-testing?
F-15 is supposed to be branched at this time, but currently the default
repo is still rawhide. Is branching delayed?
On Thu, 2011-02-10 at 10:12 +0100, Christoph Frieben wrote:
2011/2/10 Andre Robatino:
Fedora 15 Alpha TC1 is now available [1].
Beware: unlike the earlier snaphot Fedora 15 Alpha TC1 of last
month, the current installer v15.19 will ultimately --abort-- after
choosing create custom layout.
On Mon, 2011-01-24 at 23:05 -0800, Adam Williamson wrote:
On Fri, 2011-01-21 at 19:02 +, Samuel Greenfeld wrote:
I do like litmus! It's a nice evolution from testopia for
upstream
mozilla. We don't currently have an 'unclear' test result.
I'm not
Greetings,
Many thanks for Samuel's comments, I found out many valuable things to
think, identify and add to use cases/feature comparison.
The questions also remind me that many testers so far may be still not
familiar with Nitrate, therefore can't give any suggestion upon it. So
I'll introduce
Please ignore the last mail.
Hi James,
Wow, firstly, many thanks for your careful review of all the items.:)
On Wed, 2011-01-19 at 16:08 -0500, James Laska wrote:
On Tue, 2011-01-18 at 19:36 +0800, He Rui wrote:
Greetings!
Wiki workflow/use cases are reorganized and grouped by general
Greetings!
Wiki workflow/use cases are reorganized and grouped by general and main
test events(runs) use cases. The general cases cover the basic uses of
wiki, and the events cases covers the detailed certain steps for
organizing the events.
Please review it:
Hi Hongqing,
Glad to see you here! I know there maybe many staff for you to learn at
the beginning, but based on your background, you'll adapt the
environment and 'Fedora QA style' pretty soon. Here are some
introduction pages for your reference:
[1] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA
[2]
Hi Chen Gang,
Gerard is right, you need double check what he suggested. Btw, you've
been well known in the Chinese list already, I've seen they gave you
different suggestions and welcomes there[1][2]. Subscribe it and say
hello to them!
Thanks,
Hurry
[1]
On Wed, 2010-11-17 at 21:52 +0800, Chen Gang-Cuble wrote:
Hi:
I'm a Chinese man, I'm a software engineer. Familiar with C/C++. I have
about 7 years experience on software developing.
I'm new to Linux. I have read a few books before, but just began to use
it a few days ago. I have just
Greetings,
As you can see in the bug list summarized below, Test results of
F-14-Final-RC1 are positive so far, no blocker bugs were found when
executing the tests. Many thanks for the hard working of developers,
rel-engineers, and testers to keep improve the quality of Fedora.
On 10/26/2010 07:40 PM, Kamil Paral wrote:
- Kamil Paralkpa...@redhat.com wrote:
In this test case
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Testcase_Anaconda_save_traceback_to_remote_system
there's this sentence:
# On the Save dialog, choose Remote server from the destination
list.
On Tue, 2010-10-26 at 12:40 +0800, Qiang Li wrote:
On Mon, 2010-10-25 at 22:14 +0200, Christoph Frieben wrote:
2010/10/25 Qiang Li:
What kind of way do you use to install a fresh fedora rawhide?
You grab the most recent install media, e.g. F14 RC1, and add the
rawhide repo during the
Greetings testers,
Fedora 14 Final TC validation test event has come to an end, this time
we have more testers participating in the events and therefore more bugs
were identified including blocker bugs, so many thanks for the ones who
leaded/attended/payed attention on the test event. As before,
Thanks for sharing this Mike, it's very useful for testing the anaconda
package in the updates-testing repo.
Cheers,
Hurry
On Sat, 2010-10-16 at 17:17 +0100, mike cloaked wrote:
There is currently version anaconda-14.20-1.fc14 in updates-testing
but I seem to be the only one who has tested it
Greetings folks,
We've nearly finished all the tests in the installation test result page
with the contribution of testers and now there's only one test left for
testing:
QA:Testcase_Boot_Methods_efidisk.img
This test validates booting from a efidisk.img on a system capable of
supporting EFI.
Hi Tom,
Your problem seems similar to the commonbug below:
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Common_F14_bugs#Error_setting_up_repository_-_16.2C_Device_busy
There's an updates.img in the link to work around the problem. Does it
work for you?
On Wed, 2010-09-29 at 19:23 -0400, Tom Horsley wrote:
On Sun, 2010-09-26 at 21:05 +1000, Steven Haigh wrote:
On 26/09/10 19:24, Steven Haigh wrote:
I have lodged this:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=637495
I have attached to it what I saw looked to be the required logs.
For the record, installing on a laptop with an IDE DVD
On Sun, 2010-09-26 at 10:42 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
skip
I would like to have a clear story from anaconda or whoever on what
exactly is supported in terms of writing the DVD image to USB, and what
isn't. I've never been particularly clear on that point. It would be
good to clear it up
Hi Steven,
On Sun, 2010-09-26 at 03:43 +1000, Steven Haigh wrote:
Hi all,
I've tried just about everything over the last 12 hours to get F14 Beta 3 to
install from DVD with no success.
I've been booting from the DVD and found that at the repo selection screen,
only internet repos are
Thanks for your announcement, Andre. I will be away on holidays in the
following three days, so testers please help validate the DVD, CD and
Live Image installation tests[1]. Thanks in advance!
Rgds,
Hurry
[1]
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Test_Results:Current_Installation_Test
On Tue,
Greetings Testers,
Anaconda TranslationKeyboard Test Day is coming up tomorrow:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Test_Day:Current
This day will mainly focus on the translation and keyboard in different
languages during installation. Test cases have been well prepared on the
wiki page with the
Greetings testers,
As scheduled, F-14 Beta Test Compose is going to be available soon,
please keep attention on it and execute the installation[1] and
desktop[2] tests to help ensure that the F-14 Beta Release Criterion is
met[3].
Test result pages with detailed testing instructions are at:
On Sun, 2010-09-05 at 18:56 -0600, Lawrence E Graves wrote:
When trying to install Alpha 14, it comes to a halt with this error
message:
Line 65 does not end with %%end. I don't understand that. Please
advise.
Did you install with kickstart file? If yes, you need the %end there
in the file.
Greetings,
Many thanks for the ones who attended this test day, though we don't
have much attendance, the general tests for preupgrade have been nicely
covered with its bugs filed and verified.
The common issue testers encountered during preupgrade has been
identified to be an anaconda bug:
Greetings,
Preupgrade test day is coming up tomorrow:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Test_Day:Current
Several problems have been reported when preupgrading to F-14 Alpha,
this day we will focus on preupgrade[1] to summarize the issues. The
tests were designed to cover general circumstances,
On Thu, 2010-08-26 at 18:08 -0400, Andy Lawrence wrote:
Please see bug:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=627377
Any suggestions on further info/help I can provide?
I've filed a bug#624971 earlier about this issue, and probably like
Chris Bagwell said, it misused
On Tue, 2010-08-24 at 21:37 -0400, Tom Horsley wrote:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=627058
I can reproduce this hard disk install issue. I've also made some tests
and it's probably because that the directories specified under the disk
are not honored as kernel parameters, which
On Wed, 2010-08-18 at 09:38 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
On Wed, 2010-08-18 at 19:04 +0800, He Rui wrote:
Greetings testers,
Thanks for all your attention and participation on the F-14 Alpha RC
validation test events, especially for Andre's leading of the events,
quite a mount of bugs
Greetings testers,
Thanks for all your attention and participation on the F-14 Alpha RC
validation test events, especially for Andre's leading of the events,
quite a mount of bugs were identified and fixed until RC4 was posted and
finally meets Alpha Release Criteria[1].
As always, here I
On Sun, 2010-08-15 at 23:40 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
On Thu, 2010-08-12 at 10:59 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
Hi, everyone. So, we have one bug remaining for Fedora 14 whose blocker
status is unclear:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=596985
A follow up to this: a
On Thu, 2010-08-12 at 02:30 -0400, Kamil Paral wrote:
- Andre Robatino robat...@fedoraproject.org wrote:
James Laska jlaska at redhat.com writes:
I believe the {netinst,boot}.iso are intended to fit on a 700M cdr.
I edited
On Thu, 2010-08-12 at 03:18 -0400, Kamil Paral wrote:
- He Rui r...@redhat.com wrote:
2. Test report is shown once a test is completed.
The test is never completed, it runs infinitely over and over
again.
It takes quite some time too.
Also, no report is ever shown
On Thu, 2010-08-12 at 04:42 -0400, Kamil Paral wrote:
- He Rui r...@redhat.com wrote:
I don't intend to cover all the memtest features, but think we should
at
least check if there's a test result shown to reflect the test,
that's
the main goal to run a memtest.
Ok, I have
Greeting,
I have an urgent thing to deal with tomorrow morning, will be back at noon.
Thanks,
Hurry
--
Contacts
FAS name: Rhe
IRC nick: rhe #fedora-qa
Email: r...@redhat.com
--
test mailing list
test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe:
On Wed, 2010-08-11 at 00:07 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
On Wed, 2010-08-11 at 00:49 -0400, Andre Robatino wrote:
Fedora 14 Alpha RC3 is now available [1]. Please refer to the following
pages for download links and testing instructions.
Installation:
On Wed, 2010-08-11 at 13:37 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
On Wed, 2010-08-11 at 09:45 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
On Wed, 2010-08-11 at 18:09 +0800, He Rui wrote:
On Wed, 2010-08-11 at 02:28 -0700, Chuck Forsberg WA7KGX N2469R wrote:
With the default driver of the basic video driver
On Mon, 2010-08-09 at 13:41 +0200, Joachim Backes wrote:
Hi F14 testers,
I'm having a F14/RC1 (i686)running, and now I burned the F14/RC2/DVD
(i686), booted from that DVD with saying update an existing system. I
answered the question
for the partition to update (is the F14/RC1). Then I'm
On Sun, 2010-08-08 at 20:11 +0100, Frank Murphy wrote:
On 08/08/10 17:50, Adam Williamson wrote:
snip
Have uploaded boot image using virt-manager (rawvirt.repo)
http://www.zimagez.com/zimage/screenshot-080810-134240.php
Thought this was a fixed bug?
It should be. Can you do 'rpm -q
On Fri, 2010-08-06 at 14:08 +0800, He Rui wrote:
Hi all,
There's a kernel panic in the first stage of anaconda in x86_64 boot.iso
(probably in other x86_64 images as well):
Bug 621775 - kernel panic- not syncing: VFS : unable to mount root fs on
unknown-block(9,2)
Confirmed
Hi all,
There's a kernel panic in the first stage of anaconda in x86_64 boot.iso
(probably in other x86_64 images as well):
Bug 621775 - kernel panic- not syncing: VFS : unable to mount root fs on
unknown-block(9,2)
Rgds,
Hurry
On Fri, 2010-08-06 at 00:40 -0400, Andre Robatino wrote:
Fedora
Greetings Testers,
F-14 Alpha TC1 has been posted for testing:
* http://serverbeach1.fedoraproject.org/pub/alt/stage/14.TC1/
Please read the instructions and help executing the test cases at:
Installation:
* https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Test_Results:Current_Installation_Test
Desktop:
*
On Thu, 2010-07-29 at 19:40 -0300, Igor Pires Soares wrote:
Em Qui, 2010-07-29 às 14:53 +0800, He Rui escreveu:
On 07/29/2010 04:16 AM, Igor Pires Soares wrote:
Those tests are labeled as language tests but they are also intended for
input method testing, what is more related to i18n IMHO
On 07/29/2010 04:16 AM, Igor Pires Soares wrote:
Em Qua, 2010-07-28 às 15:12 +0800, He Rui escreveu:
Unfortunately, the i18n team doesn't have a specific test case template
to cover keyboard testings in Anaconda [1]. But we do have test cases
covering i18n installation [2].
Hehe
On Fri, 2010-07-23 at 12:04 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
On Fri, 2010-07-16 at 14:47 -0400, James Laska wrote:
I was just trying to cover the possibilities. For me, the appearance of
a graphical menu is really a polish issue and doesn't fit well with
Alpha, it seems more suited to
On Thu, 2010-07-22 at 16:32 -0300, Igor Pires Soares wrote:
Em Qua, 2010-07-21 às 09:34 +1000, noriko escreveu:
James Laska さんは書きました:
The tool is not packaged or available in fedora infrastructure. I think
it would be a worthwhile experiment to get familiar with the tool and
it's
Hi Bob,
Below is a very good guidance on how to obtain and use your personal
space on fedorapeople.org :
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Infrastructure/fedorapeople.org
Please refer to it. And I'll forward and discuss your script with Adam
on another thread.
Thanks,
Hurry
On Thu, 2010-07-01
Clear steps, well done.
On Wed, 2010-06-30 at 20:16 -0400, Bob Lightfoot wrote:
Dear Test Community:
Being in the queue for Proven-Tester status and waiting for a
mentor I am spending my time testing packages as they reach
updates-testing. I thought I'd share for discussion the
On Mon, 2010-06-21 at 05:09 -0400, Kamil Paral wrote:
- He Rui r...@redhat.com wrote:
Then How about adding a step 4 in 'How to test' like:
# Proceed and complete installation with VNC client.
And in the 'Expected Results', add a step like:
# VNC works normally during installation
Please ignore the date in the subject of the last email.
StorageFiltering test day will be held on this Thursday (2010-04-22).
Very sorry about that.
Thanks,
Hurry
Forwarded Message
From: He Rui r...@redhat.com
Reply-to: t...@lists.fedoraproject.org
To: test-announce test
Right, and the encrypted install bug[1] is verified fix in RC4.
Thanks
Hurry
[1] https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=578633
Thanks
Liam
On 04/06/2010 10:51 AM, He Rui wrote:
Greetings,
Fedora 13 Beta RC#4 is available for testing. Andre has created the test
results page
Greetings testers,
F13 Beta RC2 has been uploaded for testing. I've summarized main issues on Beta
RC1[1]
and highlighted related test cases on current matrices of the following links.
Please test
them as first priority to make sure they meet the beta release criteria[2]:
Installation:
Message
From: He Rui r...@redhat.com
Reply-to: fedora-test-l...@redhat.com
To: test-announce test-announce@lists.fedoraproject.org
Subject: [Test-Announce] Fedora 13 Beta TC#1 Validation Test
Date: Thu, 18 Mar 2010 16:00:25 +0800
Greetings,
Fedora 13 Beta Test Compose test is arriving[1
Greetings,
Fedora 13 Beta Test Compose test is arriving[1]. Thanks for the ones who
attended/paid attention on alpha test and please continue enjoying the
validation test on Beta. This time all the alpha and beta priority test
cases of installation[2] and desktop[3] should be passed to ensure
95 matches
Mail list logo
