Re: Nighlt-Composes?

On Tue, 5 Jun 2012 10:55:01 +1000 Amit Saha wrote: > On Tue, Jun 5, 2012 at 10:53 AM, Rob Healey > wrote: > > Greetings: > > > > I know that FC17 was just released a little while ago, but does > > anyone know when Nightly-Composes will be built upon fc18/ > > rawhide ??? > > This is where it us

Re: dropwatch package

On Mon, 4 Jun 2012 14:51:03 -0700 Rob Healey wrote: > Greetings: > > From looking at Koji Build System, I have noticed something weird: > > dropwatch-1.4-1 is being built or created for: > 1) fc18, and > 2) fc16 > > but not fc17! fc17 is getting 1.2-2 .. Can anyone tell me why? The maintain

Re: mass closing F15 bugs in bugzilla?

On Thu, 31 May 2012 09:24:03 -0700 Adam Williamson wrote: > On Thu, 2012-05-31 at 11:18 +0300, Kalev Lember wrote: > > Hello, > > > > What's the plan for handling the upcoming F15 end-of-life in > > Bugzilla? In the past, as per the bugzilla housekeeping page [1], > > the bugs for EOL releases h

Re: [Test-Announce] Fedora 17 Final Release Candidate 4 (RC4) Available Now!

On Wed, 23 May 2012 09:58:47 -0700 Adam Williamson wrote: > Yeah, mediawiki has problems with caching. I pretty much automatically > do a shift-ctrl-R on any commonly-modified page. You should definitely > do this with the results pages themselves too, btw, or you might find > yourself looking at

Re: circular dependency loop in rawhide repo?

On Mon, 21 May 2012 21:23:56 -0400 "G.Wolfe Woodbury" wrote: > I'm trying to move to rawhide by doing > yum --skip-broken distro-sync > > and I get an endless loop of resolve attempts. > They seem to be associated with NetworkManager-glib and httpd-mnm(?) > > Is this known? what component

Re: yum -- Protected multilib versions?

On Thu, 17 May 2012 11:05:45 -0400 Terry Polzin wrote: > Can't seem to install .i686 and x86_64 versions of the same package. ...snip... Either re-enable updates-testing, or 'yum distro-sync' back to all stable versions. See: http://scrye.com/wordpress-mu/nirik/2012/05/09/fedora-17-prerelease

Re: GDM login screen no more presents the user (icon) list for logging in

On Fri, 04 May 2012 20:28:46 +0200 Joachim Backes wrote: > Dear all, > > after running the most recent F17 updates, the GDM login no more shows > the user (icon) list. Only "Not listed" is presented. I have to enter > the user's name manually, clicking to it in the list not possible > (because n

Re: F17 Beta DVD install options

On Wed, 18 Apr 2012 21:19:18 -0500 John Morris wrote: > Which brings up a good point. I know that the only way to be sure is > booting the machine from a known good[1] rescue media and then check > with a copy of RPM running from there using the --root option to point > at the suspect filesystem

Re: F17 Beta DVD install options

On Tue, 17 Apr 2012 13:38:17 -0700 Chuck Forsberg WA7KGX N2469R wrote: > Why is it that yum update pulls in some 500 MB of updates > immediately after installing a brand new DVD? Why does > the install image have to be riddled with stale files? This is due to the freeze. Things are frozen while

Re: Inadequate sound device control

You could try xfce4-mixer. kevin signature.asc Description: PGP signature -- test mailing list test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test

Re: old TCs/RCs downloads - do you need them?

On Mon, 16 Apr 2012 12:34:35 -0400 (EDT) Kamil Paral wrote: > > BW has > > increased a great deal since then as well, so I have not noticed > > problems with TC/RC's sucking up all our BW. (which is not to say it > > won't happen). > > If that happens we can take some measures. One thing from to

Re: old TCs/RCs downloads - do you need them?

On Mon, 16 Apr 2012 12:07:33 -0400 (EDT) Kamil Paral wrote: > Usually all the old test and release composes are available there: > > http://dl.fedoraproject.org/pub/alt/stage/ > > Recently it was wiped clean. After a few people asked on > #fedora-admin, the latest composes were added back. Howe

Re: rescue mode?

On Fri, 13 Apr 2012 12:10:46 -0400 David wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA1 > > - -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA1 > > On 4/13/2012 10:02 AM, Kevin Fenzi wrote: > > On Thu, 12 Apr 2012 18:56:37 -0700 Samuel Sieb > > w

Re: rescue mode?

On Thu, 12 Apr 2012 18:56:37 -0700 Samuel Sieb wrote: > John Reiser wrote: > >> Has rescue mode been removed? If so, what can I use instead? > > > > Append " rescue" to the end of the kernel boot command line. > > > Yes, that's what I usually do and what I tried. I don't remember if > I've ever

Re: Fc17 updates-testing...

On Tue, 27 Mar 2012 22:30:24 -0700 Rob Healey wrote: > Greetings: > > From the koji build website, I can see that there are a lot of > packages being build for fc17 and fc18 rigght now over the last few > days! > > I can see in the mailing lists, rawhide reports... > > What I do not see is Fed

Re: missing url...

On Mon, 27 Feb 2012 17:04:02 -0800 Rob Healey wrote: > Greetings: > > In the most recent past, I have used: > http://download.fedora.redhat.com/pub/fedora/linux/development/17/x86_64/osas > my baseurl in /etc/yum.repos.d/fedora.repo > > Today, I can't find the server... > > Did the url disapp

Re: f17- usrmove issue...

On Sun, 5 Feb 2012 19:55:50 -0800 Rob Healey wrote: > Greetings: > > I have a fully updated F17/ Rawhide system except for today's > (2012-02-05) updates, and I am trying to do the usr-move instructions > that given from Harold... > > I keep getting this error message when trying to do the drac

Re: rawhide report: 20120205 changes

On Sun, 5 Feb 2012 13:16:59 -0700 Jonathan Corbet wrote: > On Sun, 5 Feb 2012 17:59:38 +0100 > Harald Hoyer wrote: > > > > Running Transaction Check > > > ERROR You need to update rpm to handle: > > > rpmlib(X-CheckUnifiedSystemdir) is needed by > > > filesystem-3-2.fc17.i686 RPM needs to be up

Re: Rawhide Rkhunter

On Sat, 19 Nov 2011 14:57:52 + Frank Murphy wrote: > On 19/11/11 14:46, Michael Schwendt wrote: > > > > > The manual page or the config file? > > The man page > > > > Files with a leading dot in the file name are hidden. That's normal. > > For rkhunter, it's a false positive. > > > > I'v

Re: Release criteria proposal: 'support' /boot on RAID

On Wed, 16 Nov 2011 10:53:17 -0800 Adam Williamson wrote: > On Wed, 2011-11-16 at 10:29 -0600, David Lehman wrote: > > On Wed, 2011-11-16 at 09:42 -0600, Bruno Wolff III wrote: > > > On Tue, Nov 15, 2011 at 21:42:40 -0600, > > > Chris Adams wrote: > > > > Old-grub also didn't support newer Lin

Re: Release criteria proposal: 'support' /boot on RAID

+1 here. I look forward to it. ;) kevin signature.asc Description: PGP signature -- test mailing list test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test

Re: gtk3-3.3.2-1/ fc16

On Mon, 7 Nov 2011 14:19:17 -0800 Rob Healey wrote: > Hello! > > A few daysd ago, I tried something that seemed uncomplicated to me? > How sad that was? > > I enabled rawhide and disabled fedora updates updates-testing... > > I updated only gtk2 gtk2-devel gtk3 gtk3-devel on my fc16 machine.

Re: [Test-Announce] Fedora 16 Final Release Declared GOLD!

On Fri, 04 Nov 2011 11:55:00 -0700 Adam Williamson wrote: > On Fri, 2011-11-04 at 11:53 -0600, Kevin Fenzi wrote: > > > > I am concerned with the process as executed not matching the > > > documentation. I'd just like to see a change codified that either >

Re: [Test-Announce] Fedora 16 Final Release Declared GOLD!

On Fri, 4 Nov 2011 09:37:33 -0500 Bruno Wolff III wrote: > On Thu, Nov 03, 2011 at 23:17:21 -0700, > Adam Williamson wrote: ...snip... > > > Yeah, agreed. I don't think there's any especial need for the > > go/no-go to be an entire day ahead of the release readiness > > meeting, in all hone

Re: F16: window manager for xfce has disappeared

On Fri, 28 Oct 2011 10:55:42 -0400 sean darcy wrote: > Running XFCE. yum upgrade'd yesterday, now there's no window manager. > Stuck using gnome. > > What is the xfce wm? And where is it turned on? It's xfwm4, and it should run by default. In the event your session had it crash and you then

Re: pushes to stable during freeze - process question

On Thu, 27 Oct 2011 07:59:12 -0400 (EDT) Kamil Paral wrote: > Quick question, > > how do rel-eng guys know which updates are OK to push to stable > during freeze and which are not? For example we have the final freeze > now. Some packages like this: > https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDO

Summary/Minutes from today's Proventesters meetup (2011-10-26)

=== #fedora-meeting: proventesters (2011-10-26) === Meeting started by nirik at 18:09:45 UTC. The full logs are available at http://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting/2011-10-26/proventesters.2011-10-26-18.09.log

Re: Rawhide Updates Borked?

On Wed, 26 Oct 2011 13:08:36 -0400 "Clyde E. Kunkel" wrote: > Haven't been able to update rawhide since 24 Oct. Issues? Rawhide has failed to compose the last 2 days. ;( Looking into it. kevin signature.asc Description: PGP signature -- test mailing list test@lists.fedoraproject.org To u

[Test-Announce] Proventesters meetup tomorrow at 18UTC (2011-10-26)

We are going to be having another proventesters meetup tomorrow on IRC in #fedora-meeting at 18:00UTC. Purpose of meetup: Brainstorm ideas on improving testing and processes for testing updates. * Intro/gather more agenda items * Recruiting more proventesters/testers. * One stop page for upda

Meeting log/Summary from today's Proventesters meetup (2011-10-19)

=== #fedora-meeting: proventesters (2011-10-19) === Meeting started by nirik at 17:59:58 UTC. The full logs are available at http://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting/2011-10-19/proventesters.2011-10-19-17.59.log

Re: firstaidkit-plugin-grub breaking tree compose.

On Wed, 19 Oct 2011 11:20:49 -0400 Dave Jones wrote: > On Tue, Oct 18, 2011 at 10:49:17AM -0400, Dave Jones wrote: > > On Mon, Oct 17, 2011 at 08:17:20PM -0500, den...@ausil.us wrote: > > > And the night before grub changes broke lorax. > > > > and today they broke firstaidkit-plugin-grub.

[Test-Announce] Proventesters meetup tomorrow at 18UTC (2011-10-19)

We are going to be having another proventesters meetup tomorrow on IRC in #fedora-meeting at 18:00UTC. Purpose of meetup: Brainstorm ideas on improving testing and processes for testing updates. * Intro/gather more agenda items * Recruiting more proventesters/testers. * One stop page for upda

Re: Can't see groups?

glibc bug. See: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=745675 kevin signature.asc Description: PGP signature -- test mailing list test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test

Minutes/Summary from today's Proventesters meetup 2011-10-12 at 18UTC

=== #fedora-meeting: proventesters (2011-10-12) === Meeting started by nirik at 18:00:38 UTC. The full logs are available at http://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting/2011-10-12/proventesters.2011-10-12-18.00.lo

Re: [Test-Announce] Proventesters meetup 2011-10-12 at 18UTC

On Wed, 12 Oct 2011 13:36:13 -0400 "Clyde E. Kunkel" wrote: > I cannot attend this meeting but would like to request that > consideration be given to changing the "Fedora NN updates-testing > report" to list the actual package/software requiring security or > critical path testing. I used to

[Test-Announce] Proventesters meetup 2011-10-12 at 18UTC

We are going to be having another proventesters meetup tomorrow on IRC in #fedora-meeting at 18:00UTC. Purpose of meetup: Brainstorm ideas on improving testing and processes for testing updates. * Intro/gather more agenda items * Recruiting more proventesters/testers. * One stop page for upda

boot.fedoraproject.org testing

Greetings. Have any of you out there done F16-beta installs via boot.fedoraproject.org? Did things work? fail? I've gotten a report from someone trying it in virtualbox with both the cd and floppy images error out with a: "Unknown keyword in configuration file: PXERetry" but, I used the usb

Summary/Minutes from today's Proventesters meetup 2011-10-05 at 18UTC

=== #fedora-meeting: proventesters (2011-10-05) === Meeting started by nirik at 18:00:01 UTC. The full logs are available at http://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting/2011-10-05/proventesters.2011-10-05-18.00.log

Re: [Test-Announce] Proventesters meetup 2011-10-05 at 18UTC

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Wed, 05 Oct 2011 09:06:45 +0200 Matthias Runge wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA1 > > Kevin, > > would it be possible to move the meeting/next meetings from 18:00 UTC > to somewhat later? I'd like to participate, but real

Re: F16 beta XFCE

On Wed, 05 Oct 2011 09:27:19 -0400 Terry Polzin wrote: > So where are the toolbars? I drag the mouse to the top and bottom of > the screen and nothing just the desktop background. Sounds like you removed all the panels? Right click, preferences, panel and add a new one (or however many)? Was

[Test-Announce] Proventesters meetup 2011-10-05 at 18UTC

We are going to be having another proventesters meetup tomorrow on IRC in #fedora-meeting at 18:00UTC. Purpose of meetup: Brainstorm ideas on improving testing and processes for testing updates. * Intro/gather more agenda items * Recruiting more proventesters/testers. * One stop page for upd

Re: proposal: new list for updates-testing info

On Wed, 28 Sep 2011 16:35:39 -0500 Bruno Wolff III wrote: > On Wed, Sep 28, 2011 at 16:29:19 -0500, > Michael Cronenworth wrote: > > Bruno Wolff III on 09/28/2011 04:20 PM wrote: > > >Not really. There are messages that limit the updates to those that > > >still need testing and are grouped by

proposal: new list for updates-testing info

It's been proposed that we setup another list that just contains the 'updates-testing' reports for folks who are interested in testing updates, but don't want to see all the rawhide/branched discussion. I suppose we could also expand it to have all testing/qa related non branched/rawhide discussi

Proventesters meetup today at 18:00UTC

Sorry for the late notice, I meant to send this out sooner... We are going to be having another proventesters meetup today on IRC in #fedora-meeting at 18:00UTC (one hour earlier than before). Vuage agenda: * new folks/joining proventesters * Presenting data to help proventesters * Testing o

Re: Some notes from fallback mode

On Thu, 22 Sep 2011 23:06:34 -0500 Bruno Wolff III wrote: > On Thu, Sep 22, 2011 at 16:13:53 -0600, > Stephen John Smoogen wrote: > > > > Sure .. I will learn the magics of what to do. Hey Jonathan you > > think you can find me a good cowboy rope >? > > One proposal that would be nice to hav

Re: Some notes from fallback mode

On Thu, 22 Sep 2011 15:43:55 -0600 Jonathan Corbet wrote: > On Thu, 22 Sep 2011 23:05:28 +0200 > Michael Schwendt wrote: > > > IMO, it could be much more productive if you also > > evaluated Fedora 16 development instead of Fedora 17 development. > > Sigh. > > I've been running Rawhide for a

Re: /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.dFHsbt: line 1: [: missing `]'

yum history I think stores output from each transaction... perhaps yum history info the one(s) you saw it in and see if it provides more info? kevin signature.asc Description: PGP signature -- test mailing list test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mai

Minutes/Summary from today's proventester meetup

=== #fedora-meeting: proventesters (2011-09-21) === Meeting started by nirik at 19:00:29 UTC. The full logs are available at http://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting/2011-09-21/proventesters.2011-09-21-19.00.log

Re: Proventester meetup today at 19:00 UTC

On Wed, 21 Sep 2011 12:36:28 -0400 Samuel Greenfeld wrote: > I presume you have verified that the Copr group (if 18:00, as in the > first emails) and EMEA Ambassadors (if 19:00) are not using the > channel then ( http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Meeting_channel)? > > If they are, we may have to mov

Proventester meetup today at 19:00 UTC

Greetings. Just a reminder that I am going to try and run a meetup of proventesters in #fedora-meeting at 19:00 UTC today on irc.freenode.net. If you are a proventester I hope you can drop by. If you are not, but are interested in whats involved in becoming one and helping test, also please dro

Re: Proventesters weekly meetup

On Thu, 15 Sep 2011 00:32:01 +0100 Athmane Madjoudj wrote: ...snip... > +1, also I would add to agenda: > > * Exchange ideas/tips on how-to test some pkg, etc... > * Review the current test-cases (eg: I wrote/fixed a bunch of > testcases but I'm not sure if they'll be correct in the future) Gre

Proventesters weekly meetup

Greetings. In some of the recent discussions of issues with the current updates policy, one idea that was suggested was to try and get proventesters to meet up say once a week. This would allow us to discuss and look at pending critical path updates that need testing or security updates or other

Re: Laptop overheating with F 16

On Mon, 12 Sep 2011 10:37:01 -0800 Erinn Looney-Triggs wrote: > Adam, > > I suppose it could be the manufacturers fault, I have had this Lenovo > ThinkPad T510 for a long time and never had any issues with it. As > well, this thing isn't even on my lap it is in a dock with a pretty > decent vent

Re: Quick updates testing method

On Thu, 08 Sep 2011 11:17:47 -0700 Adam Williamson wrote: ...snip... > Obviously it could be improved if there were an easier way to extract > the list of koji build IDs that form part of any given Bodhi update, > maybe someone could write a dumb script for that, or something. You can use bodhi

Re: rawhide report: 20110903 changes

On Sun, 4 Sep 2011 10:31:21 +0200 Thomas Spura wrote: > Some i686 updates make it to the broken deps for x86_64, others > don't... > > Why that? This is multilib. Basically packages that have a -devel subpackage have that devel subpackage and it's requirements (if available) shipped in the 64bi

Re: Firefox crash

On Tue, 30 Aug 2011 11:23:25 +0200 Michael Schwendt wrote: > On Tue, 30 Aug 2011 08:49:37 + (UTC), J (JB) wrote: > > > Kalev Lember gmail.com> writes: > > > > > ... > > > Just a wild guess -- what version of glibc do you have? For a > > > short while updates-testing had glibc-2.14.90-6 th

Re: Cannot find a valid baseurl for repo: preupgrade-main

On Sat, 27 Aug 2011 01:46:57 -0400 (EDT) Hongqing Yang wrote: > Hi, Moore, > > You have to download the releases.txt file from > http://mirrors.fedoraproject.org/releases.txt from that, you can find > the installmirrorlist is not correct. ...snip... It should in fact be correct now. Please do

Re: F16 not showing up in BFO images

On Wed, 24 Aug 2011 13:41:33 -0600 ajs wrote: > I followed the link from http://fedoraproject.org/get-prerelease to > the BFO images at http://boot.fedoraproject.org/download. > > These images do not point to F16 alpha. Is this a bug and if so what > is the Bugzilla component? > > Manually set

Re: f16a?

On Tue, 23 Aug 2011 21:53:01 +0300 cornel panceac wrote: > was fedora 16 alpha announced somewhere? Yes. http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/announce/2011-August/002992.html http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/devel-announce/2011-August/000828.html The announce list one was stuck in

Re: F-16 Branched report: 20110822 changes

On Mon, 22 Aug 2011 12:31:49 -0500 Bruno Wolff III wrote: > On Mon, Aug 22, 2011 at 11:41:43 -0600, > Kevin Fenzi wrote: > > On Mon, 22 Aug 2011 15:36:14 + > > Branched Report wrote: > > > > > Compose started at Mon Aug 22 13:15:30 UTC 2011 > > &g

Re: F-16 Branched report: 20110822 changes

On Mon, 22 Aug 2011 15:36:14 + Branched Report wrote: > Compose started at Mon Aug 22 13:15:30 UTC 2011 The repodiff/spam-o-matic failed here, but the compose did finish as far as I can tell. kevin signature.asc Description: PGP signature -- test mailing list test@lists.fedoraproject.or

Re: Missing libreport-plugin-bugzilla and libreort-plugin-logger in LXDE and XFCE Live iso.

On Wed, 17 Aug 2011 14:18:31 +0900 Masami Ichikawa wrote: > Hello everyone, > > I saw Fedora 16 Alpha RC5 LXDE and XFCE live isos don't have > libreport-plugin-bugzilla and libreort-plugin-logger so that you > cannot select report methods in the SELinux Alert Browser. It would > be nice to be in

Re: no luck installing alpha "Verne" in vbox

On Thu, 11 Aug 2011 03:48:51 -0400 (EDT) Hongqing Yang wrote: > The mirrorlist at http://mirrors.fedoraproject.org/releases.txt is > not correct now. It is still a Bug. Now the upgrade and preugprade do > not work, they are expected to work at Beta. Whats wrong with it? Has a bug been filed? I

Re: Problem with the link column on http://alt.fedoraproject.org/pub/alt/nightly-composes/

On Wed, 03 Aug 2011 12:28:26 -0700 Adam Williamson wrote: > On Wed, 2011-08-03 at 13:30 +0200, Joachim Backes wrote: > > Pressing any "taskinfo" URL in the Link column of the page > > "http://alt.fedoraproject.org/pub/alt/nightly-composes/"; > > produces following error: ...snip... > > This hap

Re: F16 Where?

On Sat, 30 Jul 2011 11:18:06 -0500 Richard Shaw wrote: > On Sat, Jul 30, 2011 at 11:14 AM, Chuck Forsberg WA7KGX N2469R > wrote: > > Does Fedora 16 exist yet separate from rawhide? > > If so, where can the files be downloaded from? > > Where are the installation ISOs? It's not there yet. Work i

Re: using dl instead of serverbeach1 for test matrix page download links

On Fri, 29 Jul 2011 08:16:17 -0400 James Laska wrote: > Thanks for the heads up Andre. Is dl.fp.org a distinct server, > different than alt. and serverbeach1.? Or is it some mirrormanager > magic that routes to either alt or sb1? It's a round robin dns that points to one of our 5 download serv

Re: Trusted Boot project in F16

On Thu, 23 Jun 2011 13:38:45 + (UTC) JB wrote: > Rahul Sundaram gmail.com> writes: > > > > > If you have problem subscribing to > > devel list, contact the list administrator to help you > > > > Rahul > > > > I have contacted the address as on this page at the bottom: > https://admin.f

Re: Request for approval in "fedora bugs" group

On Fri, 3 Jun 2011 13:39:27 +0530 Kaushik Banerjee wrote: > Hi, > > Can someone please approve me for "fedora bugs" group. We don't usually approve people into that group directly anymore. If you are a packager you should get added automatically when you are sponsored into the packager group.

Re: fsck.btrfs? (Was Re: Feedback needed : Fedora 15 Announcement)

On Fri, 20 May 2011 15:52:35 -0500 Ian Pilcher wrote: > On 05/20/2011 03:44 PM, Adam Williamson wrote: > > fedpkg co somepackage > > [pilcher@ian temp]$ fedpkg co btrfs-progs > Cloning into btrfs-progs... > The authenticity of host 'pkgs.fedoraproject.org (209.132.181.4)' > can't be established.

Re: F15 Xfce gnome-schedule install

On Wed, 18 May 2011 20:08:53 +0100 Frank Murphy wrote: > > > I have managed to install gnome-schedule in F15 Xfce using > "rpm -ivh --nodeps gnome-schedule-2. > > It works fine. That seems unlikely. ;) > but if I do a "yum update" > it says "gnme-schedule missing requires of gnome-pytho

Re: Yum Problem

On Mon, 16 May 2011 16:08:34 -0400 (EDT) ergodic wrote: > Thanks Kevin. > I just manually verified fedora-update.repo enabled and the > updates-debuginfo repository disabled. Then executed:"yum -y update > --skip-broken". The execution failed with the message: "Could not > parse metalink > htt

Re: Yum Problem

On Mon, 16 May 2011 13:00:01 -0400 (EDT) ergodic wrote: > Interesting. My since alpha came out I have had in /etc/yum/repos.d > fedora-update.repo enabled and the updates-debuginfo repository > disabled. That would have to have been done manually. :) The config is: - at branch time: enable

Re: nightly composes...

On Wed, 4 May 2011 17:00:10 -0700 Rob Healey wrote: > Greetings All: > > Since F15-Beta has been created now, are the nightly composes of FC16 > or still FC15? They will stick with the f15 branch until after f15 is released... then change over to rawhide/f16 probibly the week after. kevin s

Re: Fedora 14 Re-spin?

On Tue, 03 May 2011 01:11:55 -0700 Chuck Forsberg WA7KGX N2469R wrote: > With all the Gnome 3 usability issues et al, perhaps it would be a > good idea to release a re-spin of Fedora 14. Fedora unity does these from time to time, but haven't done a full respin in a while. However, live respins

Re: postfix versus sendmail

On Thu, 21 Apr 2011 15:16:59 +0100 Peter Robinson wrote: > On Thu, Apr 21, 2011 at 3:03 PM, Tom Horsley > wrote: > > Just curious why sendmail is still the default on f15? > > > > I notice RHEL 6 now defaults to postfix, which is odd since > > fedora usually leads the way on things like this. >

Re: [Fedora-spins] Nightly live composes in koji

On Mon, 28 Mar 2011 17:06:30 -0700 Adam Williamson wrote: > On Sat, 2011-03-26 at 15:34 -0600, Kevin Fenzi wrote: > > > You can find a list of the builds and links to their koji task pages > > at: > > > > http://alt.fedoraproject.org/pub/alt/nightly-composes/

Re: Nightly live composes in koji

On Sat, 26 Mar 2011 23:33:16 -0500 Bruno Wolff III wrote: > On Sat, Mar 26, 2011 at 15:34:46 -0600, > Kevin Fenzi wrote: > > Greetings. > > > > I've moved over to doing the nightly live media composes in koji > > instead of running them in serial on one b

Nightly live composes in koji

Greetings. I've moved over to doing the nightly live media composes in koji instead of running them in serial on one build machine. Advantages: * Composes will finish in ~30min or so for all spins instead of taking all day on the one compose machine. * They are scratch builds, so koji wil

Re: Nightly builds in abeyance?

On Fri, 18 Mar 2011 18:40:09 +0530 Rahul Sundaram wrote: > On 03/18/2011 02:04 AM, Kevin Fenzi wrote: > > > > Also, FYI, I will soon replace the above space with a page that just > > links to koji builds of these. This will be much faster and better > > moving forward

Re: Nightly builds in abeyance?

On Thu, 17 Mar 2011 14:11:20 -0400 Gregory Woodbury wrote: > The nightly composes havent been updated since the 15th. > > http://alt.fedoraproject.org:/pub/alt/nightly-composes Yep. The compose machine has been getting stuck in composes. ;

Re: Yum distro-sync makes more problems than solves

On Sat, 12 Feb 2011 22:34:49 +0100 (CET) Adam Pribyl wrote: > Would like if somebody can review the page > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Upgrading_Fedora_using_yum Those look good to me from a quick read. Thank you very much for working on the docs. :) kevin signature.asc Description: PGP

Re: missing rawhide reports

On Sat, 12 Feb 2011 04:56:02 -0600 Bruno Wolff III wrote: > On Sat, Feb 12, 2011 at 02:16:42 -0800, > Rob Healey wrote: > > Greetings: > > > > It is now going on three days plus without anything new... > > > > I was wondering if there will be one for this Saturday, Feb. 12th? > > When there

Re: Yum distro-sync makes more problems than solves

On Fri, 11 Feb 2011 23:33:38 +0100 (CET) Adam Pribyl wrote: > On Fri, 11 Feb 2011, Kevin Fenzi wrote: > > > On Fri, 11 Feb 2011 22:45:56 +0100 (CET) > > Adam Pribyl wrote: ...snip... > > Thats the Fedora 14 key. ;) > > Right, then this step probably should

Re: Yum distro-sync makes more problems than solves

On Fri, 11 Feb 2011 22:45:56 +0100 (CET) Adam Pribyl wrote: > I can not help myself but the procedure described at > http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/YumUpgradeFaq with distro-sync is not > flawless. While the "old way" with upgrading first the > fedora-release* packages and then invoking "yum upd

Re: rawhide report-2011 Feb 09

On Wed, 9 Feb 2011 14:06:17 -0800 Rob Healey wrote: > Greetings: > > I do not mean to sound stupid, but is there no rawhide report for > today?? Nope. It broke. ;( Hopefully it will work tomorrow... kevin signature.asc Description: PGP signature -- test mailing list test@lists.fedoraproj

Re: kernel in rawhide (f15) : crash

y spins for that day. > > Just as a side note, releng isn't directly responsible for the > > nightly composes, it's really under infrastructure. Kevin Fenzi > > does most or all of the maintenance. I'm not sure who his backup is > > for this. Nightly composes

Re: 2011-01-24 @ 16:00UTC - Fedora QA meeting - call for topics

On Sat, 22 Jan 2011 00:37:17 + "Jóhann B. Guðmundsson" wrote: > I see. > > Is this not FAS problem as in the required page should pop up to the > applicant for reading before he can proceed to apply or the group > admin aint doing his due diligence and regularly check the account > for new

Re: 2011-01-24 @ 16:00UTC - Fedora QA meeting - call for topics

On Sat, 22 Jan 2011 00:10:14 + "Jóhann B. Guðmundsson" wrote: > On 01/21/2011 07:09 PM, James Laska wrote: > > 1. Adjusting proventesters group to be invite-only > > I dont know who's bright idea this Mine I guess... ;) > is but I think the QA community > should automatically scrape

Re: Requests to join proventester group - not following procedure

On Thu, 20 Jan 2011 20:37:25 + mike cloaked wrote: > I note that there are 5 requests current in FAS to join the > proventester group, but without any corresponding QA Trac ticket at > https://fedorahosted.org/fedora-qa/ > > The rules for entry require a ticket in the latter to start the > p

Re: Asterisk RPMs for F14?

On Fri, 21 Jan 2011 08:28:20 +1100 Steven Haigh wrote: > Looking at the repos, it seems 1.6.2.12-0.1.rc1 is the available > version. > > It looks like on asterisk.org, the latest version is 1.6.2.17-rc1. > > How would we go about updating the available asterisk version? This looks like somethi

Re: broken less

On Thu, 23 Dec 2010 19:01:39 +0100 Michael Schwendt wrote: > Well, then the update submitter has deleted the old ticket, which IMO > is a MUST NOT. Several times before I've seen users referring to > updates they installed and which were still being offered by > Yum/PackageKit at that time, but n

Re: Karma?

On Sat, 18 Dec 2010 09:09:11 +1000 Brendan Jones wrote: > If I -1 a package either pulled from bodhi or when it hits > updates-testing, it does not stop it from getting pushed to stable Correct. Not by itself. > Perhaps I am not understanding the test system correctly. Am I right > in assumin

Re: No rawhide today?

On Thu, 16 Dec 2010 11:01:39 -0600 Bruno Wolff III wrote: > Is today's rawhide build just late or do we need to wait until > tomorrow? Rawhide compose was disabled today due to the ongoing netapp issues. ;( Hopefully it will be solved today and we will have a compose tomorrow. kevin signat

Re: updates improvements/changes ideas

On Mon, 29 Nov 2010 13:44:02 -0500 James Laska wrote: ...snip... > So there is a lag time for mirrors to receive updates. Does anyone > know what that average time for mirrors to update is? It varies. I've been doing pushes every day for a while now, I start them in the morning and they usua

Re: updates improvements/changes ideas

On Mon, 29 Nov 2010 12:40:25 -0500 James Laska wrote: ...snip... > > * setup a remote test env that people could use to test things. > > I could use more details on this point. Is this talking about setting > up QA systems hosted in Fedora infrastructure that any tester could > login and use t

Re: [PATCH] incite bug reporters to post feedback

On Sat, 4 Dec 2010 17:56:42 +0100 François Cami wrote: > Hi bodhi@, test@, > > The following patch tentatively changes the message bodhi posts to > bugzilla when a build is tagged as an update candidate to make clear > that we expect bug reporters to post their feedbacks on updates in the > bodh

updates improvements/changes ideas

Greetings. On the devel list recently there was a long thread discussing how we could improve the current https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Updates_Policy I gathered up ALL the ideas people put forth that were concrete in a list for fesco to look into. I'd love feedback from QA/Testers as well. I

Re: openldap F14 - broken stable update

On Thu, 25 Nov 2010 13:48:10 +0100 Jan Vcelak wrote: > Hi! > > Broken openldap update got into stable updates (openldap-2.4.23-3). > > Client libraries are working well but openldap-servers fails to > migrate the database and openldap server refuses to open it (to > prevent data damage). See di

Re: xulrunner and firefox conflict???

On Sun, 14 Nov 2010 18:03:30 -0800 Rob Healey wrote: > Greetings: > > When someone updated and released xulrunner without releasing an > updated firefox, firefox no longer works now!!! > > I had to downgrade xulrunner from b7 back to b6 to be able to use > firefox again! Yeah, the firefox buil

Re: XFCE was Re: kde 64bit nightly compose iso

On Sun, 14 Nov 2010 12:22:46 + Frank Murphy wrote: > On 14/11/10 03:25, Kevin Fenzi wrote: > > > > > ok. Try the x86_64 iso thats up there now. > > > > kevin > > > > > > XFCE still shows up as Oct 27th. > Might try it if rawhide based?

<    1   2   3   4   5   >