Re: fwupd problem F38 WS

On Sat, 22 Apr 2023 at 14:59, AV via test wrote: > Blocked executable in the ESP, ensure grub and shim are up to date: > /boot/efi/EFI/fedora/shimx64-fedora.efi Authenticode checksum > [0ce02100f67c7ef85f4eed368f02bf7092380a3c23ca91fd7f19430d94b00c19] is > present in dbx Where did you get

Re: GNOME 3.30.0 megaupdate

On Wed, 5 Sep 2018 at 16:19, Stephen Gallagher wrote: > I'd be *strongly* disinclined to give a Freeze Exception for a GNOME > mega-update. So you'd rather we ship GA with early pre-release builds of GNOME that have had little-to-no testing? From a downstream point of view I'm not going to fix

Re: Activity suggestion: moderate Software reviews

On 8 July 2016 at 15:43, Ivan Tomica wrote: > Is there a way to "undo" rating for some comment? For example, I accidentally > hit "No" for one usefull comment. :yakes: Don't worry too much about this; I'm hoping the effect of averaging means it all works out. We're getting a huge

Re: F23 Brightness reduces itself, this problem also in F24?

On 17 May 2016 at 22:33, Chris Murphy wrote: > Settings > Power > Automatic brightness = On is the problem. This is probably my doing, I added the feature for F23 IIRC. > On my system it'll even go to the last setting and turn the > display off as the room gets dark.

Re: Please test f24-backgrounds-24.1.1

On 27 April 2016 at 20:39, Luya Tshimbalanga wrote: > f24-backgrounds is updated with new version of default wallpapers in > addition of its supplements. 24.1.1-1 is now pushed rather than 24.1.0-1 > because of the recent changes based on feedback from Gnome Software >

Re: Testing the GUI F23 to F24 Upgrade

On 21 April 2016 at 13:04, Kamil Paral wrote: >> Does this take into account this bug: >> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1259865 Not yet; Kalev wrote some patches today to fix this but I asked for unit tests :) Richard -- test mailing list

Testing the GUI F23 to F24 Upgrade

Hi all, I've blogged about a COPR providing early access to the bits needed to do a F23->F24 upgrade using GNOME Software here: https://blogs.gnome.org/hughsie/2016/04/20/upgrading-fedora-23-to-24-using-gnome-software/ I'd appreciate any feedback or problems you face. I'm planning to backport

Re: after dnf update, Gnome SW utility still requests the same updates

On 16 September 2015 at 09:31, Kamil Paral wrote: > Actually, this was supposed to be fixed (PK was supposed to refresh metadata > when it detected altered rpm database), but apparently it isn't. Of course, the limitation is that packagekitd has to be running at the time. I

Re: firewall-applet GTK+ - Qt

On 15 June 2015 at 12:12, Thomas Woerner twoer...@redhat.com wrote: 1) The gtk statusicon widget is deprecated in gtk3, will be removed soon. Why do you need a status icon at all? I can't imagine why I'd want my firewall sending messages to the desktop. I plan to port firewall-config also over

Re: [Test-Announce] Urgent F21 testing request: libhif and PackageKit

On 20 January 2015 at 09:50, Tim Waugh twa...@redhat.com wrote: But: will all Fedora 21 users need to run 'pkcon repair' manually, or can that be made automatic? It shouldn't be required, unless someone has rpmdb index corruption and doesn't want to reboot. Richard. -- test mailing list

Re: [Test-Announce] Urgent F21 testing request: libhif and PackageKit

On 20 January 2015 at 06:30, Chris Murphy li...@colorremedies.com wrote: Unfortunately these updates don't fix Bug 1178978 - offline update fails due to separate /var volume mounting too late https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1178978 Right. This isn't actually a PackageKit bug as you

Re: [Test-Announce] Urgent F21 testing request: libhif and PackageKit

On 19 January 2015 at 22:01, Jonathan Calloway jonathancallo...@gmail.com wrote: The path /updates/PackageKit-1.0.4-1.fc21,libhif- cannot be found https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/PackageKit-1.0.4-1.fc21,libhif-0.1.8-1.fc21 Richard -- test mailing list test@lists.fedoraproject.org To

Re: test request: kernel 3.17 for F21

On 10 October 2014 10:26, Ankur Sinha sanjay.an...@gmail.com wrote: I've been running the 3.17 series for a while now - I'm on rawhide nodebug. I haven't seen any issues at all yet. They seem to work quite well. Same here, no issues experienced. Richard. -- test mailing list

Re: Transaction history when updated using gnome-software

On 10 October 2014 11:24, Ankur Sinha sanjay.an...@gmail.com wrote: Try 'pkcon get-transactions'. Hrm - that works, obviously. Or if you install gnome-packagekit, gpk-log Follow up question - what config file would g-s follow? Does it use yum.conf? I had the install only limit set to 5 in

Re: Transaction history when updated using gnome-software

On 10 October 2014 12:00, Joonas Sarajärvi m...@iki.fi wrote: 2014-10-10 13:50 GMT+03:00 Richard Hughes hughsi...@gmail.com: No, it doesn't use yum at all. What does it use? The librpm, hawkey and librepo libraries. We don't want to use DNF itself as that would mean going from C-python-C

Re: Transaction history when updated using gnome-software

On 10 October 2014 12:27, Tim Lauridsen tim.laurid...@gmail.com wrote: So PackageKit, dnf yum all have there own package transaction history. No, libhif uses the yumdb as well. I've got no idea why dnf doesn't use the yumdb as it seems to be the same format but in a different place. Richard --

Re: Transaction history when updated using gnome-software

On 10 October 2014 13:21, Ankur Sinha sanjay.an...@gmail.com wrote: I thought so. Is there a place one could add things like installonly then? If not, what does it do by default? I mean, how did it decide that I had five kernels and installing a new one, making it six, implied removing three

Re: apper in Alpha TC5 F21

On 4 September 2014 14:22, Adam Williamson adamw...@fedoraproject.org wrote: So, apper requires 'PackageKit-qt', which sounds sane, but 'PackageKit-qt' doesn't require PackageKit. Looks like that's already filed: Either that, or apper should require PackageKit directly -- IIRC there was some

Re: the 'Software Installer' and Adobe Flash

On 16 August 2014 16:08, drago01 drag...@gmail.com wrote: The flash package lacks an appdate file ... I'm trying to work around this, something like https://plus.google.com/107928060492923463788/posts/P6fZDrV5zwh -- should be in F21 in the next week or so. The actual mechanism is like this:

Re: packagekit msgs from syslogd

On 4 December 2013 21:36, Clyde E. Kunkel clydekunkel7...@verizon.net wrote: Message from syslogd@P5K-EWIFI at Dec 4 16:33:46 ... PackageKit:get-updates transaction /4692_ccdcccba from uid 1000 finished with success after 10490ms My error, sorry. I've fixed this in git and I'll do a new

Re: packagekit msgs from syslogd

On 5 December 2013 09:33, Richard Hughes hughsi...@gmail.com wrote: My error, sorry. I've fixed this in git and I'll do a new release next week. There's a F20 build here if you'd like to do some testing: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=6259310 Richard -- test mailing list

Re: packagekit msgs from syslogd

On 5 December 2013 18:59, Adam Williamson awill...@redhat.com wrote: This is only in updates-testing, right, we didn't send it anywhere important? :) It's not super important, it should only affect people that use syslogd, rather than the journal. Richard. -- test mailing list

Re: Negative karma for missing update descriptions?

On 4 July 2013 14:36, Ankur Sinha sanjay.an...@gmail.com wrote: I hardly think an update should be given negative karma for this. Sure it should, the update is defective. The description isn't optional. Richard. -- test mailing list test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe:

Re: PackageKit: Could not get update details

On 16 May 2013 13:21, Kamil Paral kpa...@redhat.com wrote: What was the command/application that you've executed? What is your locale (type 'locale')? Different issue, there's something funky going on with encoding in yum/python and it's tripping up PackageKit. Can you file a bug please.

Re: [rawhide] colord pulling in 32bit packages on 64bit installs

On 10 January 2013 17:07, Kevin Fenzi ke...@scrye.com wrote: If someone wants to go fix it, please do, otherwise I will later today. ;) Opps, sorry. I've got a little baby to keep amused this afternoon, so If someone could jump in and push a fix with a rebuild I would be very grateful. Thanks.

Re: [rawhide] colord pulling in 32bit packages on 64bit installs

On 10 January 2013 20:23, Kevin Fenzi ke...@scrye.com wrote: It's a archfull package obsoleting/providing a noarch package. We could split out a colord-profiles subpackage (noarch) and make colord dep on colord-profiles if that makes things easier. Richard. -- test mailing list

Re: Fedora and MATE desktop

On 21 September 2012 12:32, Brendan Jones brendan.jones...@gmail.com wrote: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/MATE-Desktop for your reference It's not a small job that's for sure. I'm not sure I see the point. mate-power-manager is just the output of a sed script changing all instances of

Re: firewalld configuration

On 17 April 2012 12:20, Adam Williamson awill...@redhat.com wrote: Frankly, when I found VNC being blocked was inhibiting my beta validation testing, I couldn't make head nor tail of the firewalld command line stuff so I just turned it off and went back to the static firewall. Progress! Same

Would appreciate karma for colord update

Hey, I'd appreciate some more testing for the colord update https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2011-16453 -- it fixes a security bug (although very low severity one at that) and I would like to push it to F16 as soon as possible. It's been sitting in updates-testing for nearly a week

Re: Again: Oh no, something goes wrong

On 7 September 2011 22:33, Michael Schwendt mschwe...@gmail.com wrote: Ah, come on! That's close to blanket approval for such a high number of packages, which require much more individual testing. To sign them off all with a brief comment or a simple works for me isn't credible. More to the

Re: aggregation of gnome tools

On 8 September 2011 05:03, Joachim Backes joachim.bac...@rhrk.uni-kl.de wrote: gnome-tweak-tool Current, high level. gconf-editor Legacy. dconf-editor Current, low level. gconftool-2 Legacy. gnome-session-properties Kinda current. Richard -- test mailing list

Re: Some days it just doesn't pay to update

On 31 August 2011 23:57, Jonathan Corbet corbet...@lwn.net wrote: So, I thought...LWN writing is almost done for the day, why not do an update and see what happens? I see the keyboard unpleasantness with both the kernel-3.1.0-0.rc4.git0.0.fc17.x86_64 kernel I think 99% of the developers

Re: persistent gnome dep problems (F16 alpha rc3-5, alpha), --skip-broken wants to haul in 32-bit libs

On 24 August 2011 16:08, Matthias Clasen mcla...@redhat.com wrote: Error: Protected multilib versions: gnome-panel-libs-3.1.5-2.fc16.x86_64 != gnome-panel-libs-3.0.2-3.fc16.i686 I have no idea what these errors mean or how to fix them. I'm seriously wondering if multilib is worth all this

Re: gvfs-gdu-volume running at 98% cpu

On 23 August 2011 15:43, Clyde E. Kunkel clydekunkel7...@cox.net wrote: Should we expect this in rawhide?  Runs for 15 minutes like this. No, file a bug. :-) Richard. -- test mailing list test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test

Re: Missing PackageKit notification in GNOME Shell

On 25 May 2011 10:20, Michael Schwendt mschwe...@gmail.com wrote: $ gsettings get org.gnome.settings-daemon.plugins.updates last-updates-notification uint64 0 What does that mean? Never been notified. $ gsettings get org.gnome.settings-daemon.plugins.updates frequency-get-updates 86400

Re: Gnome 3 Color profiling failure

On 9 May 2011 23:50, ergodic g...@embarqmail.com wrote: The gnome-control-center crashes every time the Spyder-3 color calibrator is connected to the usb port in Fedora 15_x86_64.  Is this a bug or an incompatibility of the Spyder-3 Elite with Gnome-3?  The Spyder-3 and Gnome-2 have work

Re: Software update should not run on any logon except...

On 7 May 2011 13:22, Leslie S Satenstein lsatenst...@yahoo.com wrote: I think that allowing dependency files may be a potential security breach. Why? Richard. -- test mailing list test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test

Re: f15beta wierdness

On 29 April 2011 16:47, James Laska jla...@redhat.com wrote: Unless this is intended, I think it's worth a bug report against PackageKit-command-not-found so it strips off any options, and only uses the $1 provided (not the entire arg string $@). I thought I fixed this last release -- if not,

Re: After most recent F15 updates, gnome-shell does no more display all menu icons

On 22 March 2011 12:31, Joachim Backes joachim.bac...@rhrk.uni-kl.de wrote: After taday having updated my system, I miss some icons in the activities bar (for example gmone-terminal), and in Activities-Applications: The icons are lost, only the icon identifier is visible, but not the icon

Re: gnome-applets and rawhide updates

On 18 February 2011 04:47, Jon Masters jonat...@jonmasters.org wrote: FWIW, I have a rawhide box that is near totally hosed at the moment. Yum is reporting many duplicate packages, etc. even though I've run the de-duping package-cleanup (which reports that there are none, though yum itself

Re: Preupgrade change?

On 1 November 2010 17:20, Adam Williamson awill...@redhat.com wrote: A few days after would be rather bad and should have been previously clearly communicated, given that preupgrade is one of our official 'Good Ways To Upgrade' and lots of people want to upgrade on release day. If there's a

Re: Preupgrade change?

On 30 October 2010 19:48, Paul Frields sticks...@gmail.com wrote: * https://fedorahosted.org/preupgrade/changeset?new=data%40d42e6189dbe4ad7591d422f200a31ad196125dccold=data%404157e81ce428be819a957a31be5a19bcc6bd2efe  Shouldn't Rawhide always stay in the list of releases? No, we can no longer

Re: heads-up: upstart reversion coming soon

2010/9/15 Jóhann B. Guðmundsson johan...@gmail.com: The decision to reject this feature certainly was a lesson in killing momentum which we will never reach again. This is how I also feel. By trying to make Fedora shiny, polished and super-cautious against breaking things we're just creating

Re: Which bugzilla component?

On 8 September 2010 18:07, John Poelstra poels...@redhat.com wrote:  * Cancelling.. The transaction failed: internal-error, The backend exited unexpectedly. This is a serious error as the spawned backend did not complete the pending transaction. This is bad, both from a your system

Re: [Test-Announce] Systemd Test Day on Tuesday 2010/09/07

On 6 September 2010 15:30, Bruno Wolff III br...@wolff.to wrote: Note that there is an update pending for systemd-9-3 that isn't going to show up in the nightly builds until the following dep issues are fixed: manager-2.31.4-1.fc14.i686 requires libgnome-control-center.so.1

Re: [Test-Announce] Systemd Test Day on Tuesday 2010/09/07

On 6 September 2010 15:51, pbrobin...@gmail.com pbrobin...@gmail.com wrote: No, its F-14 and had been broken since Aug 31st. The last good compose of gnome based (as in have gnome components) spins was Aug 30th. You can see it in the daily branched report [1]. Right, all my packages

AFK for two weeks

-desktop if it's really important. Thanks. Richard Hughes -- test mailing list test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test

Re: Update problem in F14: some packages not found

On 9 August 2010 12:04, Joachim Backes joachim.bac...@rhrk.uni-kl.de wrote: Thank you and kind regards My three builds are now in bohdi. Richard. -- test mailing list test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test

Re: Update problem in F14: some packages not found

On 9 August 2010 11:47, Joachim Backes joachim.bac...@rhrk.uni-kl.de wrote: gnome-packagekit-2.31.4-2.fc14.i686 -- Processing Dependency: libgnome-control-center.so.1 for package: I'm working on this one upstream. gnome-color-manager-2.31.4-1.fc14.i686 -- Processing Dependency:

Re: Proven tester special testing procedures: PackageKit?

On 29 July 2010 23:01, Adam Williamson awill...@redhat.com wrote: If everyone thinks this makes sense, I'll propose a wiki draft which sets up a system for package-specific testing procedures and drafts such a procedure for PackageKit. What does everyone think of this? Thanks! Makes sense to

Re: Rawhide - first experience

On 22 June 2010 21:00, Kjartan Maraas kmar...@broadpark.no wrote: Richard answered this, but shouldn't gnome-icon-theme-symbolic have been pulled in by whatever package that needs it? I suppose it should be in comps, or maybe as a require to something generic like gnome-desktop3. Richard. --

Re: Rawhide - first experience

On 22 June 2010 15:08, Kjartan Maraas kmar...@broadpark.no wrote: - the battery icon looks strange - very thin. Probably something to do with the symbolic icon support? Install gnome-icon-theme-symbolic Richard. -- test mailing list test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe: