Re: Access a Virtual disk without the VM running

Hi, you may do boot in rescue mode , or live mode with an iso , may be a solution for you ... From server edition, download Network Install iso [1], boot your vm with iso and choose troubleshoot -> rescue , rescue may allow you to do : chroot /mnt/sysimage, also you can mount share folders .

Re: Rawhide ~ kernel-6.5.0 doesn't allow VirtualBox shared folders

On Thu, 2023-07-13 at 07:29 +1000, Ian Laurie wrote: > On 7/13/23 05:00, Sérgio Basto wrote: > > what is os Server , and what is os guest ? > > > > and do you use rpmfusion rpms for the server ? > > > > > > On Wed, 2023-07-12 at 11:48 +1000, Ian Laurie

Re: Rawhide ~ kernel-6.5.0 doesn't allow VirtualBox shared folders

what is os Server , and what is os guest ? and do you use rpmfusion rpms for the server ? On Wed, 2023-07-12 at 11:48 +1000, Ian Laurie wrote: > I'm not able to mount VirtualBox shared folders in Rawhide since > kernel-6.5 began.  Works fine up to kernel-6.4.0-59.fc39.x86_64. > > My mount

Re: DNF5 testing ~ Unknown argument "--skip-broken"

On Thu, 2023-06-15 at 07:32 +1000, Ian Laurie via test wrote: > On 6/15/23 00:15, Sérgio Basto wrote: > > > Is this option being added or is this a bug? > > > > > > > seems related with > > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1501804 > > >

Re: DNF5 testing ~ Unknown argument "--skip-broken"

On Wed, 2023-06-14 at 11:54 +1000, Ian Laurie via test wrote: > The man page for DNF5 in Rawhide shows --skip-broken to be a legal > generic option, however it does not show up in a "dnf --help" and in > practice its use results in this error: > > Unknown argument "--skip-broken" for command

Re: rpm very noisy in f38

On Sun, 2023-03-05 at 02:41 -0500, Felix Miata wrote: > Is anyone using rpm besides dnf and me? It has gotten very noisy: > > # rpm -qa | grep intel > error: rpmdbNextIterator: skipping h#   2 > Header V3 RSA/SHA256 Signature, key ID 81b46521: BAD > Header SHA1 digest: OK > error:

Re: What to do after a system crash during dnf upgrade

On Sun, 2023-01-29 at 02:40 +, George R Goffe via test wrote: > Hi, > > Running dnf upgrade during periods of system instability seems to > leave the system in an unknown state. > > How does one recover from this situation? > checkdupes: package-cleanup --dupes package-cleanup --problems

Re: 有2天时间没有发布Fedora-Robotics-Live了

On Thu, 2022-12-22 at 11:27 +, wang_chen wrote: > Fedora-Robotics-Live 不再发布了吗？ the Respins Sig never have released robotics https://labs.fedoraproject.org/en/robotics/ Fedora-Robotics-Live-x86_64-37-1.7.iso -- Sérgio M. B. ___ test mailing

Re: Fedora 37 on todays LUP

On Mon, 2022-11-14 at 10:49 +, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote: > On Mon, 2022-11-14 at 08:36 +0100, Luna Jernberg wrote: > > https://linuxunplugged.com/484 > > Very depressing > > Fedora 37 review on todays Linux Unplugged > > Please don´t cross-post: > >

Re: Chromium doesn't respond to clicks or typing in 1 external monitor

On Tue, 2022-10-04 at 17:30 +0700, Frederic Muller wrote: > On 03/10/2022 19:40, Kamil Paral wrote: > > > > > On Mon, Oct 3, 2022 at 2:19 PM Frederic Muller > > wrote: > > > > > Hi! > > > > > > This one is really weird and probably too specific: > > > > > > I start chromium and move it to

Re: Loud PC speaker beep during reboot, sometimes

On Fri, 2022-09-23 at 17:20 +0200, Kamil Paral wrote: > On Fri, Sep 23, 2022 at 5:13 PM stan via test > wrote: > > I forgot to reply to this part of the message.  I have been running > > F37 > > since it was rawhide, and have never heard this beep.  But, I'm > > running > > a desktop, so that

Re: Removing 5.19 kernel; dnf wants to remove 501 other packages too. (Samuel Sieb)

On Sun, 2022-07-10 at 15:34 +, George R Goffe via test wrote: > Sam, > > Thanks for responding to this plea for help... It's appreciated. > > As expected, all kernel packages would have been successful... EXCEPT > for the kernel-headers package... 503 packages affected. Sigh. > yes , you

Re: dependency problems in rawhide as of 20220614

On Wed, 2022-06-15 at 08:50 -0700, stan via test wrote: > On Wed, 15 Jun 2022 08:12:57 -0700 > stan via test wrote: > > > On Tue, 14 Jun 2022 19:20:22 +0100 > > Sérgio Basto wrote: > > > > > On Tue, 2022-06-14 at 07:05 -0700, stan via test wrote:  &

Re: dependency problems in rawhide as of 20220614

On Tue, 2022-06-14 at 07:05 -0700, stan via test wrote: > There are a lot of dependency problems in rawhide after a large > update > a few days ago.  I'm attaching the list in case anyone is interested > in > pursuing them at this early date.  One, that seems to be with gdal- > libs, > is holding

Re: Problem: package lilv-0.24.12-4.fc37.x86_64 obsoletes lilv < 0.24.12-2 provided by lilv-0.24.12-1.fc36.i686

On Thu, 2022-04-14 at 22:54 +, Reon Beon via test wrote: > Fedora rawhide openh264 (From Cisco) - x86_64   1.7 > kB/s | 989  B 00:00    > Fedora - Rawhide - Developmental packages for the next Fedora r  27 > kB/s |  12 kB 00:00    > Fedora - Modular Rawhide -

Re: bug report https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2037703

have in some cases different sources. Best regards, On Wed, 2022-01-26 at 20:57 +, George R Goffe wrote: > > Sergio, > Thanks for the response. > I'll ask the VBox mailing list. > Regards, > George... > > On Wednesday, January 26, 2022, 02:45:13 AM PST, Sérgio Basto >

Re: bug report https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2037703

On Wed, 2022-01-26 at 00:09 +, George R Goffe via test wrote: > Hi, > > Could I get someone from this list to take a peek at the above named > bug report please? I'm STILL seeing this issue with the "latest" > Fedora upgrade. The extra text does NOT appear in the dmesg output. > > Could it

Re: kernel 5.12 test week: no 5.12.x kernel available on koji for F33

On Wed, 2021-05-12 at 21:23 +, Flo H wrote: > Hi, > usually I give a new kernel a test run during test week, however, I > just noted that this time there is no 5.12.x kernel available on koji > that was built for F33. > > What am I missing? As usual you can find builds for proper branch on

Re: A question about upgrading kernels, again

On Sun, 2021-05-09 at 03:55 -0400, Francisco Tissera wrote: > Hello everyone, > > > I know I have created a thred about this specific question, but I am > not > able to find it. Because of that, I created a new one, I apologize > for > the inconvenience. > > Someone, in the previous thred,

Re: post go upgrades (re)testing

On Wed, 2021-04-28 at 10:14 -0700, Kevin Fenzi wrote: > On Wed, Apr 28, 2021 at 10:47:39AM +0100, Sérgio Basto wrote: > > On Tue, 2021-04-27 at 11:39 -0700, Kevin Fenzi wrote: > > > Hey folks. > > > > > > I wonder if we couldn't add in some (re)testing of

Re: post go upgrades (re)testing

On Tue, 2021-04-27 at 11:39 -0700, Kevin Fenzi wrote: > Hey folks. > > I wonder if we couldn't add in some (re)testing of upgrades after a > release > is 'go' but before it's actually released. We hit at least two issues I > am aware of with f34 due to multilib. ;( > I'm asking this for years

Re: Reboot and poweroff commands not working in Rawhide

On Fri, 2020-08-28 at 12:58 +0100, Ifejika Somtochukwu Noble wrote: > Hi Everyone,Does anyone know why i experience this once in a while? > I am running Fedora Rawhide > > [noble@noblecontracts ~]$ su > Password: > [root@noblecontracts noble]# reboot > [root@noblecontracts noble]# poweroff >

Re: problems to run vboxconfig [VirtualBox-6.1-6.1.4_136177_fedora31-1.x86_64] under kernel 5.6.3-300.fc31.x86_64

On Fri, 2020-04-10 at 12:19 +0200, Joachim Backes wrote: > Hi , > > today I installed kernel-5.6.3-300.fc31.x86_64 (from Koji). It > runs, > but having the problem to get running vboxconfig (from > VirtualBox-6.1-6.1.4_136177_fedora31-1.x86_64): > > vboxdrv.sh: Stopping VirtualBox services. >

Re: F30 server boot.iso fails in rescue mode option 1

On Thu, 2019-06-13 at 02:28 +0100, Sérgio Basto wrote: > On Thu, 2019-06-13 at 02:18 +0100, Sérgio Basto wrote: > > Hi, > > Sorry email jumped but is not yet finished I have another test to > do. > After fix grub entries of grub , the bug is gone ... i.e. recuse works as

Re: how /etc/default/grub was generated on a clean install of F30 server with boot.iso

On Wed, 2019-06-12 at 22:31 -0600, Chris Murphy wrote: > On Wed, Jun 12, 2019 at 7:27 PM Sérgio Basto > wrote: > > Hi, > > The F30 server with boot.iso made a install of Fedora with > > partitions > > on xfs and we can't shrink it , So I had to dump and restore t

Re: F30 server boot.iso fails in rescue mode option 1

On Thu, 2019-06-13 at 02:18 +0100, Sérgio Basto wrote: > Hi, Sorry email jumped but is not yet finished I have another test to do. -- Sérgio M. B. ___ test mailing list -- test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to test

how /etc/default/grub was generated on a clean install of F30 server with boot.iso

Hi, The F30 server with boot.iso made a install of Fedora with partitions on xfs and we can't shrink it , So I had to dump and restore the content , and I changed disk geometry , for ext4 with 3 primary partitions (without LVM) . But /etc/default/grub have command line with something like

F30 server boot.iso fails in rescue mode option 1

Hi, -- Sérgio M. B. ___ test mailing list -- test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to test-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines:

Re: List of files in f31 repositories that fail to install.

via test wrote: > On Mon, 10 Jun 2019 02:20:50 +0100 > Sérgio Basto wrote: > > > On Sun, 2019-06-09 at 17:54 -0700, stan via test wrote: > > > I had occasion to install many packages from f31 today. The > > > large > > > majority of the

Re: List of files in f31 repositories that fail to install.

On Sun, 2019-06-09 at 17:54 -0700, stan via test wrote: > I had occasion to install many packages from f31 today. The large > majority of them installed successfully, but the packages in the > attached file didn't. There are 411 of them, which is few for as > many > packages as there are in

Re: Trying a upgrade from 29 to 30

On Wed, 2019-02-20 at 10:27 +0100, Fabio Valentini wrote: > I'd wait for at least a few days for things to settle down. Since the > branching finished only a few hours ago, there probably hasn't been > even an attempted compose for fedora 30. Until that happens, the > repositories for fedora 30

Re: Trying a upgrade from 29 to 30

https://dl.fedoraproject.org/pub/fedora/linux/development/30/ still empty , you need wait for a message with "Fedora 30 ... compose check report" On Wed, 2019-02-20 at 09:51 +0100, Ludovic Hirlimann wrote: > Hi all, > > > According to https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Releases/30/Schedule 30 >

Re: Are non-sse2 CPUs officially dead on F29?

On Wed, 2018-09-19 at 23:51 -0400, Felix Miata wrote: > Sérgio Basto composed on 2018-09-20 04:39 (UTC+0100): > > > On Wed, 2018-09-19 at 22:50 -0400, Felix Miata wrote: > > > Non-sse2 > > what is your non-sse2 [1] ? Pentium 3 (Produced > > from early 1999 to 20

Re: Are non-sse2 CPUs officially dead on F29?

On Wed, 2018-09-19 at 22:50 -0400, Felix Miata wrote: > Non-sse2 what is your non-sse2 [1] ? Pentium 3 (Produced from early 1999 to 2003) ? or pentium 2 ? In July of 2016 , we talked about enable or disable sse2 capabalities on i686 for x264 [2] On Tuesday, 26 July kwizart test it on KVM

Re: Rawhide groupinstall error

On Fri, 2018-07-27 at 11:33 +0100, Sérgio Basto wrote: > On Fri, 2018-07-27 at 10:27 +, Andre Robatino wrote: > > ValueError: no group 'hawaii-desktop' from environment 'basic- > > desktop-environment' Clarify : hawaii-desktop should be remove from comps.xml , I gue

Re: Rawhide groupinstall error

On Fri, 2018-07-27 at 10:27 +, Andre Robatino wrote: > ValueError: no group 'hawaii-desktop' from environment 'basic- > desktop-environment' Should be remove from comps.xml , I guess . Also the remaining packages of hawaii should be retired , I mention it in [1] my list of obsoleted

Re: f28 stale debuginfo repo?

On Mon, 2018-03-12 at 21:53 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote: > On Mon, 2018-03-12 at 22:44 -0600, Chris Murphy wrote: > > Hi, > > > > Last week doing 'coredumpctl gdb' or abrt-cli report, to get a > > local > > stack trace, asks for debuginfo and sometimes debugsource packages > > installed. But

i386 buildroot broken Re: Fedora Rawhide-20180309.n.0 compose check report

On Sun, 2018-03-11 at 04:10 +, Sérgio Basto wrote: > On Sun, 2018-03-11 at 03:56 +, Fedora compose checker wrote: > > > -- > > Mail generated by check-compose: > > https://pagure.io/fedora-qa/check-compose > > > Please check if secondary arches

Re: Fedora Rawhide-20180309.n.0 compose check report

On Sun, 2018-03-11 at 03:56 +, Fedora compose checker wrote: > -- > Mail generated by check-compose: > https://pagure.io/fedora-qa/check-compose Please check if secondary arches are updated [1] latest updates are from 2018-03-04 19:48 [1]

Re: VirtualBox-5.2-5.2.6_120293_fedora26-1.x86_64 won't install properly under kernel-4.14.15-300.fc27.x86_64

yes , vbox 5.2.6 won't build all modules ... you need patch the kmod vbox sources [1] Is on updates-testing of F27 RPMFusion, VirtualBox-5.2.6-2.fc27 https://rpmfusion.org/Howto/VirtualBox If you try it, you need uninstall oracle rpm sources and all files left in system ... (because don't

Re: DevedeNG F27

it is in RPMFusion 3rd party repos On Thu, 2017-11-16 at 01:46 -0500, Joerg Lechner wrote: > Hi, > > I didn't find DevedeNG for F27, is this App still in the development > phase? > > Kind regards > > ___ > test mailing list --

Re: high priority updates for samba need testing

On Wed, 2017-05-24 at 13:48 -0400, Matthew Miller wrote: > On Wed, May 24, 2017 at 09:20:19AM -0400, Matthew Miller wrote: > > Fixes CVE-2017-7494 — remote code execution from a writable share. > > > > F24: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2017-570c0071c4 > > F25:

Re: PSA: Fedora Easy Karma - remove ~/.fedora/openidbaseclient-sessions.cache when getting "You must provide a captcha_key" error

Hi, what does mean PSA ? On Thu, 2017-05-04 at 08:42 +0200, Till Maas wrote: > Hi, > > if fedora-easy-karma fails with an error message saying "You must > provide a captcha_key" it should help to remove the file > > ~/.fedora/openidbaseclient-sessions.cache > > This will also log you out

Re: gnome-software no notifications, but pending updates

On Sex, 2016-12-23 at 15:52 -0700, Chris Murphy wrote: > In gnome-shell if I go to restart (upper right corner, power button > icon) I have an 'install pending software updates' now for two days, > but there's no other notification that there are pending software > updates. > > Is this change in

[solved ?] samba browsing blocked even with the samba-client service enabled, works with connection/interface in 'trusted' zone

Hi,  Finally someone seems that found the mystery with firewalld, we need open on source port ! more details in [1], Adam can you make it happen for F25 ? also we need test it .  Thanks, [1]  https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1297235 -- Sérgio M. B.

Re: Trying to install the F24 version of VirtualBox-5.1-5.1.6 in F25

On Ter, 2016-10-11 at 15:46 +0200, Joachim Backes wrote: > On 10/11/16 14:48, Sérgio Basto wrote: > > > > On Ter, 2016-10-11 at 13:37 +0200, Joachim Backes wrote: > > > > > > On 10/11/16 11:47, Ian Kent wrote: > > > > > > > > >

Re: Trying to install the F24 version of VirtualBox-5.1-5.1.6 in F25

On Ter, 2016-10-11 at 13:37 +0200, Joachim Backes wrote: > On 10/11/16 11:47, Ian Kent wrote: > > > > On Tue, 2016-10-11 at 11:23 +0200, Sandro Mani wrote: > > > > > > > > > On 11.10.2016 11:15, Ian Kent wrote: > > > > > > > > On Tue, 2016-10-11 at 16:29 +0800, Ian Kent wrote: > > > > > > > >

Re: mplayer and vlc errors in F25 and rawhide (F26) after friday and saturday's updates

Hello ,  mplayer and vlc are rpmfusion packages therefore you should report it on rpmfusion-users  maliling list , not here .  Thanks On Seg, 2016-10-03 at 10:21 -0700, stan wrote: > Hi, > > I'm running F25.  On Friday, mplayer worked as expected.  I then >

Re: devedeng problem F24 -> could this also happen to F25 ?

On Qua, 2016-08-17 at 08:25 -0400, Joerg Lechner wrote: > Hi,  > after production of DVD iso out of MP4 file, F24 breaks down, no > shutdown, the screen is dark and the blue lamp, which signals the > system is on, is still on? The produced iso is complete and can be > burned successfully with

Re: devede beta1 nok

On Sex, 2016-07-22 at 23:47 -0400, Joerg Lechner wrote: > Hi, > not possible to run, the result of a "run trial" I had included, > after successful dnf update, where devede beta1 is in. Thank You for > Your advice, I will investigate a little bit and file a bug. After > downgrade the previous

Re: devede beta1 nok

On Sex, 2016-07-22 at 14:17 -0400, Joerg Lechner wrote: > Hi, > just saw in F23 - this might also be valid for the F23 followers: > > Aktualisiert: >   audit.x86_64 2.6.5- > 1.fc23  >   audit-libs.x86_64 2.6.5- > 1.fc23   

Re: Propose for onbaording session for new contributors

On Ter, 2016-06-28 at 09:17 -0600, Kevin Fenzi wrote: > Well, if you use https://meet.jit.si/ (Their hosted server) you > can use any web browser, it doesn't need any kind of dedicated > client. and can we have one private hosted server ?  -- Sérgio M. B. -- test mailing list

Re: Propose for onbaording session for new contributors

On Sex, 2016-06-24 at 10:12 +0800, Dev wrote: > I found opensource alternative -  https://jitsi.org I found 2 rpm spec to build it on Fedora : https://build.opensuse.org/package/view_file/home:zhonghuaren/jitsi/jit si.spec?expand=1

Re: systemd/sendmail problem - seeking help

On Qui, 2016-05-26 at 18:04 +0100, Sérgio Basto wrote: > On Qui, 2016-05-26 at 18:02 +0100, Sérgio Basto wrote: > > > > On Qui, 2016-05-26 at 09:06 -0600, Michal Jaegermann wrote: > > > > > > > > > On Thu, May 26, 2016

Re: systemd/sendmail problem - seeking help

On Qui, 2016-05-26 at 09:06 -0600, Michal Jaegermann wrote: > On Thu, May 26, 2016 at 10:26:57AM +0100, Timothy Murphy wrote: > ... > > > > and journalctl has the entry  > > "sendmail.service: PID file /run/sendmail.pid not readable (yet?)  > >   after start:  No such file or directory". > See

Re: systemd/sendmail problem - seeking help

On Qui, 2016-05-26 at 18:02 +0100, Sérgio Basto wrote: > On Qui, 2016-05-26 at 09:06 -0600, Michal Jaegermann wrote: > > > > On Thu, May 26, 2016 at 10:26:57AM +0100, Timothy Murphy wrote: > > ... > > > > > > > > > and journalctl has t

Re: Congratulations for F24β

subject fixed :-) On Qua, 2016-05-11 at 09:01 -0600, Peter G. wrote: > Sérgio Basto wrote: > > > > > yeah ß is not an β > > alt gr + s writes ß ( but this is not an beta ) > I never knew that there was a real beta character! es-zett is  > easy to type: jus

Re: Congratulations for F24ß

On Qua, 2016-05-11 at 14:41 -0400, Fred Smith wrote: > On Wed, May 11, 2016 at 07:26:41PM +0100, Sérgio Basto wrote: > > > > On Qua, 2016-05-11 at 09:13 -0700, Gordon Messmer wrote: > > > > > > On 05/11/2016 08:01 AM, Peter G. wrote: > > > > &g

Re: Congratulations for F24ß

On Qua, 2016-05-11 at 09:13 -0700, Gordon Messmer wrote: > On 05/11/2016 08:01 AM, Peter G. wrote: > > > > How do you type the Greek beta > > from the keyboard (I use US dead keys—always and exclusively)? > > One way is C-S-u 0 3 b 2 Space what you mean by C-S-u ? can't figure out  > Not

Re: Congratulations for F24ß

yeah ß is not an β   alt gr + s writes ß ( but this is not an beta )  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/%C3%9F#Graphically_similar_letters However, the reverse substitution of using German "ß" as a surrogate for Greek "β" once was common when describing beta test versions of application programs for

Re: why we don't have kernel updates on F24

On Ter, 2016-03-29 at 21:04 -0600, Chris Murphy wrote: > On Mon, Mar 28, 2016 at 10:12 PM, Adam Williamson > <adamw...@fedoraproject.org> wrote: > > > > On Mon, 2016-03-28 at 20:28 -0600, Chris Murphy wrote: > > > > > > On Mon, Mar 28, 2016 a

why we don't have kernel updates on F24

Hi,  kernel-4.5.0-0.rc7.git0.2.fc24 have almost 20 days  I see here : http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/packageinfo?packageID=8 many kernels updates for F24 , but none is in bodhi  https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/?packages=kernel Am I missing something ? Thanks, --  Sérgio M. B. --

Re: how to create grub rescue kernel entry?

On Sex, 2016-03-18 at 01:47 +, Andre Robatino wrote: > The F24 lives don't contain a rescue kernel or generate the > corresponding > grub entry (see https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1317709 > ). Is > there a way to install the rescue kernel if it was not done during > the > initial

Re: acroread

On Sex, 2015-10-09 at 03:02 -0400, Joerg Lechner wrote: > Hi, > My laptop is a 64-bit Acer. I installed via: > [root@linux joerg]# dnf install > http://linuxdownload.adobe.com/linux/i386/AdbeRdr9.5.5-1_i486linux_enu.rpm. > Acroread runs ok. dnf install

Re: problems with redhat bugzilla?

Hello, On Qua, 2015-09-30 at 14:41 +0200, Karel Volný wrote: > Hi, > > just FTR, what FTR means ? > > Bugzilla doesn't not accept weak password anymore . > > not exactly true, now I have weaker password than before Bugzilla forced me > to change it > > and by "weaker" I mean _really weak_

Re: dnf shows no F23 updates

On Ter, 2015-09-29 at 11:51 +0100, Ron Yorston wrote: > I installed the F23 beta last week when it first came out. There were > 483MB of updates on 23rd September. I didn't use it again until today. > I was expecting another bumper load of updates, GNOME 3.18 in particular. > > However, 'dnf

Re: problems with redhat bugzilla?

On Seg, 2015-09-28 at 13:30 +0200, Joachim Backes wrote: > On 28.09.2015 11:09, Joerg Lechner wrote: > > Hi, > > can not login to bugzilla, also the bug ID of a known bug is rejected. > > Currently problems there? > > Kind Regards > > > > Hi Joerg, > > I had problems too after RH BZ was updated

Re: The most recent kernel: Plague of Fives, and fatally inefficient networking

On Qui, 2015-09-24 at 15:27 -0400, Temlakos wrote: > Everyone: > > This morning I updated to the latest kernel. And promptly shut down > and rebooted the immediate previous kernel, which is the Last Known > Good. what kernel ? > > Here's why: > > 1. The kernel, once again, is prone to an

Re: dnf system-upgrade clean and dnf clean packages does not work

On Sex, 2015-09-11 at 14:25 +0200, Dario Lesca wrote: > Il giorno gio, 10/09/2015 alle 18.50 -0400, Donavan Lance ha scritto: > > using the new 'dnf system-upgrade' utility > > I have try this kind of update, but: > > > [root@dodo:~]# rpm -q dnf > > dnf-1.1.1-2.fc22.noarch > > [root@dodo:~]# dnf

Re: Virtualbox does not work with Kernel 4.2.x

On Sex, 2015-09-04 at 10:32 +0800, Ed Greshko wrote: > On 09/04/15 08:17, Aka Ídviare wrote: > > #Output /var/lib/dkms/vboxhost/4.2.32/build/make.log > > http://www.fpaste.org/263410/ > > You seem to be using a rather old version of Vbox at version 4.2.32. I > believe the latest 5.0.X versions

Re: how do i enable the updates-testing repo?

On Dom, 2015-07-26 at 06:04 -0400, Robert P. J. Day wrote: On Sun, 26 Jul 2015, Rares Aioanei wrote: Did you run 'dnf update' after enabling the repo? What does 'dnf repolist' say? i've run sudo dnf update a number of times, tells me Nothing to do. and: $ dnf repolist langpacks:

Re: how do i enable the updates-testing repo?

On Dom, 2015-07-26 at 09:09 -0500, Richard Shaw wrote: This may or may not have anything to do with your problem but it's one I ran into with dnf... I was trying to update a package I KNEW was in updates-testing (I pushed it myself) but when I asked dnf to update it it gave me the Nothing

Re: proper way to install skype 4.3 on fedora test?

Hi, On Qui, 2015-07-23 at 09:25 -0400, Robert P. J. Day wrote: (since i have my updates-testing repo enabled, this would seem to be the right place to ask this.) along with many others, i tried to install (actually, upgrade to) skype 4.3 on my 64-bit fedora laptop, went to the skype

Re: ivtv - firmware - v4l-cx2341x*.fw - Upstream Fedora

On Dom, 2015-06-21 at 23:47 +0200, poma wrote: Háu kola $ lspci -d :0016 -knn 01:08.0 Multimedia video controller [0400]: Internext Compression Inc iTVC16 (CX23416) Video Decoder [:0016] (rev 01) Subsystem: Hauppauge computer works Inc. WinTV PVR 150 [0070:8801]

Re: sizeof - w/ rpmbuild

On Sáb, 2015-06-20 at 04:10 +0200, poma wrote: On 20.06.2015 04:00, Josh Stone wrote: On 06/19/2015 06:47 PM, poma wrote: On 20.06.2015 03:30, Josh Stone wrote: On 06/19/2015 05:51 PM, Josh Stone wrote: On 06/19/2015 05:16 PM, poma wrote: This is exactly the opposite of the case with

Re: Virtualbox on FC22

On Sáb, 2015-05-09 at 23:30 +1000, Adrian wrote: Does anyone have Virtualbox working on FC22 ? yes now we got on rpmfusion : VirtualBox-4.3.26-3.fc22.x86_64.rpm * Mon May 04 2015 Sérgio Basto ser...@serjux.com - 4.3.26-3 - Added diff_smap_4.patch from https://www.virtualbox.org/ticket/13961

Re: Virtualbox on FC22

On Dom, 2015-05-10 at 00:43 +1000, Adrian wrote: Yes, Below is why I asked the question ; [root@fedora22desk ~]# /etc/init.d/vboxdrv setup bash: /etc/init.d/vboxdrv: No such file or directory [root@fedora22desk ~]# root@fedora22desk ~]# rpm -qi VirtualBox Name:

Re: Virtualbox on FC22

On Dom, 2015-05-10 at 01:27 +1000, Adrian wrote: On 10/05/15 00:49, Sérgio Basto wrote: On Dom, 2015-05-10 at 00:43 +1000, Adrian wrote: Yes, Below is why I asked the question ; [root@fedora22desk ~]# /etc/init.d/vboxdrv setup bash: /etc/init.d/vboxdrv: No such file

Re: How to know what broken dependencies in F22 with dnf

On Qui, 2015-05-07 at 12:23 +0200, poma wrote: On 06.05.2015 08:11, Frank Murphy wrote: On Wed, 06 May 2015 01:18:09 +0100 Sérgio Basto ser...@serjux.com wrote: with: yum update I got : Yum command has been deprecated, redirecting to '/usr/bin/dnf update' locate yum-dep man

Re: How to know what broken dependencies in F22 with dnf

On Qui, 2015-05-07 at 12:53 +0100, Sérgio Basto wrote: On Qui, 2015-05-07 at 12:23 +0200, poma wrote: On 06.05.2015 08:11, Frank Murphy wrote: On Wed, 06 May 2015 01:18:09 +0100 Sérgio Basto ser...@serjux.com wrote: with: yum update I got : Yum command has been deprecated

Re: How to know what broken dependencies in F22 with dnf

On Seg, 2015-05-04 at 22:21 +0200, poma wrote: On 04.05.2015 18:05, Sérgio Basto wrote: Hi, yum stops to work on F22 , first, at my point of view, just should be marked as obsolete on F23 , is a rule , one release to change the default , next release to obsolete it . Ha-ha. Yum

How to know what broken dependencies in F22 with dnf

Hi, yum stops to work on F22 , first, at my point of view, just should be marked as obsolete on F23 , is a rule , one release to change the default , next release to obsolete it . Now, I need to find out what broken dependencies do we have and where , and dnf doesn't show it. How I do it now ?

Re: vlc and f22

On Qui, 2015-04-23 at 08:26 -0600, Kevin Fenzi wrote: On Thu, 23 Apr 2015 15:12:48 +0300 Pavlo Rudyi paulcarr...@riseup.net wrote: On Thu, 2015-04-23 at 13:38 +0200, František Zatloukal wrote: I've rebuilt vlc and missing deps for Fedora 22 (64 bit only):

Re: F22 RC3 no rpmfusion

On Qua, 2015-03-11 at 10:49 +0100, Michael Schwendt wrote: Usually they don't branch in the same way as Fedora. They point their rawhide repos at Fedora Branched and ignore Fedora Rawhide for some months. Last they did that on 09-Dec-2014: $ md5sum rpmfusion-free-release-*

Re: VLC player F22 RC3

On Ter, 2015-03-10 at 08:41 -0400, Joerg Lechner wrote: Cannot find a valid baseurl for repo: rpmfusion-free/22/x86_64 [root@linux joerg]# Has anyone an idea? But possibly I have to wait for Beta only. RPMFusion doesn't have F22 branch because we are waiting for a new infrastructure , but I

Re: Heads up - Anaconda 22.17 will enforce 'good' passwords

On Qua, 2015-01-28 at 16:05 -0700, Chris Murphy wrote: On Wed, Jan 28, 2015 at 9:53 AM, Brian C. Lane b...@redhat.com wrote: I *know* this is going to be a bit of a pain to get used to. But the increased security is worth it. Super simple passwords will no longer be allowed, but it is

Re: Does anyone reuse /boot or /var partitions ?

On Qui, 2015-01-22 at 13:36 -0800, Adam Williamson wrote: There's a proposed anaconda patch ATM which would disallow mounting an existing partition as /boot or /var (or any subdirectory of those except /var/www ) without reformatting it. i.e., you can't reuse an existing partition with

Re: rpm database corrupted after fedeup from 20 to 21

On Tue, 12/23/14, Sérgio Basto ser...@serjux.com wrote: Subject: Re: rpm database corrupted after fedeup from 20 to 21 To: test@lists.fedoraproject.org Date: Tuesday, December 23, 2014, 9:45 PM On Ter, 2014-12-23 at 19:46 -0800, Mick

Re: rpm database corrupted after fedeup from 20 to 21

On Ter, 2014-12-23 at 19:46 -0800, Mick wrote: Hi Adam; thanks for trying. It made no difference. The message was: [root@localhost ~]# rpm --rebuilddb error: rpmdb: BDB0641 __db_meta_setup: /var/lib/rpm/Packages: unexpected file type or format error: cannot open Packages index

Re: netinst not part of release?

On Ter, 2014-12-16 at 19:13 -0800, Adam Williamson wrote: On Wed, 2014-12-17 at 09:31 +0800, Ed Greshko wrote: I just noticed that the Fedora-Server-netinst.iso appears not to be part of F21 release. I could not find it listed here http://torrents.fedoraproject.org/. I sometimes find

Re: In F21, Samsung ML-1740 laser printer doesn't work immediately, but does after installing splix

On Dom, 2014-12-07 at 02:15 +, Andre Robatino wrote: I have a Samsung ML-1740 laser printer which in F20 and below would work immediately after install, even though splix wasn't installed. I believe it was necessary for foomatic to be installed, and in one previous release it wasn't

Re: fedup f20-f21 kde broken deps

On Qua, 2014-12-03 at 10:45 -0500, Neal Becker wrote: Michael Schwendt wrote: On Wed, 03 Dec 2014 08:07:10 -0500, Neal Becker wrote: fedup gave me the following warnings: kde-runtime-libs-4.14.3-2.fc20.x86_64 requires exiv2- libs-0.23-5.fc20.x86_64,

Re: 2014-11-12 @ 1600 UTC ** Blocker Review Meeting Minutes

Hi, I'd like add https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1088619 as blocker to release 21 . Please read last comments #95 still #101 On Qua, 2014-11-12 at 11:26 -0700, Mike Ruckman wrote: == #fedora-blocker-review: F21-blocker-review

Re: fedup with sddm installed

On Qua, 2014-11-12 at 08:59 +0800, Ed Greshko wrote: I'm running an F20/KDE VM with sddm-0.10.0-2.fc20 installed from updates-testing. In trying to do a fedup --network 21 --product=nonproduct I get WARNING: potential problems with upgrade sddm-0.10.0-2.fc20.x86_64 (no

Re: can someone suggest why firefox is so $*^%*#^%* slow?

On Sáb, 2014-09-27 at 11:01 -0400, Chuck Anderson wrote: On Fri, Sep 26, 2014 at 07:36:19PM -0700, Adam Williamson wrote: On Wed, 2014-09-24 at 10:44 -0400, Robert P. J. Day wrote: i am at my wit's end with firefox on my fedora rawhide system -- to say it's nad-grindingly slow would be

Re: can someone suggest why firefox is so $*^%*#^%* slow?

On Qua, 2014-09-24 at 11:08 -0400, Robert P. J. Day wrote: On Wed, 24 Sep 2014, Nikos Roussos wrote: On September 24, 2014 5:44:40 PM EEST, Robert P. J. Day rpj...@crashcourse.ca wrote: watching any sort of youtube video is excruciating ... while audio is typically, i will

Re: Sound problems with skype in F21

On Qui, 2014-09-18 at 12:27 +0200, Joachim Backes wrote: Hello F21 testers, anybody runs skype-4.3.0.37-fc16.i586 in F21 with pulseaudio sound? On my box, skype does not produce any sound. Trying the same in F20 runs flawlessly (with sound and identical skype rpm). I have to test it but

Re: Best way to request a backport

On Ter, 2014-09-16 at 07:30 +0800, Ed Greshko wrote: Not strictly a test question but. I rebuilt NetworkManager-0.9.10.0-6.git20140704 from F21 for F20 and installed it. After 2 days I have not seen https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1059597. It normally crops up within 6

how upgrade Fedora 20 to 21

Hi, I have 2 machines that I use for tests , I'd like to update them from Fedora 20 to Fedora 21. Where is the boot.iso or dvd.iso for Fedora 21, fedup is supposed to work ? using yum how I tell to yum that rpmfusion rawhide is relversion 21 ? Thanks, -- Sérgio M. B. -- test mailing

Re: how upgrade Fedora 20 to 21

On Sex, 2014-08-01 at 12:14 +0100, Sérgio Basto wrote: Hi, I have 2 machines that I use for tests , I'd like to update them from Fedora 20 to Fedora 21. Where is the boot.iso or dvd.iso for Fedora 21, fedup is supposed to work ? using yum how I tell to yum that rpmfusion rawhide

  1   2   >