On Fri, 05 Dec 2014 11:23:12 -0600
Ian Pilcher wrote:
Am I crazy? Anyone else seen this? Expected behavior?
Yep. Happened to someone here at work with CentOS 7 I believe.
One of the many reasons I would never in a million years
use a shared /boot :-).
If I want to multi-boot, I use a stand
On Fri, 05 Dec 2014 16:14:01 -0600
Ian Pilcher wrote:
As I just posted in the bug, the one thing I still don't understand is
whether this is intentional (and if so, why) or a bug.
Yea, why should it ever rebuild any initramfs for any reason
if they are already there unless it has specific
On Fri, 05 Dec 2014 15:08:48 -0800
Adam Williamson wrote:
It's intentional. See the bug.
Yea, I saw the bug and that's what confused me :-).
The initramfs file already exists. What reason is there for
a mass rebuild? I didn't see anything in the bug that explained
that.
--
test mailing list
On Thu, 04 Dec 2014 13:21:49 -0600
Ian Pilcher wrote:
Short of major surgery (pulling the RAID drives, breaking the RAID,
etc.), can anyone think of a way to get F21 installed on this system?
Well, if it is strictly an anaconda problem, you could install
inside a virtual machine, then copy the
On Tue, 11 Nov 2014 13:16:09 -0500
Frank wrote:
I think I have UXA in my xorg.conf file already but I will check
after I reboot out of
Windows :)
Of course, on my fedora 20 system, I have to explicitly turn on SNA
because the default UXA was giving me video playback that looked like
it
On Tue, 04 Nov 2014 11:10:04 -0800
Adam Williamson wrote:
I thought I read that support for Maxwell (I think its maxwell :-) was in
the latest
nouveau and mesa. Is the latest not in f21? Is it a bug that it doesn't
work?
(I just get a black screen on my UHD monitor with display port
I just tried the f21 beta workstation live iso, and the poor old nouveau
driver apparently can't run this card:
01:00.0 VGA compatible controller: NVIDIA Corporation GM107 [GeForce GTX 750
Ti] (rev a2)
I thought I read that support for Maxwell (I think its maxwell :-) was in the
latest
nouveau
Yep. I installed F21 branched even before the alpha
was released on my desktop at work to check out the
support for my video card (which limps in f20 with
the random rawhide bits from rpmfusion I needed),
and it works fine as near as I can tell. No problems
that I've noticed when testing it and
On Sun, 14 Sep 2014 15:08:24 -0600
Chris Murphy wrote:
So I run each of those manually, interlaced with grub2-editenv list. Nothing
changes
Maybe you could arrange to make grubenv immutable and see when someone barfs
trying to write it?
--
test mailing list
test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To
On Wed, 10 Sep 2014 15:16:18 -0400
Gene Czarcinski wrote:
Personally, I do not use os-prober and prefer to create
/etc/grub.d/40_custom files which use configfile to chain-load other
configuration files.
Me too, which is why I really really wish I could tell anaconda
to create the grub2
On Wed, 27 Aug 2014 09:06:47 -0600
Kevin Fenzi wrote:
- systemd is stuck in a loop waiting for 4-5 items, such as devices
during shutdown or reboot - no patience to wait for more than two
minutes!
One of the issues I once ran into was the network going down
before the NFS filesystems
On Sun, 24 Aug 2014 12:23:55 -0500
Michael Catanzaro wrote:
We currently do not have any release criterion that applies to dual
booting with other Linux systems.
Certainly one thing that could simplify this is an option to go ahead
and install the grub rpms and configure the
I got a kernel update in my F21 Branched system recently,
and I just noticed that the default boot is still set
to the original kernel.
There is all kinds of cryptic gibberish in grub.cfg
dealing with the environment file and saved entries
so I can't even tell exactly where the heck the default
On Mon, 18 Aug 2014 14:28:45 -0500
Bruno Wolff III wrote:
If you were using a PAE kernel
So I guess on a 64bit system it is essentially meaningless :-).
--
test mailing list
test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
On Wed, 6 Aug 2014 07:55:55 -0400
Matthew Miller wrote:
consistent on the same machine for a given OS release,
_across any possible hardware changes_
Maybe, but I know I watched the interface names change
just because a new version of bisodevname was released
before biosdevname was engulphed
Out of curiosity I installed Fedora 21 Branched to see if
nouveau supported the GeForce GTX 750 Ti (GM107-A) video
card in 3840x2160 resolution on my Samsung U28D590 UHD
monitor.
It seems to load nouveau, but nouveau decides it doesn't
support this card (I guess), anyway it falls back on VESA,
On Tue, 5 Aug 2014 12:05:51 -0400
Tom Horsley wrote:
I guess I didn't have a lot of hope for the nouveau driver,
and this video card, but the dashes all over the screen seem
weird enough to mention on the list:-).
Perhaps even stranger, after rebooting a couple of times,
this stopped
Is anyone running an nvidia maxwell card with the nouveau
driver on the fedora 21 branch these days?
Poking around on the nouveau web site, I get the impression
that all the versions of mesa/drm/xorg/kernel are up to the
min level required for nouveau maxwell support.
I just wonder if it really
The p8z77-vle plus BIOS does not seem to have a problem with this keyboard.
I have the opposite problem with one of my systems.
About 60% of the time a USB keyboard can't get the
BIOS's attention, and I have to dig out an old ps/2
keyboard if I want to get into the BIOS.
Every once in a while
On Fri, 21 Jun 2013 04:22:39 -0400
Felix Miata wrote:
Furthermore, I require maximum installation time configurability. No live
media installer I've ever tried has offered anything remotely close to
meeting this requirement.
Well, Fedora 19 solves your problem then, since the full
installer
Is it my imagination, or is it taking fantastically longer
in f19 to do the rebuild rpms from delta phase of yum
update?
It also seems like there are always a half dozen or so
rpms that report deltas don't match and it has to download
the whole thing. (The update I just did had dbus-libs and
a
On Sat, 15 Jun 2013 14:57:18 -0400
Felix Miata wrote:
X forced DPI = 96 on displays natively 96 DPI causes a11y issues
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=974780
But you gotta be really careful :-). My Samsung TV I use as
a display reports itself as 7 inches (it is really 46). If
it
On Sat, 15 Jun 2013 12:51:09 -0700
Adam Williamson wrote:
You're drawing an erroneous conclusion from a sample of two displays. It
is not always the case that larger displays have a higher native DPI
than smaller displays.
So we just need to all chip in and buy the anaconda developers
one of
On Fri, 14 Jun 2013 05:24:18 -0400
Felix Miata wrote:
Its unintuitive logic has me pretty well baffled.
Me too. My preferred install technique these days is
to install into a nice new virtual machine where it
can't screw anything up, then guestmount and rsync
the virtual machine image to the
Here's an odd one. I just did a minimal install of
f19 TC3 from the netinst.iso.
When I finally go around to trying to boot it,
the normal kernel wouldn't boot. It would hang
right after a bunch of messages about cache mode
for all the disks.
The rescue image did boot fine, and after running
I just installed a bunch of updates on my Fedora 19 partition,
and now the new default kernel is Fedora 19 Rescue?
Is that really what was intended?
--
test mailing list
test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
On Fri, 14 Jun 2013 11:34:10 +1200
Gavin Flower wrote:
On the software selection spoke, you can select broad categories, but
you can't pick chose within those categories.
Yea, even on the old system, I just gave up. I install
minimal to get up and running as fast as possible, then
use yum to
On Tue, 11 Jun 2013 19:25:29 -0700
Adam Williamson wrote:
It is very useful if you want to be absolutely sure that a given disk
will not be used at all
But a option in the tree view to say Protect this disk from any
changes would work as well, and also give you the opportunity
to actually
On Wed, 12 Jun 2013 09:09:02 -0700
Adam Williamson wrote:
Actually, just calling it Next instead of Done would help a lot
to provide some hope that you might eventually get to select partitions
:-).
Like I said, that's exactly what it was labeled before, and people
didn't like that
On Mon, 10 Jun 2013 19:09:47 -0700
Adam Williamson wrote:
They will be left untouched until you click on the
main menu's Begin Installation button.
Yea, but then what happens? You still have no idea.
we tried two other layouts before this one and
people found both of those confusing too
On Mon, 10 Jun 2013 14:59:51 -0700
Samuel Sieb wrote:
Check the logs for selinux errors or boot with selinux in permissive
mode. You may need to relabel the filesystem.
Yep, it was definitely selinux. I couldn't check the logs though
because one of the services selinux prevented from
Anyone know if there are plans to provide an option to
anaconda so I can have it install all the needed files
in /boot, but don't screw with the MBR?
I have just setup a nice stand alone grub2 partition
where I can do stuff like this:
menuentry 'Fedora 19 via multiboot' {
insmod
On Tue, 11 Jun 2013 09:46:48 -0400
Felix Miata wrote:
I've been installing Fedora sans bootloader ever since Grub Legacy was
dropped from installation media.
But how? What option did I not see in the installer? It seems to
be determined to install grub2 and overwrite MBR with no way
to
There are funny systemd rsh files now, not an /etc/xinetd.d/rsh
script to edit, but it doesn't seem to be a real systemd
service either.
[Yes, yes, I know my hair will fall out and my teeth will
turn blue if I use an insecure service like rsh - I don't
care, OK?]
--
test mailing list
On Tue, 11 Jun 2013 11:16:27 -0400
Daniel J Walsh wrote:
Sounds like you had a labeling issue. No reason that SELinux should block
starting syslog, unless the system was mislabeled.
I'm sure I did - I installed gazillions of updates while
booted into f18 by chrooting into the f19 partition to
On Tue, 11 Jun 2013 10:57:55 -0400
Tom Horsley wrote:
There are funny systemd rsh files now, not an /etc/xinetd.d/rsh
script to edit, but it doesn't seem to be a real systemd
service either.
I finally found systemctl enable rsh.socket
But now it only appears to accept connections
On Tue, 11 Jun 2013 13:54:07 -0400
Tom Horsley wrote:
But now it only appears to accept connections on localhost
(and I don't really need a remote connection to localhost :-).
Finally figured it out - it was only listening on IPv6.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=973348
--
test
On Tue, 11 Jun 2013 13:53:36 -0400
Chris Murphy wrote:
The easier way to do this is to use one instance of GRUB 2 in the MBR gap,
and then use configfile to load the grub.cfg for each distribution. Each
distribution updates its respective grub.cfg when there are kernel updates,
while
On Sun, 09 Jun 2013 18:55:49 -0700
Adam Williamson wrote:
The way to achieve this, though, is to file a
bug report. Could you do that? Thanks.
Done:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=972670
--
test mailing list
test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe:
I just installed f19 beta, picking minimal install, which
does not install X - I just get a console login.
The apostrophe-like thing in Schrödinger's cat (which
prints in the login prompt) shows up as a white block
(I do get the 'o' with the two little dots above it though).
I also copied some
I just installed f19 beta, and it overwrote my MBR with
grub2ness (as expected).
But now I'm wondering - the actual installation of
f19 is entirely on /dev/sda2 (including the /boot
directory which is just a subdirectory of /, not
a separate partition).
My old f18 /dev/sda3 partition is the only
On Mon, 10 Jun 2013 17:46:21 +0300
Cristian Sava wrote:
Sometime back I had a similar problem and I discovered that my old grub
install (other partition) was used. Do you mind to check?
I don't have an actual problem. It is definitely using the
new install to boot from because it offers the
I had a working minimal install of f19.
I booted f18 on the same machine to get work done,
and in background installed a gazillion packages
while chrooted into the f19 partition.
Now when I try to boot f19, it tells me I have
an invalid password for every user I try to login
as :-(.
I tried
On Mon, 10 Jun 2013 14:59:51 -0700
Samuel Sieb wrote:
Check the logs for selinux errors or boot with selinux in permissive
mode. You may need to relabel the filesystem.
Good idea. I'll check that when I get back to work tomorrow.
I usually turn off selinux, but I don't think I did that yet.
...I'm still filled with trepidation when the only choice
I appear to have is to click Done after selecting a disk
to install on. I'm not Done :-). I want to pick partitions
to install on, etc, but there is absolutely no indication
you will have that chance unless you actually work up the
nerve to
I'm waiting for the installing boot loader step of a
net install of fedora 19 to finish (about 20 minutes
now).
Poking around in the various console screens, I see
that it is running the os-prober script during the
grub2 mkconfig.
In the syslog, I see it getting gazillions of errors
on device
I disabled NetworkManager, I enabled network, I copied in all my
/etc/sysconfig/network-scripts/ifcfg-* files, but I don't get
any networking on my fedora 19 install.
I've got this box connected to a dd-wrt router doing
tagged packets for vlan support, so the network setup
is a tad complex :-).
On Sat, 8 Jun 2013 10:39:09 -0400
Tom Horsley wrote:
Anyone know what might be missing that prevents this
stuff from working?
Finally found it: There was no /etc/sysconfig/network
file.
The ifup initscript pukes when it can't find that file.
I copied the one from fedora 18, and all my
On Sat, 8 Jun 2013 13:02:31 -0400
Tom Horsley wrote:
Finally found it: There was no /etc/sysconfig/network
file.
And I see there is a bugzilla for this as well (which
I couldn't find till I knew what the problem was :-).
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=972353
--
test mailing list
I haven't tried editing any grub entries in my f18 system, but
I did notice that f18 came with fancy gfx nonsense turned on.
I wonder if deleting all the gfx junk from the config file
and running grub with a plain old text console would allow
editing to work? (Just a random thought).
--
test
On Mon, 07 Jan 2013 10:51:30 +1100
Ankur Sinha wrote:
Evolution has crashed 6 times between my earlier mail and this one. It's
getting really difficult to use :(.
I gave up completely on evolution years ago. Switched to claws-mail and
never looked back.
--
test mailing list
On Wed, 26 Dec 2012 19:24:28 +0800
Ed Greshko wrote:
Did you notice that after doing that you get the following warning when
starting some applications from the command line?
Fontconfig warning: /etc/fonts/conf.d/50-user.conf, line 9: reading
configurations from ~/.fonts.conf is
On Wed, 26 Dec 2012 08:15:50 +0800
Ed Greshko wrote:
So, it seems F18 is pretty close to stable and good to go for release soon.
Rather than installing F17 I'm thinking I'll just go to F18 and go the
distro-sync route.
I just did a distro-sync this evening, and everything worked OK.
The
This bug: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=708525
was resolved for me when comment #4 described the incredibly
useful technique of linking the 10-autohint.conf file into
the /etc/fonts/conf.d/ directory.
On fedora 18, I found the .conf files had moved, but I
dug up the new location and
On Sat, 22 Dec 2012 09:48:24 -0500
Tom Horsley wrote:
What happened to the marvellous effect autohint used to
have? Is there something new I have to jigger to get it
turned on?
Answering my own question after a bit of comparison
between f18 and f17:
Not only did the autohint file move
I've been getting this yum error for a few days now:
-- Finished Dependency Resolution
Error: Package: 1:libguestfs-1.20.0-1.fc18.x86_64 (updates-testing)
Requires: selinux-policy = 3.11.1-63
Installed: selinux-policy-3.11.1-62.fc18.noarch (@updates-testing)
On Fri, 14 Dec 2012 00:26:01 -0800
Chuck Forsberg WA7KGX N2469R wrote:
This is \unfortunate\ as Lunix stopped being a
useful server when I tried ro revert to the old network as suggested by the
article.
Really? I've never found anything that works correctly under NM,
what server
On Fri, 14 Dec 2012 10:33:38 -0800
Chuck Forsberg WA7KGX N2469R wrote:
If NM with its doppleganger ModemManager isn't as good as network,
why is it in Fedora?
My best guess is because a bunch of guys who spend all their time
on laptops hopping from one Starbucks to another decided to
write a
On Thu, 13 Dec 2012 16:52:46 -0500
Felix Miata wrote:
Something should be done to get people to resize Windows Vista+ partitions in
advance using Windows' own resizer, leaving the installer to just use
freespace.
The trouble with that is that the Windows resizer is not very good.
I tried to
When the login screen comes up, I get a popup saying:
Failed login from my system at work
Anyone know where this comes from? I'd like to make it go away.
It is always going to be caused by my system at work attempting
to ssh into my system at home, and I haven't yet installed the
proper ssh
I came up with a way to install fedora 18 on my main system
without any worries that the cryptic partitioning interface
might wind up wiping out my system. I liked it so much I
may install fedora this way from now on. Here's my technique:
1. Install f18 in a brand new virtual machine.
2. Shutdown
It wasn't long ago that I had to change several program to
use libudev instead of libhal.
Now in fedora 18 it says there is no libudev?
What the heck is the flavor of the month now for querying
hardware and how much different is it than libudev?
--
test mailing list
test@lists.fedoraproject.org
In many many years of installing all kinds of linux distros,
I have never encountered a more baffling and cryptic screen
than the one I ran into when I made the attempt to install
Fedora 18 Beta from the DVD image:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=882542
This has got to be the result
On Tue, 22 May 2012 10:45:37 + (UTC)
Andre Robatino wrote:
Jonathan Dieter just did a Rawhide
build (yum-presto-0.8.0-1.fc18) that adds multicore support to yum-presto.
Actually, what would be even more useful is to start the building
of the rpms from the drpms as soon as the first drpm is
On Tue, 22 May 2012 11:49:18 + (UTC)
Andre Robatino wrote:
Actually, what would be even more useful is to start the building
of the rpms from the drpms as soon as the first drpm is fetched
instead of waiting till all of them are fetched before starting
the rebuilding.
Are you
On Mon, 21 May 2012 08:13:52 -0700
Adam Williamson wrote:
Well, um, yes. Bluetooth is a standardized protocol (really, set of
protocols), like USB.
You've never taken a look at the hid-quirks.c file in the kernel
have you? A gazillion lines of code to recognize all the USB
devices with known
On Sat, 05 May 2012 11:48:54 +0200
Joachim Backes wrote:
It seems the update of biosdevname to biosdevname-0.4.0-1.fc17.x86_64
was the culprit. After downgrading to biosdevname-0.3.11-6, the LAN
device was renamed to em1.
It sure is nice that the immutable constant name generator
seems to
On Thu, 03 May 2012 07:49:28 -0400
Jonathan Kamens wrote:
The developer in question is perfectly happy with the idea that by
remaining true to its vision, GIMP is going to drive away many users.
Just another example of the Vogon Effect...
On Tue, 01 May 2012 09:50:22 -0400
Jonathan Kamens wrote:
Does anybody have any thoughts?
My only thought is that firefox became popular mainly because
it wasn't a slow bloated mess, now it has evolved into a slow
bloated mess, and chrome is becoming popular because it isn't
a slow bloated mess
I'm running dovecot on Fedora 16. I seem unable to create new IMAP
subfolders from clients; and this is possibly associated with the most
recent dovecot update on F16.
Yes I also ran into the above issue when I lost my backups (HD failed)
and had to reinstall a workstation.
I'm
On Tue, 01 May 2012 13:03:18 -0500
John Morris wrote:
I depend on SMART being right
enough so I can usually yank a failing drive before it goes so bad the
worker can't login and use the machine.
Of course, it was the SMART firmware on my Crucial SSD drive
that made it break after 5184 hours
On Tue, 1 May 2012 14:11:15 -0400
Bill Nottingham wrote:
In my experience, extremely slow FF performance is usually due to
writing out either the assorted sqlite data files in the profile
directory, or the big javascript pile that is the session storage.
I've got one really weird slowdown I
On Tue, 01 May 2012 15:51:08 -0400
Adam Jackson wrote:
- xulrunner maybe shouldn't assert PRIMARY ownership in this case
That's the point for me: What on earth in the bookmarks
sidebar needs or wants the selection? And it is a super
long delay just in firefox.
I can run other apps that really
On fedora 16 if I type reboot in a terminal, there is a
7 second delay from when I hit enter to when shutdown messages
start scrolling on my screen (I have rhgb turned off).
On fedora 17 if I type reboot in a terminal, there is a
1 minute and 37 second delay between enter and shutdown
message
Anyone know what the heck is happening in those extra
90 seconds?
OK, I found an earlier thread about systemd hanging
on shutdown, and tried the experiment of doing
sudo service network stop
just before typing reboot, and fedora 17 then
rebooted in about the same 7 seconds as fedora 16.
I
On Mon, 30 Apr 2012 12:26:39 +0200
Karel Volný wrote:
I hope there doesn't exist one more step before like in previous
iteration, users were bad to us, so let's break some feature to
do harm to them :-)
I have yet another theory - what if it is deliberate sabotage
by people who would profit
On Mon, 30 Apr 2012 23:35:58 +0800
Ed Greshko wrote:
I look a all these changes related to GIMP, systemd, GNOME 3, KDE 4, grub2 as
challenges and an Alzheimer's avoidance strategy.
I sorta do too. That's one of the reasons I started my
Game Of Linux web pages :-).
On Sun, 22 Apr 2012 09:53:25 -0600 (MDT)
Bodhi Zazen wrote:
The default is to install grub2 to the MBR. It will detect you OS and allow
you to select which OS to boot. the grub2 os-prober is much better and, with
the complexity of configuring grub2, most people go with the defaults.
The os
On Sun, 22 Apr 2012 17:51:45 +0200
drago01 wrote:
yum install systemd-analyze and then systemd-analye blame should
tell you whom to blame.
It should, but it doesn't always. I'm not sure what counts
as blame in its eyes. A simpler technique is sometimes to
just turn off the kernel rhgb
On Sun, 22 Apr 2012 09:58:02 -0700 (PDT)
Antonio Olivares wrote:
Tom has worked it out, but I wonder if he has saved the changes in the
/etc/grub2/default file so that updates won't mess any of his changes?
That's the other beauty of a stand alone grub partition. I don't
do any updates to it
On Sun, 22 Apr 2012 22:32:48 +0100
Adam Williamson wrote:
Are you sure you're not just talking about
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=804835 ?
Sure. I'm just reading the writing on the wall :-).
They spew messages about it being fragile, they
require a --force option, there are old
I see in f17 that firewalld is the default and iptables and
ip6tables are not enabled by default.
So if I have an elaborate /etc/sysconfig/iptables file
that has grown over the years to do all sorts of complicated
stuff, how do I port it to firewalld?
Is firewalld nice enough to just go ahead
I've just spend most of an evening getting a stand alone
GRUB2 partition to work (if you can call it that) and
I consider myself lucky I managed that much :-).
Here's the fascinating fruit of my labors - a grub.cfg
that can multi boot fedora 16, fedora 17, and memtest:
set default=0
set
On Wed, 18 Apr 2012 01:46:54 -0700
Dan Mashal wrote:
Just use whatever the default options are for upgrading or replace
existing linux system with all default options for now,
That should do it.
I'm not upgrading. I'm installing from scratch in a different
partition.
--
test mailing list
That's still notabug, I think. See my comment. Even if it wasn't, the
fault isn't anaconda's.
Then the bug should be moved to grub2, because it sure is a bug.
--
test mailing list
test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
On Thu, 19 Apr 2012 00:05:42 +0100
Adam Williamson wrote:
If grub2 isn't designed to be chainloaded in that way, it isn't.
But it is supposed to work. I've already added a pointer to
an upstream bug fixed not too long ago where blocklist
booting was broken and the grub maintainers considered
On Tue, 17 Apr 2012 17:49:46 +0200 (CEST)
Adam Pribyl wrote:
The only reason I know is, that people tend to modify grub.cfg manually,
but with grub2 this is plain wrong anyway. Why do we support this messy
setup then?
Because the reverse is true - requiring a tool to modify grub.cfg
is
On Fri, 30 Mar 2012 17:31:58 -0600
Tim Flink wrote:
I think this has been discussed before, but the basic idea is to take
fedora-easy-karma and add more information to it so that karma-giving
isn't quite so intimidating and swapping back and forth between
bodhi, koji, yum and repoinfo
This bug casually mentions that an app (swell-foop) menu has
moved from the app itself to the gnome-shell panel:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=803430#c4
My reaction to this is What in the $#@! is going on?!?.
Is gnome 3 now being turned into ubuntu unity where
no apps have menu
On Thu, 22 Mar 2012 17:46:36 -0600
Jonathan Corbet wrote:
It turns out that the Emacs developers explicitly changed the default
behavior in this regard for the 24 release.
I sent in a yank enhancement once, but I don't know if anyone
ever actually picked it up. My version of yank pastes in
the
I don't think I need any of these things, but I have been trying
to get all the same rpms on my F17 alpha as I have on my F16
system, and these dependency errors have persisted for a while:
Loaded plugins: downloadonly, fastestmirror, langpacks, presto, refresh-
: packagekit
Loading
OK, what bugzilla component is used to report bugs about
missing packages in the DVD?
There is no bridge-utils installed from the DVD which
leaves you with a totally non-functional network when
you copy over your previously working ifcfg scripts
which define bridges.
Then, with a totally
On Sat, 03 Mar 2012 10:35:14 -0500 (EST)
Kamil Paral wrote:
OK, what bugzilla component is used to report bugs about
missing packages in the DVD?
That should probably be reported against distribution component.
Thanks. Bug filed:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=799625
--
test
I've just installed f17 alpha and they both just say
SYSFONT=True
That looks wrong. It should be a font name (such as
latarcyrheb-sun16, or whatever.
OK, I've submitted this bug:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=799401
Maybe more info will appear there.
--
test mailing list
In previous releases the /etc/sysconfig/i18n file and the
SYSFONT boot parameter named a console font.
I've just installed f17 alpha and they both just say
SYSFONT=True
So what magic do I need to do to make it use the
latarcyrheb-sun32 font that is finally included
in the kbd package?
--
test
Just submitted this bug:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=798823
The installer kernel never gets through the boot when
I try to do an install from hard disk (haven't tried
writing a DVD to see if the DVD will work).
--
test mailing list
test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe:
Yesterday we were trying to figure out why no prices show up
on newegg.com on a friend's rhel 6 system when visiting it
with firefox. The only google results I found was someone with
the same problem when he disabled javascript (but javascript
was not disabled).
Today I tried it on my fedora 16
On Thu, 3 Nov 2011 08:12:43 -0400
Scott Robbins wrote:
On Thu, Nov 03, 2011 at 08:03:25AM -0400, Tom Horsley wrote:
Yesterday we were trying to figure out why no prices show up
on newegg.com on a friend's rhel 6 system when visiting it
with firefox. The only google results I found
On Thu, 03 Nov 2011 05:44:44 -0700
Adam Williamson wrote:
It works here, and I'm even using noscript (though I've allowed
newegg)...
Weird. If only we could figure out what is different :-).
In any case, since I got confirmation that at least one
other person sees the bug, I added a bugzilla
On Thu, 03 Nov 2011 13:25:21 -0400
Felix Miata wrote:
1-IPV6 vs IPV4
Bingo! You are a genius! I had ipv6 disabled in my fedora 15
about:config in firefox, on fedora 16 I had the default enabled
setting. When I disable it on f16, I can see the prices again.
Apparently it can't lookup the IP for
1 - 100 of 207 matches
Mail list logo
