On Thu, 6 Dec 2012, Matthew Miller wrote:
On Wed, Dec 05, 2012 at 09:39:41PM -0800, Adam Williamson wrote:
I think that may be the case _now_ with our current Anaconda situation, but
the more I think about it, the more strongly I feel about making this the
approach for future releases. When
On Sun, 11 Nov 2012, drago01 wrote:
On Sat, Nov 10, 2012 at 4:42 PM, John Reiser jrei...@bitwagon.com wrote:
I noticed the post install processing in f16 lasted only
a few seconds, not the seemingly interminable wait
a Fedora 18 install takes.
If you have many partitions, then the grub2
On Wed, 2011-08-31 at 17:15 -0600, Jonathan Corbet wrote:
On Wed, 31 Aug 2011 16:03:44 -0700
Adam Williamson awill...@redhat.com wrote:
it would probably help to know what *was* in the update set.
OK, from yum.log:
while in this case yum.log is fine. I would like to encourage you to
On Thu, 2011-08-25 at 15:15 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
yum --setopt=protected_multilib=0 blah blah blah
which might help in situations where things are already deeply sideways.
worth noting for the record that, as always when using 'force' type
parameters to a package management
On Thu, 2011-08-25 at 11:12 -0600, Jonathan Corbet wrote:
On Wed, 24 Aug 2011 11:08:52 -0400
Matthias Clasen mcla...@redhat.com wrote:
Error: Protected multilib versions:
gnome-panel-libs-3.1.5-2.fc16.x86_64 !=
gnome-panel-libs-3.0.2-3.fc16.i686
I have no idea what these
On Thu, 2011-08-25 at 14:28 -0400, Dave Jones wrote:
On Thu, Aug 25, 2011 at 02:20:12PM -0400, seth vidal wrote:
Dunno if that helps anybody... never a dull moment...
When upgrading rawhide from X - use screen.
and also when upgrading from ssh.
things have definitely gotten
On Wed, 2011-08-24 at 06:40 +, JB wrote:
Hi,
could you please interpret what is happening here - why the downgrades ?
$ cat /etc/fedora-release
Fedora release 16 (Verne)
$ yum repolist enabled
...
repo id repo name status
On Wed, 2011-08-24 at 09:24 -0400, seth vidal wrote:
On Wed, 2011-08-24 at 06:40 +, JB wrote:
Hi,
could you please interpret what is happening here - why the downgrades ?
$ cat /etc/fedora-release
Fedora release 16 (Verne)
$ yum repolist enabled
...
repo id
On Wed, 2011-08-24 at 13:09 -0400, Tom Horsley wrote:
On Wed, 24 Aug 2011 17:26:44 +0100
Richard Hughes wrote:
I'm seriously wondering if multilib is worth all this hassle...
Oh I've never wondered that: It has clearly never been a good
idea. Starting with the total lack of documentation
On Fri, 2011-06-10 at 12:06 -0400, Mathieu Bouffard wrote:
On 06/10/2011 11:08 AM, Nick Jacek wrote:
My name is Nick Jacek. This summer I'm an intern at Red Hat, where I'll be
working on yum.
Congrats and welcome. :P
Will you be working on the yum bacon command per chance?
Mathieu,
I'm
On Tue, 2011-05-31 at 08:56 -0500, Jason D. Clinton wrote:
On Tue, May 31, 2011 at 01:45, Pasha R pashar...@gmail.com wrote:
Care to explain the logic behind this? Because it is really beyond my
understanding.
No, I don't. Your attitude is too antagonistic.
I don't think there is
On Wed, 2011-04-20 at 14:35 -0500, Michael Cronenworth wrote:
upda...@fedoraproject.org wrote:
cobbler-2.0.11-1.fc14 (FEDORA-2011-5680)
Boot server configurator
On Wed, 2011-04-20 at 14:43 -0500, Michael Cronenworth wrote:
seth vidal wrote:
wasteful to what?
When I create updates in the future should I make them hundreds of lines
long like I'm in detention at school, too? I don't like resulting to
sarcasm, but I don't see how you see
On Sat, 2011-02-12 at 22:34 +0100, Adam Pribyl wrote:
On Fri, 11 Feb 2011, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
Absolutely. Please do improve the page. ;)
Done.
IMHO there are three problems:
1. keys needs to be imported per distro version
2. yum clean all can not be followed by yum update yum
On Sun, 2011-01-09 at 21:59 +, Adam Williamson wrote:
On Sun, 2011-01-09 at 21:03 +, Andre Robatino wrote:
When running yum --skip-broken update and getting this message (currently
in
Rawhide), should it always be considered a bug and reported?
Depends what you mean. If you mean
On Wed, 2011-01-05 at 16:54 -0700, Michal Jaegermann wrote:
On Wed, Jan 05, 2011 at 05:09:30PM -0600, Dennis Gilmore wrote:
On Wednesday, January 05, 2011 04:32:02 pm Michal Jaegermann wrote:
This is from a changelog of yum-3.2.28-16.fc15:
* Tue Jan 04 2011 Seth Vidal skvidal
On Sun, 2010-10-31 at 19:26 +, Richard Hughes wrote:
On 30 October 2010 19:48, Paul Frields sticks...@gmail.com wrote:
*
https://fedorahosted.org/preupgrade/changeset?new=data%40d42e6189dbe4ad7591d422f200a31ad196125dccold=data%404157e81ce428be819a957a31be5a19bcc6bd2efe
Shouldn't
On Mon, 2010-11-01 at 11:21 -0400, James Laska wrote:
On Mon, 2010-11-01 at 11:11 -0400, seth vidal wrote:
On Sun, 2010-10-31 at 19:26 +, Richard Hughes wrote:
On 30 October 2010 19:48, Paul Frields sticks...@gmail.com wrote:
*
https://fedorahosted.org/preupgrade/changeset?new
On Fri, 2010-10-01 at 14:22 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
On Thu, 2010-09-30 at 14:15 -0500, John Watzke wrote:
Actually I misspoke it's gtk2 that was changed not glib2. So I
wonder if this is glib2 related at all since these packages fix the
problem.
are you sure you didn't also
On Wed, 2010-09-22 at 16:38 +0200, Joachim Backes wrote:
I runned because of curiosity reasons the command
yum distro-sync,
and this command downgraded the installed pidgin.i686 0:2.7.3-1.fc14 and
libpurple.i686 0:2.7.3-1.fc14 to
pidgin.i686 0:2.7.2-1.fc14 and libpurple.i686
On Wed, 2010-09-15 at 09:28 +0200, Joachim Backes wrote:
On 09/15/2010 08:04 AM, Steven Haigh wrote:
What plugins do you have installed? I only get:
# pwd
/var/lib/yum
# du -hs *
1.2Mhistory
0 rpmdb-indexes
4.0Kuuid
9.0Myumdb
Hi Steven,
cd
On Mon, 2010-09-20 at 09:53 -0400, Tom Horsley wrote:
In the yum.log I see the time on modprobe.conf occurs
in a gap in the yum updates:
Aug 25 19:37:56 Updated: xorg-x11-drv-aiptek-1.3.1-1.fc14.x86_64
Aug 25 20:02:56 Updated: libgcc-4.5.1-1.fc14.x86_64
The fix for
On Mon, 2010-09-20 at 16:22 +0200, Joachim Backes wrote:
On 09/20/2010 03:16 PM, seth vidal wrote:
On Wed, 2010-09-15 at 09:28 +0200, Joachim Backes wrote:
On 09/15/2010 08:04 AM, Steven Haigh wrote:
What plugins do you have installed? I only get:
# pwd
/var/lib/yum
# du -hs
On Mon, 2010-09-20 at 15:45 +0100, Frank Murphy wrote:
On 20/09/10 14:16, seth vidal wrote:
repomanage -o /var/lib/yum/plugins/local | xargs rm -f
Could this be added as a start up script?
in /etc/rc.local
shrug up to you, but there's no reason it couldn't be.
-sv
--
test mailing list
On Thu, 2010-09-16 at 10:24 -0400, Genes MailLists wrote:
On 09/16/2010 09:48 AM, Michael Schwendt wrote:
So, you should not have installed nss-tools.i686 manually.
Ah - but yum update did not work without installing it. I imagine when
I added the i686 libs - I did not do it right ...
On Wed, 2010-09-08 at 23:18 -0500, John Morris wrote:
Sorry everyone, time to vent.
Bah. This is why I just blocked kernel updates in the first place.
Tried updating now things are worse due to a bad combination of
Fedora policy multiplied by my own stupidity. I KNEW you were supposed
On Mon, 2010-08-02 at 09:44 +0100, Frank Murphy wrote:
XFCE
Although Yum updated to F14-Br, it stayed with py2.6
Had to use rpm\yum\apt to get a full working py2.7 system.
If enough interest I cut put it up somewhere.
I'm curious what the process looked like that required the use of rpm
On Thu, 2010-06-24 at 08:05 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
On Thu, 2010-06-24 at 09:48 -0400, Adam Jackson wrote:
I'd really rather not, it's still necessary in quite a lot of cases. My
laptop, fr'instance, where intel or nouveau (or both, depending which
graphics adapter you select)
28 matches
Mail list logo
