On Tue, 2013-01-22 at 19:30 -0800, Adam Williamson wrote:
The 'new style' tracker bug aliases are as follows:
AlphaBlocker
AlphaFreezeException
BetaBlocker
BetaFreezeException
FinalBlocker
FinalFreezeException
Versioned aliases will still be applied to all the tracker bugs, so that
we
There was a very solid consensus that the old scheme sucked and the
final form of the new proposal was miles better, and this is not the
first time the topic has come up (there are various proposals in the
list archives). So I decided to go ahead and Just Do It, putting the
proposal into
Hey folks!
At FUDCon Lawrence, Tim Flink presented on the Fedora blocker bug and
'NTH' processes, and we got some interesting and useful feedback. People
felt that the 'nice to have' / 'accepted' name used in that process was
confusing and difficult to understand, and that the aliases used for
On Tue, 2013-01-22 at 19:30 -0800, Adam Williamson wrote:
I can think of a couple of potential issues with the 'dynamic' tracker
names (I'm not sure whether nominations will 'transfer' from one release
to the next when we change where the alias points, and if so, whether we
want that,
On Tue, Jan 22, 2013 at 19:30:25 -0800,
Adam Williamson awill...@redhat.com wrote:
There was a very solid consensus that the old scheme sucked and the
final form of the new proposal was miles better, and this is not the
first time the topic has come up (there are various proposals in the
list
Thanks and support+1:).
- Original Message -
From: Adam Williamson awill...@redhat.com
To: test@lists.fedoraproject.org, de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Sent: Tuesday, January 22, 2013 10:30:25 PM
Subject: 'Nice to have' process is now 'Freeze exception' process,
improvements to
