It seems to me that in going from single-day testing
to a multiday test season, one has produced a situation
in which the date specifies more than desired.
One possibility is to produce a page named in accordance
with what is being done, rather than when it is done.
Once the date has settled,
a pa
On Mon, 2023-03-06 at 19:33 +0100, Kamil Paral wrote:
>
> On Thu, Mar 2, 2023 at 6:00 PM Adam Williamson
> wrote:
>
> > The wikitcms parser relies on the -MM-DD part of the title,
> > so if we change this I would have to rewrite the parser to handle two
> > different types of test day page,
On Fri, Mar 3, 2023 at 2:28 AM Sumantro Mukherjee
wrote:
> So, I am thinking when the
> test day/week are over. How about then we add the date and pass it through
> the testdays CLI tool.
>
This would be a solution if we don't want to adjust our tooling. The wiki
pages can be created like "TestD
For the record, it was me who nudged Sumantro to send this proposal. It's
my understanding that having the date in the title discourages Sumantro (or
anyone handling it) from creating the wiki page too soon, before the page
is really settled. It makes sense, because any date change (and sometimes
t
On Fri, 2023-03-03 at 06:57 +0530, Sumantro Mukherjee wrote:
> Replying inline
>
>
> On Thu, Mar 2, 2023 at 10:30 PM Adam Williamson
> wrote:
>
> > On Thu, 2023-03-02 at 15:43 +, Ahmed Almeleh wrote:
> > > +1 for the new release + milestone suggestion and dropping the date on
> > test
> > >
Replying inline
On Thu, Mar 2, 2023 at 10:30 PM Adam Williamson
wrote:
> On Thu, 2023-03-02 at 15:43 +, Ahmed Almeleh wrote:
> > +1 for the new release + milestone suggestion and dropping the date on
> test
> > pages
> >
> > On Thu, 2 Mar 2023 at 15:13, Ben Cotton wrote:
> >
> > > I don't
On Thu, 2023-03-02 at 15:43 +, Ahmed Almeleh wrote:
> +1 for the new release + milestone suggestion and dropping the date on test
> pages
>
> On Thu, 2 Mar 2023 at 15:13, Ben Cotton wrote:
>
> > I don't see that including the date in the title adds much value,
> > particularly since it creat
+1 for the new release + milestone suggestion and dropping the date on test
pages
On Thu, 2 Mar 2023 at 15:13, Ben Cotton wrote:
> I don't see that including the date in the title adds much value,
> particularly since it creates the potential for confusion. Using the
> release (e.g. 'F38') or re
I don't see that including the date in the title adds much value,
particularly since it creates the potential for confusion. Using the
release (e.g. 'F38') or release+milestone when there are multiple in a
cycle (e.g. "F38beta") provides uniqueness in a way that's much easier
to manage.
I'm in fav
Hey Folks!
In the recent past, I have experienced multiple such scenarios where
the creation of the test day pages well in advance could have saved us
some time and helped a long way with planning. The test day planning
is already done with a short fuse; meaning from the day the maintainer
wants a
10 matches
Mail list logo
