On Sat, Jan 09, 2016 at 07:45:43PM -, Andre Robatino wrote:
> I think you're looking at the wrong time period. libpng-1.6.19-1.fc23
> went to stable on 2015-11-23 (see
> https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2015-9199a1bfe1 ). At
> this time, 1.6.17-3 had already been pushed to
> Sorry on the qemu front, but I was under the impression that bodhi handles
> obsoleting old updates when a new version is submitted. Am I wrong, or is
> something busted on the bodhi side?
See the bug. The downgrades happened when old updates were submitted for
stable, either by the packager
On Sat, 09 Jan 2016 18:54:29 -
"Andre Robatino" wrote:
> I don't see which of those apply for any of the three packages in the
> bug. Are you sure you're not talking about the old bodhi? --
Wed Nov 18 02:23:16 2015: libpng-1.6.17-3.fc23 tagged into
I don't see which of those apply for any of the three packages in the bug. Are
you sure you're not talking about the old bodhi?
--
test mailing list
test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe:
http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/test@lists.fedoraproject.org
I think you're looking at the wrong time period. libpng-1.6.19-1.fc23 went to
stable on 2015-11-23 (see
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2015-9199a1bfe1 ). At this time,
1.6.17-3 had already been pushed to testing and was just sitting there. Then it
was submitted for stable on
On 01/09/2016 01:15 AM, Andre Robatino wrote:
> The stable versions of qemu, libpng, and just now bzip2 have been downgraded
> in F23 (although qemu has been fixed). See
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1292914 . It would be a good
> idea for packagers to keep track of what the latest
On Sat, 09 Jan 2016 16:51:15 -
"Andre Robatino" wrote:
> > Sorry on the qemu front, but I was under the impression that bodhi
> > handles obsoleting old updates when a new version is submitted. Am
> > I wrong, or is something busted on the bodhi side?
It does,
On Sat, 09 Jan 2016 19:45:43 -
"Andre Robatino" wrote:
> I think you're looking at the wrong time period.
I don't think so, but it's possible. :)
> libpng-1.6.19-1.fc23
> went to stable on 2015-11-23 (see
>
The stable versions of qemu, libpng, and just now bzip2 have been downgraded
in F23 (although qemu has been fixed). See
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1292914 . It would be a good
idea for packagers to keep track of what the latest stable version of their
package is, and not submit