On Mon, Oct 23, 2017 at 12:00 AM, Ankur Sinha
wrote:
> On Thu, 2017-10-19 at 20:24 +0200, Till Maas wrote:
> > Unfortunately, yes, it needs to be changed in the script at the
> > moment.
> > I am currently considering options to fix this so the next update
> > will
> >
On Thu, 2017-10-19 at 20:24 +0200, Till Maas wrote:
> Unfortunately, yes, it needs to be changed in the script at the
> moment.
> I am currently considering options to fix this so the next update
> will
> not require this manual change anymore.
Ah, that's great! Thanks, Till.
I'll keep an eye
On Thu, Oct 19, 2017 at 12:00:51PM +0100, Ankur Sinha wrote:
> On Fri, 2017-10-13 at 12:06 +0200, Till Maas wrote:
> > in case you encounter problems with messages containing " Max retries
> > exceeded with url:" it might help to reduce the number of updates f-
> > e-k
> > requests, for example
On Fri, 2017-10-13 at 12:06 +0200, Till Maas wrote:
> Hi,
Hi Till,
>
> in case you encounter problems with messages containing " Max retries
> exceeded with url:" it might help to reduce the number of updates f-
> e-k
> requests, for example to 100. For this you need to change
>
> "limit":
Hi,
in case you encounter problems with messages containing " Max retries
exceeded with url:" it might help to reduce the number of updates f-e-k
requests, for example to 100. For this you need to change
"limit": 1000
to
"limit": 100
Kind Regards
Till