Re: Is the rawhide repo broken?

2018-10-05 Thread Adam Williamson
On Fri, 2018-10-05 at 21:24 +, George R Goffe wrote: > Hi, > > I'm starting to see these messages from dnf on my fc30 x86_64 system. Is the > repo broken or are these bugs? https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1616118 -- Adam Williamson Fedora QA Community Monkey IRC: adamw |

Is the rawhide repo broken?

2018-10-05 Thread George R Goffe
Hi, I'm starting to see these messages from dnf on my fc30 x86_64 system. Is the repo broken or are these bugs? Thanks, George... /usr/bin/dnf --best --refresh --skip-broken upgrade Fedora - Modular Rawhide - Developmental packages for the next Fedora release

Re: Is the 28 rawhide repo broken?

2018-02-15 Thread Adam Williamson
On Thu, 2018-02-15 at 12:58 -0600, Bruno Wolff III wrote: > On Thu, Feb 15, 2018 at 18:54:43 +, > George R Goffe wrote: > > Hi, > > I haven't seen updates from the rawhide repo in over a week. Is it that the > > "freeipa" situation clogging things up? > > Thanks, > >

Re: Is the 28 rawhide repo broken?

2018-02-15 Thread stan
On Thu, 15 Feb 2018 18:54:43 + (UTC) George R Goffe wrote: > Hi, > I haven't seen updates from the rawhide repo in over a week. Is it > that the "freeipa" situation clogging things up? Thanks, > George... I think this is due to the mass rebuild, and some changes to

Re: Is the 28 rawhide repo broken?

2018-02-15 Thread Bruno Wolff III
On Thu, Feb 15, 2018 at 18:54:43 +, George R Goffe wrote: Hi, I haven't seen updates from the rawhide repo in over a week. Is it that the "freeipa" situation clogging things up? Thanks, George... There hasn't been a fully successful compose since the 4th. The

Is the 28 rawhide repo broken?

2018-02-15 Thread George R Goffe
Hi, I haven't seen updates from the rawhide repo in over a week. Is it that the "freeipa" situation clogging things up? Thanks, George... This is what I see pending for my system: Available Upgrades emacs-auctex.noarch    12.1-1.fc28   rawhide

Is the Rawhide repo broken?

2017-12-11 Thread George R Goffe
Hi, I haven't gotten any updates for several days from the Rawhide Repo... Is it broken? Thanks, George... ___ test mailing list -- test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to test-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: Is the rawhide repo broken?

2017-07-31 Thread Peter Robinson
On Mon, Jul 31, 2017 at 6:44 PM, Adam Williamson wrote: > On Mon, 2017-07-31 at 09:16 +0100, Peter Robinson wrote: >> On Sun, Jul 30, 2017 at 4:03 PM, Matthew Miller >> wrote: >> > On Sun, Jul 30, 2017 at 05:00:02AM +, George R Goffe

Re: Is the rawhide repo broken?

2017-07-31 Thread Adam Williamson
On Mon, 2017-07-31 at 09:16 +0100, Peter Robinson wrote: > On Sun, Jul 30, 2017 at 4:03 PM, Matthew Miller > wrote: > > On Sun, Jul 30, 2017 at 05:00:02AM +, George R Goffe wrote: > > > Any other ideas? Just wait for whomever to fix the packaging > > > problems? I

Re: Is the rawhide repo broken?

2017-07-31 Thread Peter Robinson
On Sun, Jul 30, 2017 at 4:03 PM, Matthew Miller wrote: > On Sun, Jul 30, 2017 at 05:00:02AM +, George R Goffe wrote: >> Any other ideas? Just wait for whomever to fix the packaging >> problems? I could write a bug if you think that might be a good thing >> to do. > >

Re: Is the rawhide repo broken?

2017-07-30 Thread Kevin Fenzi
On 07/29/2017 06:44 AM, George R Goffe wrote: > Hi, > > I am trying to keep my Fedora 27 (Rawhide) system up to date by running "dnf > upgrade" at least daily. For the past week I have seen a list of packages > with broken dependencies. 165 in number. dnf --best reports 118 or so > "problems".

Re: Is the rawhide repo broken?

2017-07-30 Thread Matthew Miller
On Sun, Jul 30, 2017 at 05:00:02AM +, George R Goffe wrote: > Any other ideas? Just wait for whomever to fix the packaging > problems? I could write a bug if you think that might be a good thing > to do. We're in the middle of doing a mass rebuild, and it's not surprising that rawhide is

Re: Is the rawhide repo broken?

2017-07-30 Thread Russel Winder
On Sun, 2017-07-30 at 05:00 +, George R Goffe wrote: > Russel, > > Thanks for your response. > > Removing python3-docs did not appear to change the problem. I am surprised you didn't get some change since a number of Fedora system packages depend on the python3 version. > Any other ideas?

Is the rawhide repo broken?

2017-07-29 Thread George R Goffe
(UTC) From: George R Goffe <grgo...@yahoo.com> Subject: Is the rawhide repo broken? To: "test@lists.fedoraproject.org" <test@lists.fedoraproject.org> Message-ID: <1117066636.2047108.1501335863...@mail.yahoo.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Hi, I am

Re: Is the rawhide repo broken?

2017-07-29 Thread Russel Winder
Hi, I believe there is currently a problem between Boost and LibreOffice staopping quite a few upgrades but not 165/118, far fewer than that. I found though I had to remove python3-docs as that package has not been updated where all the other python3-* packages appear to have been. On Sat,

Is the rawhide repo broken?

2017-07-29 Thread George R Goffe
Hi, I am trying to keep my Fedora 27 (Rawhide) system up to date by running "dnf upgrade" at least daily. For the past week I have seen a list of packages with broken dependencies. 165 in number. dnf --best reports 118 or so "problems". I'm not sure what to do about this. Could someone give me