On Fri, 2018-10-05 at 21:24 +, George R Goffe wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm starting to see these messages from dnf on my fc30 x86_64 system. Is the
> repo broken or are these bugs?
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1616118
--
Adam Williamson
Fedora QA Community Monkey
IRC: adamw |
Hi,
I'm starting to see these messages from dnf on my fc30 x86_64 system. Is the
repo broken or are these bugs?
Thanks,
George...
/usr/bin/dnf --best --refresh --skip-broken upgrade
Fedora - Modular Rawhide - Developmental packages for the next Fedora release
On Thu, 2018-02-15 at 12:58 -0600, Bruno Wolff III wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 15, 2018 at 18:54:43 +,
> George R Goffe wrote:
> > Hi,
> > I haven't seen updates from the rawhide repo in over a week. Is it that the
> > "freeipa" situation clogging things up?
> > Thanks,
> >
On Thu, 15 Feb 2018 18:54:43 + (UTC)
George R Goffe wrote:
> Hi,
> I haven't seen updates from the rawhide repo in over a week. Is it
> that the "freeipa" situation clogging things up? Thanks,
> George...
I think this is due to the mass rebuild, and some changes to
On Thu, Feb 15, 2018 at 18:54:43 +,
George R Goffe wrote:
Hi,
I haven't seen updates from the rawhide repo in over a week. Is it that the
"freeipa" situation clogging things up?
Thanks,
George...
There hasn't been a fully successful compose since the 4th. The
Hi,
I haven't seen updates from the rawhide repo in over a week. Is it that the
"freeipa" situation clogging things up?
Thanks,
George...
This is what I see pending for my system:
Available Upgrades
emacs-auctex.noarch 12.1-1.fc28 rawhide
Hi,
I haven't gotten any updates for several days from the Rawhide Repo... Is it
broken?
Thanks,
George...
___
test mailing list -- test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to test-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
On Mon, Jul 31, 2017 at 6:44 PM, Adam Williamson
wrote:
> On Mon, 2017-07-31 at 09:16 +0100, Peter Robinson wrote:
>> On Sun, Jul 30, 2017 at 4:03 PM, Matthew Miller
>> wrote:
>> > On Sun, Jul 30, 2017 at 05:00:02AM +, George R Goffe
On Mon, 2017-07-31 at 09:16 +0100, Peter Robinson wrote:
> On Sun, Jul 30, 2017 at 4:03 PM, Matthew Miller
> wrote:
> > On Sun, Jul 30, 2017 at 05:00:02AM +, George R Goffe wrote:
> > > Any other ideas? Just wait for whomever to fix the packaging
> > > problems? I
On Sun, Jul 30, 2017 at 4:03 PM, Matthew Miller
wrote:
> On Sun, Jul 30, 2017 at 05:00:02AM +, George R Goffe wrote:
>> Any other ideas? Just wait for whomever to fix the packaging
>> problems? I could write a bug if you think that might be a good thing
>> to do.
>
>
On 07/29/2017 06:44 AM, George R Goffe wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I am trying to keep my Fedora 27 (Rawhide) system up to date by running "dnf
> upgrade" at least daily. For the past week I have seen a list of packages
> with broken dependencies. 165 in number. dnf --best reports 118 or so
> "problems".
On Sun, Jul 30, 2017 at 05:00:02AM +, George R Goffe wrote:
> Any other ideas? Just wait for whomever to fix the packaging
> problems? I could write a bug if you think that might be a good thing
> to do.
We're in the middle of doing a mass rebuild, and it's not surprising
that rawhide is
On Sun, 2017-07-30 at 05:00 +, George R Goffe wrote:
> Russel,
>
> Thanks for your response.
>
> Removing python3-docs did not appear to change the problem.
I am surprised you didn't get some change since a number of Fedora
system packages depend on the python3 version.
> Any other ideas?
(UTC)
From: George R Goffe <grgo...@yahoo.com>
Subject: Is the rawhide repo broken?
To: "test@lists.fedoraproject.org" <test@lists.fedoraproject.org>
Message-ID: <1117066636.2047108.1501335863...@mail.yahoo.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Hi,
I am
Hi,
I believe there is currently a problem between Boost and LibreOffice
staopping quite a few upgrades but not 165/118, far fewer than that.
I found though I had to remove python3-docs as that package has not
been updated where all the other python3-* packages appear to have
been.
On Sat,
Hi,
I am trying to keep my Fedora 27 (Rawhide) system up to date by running "dnf
upgrade" at least daily. For the past week I have seen a list of packages with
broken dependencies. 165 in number. dnf --best reports 118 or so "problems".
I'm not sure what to do about this. Could someone give me
16 matches
Mail list logo