Re: dnf shows no F23 updates

2015-09-29 Thread Lukas Brabec
Hi, I encountered probably the same problem with dnf-1.1.2-2, command 'dnf update --refresh' reported nothing to do, but 'yum-deprecated update' wanted to download the updates. It seems that dnf-1.1.2-2 from updates-testing was broken, it didn't check the repos properly. I downgraded the dnf

Re: dnf shows no F23 updates

2015-09-29 Thread Ron Yorston
Lukas Brabec wrote: >It seems that dnf-1.1.2-2 from updates-testing was broken, it >didn't check the repos properly. I downgraded the dnf (and all >dependencies) with yum-deprecated to dnf-1.1.1-2 and it works now. Thanks for the hint. Downgrading dnf from 1.1.2-2 to 1.1.1-2 resulted in 'dnf

dnf shows no F23 updates

2015-09-29 Thread Ron Yorston
I installed the F23 beta last week when it first came out. There were 483MB of updates on 23rd September. I didn't use it again until today. I was expecting another bumper load of updates, GNOME 3.18 in particular. However, 'dnf update' and 'dnf --best update' both report there's nothing to do.

Re: dnf shows no F23 updates

2015-09-29 Thread Sérgio Basto
On Ter, 2015-09-29 at 11:51 +0100, Ron Yorston wrote: > I installed the F23 beta last week when it first came out. There were > 483MB of updates on 23rd September. I didn't use it again until today. > I was expecting another bumper load of updates, GNOME 3.18 in particular. > > However, 'dnf

Re: dnf shows no F23 updates

2015-09-29 Thread Ankur Sinha
On Tue, 2015-09-29 at 15:04 +0100, Ron Yorston wrote: > Thanks for the hint.  Downgrading dnf from 1.1.2-2 to 1.1.1-2 > resulted > in 'dnf update' finding 214MB of updates, which is more like what I > was > expecting.  I see that dnf-1.1.2-2 wasn't among them. Probably a faulty update which is

Re: dnf shows no F23 updates

2015-09-29 Thread Adam Williamson
On Tue, 2015-09-29 at 15:04 +0100, Ron Yorston wrote: > Lukas Brabec wrote: > > It seems that dnf-1.1.2-2 from updates-testing was broken, it > > didn't check the repos properly. I downgraded the dnf (and all > > dependencies) with yum-deprecated to dnf-1.1.1-2 and it works now. > > Thanks for

Re: dnf shows no F23 updates

2015-09-29 Thread Zdenek Kabelac
Dne 29.9.2015 v 16:04 Ron Yorston napsal(a): Lukas Brabec wrote: It seems that dnf-1.1.2-2 from updates-testing was broken, it didn't check the repos properly. I downgraded the dnf (and all dependencies) with yum-deprecated to dnf-1.1.1-2 and it works now. Thanks for the hint. Downgrading

Re: dnf shows no F23 updates

2015-09-29 Thread Adam Williamson
On Tue, 2015-09-29 at 16:57 +0200, Zdenek Kabelac wrote: > IMHO primary problem I can see here with dnf is - > it's pushed to rawhide with no testing by it's developers. It has a fairly large test suite, in fact. It just didn't catch this issue. -- Adam Williamson Fedora QA Community Monkey

Re: dnf shows no F23 updates

2015-09-29 Thread Ron Yorston
Adam Williamson wrote: >On Tue, 2015-09-29 at 15:04 +0100, Ron Yorston wrote: >> I really don't much like dnf:  its default behaviour seems off compared >> to yum and I have less trust in it than I did yum. > >It was just a bug, in a pre-release piece of software. My opinion of dnf is not based

Re: dnf shows no F23 updates

2015-09-29 Thread Christopher Meng
The tracker bug of this issue is at: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1265336 You don't need to yield to yum, dnf still works. -- Yours sincerely, Christopher Meng http://awk.io -- test mailing list test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe: