Hi,
I encountered probably the same problem with dnf-1.1.2-2,
command 'dnf update --refresh' reported nothing to do, but
'yum-deprecated update' wanted to download the updates.
It seems that dnf-1.1.2-2 from updates-testing was broken, it
didn't check the repos properly. I downgraded the dnf
Lukas Brabec wrote:
>It seems that dnf-1.1.2-2 from updates-testing was broken, it
>didn't check the repos properly. I downgraded the dnf (and all
>dependencies) with yum-deprecated to dnf-1.1.1-2 and it works now.
Thanks for the hint. Downgrading dnf from 1.1.2-2 to 1.1.1-2 resulted
in 'dnf
I installed the F23 beta last week when it first came out. There were
483MB of updates on 23rd September. I didn't use it again until today.
I was expecting another bumper load of updates, GNOME 3.18 in particular.
However, 'dnf update' and 'dnf --best update' both report there's nothing
to do.
On Ter, 2015-09-29 at 11:51 +0100, Ron Yorston wrote:
> I installed the F23 beta last week when it first came out. There were
> 483MB of updates on 23rd September. I didn't use it again until today.
> I was expecting another bumper load of updates, GNOME 3.18 in particular.
>
> However, 'dnf
On Tue, 2015-09-29 at 15:04 +0100, Ron Yorston wrote:
> Thanks for the hint. Downgrading dnf from 1.1.2-2 to 1.1.1-2
> resulted
> in 'dnf update' finding 214MB of updates, which is more like what I
> was
> expecting. I see that dnf-1.1.2-2 wasn't among them.
Probably a faulty update which is
On Tue, 2015-09-29 at 15:04 +0100, Ron Yorston wrote:
> Lukas Brabec wrote:
> > It seems that dnf-1.1.2-2 from updates-testing was broken, it
> > didn't check the repos properly. I downgraded the dnf (and all
> > dependencies) with yum-deprecated to dnf-1.1.1-2 and it works now.
>
> Thanks for
Dne 29.9.2015 v 16:04 Ron Yorston napsal(a):
Lukas Brabec wrote:
It seems that dnf-1.1.2-2 from updates-testing was broken, it
didn't check the repos properly. I downgraded the dnf (and all
dependencies) with yum-deprecated to dnf-1.1.1-2 and it works now.
Thanks for the hint. Downgrading
On Tue, 2015-09-29 at 16:57 +0200, Zdenek Kabelac wrote:
> IMHO primary problem I can see here with dnf is -
> it's pushed to rawhide with no testing by it's developers.
It has a fairly large test suite, in fact. It just didn't catch this
issue.
--
Adam Williamson
Fedora QA Community Monkey
Adam Williamson wrote:
>On Tue, 2015-09-29 at 15:04 +0100, Ron Yorston wrote:
>> I really don't much like dnf: its default behaviour seems off compared
>> to yum and I have less trust in it than I did yum.
>
>It was just a bug, in a pre-release piece of software.
My opinion of dnf is not based
The tracker bug of this issue is at:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1265336
You don't need to yield to yum, dnf still works.
--
Yours sincerely,
Christopher Meng
http://awk.io
--
test mailing list
test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe:
10 matches
Mail list logo