On 23.06.2015 22:35, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
- cut a crap -
> For example, this thread IMHO would have been fine for a
> bugzilla.redhat.com bug report against linux-firmware or kernel with
> something like:
>
> "Hey, since ivtv package was retired I am unable to find 2 firmware
> files I need for m
On Tue, Jun 23, 2015 at 02:35:49PM -0600, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
>
> For example, this thread IMHO would have been fine for a
> bugzilla.redhat.com bug report against linux-firmware or kernel with
> something like:
>
> "Hey, since ivtv package was retired I am unable to find 2 firmware
> files I need
On Tue, 23 Jun 2015 16:56:30 +0200
poma wrote:
> On 23.06.2015 00:51, Adam Williamson wrote:
> ...
> > The question of what firmwares to include in the Fedora packages is
> > on -topic for maybe the devel@ list or the kernel list, but unless
> > it's
> ...
>
> Wait a minute, Williamson, did you
On 23.06.2015 00:51, Adam Williamson wrote:
...
> The question of what firmwares to include in the Fedora packages is on
> -topic for maybe the devel@ list or the kernel list, but unless it's
...
Wait a minute, Williamson, did you mention @kernel and @devel, where the
malicious hordes tried to pr
On 23.06.2015 00:51, Adam Williamson wrote:
> On Tue, 2015-06-23 at 00:33 +0200, poma wrote:
>> On 22.06.2015 23:55, Adam Williamson wrote:
>>> On Mon, 2015-06-22 at 17:44 +0200, poma wrote:
Are there any technical or legal issues for all these firmware
files
not to be include
On Tue, 2015-06-23 at 00:33 +0200, poma wrote:
> On 22.06.2015 23:55, Adam Williamson wrote:
> > On Mon, 2015-06-22 at 17:44 +0200, poma wrote:
> > >
> > > Are there any technical or legal issues for all these firmware
> > > files
> > > not to be included downstream within "linux-firmware" packa
On 22.06.2015 23:55, Adam Williamson wrote:
> On Mon, 2015-06-22 at 17:44 +0200, poma wrote:
>>
>> Are there any technical or legal issues for all these firmware files
>> not to be included downstream within "linux-firmware" package, with
>> the rest of firmwares?
>
> Whatever the answer to that
On Mon, 2015-06-22 at 17:44 +0200, poma wrote:
>
> Are there any technical or legal issues for all these firmware files
> not to be included downstream within "linux-firmware" package, with
> the rest of firmwares?
Whatever the answer to that question, it doesn't seem terribly relevant
to test@
On 22.06.2015 14:20, Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote:
> (please disregard my last e-mail - I pressed, by mistake, some control
> sequence
> to send it before finishing it)
>
> Hi,
>
> Em Sun, 21 Jun 2015 23:47:42 +0200
> poma escreveu:
>
>>
>> Háu kola
>>
>>
>> $ lspci -d :0016 -knn
>> 01:08.0
On Dom, 2015-06-21 at 23:47 +0200, poma wrote:
> Háu kola
>
>
> $ lspci -d :0016 -knn
> 01:08.0 Multimedia video controller [0400]: Internext Compression Inc iTVC16
> (CX23416) Video Decoder [:0016] (rev 01)
> Subsystem: Hauppauge computer works Inc. WinTV PVR 150 [0070:8801]
>
Háu kola
$ lspci -d :0016 -knn
01:08.0 Multimedia video controller [0400]: Internext Compression Inc iTVC16
(CX23416) Video Decoder [:0016] (rev 01)
Subsystem: Hauppauge computer works Inc. WinTV PVR 150 [0070:8801]
Kernel driver in use: ivtv
Kernel modules: ivtv
11 matches
Mail list logo
