On Tue, 2018-11-27 at 10:47 +0100, Kamil Paral wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 26, 2018 at 6:20 PM Adam Williamson
> wrote:
>
> > On Mon, 2018-11-26 at 15:41 +0100, Kamil Paral wrote:
> > > > > * Into Additional Repositories section, add updates-testing repo
> > item,
> > > > > disabled by default, and
i'm glad to see this revived.
As I mentioned before, my vote goes to B + updates-testing checkbox for
prereleases.
That way we can:
- test the compose as is, even installing from lives
- bypass broken u-t packages
But also:
- install directly with u-t in case that compose is installing but
On Thu, Nov 22, 2018 at 11:00 AM Kamil Paral wrote:
...
> b) don't use testing updates at all during the whole cycle
>
> This makes the install process more stable (testing updates can't break it).
> The installed packages more closely match what the composes consist of (the
> composes never
On 11/27/18 4:47 AM, Kamil Paral wrote:
On Mon, Nov 26, 2018 at 6:20 PM Adam Williamson
wrote:
On Mon, 2018-11-26 at 15:41 +0100, Kamil Paral wrote:
* Into Additional Repositories section, add updates-testing repo
item,
disabled by default, and only visible in pre-release composes.
On Mon, Nov 26, 2018 at 6:20 PM Adam Williamson
wrote:
> On Mon, 2018-11-26 at 15:41 +0100, Kamil Paral wrote:
> >
> > > > * Into Additional Repositories section, add updates-testing repo
> item,
> > > > disabled by default, and only visible in pre-release composes.
> Mkolman
> > > from
> > > >
On Mon, 2018-11-26 at 15:41 +0100, Kamil Paral wrote:
>
> > > * Into Additional Repositories section, add updates-testing repo item,
> > > disabled by default, and only visible in pre-release composes. Mkolman
> > from
> > > anaconda said they definitely don't want to offer updates-testing in
> >
On Fri, Nov 23, 2018 at 5:47 PM Adam Williamson
wrote:
> On Fri, 2018-11-23 at 10:02 +0100, Kamil Paral wrote:
> > On Thu, Nov 22, 2018 at 6:22 PM Adam Williamson <
> adamw...@fedoraproject.org>
> > wrote:
> >
> > > Here's a bit of background:
> > >
> > >
On Fri, 2018-11-23 at 10:02 +0100, Kamil Paral wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 22, 2018 at 6:22 PM Adam Williamson
> wrote:
>
> > Here's a bit of background:
> >
> > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=962522
> >
> > The key point there is that if we implement your b), the checkbox would
> >
On Thu, Nov 22, 2018 at 6:22 PM Adam Williamson
wrote:
> Here's a bit of background:
>
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=962522
>
> The key point there is that if we implement your b), the checkbox would
> effectively do nothing in the pre-release phase at all, because there
> are no
On Thu, 2018-11-22 at 16:59 +0100, Kamil Paral wrote:
> I'll try to revive a discussion related to ticket #567 [1] and a previous
> test list thread [2] (I decided to start a new one to make the subject
> clearer and avoid the confusion from the initial email).
>
> During F29 development, we
On 11/22/18 10:59 AM, Kamil Paral wrote:
I'll try to revive a discussion related to ticket #567 [1] and a previous
test list thread [2] (I decided to start a new one to make the subject
clearer and avoid the confusion from the initial email).
During F29 development, we couldn't agree which
I'll try to revive a discussion related to ticket #567 [1] and a previous
test list thread [2] (I decided to start a new one to make the subject
clearer and avoid the confusion from the initial email).
During F29 development, we couldn't agree which repos should be enabled by
default in anaconda
12 matches
Mail list logo
