The following Fedora 20 Security updates need testing:
Age URL
97
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2014-15371/rubygem-actionpack-4.0.0-5.fc20
74
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2014-16845/resteasy-3.0.6-3.fc20
74
The following Fedora 21 Security updates need testing:
Age URL
74
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2014-16833/asterisk-11.14.2-1.fc21
69
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2014-17195/httpd-2.4.10-15.fc21
65
The following Fedora 22 Security updates need testing:
Age URL
0
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2015-2563/compat-libuv010-0.10.34-1.fc22
The following Fedora 22 Critical Path updates have yet to be approved:
Age URL
0
On Fri, Feb 20, 2015 at 05:38:03PM -0700, Mike Ruckman wrote:
Greetings Testers!
With the F22 switch from yum to dnf as a package manager, there was a need to
figure out what the scope would be for QA testing. Naturally, to define the
scope for a subset, I had to figure out (at least in a
On Wed, Feb 25, 2015 at 4:55 PM, Robert Moskowitz r...@htt-consult.com wrote:
I don't know where the original message came from. Don't see it in my
folder for this list
5 days ago...
Isn't this the majority of yum users?
Yes, I use yumex when I am looking for some package that meets a
anaconda crashes after continuing from language selection screen - i686 boot.iso
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1185585
I still run into this with TC5 boot.iso even though the bug is updated
saying that Package gtk3-3.15.9-1.fc22 should fix it.
I can't tell if that version is
On Wed, 2015-02-25 at 17:59 -0700, Chris Murphy wrote:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Test_Results:Fedora_22_Branched_20150221_Installation?rd=Test_
Results:Current_Installation_Test
Oh - I just saw the subject line. You've got an old varnish cache link
there. You're on the 20150221 nightly
On Wed, 2015-02-25 at 17:59 -0700, Chris Murphy wrote:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Test_Results:Fedora_22_Branched_20150221_Installation?rd=Test_
Results:Current_Installation_Test
I don't see server images in the test matrix.
Generic boot is boot.iso, a.k.a. netinstall, which I think
On Wed, Feb 25, 2015 at 6:57 PM, Adam Williamson
adamw...@fedoraproject.org wrote:
On Wed, 2015-02-25 at 17:59 -0700, Chris Murphy wrote:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Test_Results:Fedora_22_Branched_20150221_Installation?rd=Test_
Results:Current_Installation_Test
Oh - I just saw the subject
Is this how the known kernel bug manifests? I don't see a link for the
kernel bug so...
TC5 showstopper, dracut-initqueue thousands of cp will not create hard
link messages
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1196481
Direct link to photo of the failure...
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Test_Results:Fedora_22_Branched_20150221_Installation?rd=Test_Results:Current_Installation_Test
I don't see server images in the test matrix.
Generic boot is boot.iso, a.k.a. netinstall, which I think eventually
we're supposed to get per product versions, correct?
I don't know where the original message came from. Don't see it in my
folder for this list
On 02/25/2015 04:39 PM, Brian C. Lane wrote:
On Fri, Feb 20, 2015 at 05:38:03PM -0700, Mike Ruckman wrote:
Greetings Testers!
With the F22 switch from yum to dnf as a package manager, there was a
As per the Fedora 22 schedule [1], Fedora 22 Alpha Test Compose 5
(TC5) is now available for testing.
** PLEASE NOTE **: This will likely be a short-lived compose - while
it was spinning we discovered the likely cause of the bug that causes
live image boots to often fail with a kernel crash,
The following Fedora 20 Security updates need testing:
Age URL
98
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2014-15371/rubygem-actionpack-4.0.0-5.fc20
74
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2014-16845/resteasy-3.0.6-3.fc20
74
On Wed, Feb 25, 2015 at 10:49 PM, Adam Williamson
adamw...@fedoraproject.org wrote:
On Wed, 2015-02-25 at 22:15 -0700, Chris Murphy wrote:
On Wed, Feb 25, 2015 at 9:20 PM, Adam Williamson
adamw...@fedoraproject.org wrote:
On Wed, 2015-02-25 at 20:50 -0700, Chris Murphy wrote:
Is this how
On Wed, Feb 25, 2015 at 11:40 PM, Chris Murphy li...@colorremedies.com wrote:
On Wed, Feb 25, 2015 at 10:49 PM, Adam Williamson
adamw...@fedoraproject.org wrote:
On Wed, 2015-02-25 at 22:15 -0700, Chris Murphy wrote:
On Wed, Feb 25, 2015 at 9:20 PM, Adam Williamson
adamw...@fedoraproject.org
On Wed, 2015-02-25 at 23:54 -0700, Chris Murphy wrote:
I definitely have 32bit TC5 imaged to a USB stick.
sudo dd if=/Users/chris/Downloads/Fedora-Live-Workstation-i686-
22_Alpha-TC5.iso
of=/dev/rdisk3 bs=512k
The problem does not occur.
Yeah, see my follow-up, it makes sense for it not
On Wed, 2015-02-25 at 20:50 -0700, Chris Murphy wrote:
Is this how the known kernel bug manifests? I don't see a link for
the kernel bug so...
Doesn't look quite the same, and that one's only known to affect lives
(and Atomic, apparently).
TC5 showstopper, dracut-initqueue thousands of cp
On Wed, 2015-02-25 at 21:49 -0800, Adam Williamson wrote:
On Wed, 2015-02-25 at 22:15 -0700, Chris Murphy wrote:
On Wed, Feb 25, 2015 at 9:20 PM, Adam Williamson
adamw...@fedoraproject.org wrote:
On Wed, 2015-02-25 at 20:50 -0700, Chris Murphy wrote:
Is this how the known kernel bug
On Wed, Feb 25, 2015 at 9:20 PM, Adam Williamson
adamw...@fedoraproject.org wrote:
On Wed, 2015-02-25 at 20:50 -0700, Chris Murphy wrote:
Is this how the known kernel bug manifests? I don't see a link for
the kernel bug so...
Doesn't look quite the same, and that one's only known to affect
On Wed, 2015-02-25 at 22:15 -0700, Chris Murphy wrote:
On Wed, Feb 25, 2015 at 9:20 PM, Adam Williamson
adamw...@fedoraproject.org wrote:
On Wed, 2015-02-25 at 20:50 -0700, Chris Murphy wrote:
Is this how the known kernel bug manifests? I don't see a link
for the kernel bug so...
The following Fedora 21 Security updates need testing:
Age URL
74
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2014-16833/asterisk-11.14.2-1.fc21
69
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2014-17195/httpd-2.4.10-15.fc21
66
As per the Fedora 22 schedule [1], Fedora 22 Alpha Test Compose 5
(TC5) is now available for testing.
** PLEASE NOTE **: This will likely be a short-lived compose - while
it was spinning we discovered the likely cause of the bug that causes
live image boots to often fail with a kernel crash,
23 matches
Mail list logo
