On Sun, 2015-03-29 at 17:31 -0500, Dan Mossor wrote:
Rawhide should be using DNF exclusively. Please try again using dnf
and
let us know the results from that.
Not really. yum is still present and expected to be used, no-one's
expecting the world to stop using yum overnight. If segfaults
The following Fedora 22 Security updates need testing:
Age URL
31
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2015-2638/echoping-6.1-0.1.beta.r434svn.fc22
30
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2015-2783/drupal7-entity-1.6-1.fc22
20
Hi folks! I'm proposing we cancel tomorrow's QA meeting; there's lots
going on, but I think we're all more or less on the same page - Beta
TC6 should happen pretty soon and we can carry on getting all the
testing done. We'll be having the blocker review meeting at 1600, so
we can sync up on
On Sat, 2015-03-28 at 21:07 +0100, Giulio 'juliuxpigface' wrote:
Giulio 'juliuxpigface' wrote:
Hi guys,
I've just reported the bug
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1206760encountered
while I
was testing the behavior of a freshly-installed Beta-TC5 with
KDE.
The following Fedora 20 Security updates need testing:
Age URL
118
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2014-15988/fail2ban-0.9.1-1.fc20
106
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2014-16845/resteasy-3.0.6-3.fc20
106
Hi,
Perhaps it's not the same issue, but here some RPMs fail to install with
either dnf or yum (running rawhide up-to-date i686). If I try to install
the rpm file from /var/cache with rpm -ivh I also get a return status of
139. If I use more -v's I don't get anything, it just stops at D:
On Sun, 2015-03-29 at 23:53 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
[…]
That being said, it's hard to tell much from just 'it segfaulted' -
an
abrt report would be better, if we can get one?
Is there a way of forcing one to be triggered to get the data needed:
[root@lionors ~]# yum reinstall gdm
On Sun, 2015-03-29 at 23:53 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
On Sun, 2015-03-29 at 17:31 -0500, Dan Mossor wrote:
Rawhide should be using DNF exclusively. Please try again using
dnf
and
let us know the results from that.
OK, I will investigate switching.
Not really. yum is still
On Sun, 2015-03-29 at 17:31 -0500, Dan Mossor wrote:
[…]
Rawhide should be using DNF exclusively. Please try again using dnf
and
let us know the results from that.
Downloading Packages:
(1/2): openmpi-1.8.4-5.20150228gitgd83fb30.fc23 747 kB/s | 395 kB 00:00
(2/2):
On Mon, Mar 30, 2015 at 12:04:31PM -0400, Matthias Clasen wrote:
What we do plan wrt. to the nautilus desktop window is to move it to a
separate process, so that the nautilus application can stop carrying
this ballast.
For whatever it's worth, this seems great to me, as someone who doesn't
==
#fedora-blocker-review: F22-blocker-review
==
Meeting started by roshi at 16:04:24 UTC. The full logs are available at
On Thu, 2015-03-26 at 14:24 -0400, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/rolekit-0.3.0-1.fc22
Defying even my own expectations, we've released rolekit 0.3.0 today
with full multiple-instancing support. I'd really like for this to
end
up in the Fedora 22 Beta
On Sat, 2015-03-28 at 09:14 +0100, Giulio 'juliuxpigface' wrote:
Hi Joachim,
I think it's not a bug, the warning is clear enough. I'd say that
this
feature is not ready yet, but the developers are aware of it and know
it's missing. The message is like a placeholder that warns users, but
Hi folks! I'm proposing we cancel tomorrow's QA meeting; there's lots
going on, but I think we're all more or less on the same page - Beta
TC6 should happen pretty soon and we can carry on getting all the
testing done. We'll be having the blocker review meeting at 1600, so
we can sync up on
14 matches
Mail list logo
