On 22.06.2015 14:20, Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote:
(please disregard my last e-mail - I pressed, by mistake, some control
sequence
to send it before finishing it)
Hi,
Em Sun, 21 Jun 2015 23:47:42 +0200
poma pomidorabelis...@gmail.com escreveu:
Háu kola
$ lspci -d :0016 -knn
syslinux and variants aren't used for UEFI booting, where GRUB is used instead.
--
test mailing list
test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
On 22.06.2015 22:45, Chris Murphy wrote:
syslinux and variants aren't used for UEFI booting, where GRUB is used
instead.
You are indeed a source of a great knowledge!
So do they walk with the GRUB?
--
test mailing list
test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe:
On Mon, 2015-06-22 at 14:57 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
On Mon, 2015-06-22 at 22:12 +0200, poma wrote:
https://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org/mash/rawhide/x86_64/os/images/
boot.iso
https://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org/work/tasks/6196/10176196/
Fedora-Live-Xfce-x86_64-rawhide-20150621.iso
On Mon, Jun 22, 2015 at 04:27:07PM -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
On Mon, 2015-06-22 at 14:57 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
On Mon, 2015-06-22 at 22:12 +0200, poma wrote:
https://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org/mash/rawhide/x86_64/os/images/
boot.iso
On Mon, 2015-06-22 at 22:12 +0200, poma wrote:
https://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org/mash/rawhide/x86_64/os/images/
boot.iso
https://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org/work/tasks/6196/10176196/
Fedora-Live-Xfce-x86_64-rawhide-20150621.iso
are broken at early boot stage - isolinux.
syslinux got
On Tue, 2015-06-23 at 00:33 +0200, poma wrote:
On 22.06.2015 23:55, Adam Williamson wrote:
On Mon, 2015-06-22 at 17:44 +0200, poma wrote:
Are there any technical or legal issues for all these firmware
files
not to be included downstream within linux-firmware package,
with
On Mon, 2015-06-22 at 16:27 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
On Mon, 2015-06-22 at 14:57 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
On Mon, 2015-06-22 at 22:12 +0200, poma wrote:
https://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org/mash/rawhide/x86_64/os/images/
boot.iso
On Mon, 2015-06-22 at 17:44 +0200, poma wrote:
Are there any technical or legal issues for all these firmware files
not to be included downstream within linux-firmware package, with
the rest of firmwares?
Whatever the answer to that question, it doesn't seem terribly relevant
to test@.
Compose started at Mon Jun 22 13:44:04 UTC 2015
Broken deps for i386
--
[amqp]
1:amqp-devel-1.0-1.20150622svn1686756.fc23.noarch requires amqp =
0:1.0-1.20150622svn1686756.fc23
[apache-scout]
apache-scout-1.2.6-11.fc21.noarch
On 22.06.2015 23:55, Adam Williamson wrote:
On Mon, 2015-06-22 at 17:44 +0200, poma wrote:
Are there any technical or legal issues for all these firmware files
not to be included downstream within linux-firmware package, with
the rest of firmwares?
Whatever the answer to that question,
On Mon, 2015-06-22 at 20:58 -0400, Fred Smith wrote:
I'll try and figure out the difference between the two builds.
Same version of GCC??
No, but that doesn't mean that's the important factor.
--
Adam Williamson
Fedora QA Community Monkey
IRC: adamw | Twitter: AdamW_Fedora | XMPP: adamw
On Sun, 2015-06-21 at 10:54 -0600, Chris Murphy wrote:
I've got a bug proposed for alpha block but it's not showing up in
the
blockerbugs tracker. I filed this infra bug, probably against the
wrong component (General):
https://fedorahosted.org/fedora-infrastructure/ticket/4800
No, it's
Hi folks! I'm proposing we cancel Monday's QA meeting. I don't really
have anything urgent for the agenda.
If anyone can think of something urgent to discuss, please reply to
this mail and we can get together at the usual time (15:00 UTC in
#fedora-meeting).
Note there will be a blocker review
The following Fedora 21 Security updates need testing:
Age URL
142
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2015-1467/openstack-glance-2014.1.3-4.fc21
87
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2015-4689/quassel-0.11.0-2.fc21
72
The following Fedora 20 Security updates need testing:
Age URL
182
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2014-17089/aeskulap-0.2.2-0.20beta1.fc20,orthanc-0.8.5-2.fc20,dcmtk-3.6.1-1.fc20
137
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2015-1718/389-admin-1.1.38-1.fc20
120
The following Fedora 22 Security updates need testing:
Age URL
73
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2015-5878/echoping-6.1-0.beta.r434svn.1.fc22
72
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2015-5948/asterisk-13.3.2-1.fc22
50
https://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org/mash/rawhide/x86_64/os/images/
boot.iso
https://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org/work/tasks/6196/10176196/
Fedora-Live-Xfce-x86_64-rawhide-20150621.iso
are broken at early boot stage - isolinux.
UEFI boot?
--
test mailing list
test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To
Hi folks! I'm proposing we cancel Monday's QA meeting. I don't really
have anything urgent for the agenda.
If anyone can think of something urgent to discuss, please reply to
this mail and we can get together at the usual time (15:00 UTC in
#fedora-meeting).
Note there will be a blocker review
19 matches
Mail list logo
