Re: SAS or Raid testcase?

2019-12-04 Thread alciregi
On Tue, 2019-12-03 at 14:57 -0800, Samuel Sieb wrote: > I wonder if you can do SMART checks on them. Yes. $ sudo smartctl --all /dev/sg1 ... === START OF INFORMATION SECTION === Vendor: HITACHI Product: H103030SCSUN300G Revision: A2A8 Compliance:

Fedora rawhide compose report: 20191204.n.0 changes

2019-12-04 Thread Fedora Rawhide Report
OLD: Fedora-Rawhide-20191203.n.1 NEW: Fedora-Rawhide-20191204.n.0 = SUMMARY = Added images:4 Dropped images: 7 Added packages: 0 Dropped packages:8 Upgraded packages: 0 Downgraded packages: 0 Size of added packages: 0 B Size of dropped packages:75.14 MiB

Fedora-Rawhide-20191204.n.0 compose check report

2019-12-04 Thread Fedora compose checker
No missing expected images. Compose FAILS proposed Rawhide gating check! 6 of 43 required tests failed, 1 result missing openQA tests matching unsatisfied gating requirements shown with **GATING** below Failed openQA tests: 12/161 (x86_64), 1/2 (arm) New failures (same test not failed in

Re: Proposal: Asynchronous blocker review process (using Pagure)

2019-12-04 Thread Kamil Paral
On Tue, Dec 3, 2019 at 8:29 PM Kevin Fenzi wrote: > I pretty much agree with all the points you made on the various systems. > That said, I think this is kinda a bad time to be doing this change. > There's a lot of... (grumblings? rumors? idle converstations?) about the > various

Re: Proposal: Asynchronous blocker review process (using Pagure)

2019-12-04 Thread Kamil Paral
On Tue, Dec 3, 2019 at 10:22 PM Tim Flink wrote: > Has anyone poked at scoping out the work required for either the bot or > the enhancements we would need for pagure? > Lukáš Brabec looked into it, and creating a new Pagure ticket is a matter of a few lines of code (already written). Extending

Test request: BZ 1773879

2019-12-04 Thread Ben Cotton
Hi team, If you have some spare time and a ThinkPad (particularly the T490), can you please see if you can replicate the behavior reported in: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1773879 In today's Prioritized Bugs meeting, we decided we don't have enough information to make a decision.

Re: Proposal: Asynchronous blocker review process (using Pagure)

2019-12-04 Thread Kamil Paral
On Tue, Dec 3, 2019 at 5:15 PM Geoffrey Marr wrote: > Kamil, > > I wasn't intending the time we would get together each week for voting, > instead for time spent discussing and clarifying any discrepancies we may > have with the bugs. By the time we would have this 30 or so minute >

Re: Test request: BZ 1773879

2019-12-04 Thread Silvia Sánchez
I have a T440s, I'll try to replicate the bug. Also, and just FYI I can't login with my FAS in Red Hat Bugzilla. On Wed, 4 Dec 2019 at 18:23, Ben Cotton wrote: > Hi team, > > If you have some spare time and a ThinkPad (particularly the T490), > can you please see if you can replicate the

pipewire

2019-12-04 Thread pmkel...@frontier.com
I have just recently become aware of pipewire. If my questions are the wrong ones please feel free to interpret them in a more correct way. I am wondering: Is pipewire part of Wayland? From what I've seen so far, it seems like pipewire will replace gstreamer, ffmpeg, pulse audio, and jack.

Re: pipewire

2019-12-04 Thread Ed Greshko
On 2019-12-05 04:53, pmkel...@frontier.com wrote: > I have just recently become aware of pipewire. If my questions are the wrong > ones please feel free to interpret them in a more correct way. I am wondering: > > Is pipewire part of Wayland? > > From what I've seen so far, it seems like pipewire

Fedora-Cloud-30-20191205.0 compose check report

2019-12-04 Thread Fedora compose checker
No missing expected images. Passed openQA tests: 1/1 (x86_64) -- Mail generated by check-compose: https://pagure.io/fedora-qa/check-compose ___ test mailing list -- test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to