On Wed, 14 Sep 2011 09:25:35 -0400, GM (Genes) wrote:
On 09/14/2011 09:02 AM, Joachim Backes wrote:
On 09/14/2011 01:01 PM, Matej Cepl wrote:
Dne 14.9.2011 09:57, Joachim Backes napsal(a):
Having sound problems after the todays updates: Playing some sound stops
after 1-2 secs, and the
Hi,
I'm maintaining the xorg-x11-drv-openchrome package, which provides the
X driver for VIA IGPs and it never received any karma from a proven
tester, most probably because this hardware is not available to any of them.
So I think there are 3 options :
- A proven tester with the hardware
Hello,
A missing information, there is no problem with a file with a size of 0
(I suppose with a size less than 1 block).
Best regards.
Francis
On 09/14/2011 02:41 PM, Francis SOUYRI wrote:
Hello,
I have this:
Sep 14 14:38:19 tauntauns1 systemd[1]: tftp.service failed to run
On Thu, Sep 15, 2011 at 12:24:53 +0200,
Xavier Bachelot xav...@bachelot.org wrote:
Hi,
I'm maintaining the xorg-x11-drv-openchrome package, which provides the
X driver for VIA IGPs and it never received any karma from a proven
tester, most probably because this hardware is not available
On 09/15/2011 12:19 PM, Bruno Wolff III wrote:
On Thu, Sep 15, 2011 at 12:24:53 +0200,
Xavier Bachelotxav...@bachelot.org wrote:
Hi,
I'm maintaining the xorg-x11-drv-openchrome package, which provides the
X driver for VIA IGPs and it never received any karma from a proven
tester, most
On 09/14/2011 10:02 PM, Tim Flink wrote:
OK, this had better be the last pre-RC boot.iso testing request :)
http://tflink.fedorapeople.org/iso/20110914_preRC_boot3.x86_64.iso
http://tflink.fedorapeople.org/iso/20110914_preRC_boot2.x86_64.iso.sha256
Hi, Tim, looks like you sent us the boot2
As per the Fedora 16 schedule [1], Fedora 16 Beta Release Candidate 1
(RC1) is now available for testing. Please see the following pages for
download links and testing instructions. In general, official live
images arrive a few hours after the install images: see the links below
for updates. When
The following Fedora 16 Security updates need testing:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/stunnel-4.42-1.fc16
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/mantis-1.2.8-1.fc16
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/audacious-plugins-3.0.2-2.fc16
I downloaded
http://dl.fedoraproject.org/pub/alt/stage/16-Beta.RC1/Live/x86_64/Fedora-16-Beta-x86_64-Live-Desktop.iso
and wrote it to a LiveUSB; system with i915 graphics boots up but is
in the GNOME 3 Oh no! Something has gone wrong loop. gsettings-data
was repeatedly reporting:
segfault at 18
Xavier Bachelot (xav...@bachelot.org) said:
Meanwhile, If I understand correctly, all X drivers inherit critpath
because they are required by xorg-x11-drivers which is itself a critpath
package.
So either xorg-x11-drivers stops requiring the non-critpath drivers,
which is probably not
On Thu, 2011-09-15 at 15:03 +0200, Xavier Bachelot wrote:
On 09/15/2011 12:19 PM, Bruno Wolff III wrote:
On Thu, Sep 15, 2011 at 12:24:53 +0200,
Xavier Bachelotxav...@bachelot.org wrote:
Hi,
I'm maintaining the xorg-x11-drv-openchrome package, which provides the
X driver for VIA
On Thu, 2011-09-15 at 12:22 -0400, Dan Scott wrote:
I downloaded
http://dl.fedoraproject.org/pub/alt/stage/16-Beta.RC1/Live/x86_64/Fedora-16-Beta-x86_64-Live-Desktop.iso
and wrote it to a LiveUSB; system with i915 graphics boots up but is
in the GNOME 3 Oh no! Something has gone wrong loop.
On Thu, 2011-09-15 at 13:10 -0400, Bill Nottingham wrote:
Given that critpath is currently done solely by dependency resolution
of certain comps groups, 'excluding' a package isn't really possible.
If you look at the group, you'll note:
!-- Just the mandatory packages from base-x.
On 09/15/2011 01:17 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
On Thu, 2011-09-15 at 12:22 -0400, Dan Scott wrote:
I downloaded
http://dl.fedoraproject.org/pub/alt/stage/16-Beta.RC1/Live/x86_64/Fedora-16-Beta-x86_64-Live-Desktop.iso
and wrote it to a LiveUSB; system with i915 graphics boots up but is
in the
On Thu, Sep 15, 2011 at 3:17 PM, Adam Williamson awill...@redhat.com wrote:
On Thu, 2011-09-15 at 12:22 -0400, Dan Scott wrote:
I downloaded
http://dl.fedoraproject.org/pub/alt/stage/16-Beta.RC1/Live/x86_64/Fedora-16-Beta-x86_64-Live-Desktop.iso
and wrote it to a LiveUSB; system with i915
On Thu, 2011-09-15 at 16:19 -0400, Dan Scott wrote:
On Thu, Sep 15, 2011 at 3:17 PM, Adam Williamson awill...@redhat.com wrote:
On Thu, 2011-09-15 at 12:22 -0400, Dan Scott wrote:
I downloaded
On 09/15/2011 02:22 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
On Thu, 2011-09-15 at 16:19 -0400, Dan Scott wrote:
On Thu, Sep 15, 2011 at 3:17 PM, Adam Williamson awill...@redhat.com wrote:
On Thu, 2011-09-15 at 12:22 -0400, Dan Scott wrote:
I downloaded
On Thu, Sep 15, 2011 at 4:44 PM, Tim Flink tfl...@redhat.com wrote:
On 09/15/2011 02:22 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
On Thu, 2011-09-15 at 16:19 -0400, Dan Scott wrote:
On Thu, Sep 15, 2011 at 3:17 PM, Adam Williamson awill...@redhat.com
wrote:
On Thu, 2011-09-15 at 12:22 -0400, Dan Scott
On 09/15/2011 08:39 AM, Andre Robatino wrote:
As per the Fedora 16 schedule [1], Fedora 16 Beta Release Candidate 1
(RC1) is now available for testing.
Trying to install on a ThinkPad X32. I get a udevadm setttle timeout and
nm_client_get_devices error getting devices. Anyone else seen this?
On 09/15/2011 04:26 PM, Orion Poplawski wrote:
On 09/15/2011 08:39 AM, Andre Robatino wrote:
As per the Fedora 16 schedule [1], Fedora 16 Beta Release Candidate 1
(RC1) is now available for testing.
Trying to install on a ThinkPad X32. I get a udevadm setttle timeout and
On Thu, 2011-09-15 at 16:34 -0600, Tim Flink wrote:
On 09/15/2011 04:26 PM, Orion Poplawski wrote:
On 09/15/2011 08:39 AM, Andre Robatino wrote:
As per the Fedora 16 schedule [1], Fedora 16 Beta Release Candidate 1
(RC1) is now available for testing.
Trying to install on a ThinkPad
On Thu, 2011-09-15 at 16:44 -0600, Orion Poplawski wrote:
On 09/15/2011 04:34 PM, Tim Flink wrote:
On 09/15/2011 04:26 PM, Orion Poplawski wrote:
On 09/15/2011 08:39 AM, Andre Robatino wrote:
As per the Fedora 16 schedule [1], Fedora 16 Beta Release Candidate 1
(RC1) is now available for
On 09/15/2011 04:44 PM, Orion Poplawski wrote:
On 09/15/2011 04:34 PM, Tim Flink wrote:
On 09/15/2011 04:26 PM, Orion Poplawski wrote:
On 09/15/2011 08:39 AM, Andre Robatino wrote:
As per the Fedora 16 schedule [1], Fedora 16 Beta Release Candidate 1
(RC1) is now available for testing.
Just in case anyone is interested. It was very much a hardware issue
that was leading to the system experiencing thermal issues, just so
happens that upon upgrading the Fedora 16 I was paying a lot closer
attention to the logs and noticed it. Not sure why I wasn't able to
reproduce it as easily in
On Thu, 2011-09-15 at 16:12 -0800, Erinn Looney-Triggs wrote:
Just in case anyone is interested. It was very much a hardware issue
that was leading to the system experiencing thermal issues, just so
happens that upon upgrading the Fedora 16 I was paying a lot closer
attention to the logs and
On Thu, 2011-09-15 at 17:02 -0600, Orion Poplawski wrote:
On 09/15/2011 04:44 PM, Orion Poplawski wrote:
On 09/15/2011 04:34 PM, Tim Flink wrote:
On 09/15/2011 04:26 PM, Orion Poplawski wrote:
On 09/15/2011 08:39 AM, Andre Robatino wrote:
As per the Fedora 16 schedule [1], Fedora 16 Beta
The following Fedora 15 Security updates need testing:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/seamonkey-2.3.3-1.fc15
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/bcfg2-1.1.2-2.fc15
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/mantis-1.2.8-1.fc15
The following Fedora 14 Security updates need testing:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/libsoup-2.32.2-2.fc14
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/foomatic-4.0.8-3.fc14
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/librsvg2-2.32.0-4.fc14
Hi folks! As well as normal RC1 testing, we have an extra request. Can
you please test RC1 installs and upgrades using this updates image:
http://dlehman.fedorapeople.org/updates-lvm.img
(just pass updates=http://dlehman.fedorapeople.org/updates-lvm.img to
the installer as a parameter to do
I have noticed that pulseaudio uses upwards of 16% CPU and when I start krunner
to investigate, I see that there are often numerous pulseaudio processes all
running simultaneously, but greyed out. And this, while I am not even using any
applications that emit sound!
It is so bad, that the
Peter Gueckel wrote:
I have noticed that pulseaudio uses upwards of 16% CPU and when I start
krunner to investigate, I see that there are often numerous pulseaudio
processes all running simultaneously, but greyed out. And this, while I am
not even using any applications that emit sound!
It
31 matches
Mail list logo
