On 2012/04/02 17:06 (GMT-0700) Adam Williamson composed:
the problem with doing a default network install is you get packages
from updates-testing...I did several minimal installs of Beta RC2 and
saw nothing like this.
I did it all over, except unchecked the updates-testing source box. Didn't
I replaced a power supply and the spontaneous reboots associated
with FFMPEG have not recurred.
However, the odd behavior where Fedora decides to ignore all input
except for mouse movement persists. When this happens, Fedora
seems to slowly grind to a catatonic state which requires a
hardware
Compose started at Tue Apr 3 08:15:09 UTC 2012
Broken deps for x86_64
--
[HippoDraw]
HippoDraw-devel-1.21.3-2.fc17.i686 requires python-numarray
HippoDraw-devel-1.21.3-2.fc17.x86_64 requires python-numarray
I was quite depressed how hard it can be for a layman to find a way to install
Fedora from LiveCD environment. If you don't recognize the icon in Gnome Shell
Overview mode, it can give you quite some work to find it. Since OSS philosophy
is if you don't like it, fix it, I did. In the last two
Kamil Paral wrote:
http://kparal.fedorapeople.org/misc/InstallFedoraButton.png
What do you think? Better than default?
I like it. Good work.
Would it be better to have the text say Install Fedora instead of ..
to Hard Drive? Hard Drive is becoming an obsolete term. You have flash
drives,
Would it be better to have the text say Install Fedora instead of
..
to Hard Drive? Hard Drive is becoming an obsolete term. You have
flash
drives, SSDs, or whatever else people install Fedora to.
I pull that string from default anaconda launcher. If they change it, it will
change also in
On Tue, 2012-04-03 at 09:26 -0400, Kamil Paral wrote:
I was quite depressed how hard it can be for a layman to find a way to
install Fedora from LiveCD environment. If you don't recognize the icon in
Gnome Shell Overview mode, it can give you quite some work to find it. Since
OSS philosophy
On Apr 3, 2012, at 7:26 AM, Kamil Paral wrote:
You can see it here:
http://kparal.fedorapeople.org/misc/InstallFedoraButton.png
What do you think? Better than default?
How about Install Fedora since it could be installed to SSD or
iSCSI etc.
I pull that string from default anaconda
So, we decided for F16 that we don't want to add extensions like that
to
the shell that we ship on the live cd. It should be the default
experience.
Can't be 100% default, because installer is a slightly different use case,
isn't it.
For the 'make installing obvious' problem, what we
On 30/03/12 07:53, stan wrote:
In general, install went very well. Of the several thousand packages I
installed, these were the only errors. I was really impressed.
These packages failed at transaction check:
Transaction Check Error:
file /etc/logrotate.d/syslog from install of
On Tue, 03 Apr 2012 17:16:22 +0200
Matthias Runge mru...@matthias-runge.de wrote:
On 30/03/12 07:53, stan wrote:
Transaction Check Error:
file /etc/logrotate.d/syslog from install of
syslog-ng-3.2.5-5.fc17.x86_64 conflicts with file from package
rsyslog-5.8.7-1.fc17.x86_64
Thanks
On Tue, 03 Apr 2012 03:11:17 -0700
Chuck Forsberg WA7KGX N2469R c...@omen.com wrote:
However, the odd behavior where Fedora decides to ignore all input
except for mouse movement persists. When this happens, Fedora
seems to slowly grind to a catatonic state which requires a
hardware reset.
On Tue, Apr 03, 2012 at 10:29:27 -0400,
Matthias Clasen mcla...@redhat.com wrote:
For the 'make installing obvious' problem, what we really want is to
just autostart the installer. Unfortunately, the current live installer
does not really work well for that...
I don't think that is a good
On Tue, 2012-04-03 at 11:30 -0500, Bruno Wolff III wrote:
On Tue, Apr 03, 2012 at 10:29:27 -0400,
Matthias Clasen mcla...@redhat.com wrote:
For the 'make installing obvious' problem, what we really want is to
just autostart the installer. Unfortunately, the current live installer
does
On 04/03/2012 09:24 AM, stan wrote:
On Tue, 03 Apr 2012 03:11:17 -0700
Chuck Forsberg WA7KGX N2469Rc...@omen.com wrote:
However, the odd behavior where Fedora decides to ignore all input
except for mouse movement persists. When this happens, Fedora
seems to slowly grind to a catatonic state
Once upon a time, Matthias Clasen mcla...@redhat.com said:
That really depends on what use cases we see for our live cds. In my
view, there's really only two:
The primary use for a live cd is to install.
That's the primary use of the install media. The primary use of the
live media is to
To summarize, I see two major paths:
a) Make installer launcher more visible:
e.g. http://kparal.fedorapeople.org/misc/InstallFedoraButton.png
-or-
b) Use a proxy window asking which use case is relevant for you:
e.g. http://i.imgur.com/I26vS.png
Both approaches are fine in my view and
On 03/04/12 18:04, stan wrote:
[1] https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=796373
Thanks for the link and the response. That was my first thought;
unlike the ticket, on my system removing rsyslog wants to uninstall
many more packages. I can keep track of them, and re-install them after
On Tue, Apr 03, 2012 at 12:44:17 -0400,
Matthias Clasen mcla...@redhat.com wrote:
That really depends on what use cases we see for our live cds. In my
view, there's really only two:
The primary use for a live cd is to install.
And then, there is a secondary use where you want to review or
The following Fedora 16 Security updates need testing:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2012-4342/libtasn1-2.12-1.fc16
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2012-4291/taglib-1.7.1-1.fc16
The following Fedora 15 Security updates need testing:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2012-5256/wireshark-1.4.12-1.fc15
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2012-4308/libtasn1-2.12-1.fc15
On Tue, 3 Apr 2012, Felix Miata wrote:
I filed a bug and found a workaround:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=809470
This is your workaround:
title Install Rawhide (hd0,13)
kernel (hd0,2)/fedora/vmlinuz
repo=http://mirrors.us.kernel.org/fedora/development/17/i386/os
On Mon, 2012-02-27 at 14:58 +0100, Petr Schindler wrote:
I've added new criterion to beta release criteria. Tha alpha criterion
has already been there (I proposed it in another thread). You can find
changes here [1].
[1] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_17_Beta_Release_Criteria
On
Good job guys. I just wonder why use the updates-testing repo in the first
place? I realize it's a beta.. but might as well just run rawhide at that
point. Amirite?
Dan
-Original Message-
From: test-boun...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[mailto:test-boun...@lists.fedoraproject.org] On
On Tue, 2012-04-03 at 19:21 -0700, Dan Mashal wrote:
Good job guys. I just wonder why use the updates-testing repo in the
first place? I realize it's a beta.. but might as well just run
rawhide at that point. Amirite?
That's nothing to do with this thread. We're talking about this:
25 matches
Mail list logo
