Re: automate detection of scriptlet errors?
Scriptlet failures that happen on uninstall can be detected by doing a yum reinstall on the package. However, testers don't normally do this, so they usually don't get detected until the next update, and it can be difficult to find which of the many updates is generating the error message. Would it be possible to automate something like a yum reinstall on each new package and capture any resulting errors? That would be possible to automate in AutoQA once we are in a position we can automate stuff easily (not yet) :) But since you raised this up, I already wondered several times - when I see a scriptlet error during update, is there an easy way to tell which package generated it? Often it is not clear at all and I don't know how to find it out. Shouldn't be easy for yum to prepend the error message with a package NVR that caused it? -- test mailing list test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
Re: 2012-06-18 - Fedora QA Meeting - recap
On Tue, Jun 19, 2012 at 21:25:18 -0700, Adam Williamson awill...@redhat.com wrote: * Bruno was not around to discuss his blocker list analysis suggestion I had to go to work meeting before that topic was reached. I'll try to get the data on how many blockers were associated with each component for the next meeting. -- test mailing list test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
Re: 2012-06-18 - Fedora QA Meeting - recap
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Tue, 19 Jun 2012 21:25:18 -0700 Adam Williamson awill...@redhat.com wrote: TOPIC: ARM as a primary arch === * Supported ARM implementations are pandaboard, trimslice, highbank, beagleboard, kirkwood and Raspberry Pi; currently QA has a pandaboard and a trimslice, and some Pis on order. Also an XO 1.75, which is not listed * j_dulaney and nb believe there is budget available to get more hardware * With ARM as a primary arch, would we hold an entire release due to one ARM implementation being broken? Raspberry pi is not officially supported. There is no support at all for it in our kernel. we do intend to support it when support lands in the upstream kernel. xo-1.75 is in the same boat as the pi no upstream kernel support. Not all arm systems will support all possible installation methods. Dennis -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v2.0.18 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAk/h1gYACgkQkSxm47BaWfc/iACeK72lrqlCzpMOCu6kJgiRg7HV LYEAnRIvjgQrkpktIajN5yccgEPTcYBp =q773 -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- test mailing list test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
Re: F17 Gallium 0.4 on NV34 and Mesa 8.1-devel
On Tue, 2012-06-19 at 15:37 -0400, mwesten wrote: [10432.323596] [drm] nouveau :01:04.0: PGRAPH - ERROR nsource: DATA_ERROR nstatus: BAD_ARGUMENT [10432.323612] [drm] nouveau :01:04.0: PGRAPH - ch 3/7 class 0x0697 mthd 0x0208 data 0x04050348 Driver bug. Probably best to follow up on nouv...@lists.freedesktop.org - ajax signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part -- test mailing list test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
Re: 2012-06-18 - Fedora QA Meeting - recap
On Wed, 2012-06-20 at 08:54 -0500, Dennis Gilmore wrote: On Tue, 19 Jun 2012 21:25:18 -0700 Adam Williamson awill...@redhat.com wrote: TOPIC: ARM as a primary arch === * Supported ARM implementations are pandaboard, trimslice, highbank, beagleboard, kirkwood and Raspberry Pi; currently QA has a pandaboard and a trimslice, and some Pis on order. Also an XO 1.75, which is not listed * j_dulaney and nb believe there is budget available to get more hardware * With ARM as a primary arch, would we hold an entire release due to one ARM implementation being broken? Raspberry pi is not officially supported. There is no support at all for it in our kernel. we do intend to support it when support lands in the upstream kernel. Right, I forgot to clarify that in the meeting and also to fix it in the recap :/ sorry. I'll update the wiki page. -- Adam Williamson Fedora QA Community Monkey IRC: adamw | Twitter: AdamW_Fedora | identi.ca: adamwfedora http://www.happyassassin.net -- test mailing list test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
Re: fc18 Nightly LiveCD / 20120619
On Tue, 19 Jun 2012, Dennis Gilmore wrote: do note that livecd-tools are no longer supported. f18 will be using livemedia-creator to make the livecds i susoect you wont see the old tools fixed. I do not see a package for: livemedia-creator in bugzilla, nor does my local mirror of RawHide disclose such a package. What SRPM holds: livemedia-creator ? Thank you -- Russ herrold -- test mailing list test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
Re: fc18 Nightly LiveCD / 20120619
On Wed, Jun 20, 2012 at 14:35:14 -0400, R P Herrold herr...@owlriver.com wrote: On Tue, 19 Jun 2012, Dennis Gilmore wrote: do note that livecd-tools are no longer supported. f18 will be using livemedia-creator to make the livecds i susoect you wont see the old tools fixed. I do not see a package for: livemedia-creator in bugzilla, nor does my local mirror of RawHide disclose such a package. # rpm -qf `which livemedia-creator` lorax-17.26-1.fc17.x86_64 What SRPM holds: livemedia-creator ? # rpm -qif `which livemedia-creator` | grep Source Source RPM : lorax-17.26-1.fc17.src.rpm -- test mailing list test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
Re: Release criteria proposal: USB-written images
On Mon, 2012-06-18 at 10:26 +0200, Petr Schindler wrote: As two people voted for it, patch. Beta proposal is unchanged. For Alpha, instead of adding a new criterion, the existing criterion is simply modified to: * The installer must boot (if appropriate) and run on all primary architectures, with all system firmware types that are common on those architectures, from default live image, DVD, and boot.iso install media when written to an optical disc and when written to a USB stick with at least one of the [[How_to_create_and_use_Live_USB|officially supported methods]] It's a bit of an ugly long sentence, but I can't see a way to contract it without losing significance, and the two people who commented preferred one really long criterion to two quite long ones. +1 It is long, but understandable. I have gone ahead and implemented both parts of the proposal (the modified Alpha proposal that Petr and John +1ed, and the Beta proposal that was not changed). Thanks for the feedback all! -- Adam Williamson Fedora QA Community Monkey IRC: adamw | Twitter: AdamW_Fedora | identi.ca: adamwfedora http://www.happyassassin.net -- test mailing list test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
Re: fc18 Nightly LiveCD / 20120619
On Wed, 20 Jun 2012, Bruno Wolff III wrote: # rpm -qf `which livemedia-creator` lorax-17.26-1.fc17.x86_64 thank you -- Russ herrold -- test mailing list test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
Re: fc18 Nightly LiveCD / 20120619
On Thu, Jun 21, 2012 at 5:09 AM, R P Herrold herr...@owlriver.com wrote: On Wed, 20 Jun 2012, Bruno Wolff III wrote: # rpm -qf `which livemedia-creator` lorax-17.26-1.fc17.x86_64 thank you I tried using livemedia-creator a while back and ran into a number of issues [1]. If you succeed, do share your findings. Thanks, Amit [1] http://markmail.org/message/mi5wij5gi54orwt4 -- Russ herrold -- test mailing list test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test -- http://echorand.me -- test mailing list test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
Re: fc18 Nightly LiveCD / 20120619
On Thu, 21 Jun 2012, Amit Saha wrote: On Thu, Jun 21, 2012 at 5:09 AM, R P Herrold herr...@owlriver.com wrote: On Wed, 20 Jun 2012, Bruno Wolff III wrote: # rpm -qf `which livemedia-creator` lorax-17.26-1.fc17.x86_64 I tried using livemedia-creator a while back and ran into a number of issues [1]. If you succeed, do share your findings. Lorax appeared around F15, and has a later Python usage which prevents building on older CentOS (my primary environment, where I would build images) /usr/bin/env python setup.py build File setup.py, line 30 finally: ^ Not clear that back porting will work here, but we will see As to the issues you have encountered, Amit, I would encourage you to file bugs at: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/ along with reproducing cases, and as possible, fixes (a form of sharing ** your ** findings ;) ). Without such reports, the developers do not know your pain points -- Russ herrold -- test mailing list test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
Fedora 16 updates-testing report
The following Fedora 16 Security updates need testing: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2012-9029/boost-1.47.0-7.fc16 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2012-9037/thunderbird-lightning-1.5-2.fc16,thunderbird-13.0-1.fc16 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2012-9078/lighttpd-1.4.31-1.fc16 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2012-9546/vte-0.28.2-6.fc16 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2012-9314/gd-2.0.35-17.fc16 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2012-6614/gdb-7.3.50.20110722-16.fc16 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2012-9577/clamav-0.97.5-1600.fc16 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2012-9425/openstack-nova-2011.3.1-10.fc16 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2012-9628/openjpeg-1.4-13.fc16 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2012-9414/mosh-1.2.2-1.fc16 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2012-9636/rubygem-actionpack-3.0.10-7.fc16 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2012-9639/rubygem-activerecord-3.0.10-3.fc16 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2012-9399/xen-4.1.2-8.fc16 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2012-9313/ImageMagick-6.7.0.10-5.fc16 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2012-9324/mysql-5.5.24-1.fc16 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2012-9337/roundcubemail-0.7.2-2.fc16 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2012-7593/tomcat6-6.0.35-1.fc16 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2012-9637/gc-7.2b-2.fc16 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2012-9666/gallery3-3.0.4-1.fc16 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2012-8021/sudo-1.8.3p1-3.fc16 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2012-9714/sticky-notes-0.3.09062012.4-5.fc16 The following Fedora 16 Critical Path updates have yet to be approved: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2012-9587/thunderbird-13.0.1-1.fc16,xulrunner-13.0.1-1.fc16,firefox-13.0.1-1.fc16 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2012-9561/tar-1.26-3.fc16 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2012-9507/selinux-policy-3.10.0-89.fc16 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2012-9324/mysql-5.5.24-1.fc16 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2012-9314/gd-2.0.35-17.fc16 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2012-9274/gstreamer-plugins-good-0.10.30-6.fc16 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2012-9267/lxpanel-0.5.10-1.fc16 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2012-9171/qtwebkit-2.2.2-1.fc16 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2012-9477/analitza-4.8.4-1.fc16,ark-4.8.4-1.fc16,blinken-4.8.4-1.fc16,cantor-4.8.4-1.fc16,filelight-4.8.4-2.fc16,gwenview-4.8.4-1.fc16,jovie-4.8.4-1.fc16,kaccessible-4.8.4-1.fc16,kactivities-4.8.4-1.fc16,kalgebra-4.8.4-1.fc16,kalzium-4.8.4-1.fc16,kamera-4.8.4-1.fc16,kanagram-4.8.4-1.fc16,kate-4.8.4-1.fc16,kbruch-4.8.4-1.fc16,kcalc-4.8.4-2.fc16,kcharselect-4.8.4-2.fc16,kcolorchooser-4.8.4-1.fc16,kdeaccessibility-4.8.4-1.fc16,kdeadmin-4.8.4-1.fc16,kdeartwork-4.8.4-1.fc16,kde-baseapps-4.8.4-1.fc16,kdebindings-4.8.4-1.fc16,kdeedu-4.8.4-1.fc16,kdegames-4.8.4-1.fc16,kdegraphics-4.8.4-1.fc16,kdegraphics-mobipocket-4.8.4-1.fc16,kdegraphics-strigi-analyzer-4.8.4-1.fc16,kdegraphics-thumbnailers-4.8.4-1.fc16,kde-l10n-4.8.4-1.fc16,kdelibs-4.8.4-4.fc16,kdemultimedia-4.8.4-3.fc16,kdenetwork-4.8.4-1.fc16,kdepim-4.8.4-2.fc16,kdepimlibs-4.8.4-1.fc16,kdepim-runtime-4.8.4-1.fc16,kdeplasma-addons-4.8.4-1.fc16,kde-printer-applet-4.8.4-1.fc16,kde-runtime-4.8.4-1.fc16,kdesdk-4.8.4-1.fc16,kdetoys-4.8.4-1.fc16,kdeutils-4.8.4-1.fc16,kde-wallpapers-4.8.4-1.fc16,kde-workspace-4.8.4-2.fc16,kdf-4.8.4-2.fc16,kfloppy-4.8.4-1.fc16,kgamma-4.8.4-1.fc16,kgeography-4.8.4-1.fc16,kgpg-4.8.4-1.fc16,khangman-4.8.4-1.fc16,kig-4.8.4-1.fc16,kimono-4.8.4-1.fc16,kiten-4.8.4-1.fc16,klettres-4.8.4-1.fc16,kmag-4.8.4-1.fc16,kmousetool-4.8.4-1.fc16,kmouth-4.8.4-1.fc16,kmplot-4.8.4-1.fc16,kolourpaint-4.8.4-1.fc16,konsole-4.8.4-1.fc16,kremotecontrol-4.8.4-1.fc16,kross-interpreters-4.8.4-1.fc16,kruler-4.8.4-1.fc16,ksaneplugin-4.8.4-1.fc16,ksecrets-4.8.4-1.fc16,ksnapshot-4.8.4-1.fc16,kstars-4.8.4-1.fc16,ktimer-4.8.4-1.fc16,ktouch-4.8.4-1.fc16,kturtle-4.8.4-1.fc16,kwallet-4.8.4-1.fc16,kwordquiz-4.8.4-1.fc16,libkdcraw-4.8.4-1.fc16,libkdeedu-4.8.4-1.fc16,libkexiv2-4.8.4-1.fc16,libkipi-4.8.4-1.fc16,libksane-4.8.4-1.fc16,marble-4.8.4-1.fc16,okular-4.8.4-1.fc16,oxygen-icon-theme-4.8.4-1.fc16,parley-4.8.4-1.fc16,pykde4-4.8.4-1.fc16,qyoto-4.8.4-1.fc16,rocs-4.8.4-1.fc16,ruby-korundum-4.8.4-1.fc16,ruby-qt-4.8.4-1.fc16,smokegen-4.8.4-1.fc16,smokekde-4.8.4-1.fc16,smokeqt-4.8.4-1.fc16,step-4.8.4-1.fc16,superkaramba-4.8.4-1.fc16,svgpart-4.8.4-1.fc16,sweeper-4.8.4-1.fc16 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2012-9014/gawk-4.0.1-1.fc16
