And there are dozens of applications out there that used to utilize
the UPower signal and haven't been given proper chance to adjust to
the new approach, so they are broken at the moment.
Dozens ? Name them, please. I've fixed the ones I've found (which was
just NM, really).
From the
Compose started at Mon Feb 4 08:15:37 UTC 2013
Broken deps for x86_64
--
[bootconf]
bootconf-1.4-6.fc18.noarch requires grub
[compat-gcc-34]
compat-gcc-34-c++-3.4.6-24.fc17.x86_64 requires libstdc++ 0:4.8.0
[couchdb]
Once upon a time, Adam Jackson a...@redhat.com said:
If I can abuse this thread for design discussion for a moment, what if
instead of the grub editor horrorshow for things like this, we had a
list of debugging tickboxes you could check that appended the right
thing to kcmdline (and just
Hello all,
After many years of using Red Hat Linux and Fedora I'd like to step up and
contribute to the Fedora Project by zapping bugs.
Some weeks ago I reported a KSH bug and found it to be very nice to get it
to be recognized and worked on by people. I would like to give a helping
hand to
On Feb 4, 2013, at 9:01 AM, Adam Jackson a...@redhat.com wrote:
If I can abuse this thread for design discussion for a moment, what if
instead of the grub editor horrorshow for things like this, we had a
list of debugging tickboxes you could check that appended the right
thing to kcmdline
Michael Cronenworth wrote:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=883182
I wasn't sure on the component. Feel free to correct. Thanks!
Apparently lorax was incorrect.
Does anyone have any input on what component this should be filed against?
--
test mailing list
#332: Add Fedora 19 Milestones
---+---
Reporter: tflink| Owner: tflink
Type: enhancement | Status: new
Priority: major | Milestone: Fedora 19
Component: Blocker
On Feb 4, 2013, at 11:36 AM, Michael Cronenworth m...@cchtml.com wrote:
Michael Cronenworth wrote:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=883182
I wasn't sure on the component. Feel free to correct. Thanks!
Apparently lorax was incorrect.
Does anyone have any input on what
Chris Murphy wrote:
I'm not understanding the problem in the bug.
The Date/Time setting is required by anaconda before package
installation may begin. I wanted to make this an optional setting. In
order for it to be optional the date/time must be set to something
reasonable from a trusted
On Feb 4, 2013, at 1:35 PM, Michael Cronenworth m...@cchtml.com wrote:
Chris Murphy wrote:
I'm not understanding the problem in the bug.
The Date/Time setting is required by anaconda before package
installation may begin. I wanted to make this an optional setting. In
order for it to be
The following Fedora 17 Security updates need testing:
Age URL
3
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2013-1734/libupnp-1.6.18-1.fc17
13
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2013-1244/libexif-0.6.21-2.fc17
13
The following Fedora 16 Security updates need testing:
Age URL
55
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2012-20157/libproxy-0.4.11-1.fc16
3 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2013-1748/sssd-1.8.6-1.fc16
3
The following Fedora 18 Security updates need testing:
Age URL
3
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2013-1357/dnsmasq-2.65-4.fc18
13
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2013-1277/python-tw2-jquery-2.0.3-5.fc18
87
On Tue, 2013-01-22 at 19:30 -0800, Adam Williamson wrote:
The 'new style' tracker bug aliases are as follows:
AlphaBlocker
AlphaFreezeException
BetaBlocker
BetaFreezeException
FinalBlocker
FinalFreezeException
Versioned aliases will still be applied to all the tracker bugs, so that
we
week, mostly.
This is a reminder of the upcoming QA meeting. Please add any topic
suggestions to the meeting wiki page:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA/Meetings/20130204
The current proposed agenda is included below.
== Proposed Agenda Topics ==
1. Criteria Revision
2. Test Case Revision
3
15 matches
Mail list logo
