Missing expected images:
Atomic qcow2 x86_64
Workstation live i386
Server boot i386
Atomic raw-xz x86_64
Kde live i386
Failed openQA tests: 18/137 (x86_64), 1/18 (i386), 1/2 (arm)
New failures (same test did not fail in Rawhide-20170710.n.0):
ID: 120133 Test: x86_64 Server-dvd-iso
On 07/12/2017 10:39 AM, Michael Schwendt wrote:
Installing wine.x86_64 pulls in dozens of i686 packages by default through
implicit or explicit dependencies.
Working as intended or else my inbox would be swamped with "I can't start app
$XYZ!"
___
The following Fedora 26 Security updates need testing:
Age URL
95 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2017-1bf5a0ce01
python-XStatic-jquery-ui-1.12.0.1-2.fc26
35 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2017-2522df3526
nodejs-brace-expansion-1.1.7-1.fc26
8
The following Fedora 25 Security updates need testing:
Age URL
197 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2016-d79ba708cb
exim-4.87.1-1.fc25
95 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2017-e2d17af41e
python-XStatic-jquery-ui-1.12.0.1-4.fc25
39
The following Fedora 24 Security updates need testing:
Age URL
203 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2016-26f9817b08
squid-3.5.23-1.fc24
197 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2016-eaaa9c4a08
exim-4.87.1-1.fc24
159
On Wed, 12 Jul 2017 08:22:32 -0500, Michael Cronenworth wrote:
> IMO, we need to stop allowing arch to be specified in dnf by default. Users
> think
> they need to add them and get into constant trouble by it. I've closed a
> handful of
> bugs against Wine for this reason. A command argument
On Mon, 2017-07-10 at 14:46 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
> On Sun, 2017-07-09 at 19:17 +, Matthew Saltzman wrote:
> > I upgraded a workstation from up-to-date Fedora 25 to Fedora 26
> > beta
> > and I can no longer log in via GDM to a gnome-shell session. I get
> > prompted to enter a
On 07/12/2017 05:12 AM, Michael Schwendt wrote:
The x86_64 and i686 build of a package are published at the same time.
If you get a conflict like this, where the version of the two packages
is not the same, you need to examine your installation and the repository
contents to figure out why you
Hi,
sorry a second and third boot with the same configuration was ok.
sorry kind regards
-Ursprüngliche Mitteilung-
Von: Joerg Lechner
An: test
Verschickt: Mi, 12. Jul 2017 14:33
Betreff: Re: F26 Final boot on 64GB USB flash
On Wed, 12 Jul 2017 10:39:31 + (UTC), Thomas Goffin wrote:
> Thanks for reaction, the problem was in the duplicate:
> * gstreamer1-1.12.1-1.fc27* gstreamer1-1.12.0-1.fc27
> Maybe it will be a good idea to use 'installonly_limit=1' into a dnf
> configuration sometimes.
>
Unlikely. That
Hi,
boot of F26 RC 1.4 was ok
Kind regards
-Ursprüngliche Mitteilung-
Von: Joerg Lechner
An: test
Verschickt: Mi, 12. Jul 2017 14:32
Betreff: F26 Final boot on 64GB USB flash medium unsuccessful
Hi,
just I downloaded F26 RC
On Wed, 12 Jul 2017 12:12:07 +0200
Michael Schwendt wrote:
> On Tue, 11 Jul 2017 12:27:34 + (UTC), Thomas Goffin wrote:
>
> > Hello, I'm just trying to install the Wine via dnf and get:
> > # dnf install wine ... Error: Transaction check error:
> > file
Thanks for reaction, the problem was in the duplicate:
* gstreamer1-1.12.1-1.fc27* gstreamer1-1.12.0-1.fc27
Maybe it will be a good idea to use 'installonly_limit=1' into a dnf
configuration sometimes.
Regards.
On Wednesday, July 12, 2017, 1:13:14 PM GMT+3, Michael Schwendt
On Tue, 11 Jul 2017 12:27:34 + (UTC), Thomas Goffin wrote:
> Hello, I'm just trying to install the Wine via dnf and get:
> # dnf install wine ... Error: Transaction check error:
> file /usr/share/doc/gstreamer1/NEWS from install of
> gstreamer1-1.12.1-1.fc27.i686 conflicts with file from
Thanks, I'll get on that
On 12 July 2017 00:30:24 GMT+03:00, Adam Williamson
wrote:
>On Tue, 2017-07-11 at 23:38 +0300, Allan Mwenda wrote:
>> I just booted a live iso of Fedora 26 LXDE and noted a few things.
>> 1. It is not LXQT:(
>
>There is a separate lxqt spin:
15 matches
Mail list logo