No missing expected images.
Failed openQA tests: 14/137 (x86_64), 5/23 (i386), 1/2 (arm)
ID: 206139 Test: x86_64 Server-dvd-iso server_role_deploy_domain_controller
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/206139
ID: 206145 Test: x86_64 Server-dvd-iso server_role_deploy_database_serv
No missing expected images.
Failed openQA tests: 17/137 (x86_64), 5/23 (i386), 1/2 (arm)
ID: 205977 Test: x86_64 Server-dvd-iso server_role_deploy_domain_controller
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/205977
ID: 205983 Test: x86_64 Server-dvd-iso server_role_deploy_database_serv
OLD: Fedora-28-20180316.n.0
NEW: Fedora-28-20180316.n.1
= SUMMARY =
Added images:1
Dropped images: 0
Added packages: 1
Dropped packages:0
Upgraded packages: 0
Downgraded packages: 0
Size of added packages: 121.15 MiB
Size of dropped packages:0 B
Size of
OLD: Fedora-Rawhide-20180316.n.0
NEW: Fedora-Rawhide-20180316.n.1
= SUMMARY =
Added images:1
Dropped images: 2
Added packages: 1
Dropped packages:0
Upgraded packages: 49
Downgraded packages: 1
Size of added packages: 91.26 MiB
Size of dropped packages:0 B
On Fri, 2018-03-16 at 13:51 +0100, Kalev Lember wrote:
> On 03/16/2018 01:08 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
> > On Fri, 2018-03-16 at 11:52 +0100, Kalev Lember wrote:
> > >
> > > I'd appreciate a lot if people could give it a quick spin and see if
> > > they can find anything that looks like a regress
On Fri, 2018-03-16 at 10:50 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
> On Fri, 2018-03-16 at 18:22 +0100, Frantisek Zatloukal wrote:
> > Hi,
> > the issue is already reported (although, I didn't check the clean install,
> > just an upgrade, but I believe it is the same problem).
> >
> > https://bugzilla.redh
No missing expected images.
Failed openQA tests: 15/137 (x86_64), 5/23 (i386), 1/2 (arm)
ID: 205499 Test: x86_64 Server-dvd-iso server_role_deploy_domain_controller
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/205499
ID: 205505 Test: x86_64 Server-dvd-iso server_role_deploy_database_serv
No missing expected images.
Failed openQA tests: 36/137 (x86_64), 12/24 (i386), 1/2 (arm)
New failures (same test did not fail in Rawhide-20180312.n.0):
ID: 205331 Test: x86_64 Server-dvd-iso install_default_upload
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/205331
ID: 205335 Test: x86
No missing expected images.
Failed openQA tests: 83/137 (x86_64), 24/24 (i386), 1/2 (arm)
ID: 205074 Test: x86_64 Server-boot-iso install_default
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/205074
ID: 205075 Test: x86_64 Server-boot-iso install_default@uefi
URL: https://openqa.fedorapro
On Fri, 2018-03-16 at 18:22 +0100, Frantisek Zatloukal wrote:
> Hi,
> the issue is already reported (although, I didn't check the clean install,
> just an upgrade, but I believe it is the same problem).
>
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1555391
Can you folks try with a Rawhide image
The following Fedora 26 Security updates need testing:
Age URL
232 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2017-ccb5c8d1e7
docker-distribution-2.6.2-1.git48294d9.fc26
64 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2018-66b885ae3c
keycloak-httpd-client-install-0.8-1.fc26
51
Hi,
the issue is already reported (although, I didn't check the clean install,
just an upgrade, but I believe it is the same problem).
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1555391
On Fri, Mar 16, 2018 at 5:46 PM, AV wrote:
> This applies to an ASUS Zenbook with Fed27 installed using
> UE
This applies to an ASUS Zenbook with Fed27 installed using
UEFI + Secure Boot (working without problems).
I downloaded
Fedora-Workstation-netinstall-x86_64-28-20180313.n.0.iso
and wanted to install it on the Zenbook (wiping Fed27) but enountered
this:
Secure Boot Violation
Invalid Signature Detec
OLD: Fedora-28-20180315.n.0
NEW: Fedora-28-20180316.n.0
= SUMMARY =
Added images:0
Dropped images: 8
Added packages: 0
Dropped packages:0
Upgraded packages: 0
Downgraded packages: 0
Size of added packages: 0 B
Size of dropped packages:0 B
Size of upgraded
OLD: Fedora-Rawhide-20180315.n.1
NEW: Fedora-Rawhide-20180316.n.0
= SUMMARY =
Added images:1
Dropped images: 2
Added packages: 7
Dropped packages:0
Upgraded packages: 164
Downgraded packages: 1
Size of added packages: 1.01 MiB
Size of dropped packages:0 B
On 03/16/2018 01:08 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
> On Fri, 2018-03-16 at 11:52 +0100, Kalev Lember wrote:
>>
>> I'd appreciate a lot if people could give it a quick spin and see if
>> they can find anything that looks like a regression compared to the
>> stable F28 images, and then we can further dis
On Fri, 2018-03-16 at 11:52 +0100, Kalev Lember wrote:
>
> I'd appreciate a lot if people could give it a quick spin and see if
> they can find anything that looks like a regression compared to the
> stable F28 images, and then we can further discuss this at the blocker
> review meeting on Monday.
On 03/16/2018 12:35 PM, Felipe Borges wrote:
> I have tried to boot up the image above but it fails for me. After
> grub it spams intermittently the terminal with
>
> [dracut-initqueue[582]: Warning: dractur-initqueue timeout - starting
> timeout scripts
>
> And after some time it falls back into
2018-03-16 12:35 GMT+01:00 Felipe Borges :
>
> And after some time it falls back into emergency mode.
>
> The media test also fails. I have downloaded it three times to make sure.
>
> Has somebody else run into the same problem?
Same problem here.
A.
_
On 03/16/2018 12:13 PM, Charles-Antoine Couret wrote:
> I have an issue with Gnome-Shell which is crashing every time before
> displaying applications. I have to downgrade to a beta release to be
> able to use it.
>
> I reported a bug:
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1551749
>
> Apa
Hi,
I have an issue with Gnome-Shell which is crashing every time. I have to
downgrade to a beta release to be able to use it.
I reported a bug:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1551749
Apart from mutter/gnome-shell/mesa issue, other components are working well
with the latest releas
Hi test list,
I'm hoping we could have GNOME 3.28.0 in F28 Beta as a Freeze Exception.
I've filed a bug tracking this, and I hope we can discuss this further
during the blocker review meeting on Monday.
Bodhi update for 3.28.0:
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2018-5ebe0eb1f2
FE bu
No missing expected images.
Passed openQA tests: 2/2 (x86_64)
--
Mail generated by check-compose:
https://pagure.io/fedora-qa/check-compose
___
test mailing list -- test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to test-le...@lists.fedoraproj
On Thu, 2018-03-15 at 22:26 +, Fedora compose checker wrote:
> No missing expected images.
>
> Failed openQA tests: 84/137 (x86_64), 24/24 (i386), 1/2 (arm)
Virtually all tests currently fail on Rawhide because a complete
redesign of Cantarell - the font we use in anaconda - landed and broke
24 matches
Mail list logo
