On Tue, 2019-03-26 at 11:14 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
> The justification for this is, I hope I am correctly representing all
> views here (please say so if not), that this mechanism is both less
> necessary (due to a general reduction in the amount of 'weird' graphics
> hardware out there,
On Wed, 2019-03-06 at 12:46 -0800, Adam Williamson wrote:
> Hi folks!
>
> So there's a current Beta blocker bug:
>
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1683197
>
> it is currently accepted as a blocker on the understanding that trying
> to boot to Workstation in 'basic graphics mode'
On Thu, 2017-06-22 at 16:57 +0200, Michael Schwendt wrote:
>Stack trace of thread 1456:
>#0 0x7ff745e9a7bb raise
> (libc.so.6)
>
On Tue, 2016-10-25 at 02:12 +0200, AV wrote:
> It is no longer mentioned under Settings-Details where I now
> see 'Graphics: Intel HD Graphics 5500 (Broadwell GT2)' instead
> of 'Wayland...'
That's intentional. The wayland session never bothered to look up the
GL renderer information until now.
On Fri, 2016-01-15 at 10:51 +, Fedora Rawhide Report wrote:
Some fallout from the glew rebase in here, none of which is strictly
glew's fault as far as I can tell.
> [FlightGear-Atlas]
> FlightGear-Atlas-0.5.0-0.15.cvs20141002.fc24.i686 requires
> libGLEW.so.1.10
Map.o: In function
On Sat, 2015-08-15 at 11:18 +, Fedora Rawhide Report wrote:
acl-2.2.52-10.fc24
--
* Fri Aug 14 2015 Adam Jackson a...@redhat.com 2.2.52-10
- Remove bizarre 12 year old libtool invocation workaround that prevented
hardened cflags working
On this note: I'll be casually
On Sat, 2015-08-08 at 11:27 -0500, Dennis Gilmore wrote:
It worked in f22 but was a bit slow. Plasmashell is segfaulting and
the bug filing process does not work.
Do you mean:
a) abrt can't figure out how to file a bug about this
b) nobody can be bothered to file a bug about this
c) there is
On Tue, 2014-10-28 at 10:57 +, Fedora Rawhide Report wrote:
[dragonegg]
dragonegg-3.4-0.3.rc0.fc21.i686 requires libLLVM-3.4.so
dragonegg-3.4-0.3.rc0.fc21.i686 requires gcc = 0:4.8.2-14.fc21
This one's a joy. dragonegg is a gcc plugin that basically replaces the
middle and
On Tue, 2014-10-14 at 14:10 -0400, Felix Miata wrote:
Adam Jackson composed on 2014-10-14 11:56 (UTC-0400):
Might this be worked around via some manual acceleration option for the
Intel
X driver?
Probably. Option AccelMethod UXA perhaps?
/etc/X11/xorg.conf.d/60-flags.conf
On Wed, 2014-09-10 at 12:32 -0400, Robert P. J. Day wrote:
possibly admitting my ignorance, but why does installing
perl-ExtUtils-MakeMaker drag in systemtap-sdt-devel? i see no logical
connection, and i don't even have any systemtap packages installed.
i ask since i'm working with a
On Wed, 2014-07-02 at 18:08 +0200, František Zatloukal wrote:
It's difficult to run Fedora on old Intel graphics. From OpenGL 2.0
support in Mesa lot of apps and (especially wine) games became
unplayable because the hardware doesn't support OpenGL 2 fully and lot
of things are slower.
On gen3
On Thu, 2014-05-22 at 14:40 +0200, Michael Schwendt wrote:
On Thu, 22 May 2014 10:34:01 +, Fedora Rawhide Report wrote:
uthash-1.9.9-4.fc21
---
* Wed May 21 2014 Peter Robinson pbrobin...@fedoraproject.org 1.9.9-4
- Root package should be noarch too
Please
On Fri, 2014-02-28 at 23:57 +0200, Panu Matilainen wrote:
And FWIW no, I dont follow the there are some packages with incorrect
URL, thus the field must be useless and should be removed logic here.
Just to puree the horse further: I never said that.
I do believe that the most valuable URL
On Thu, 2014-02-27 at 16:03 +0200, Alexander Todorov wrote:
Adam,
just for completeness - libpciaccess doesn't seem to have a test suite. Do
you
mean to exclude it from the effort of creating one as well, or only exclude
reports for missing %check?
The latter.
Btw the URL field in the
On Thu, 2014-02-27 at 17:50 +0100, poma wrote:
On 27.02.2014 17:24, Adam Jackson wrote:
On Thu, 2014-02-27 at 16:03 +0200, Alexander Todorov wrote:
...
Btw the URL field in the spec file should be updated to
http://cgit.freedesktop.org/xorg/lib/libpciaccess/
Oh yes, another useless
On Wed, 2014-02-26 at 09:07 -0500, Josh Boyer wrote:
Except the kernel. Please exclude it from all of this.
Also: xorg-x11-server, xorg-x11-drv-*, libdrm, libpciaccess, mesa. Any
reasonable amount of testing on those is going to require more hardware
access than is feasible at rpmbuild time.
On Fri, 2013-12-06 at 12:53 -0800, Adam Williamson wrote:
On Fri, 2013-12-06 at 13:10 -0700, Lawrence E Graves wrote:
I don't mean to be a pain in the ---, but there is only one choice of
nvidia drivers which are 304.116. Who do I report this problem to?
Given that you don't provide any
On Fri, 2013-07-12 at 09:06 -0400, Kamil Paral wrote:
But if you say 'nomodeset' on kcmdline you'll stick with efifb
at runtime, so in that sense testing this is the same as with BIOS
systems.
The visible difference at X time is that you'll be using the fbdev
driver instead of the vesa
On Thu, 2013-07-11 at 08:25 -0400, Jan Sedlak wrote:
From what I read [2, 3], it seems that UEFI systems don't support VESA graphic
mode. I must admit that I don't fully understand what's the state of UEFI
graphic protocols (there is GOP and UGA protocols, but I don't know whether
Linux
On Thu, 2013-07-11 at 13:09 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
As things stand, we don't really have a fallback graphics method for
UEFI.
False.
- ajax
--
test mailing list
test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
On Thu, 2013-07-11 at 13:47 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
On Thu, 2013-07-11 at 16:28 -0400, Adam Jackson wrote:
On Thu, 2013-07-11 at 13:09 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
As things stand, we don't really have a fallback graphics method for
UEFI.
False.
In what way
On Thu, 2013-07-11 at 14:12 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
We probably need to test it more, but the impression I was getting from
the bug is that we don't necessarily want to simply use 'nomodeset' as
the 'standard fallback path' for UEFI, that there may be UEFI systems on
which we might want
On Thu, 2013-07-11 at 15:54 -0600, Chris Murphy wrote:
[drm:drm_pci_agp_init] *ERROR* Cannot initialize the agpgart module.
DRM: Fill_in_dev failed.
Unrelated.
X.log from F19 netinstl shows the fbdev driver is loaded, but there's an
error finding screens:
(EE) VESA(0): V_BIOS address
On Mon, 2013-06-17 at 19:23 -0600, Chris Murphy wrote:
While anaconda is running an installation, gnome-shell is hogging a
whole core on its own, and X is using about 25% of the other core. Is
this expected? This is on baremetal, with a nouveau supported GPU:
NVIDIA Corporation G84M [GeForce
On Tue, 2013-04-02 at 12:45 -0500, Kevin Martin wrote:
I would happily use the nouveau driver (and was using it until going to the
3.8+ kernel where it became virtually
unusable with noaccel turned on)
Option ShadowFB on
Or try vesa instead.
- ajax
--
test mailing list
On Wed, 2013-03-06 at 14:50 +, Jóhann B. Guðmundsson wrote:
Well they kinda need to rethink how they are handling this due to steam
and all ;)
The smiley does not make this less condescending.
We will be updating Mesa aggressively. I said as much on the phone to
Valve last week.
- ajax
On Wed, 2013-02-13 at 17:10 -0800, Per Bothner wrote:
Does this ring a bell with anyone? I do have Xorg.0.log
and /var/log/messages copied from a non-working setup.
I'd like to see them. It sounds like you're falling onto the nomodeset
path for some reason, given that you're seeing both I
On Fri, 2013-02-01 at 10:44 -0800, Per Bothner wrote:
Though it seems a bug to set the installed default mode line to
nomodeset based on whether one boots up the live DVD in basic graphics
mode. Better to install the settings appropriate for the hardware
*plus* some kind of safe mode in the
On Wed, 2013-01-16 at 10:31 -0500, Clyde E. Kunkel wrote:
Rawhide gnome desktop acting up recently. Have to restart several times
to get desktop that is readable. Several times screens are garbled.
Here is a bit of an Xorg.0.log that may be a clue:
Here's how to read this and similar
On Thu, 2013-01-10 at 18:26 -0700, Lawrence Graves wrote:
I got the nvidia drivers to install with kernel 3.7.1-5 but now it
won't compile my vmware workstation modules.
This is not the list for third party driver support.
- ajax
--
test mailing list
test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To
On Thu, 2012-12-20 at 10:43 -0800, Stephen Sheldon wrote:
On 12/20/2012 10:40 AM, Jim wrote:
On 12/20/2012 01:32 PM, Stephen Sheldon wrote:
I upgraded my eeepc 701 to fc18 using yum. Now I cannot push a
window above the top of the screen in gnome 3, either in gnome shell
or fallback
On Wed, 2012-12-19 at 05:54 -0700, Lawrence Graves wrote:
There is a bug in the last gnome-shell update. After installing the
latest updates which gnome-shell 3.6.2-6 was a part of,
That's... suspicious. The only change between -5 and -6 was:
===
@@ -122,7 +122,7 @@ rm
On Wed, 2012-12-12 at 14:33 +0100, Gianluca Cecchi wrote:
Tried also this way
remove: quiet
insert: xdriver=vesa vga=ask
then selected 318
result is that I recevie error rgarding X Windows System start and
when I land to text selection menu no keyboard and no Alt+Fx
see screenshots
On Tue, 2012-12-11 at 15:53 +0100, Gianluca Cecchi wrote:
TC1 of final netinst.iso fails worse neither arrives at initial screen
Gonna need to see an X log from this to know why it's failing, I think.
If you can't extract it from the install environment, you might try
installing through text
On Sun, 2012-11-11 at 11:19 -0800, Chuck Forsberg WA7KGX N2469R wrote:
Noveau crashed again. I am now running Nvidia.
The release notes should clearly explain the procedure
for installing the Nvidia driver. Some will need it.
No, we're not doing that, ever. Stop suggesting it.
- ajax
On Wed, 2012-11-14 at 14:43 -0500, G.Wolfe Woodbury wrote:
3) The installed system won't take to the FB X server by itself, I had
to mangle a xorg.conf file to bring up an 800x600 fbdev instance and
then let firstboot run on a reboot
That's a bug, sir. X on efifb should work without
On 11/8/12 7:17 PM, Ankur Sinha wrote:
Hi folks,
My f18 system doesn't pull up a login screen on boot. It just waits.
Restarting the gdm.service from a virtual terminal gets it up though,
but I need to this at every boot now.
Here's the gdm.service status when it didn't come up:
On Thu, 2012-10-25 at 09:52 +0200, drago01 wrote:
On Thu, Oct 25, 2012 at 7:11 AM, Chris Murphy li...@colorremedies.com wrote:
Is anyone else seeing 100% CPU consumption in top for gnome-shell for the
entire installation process? This seems excessive for something that isn't
doing
On Thu, 2012-10-25 at 20:33 +0100, Frank Murphy wrote:
On 25/10/12 17:01, Matthias Clasen wrote:
at-spi* is not an app though. It is a central piece of desktop
infrastructure.
Why?
Because treating those who do need accessibility as second-class
citizens means they inevitably get a
On Thu, 2012-10-25 at 22:21 +0100, Frank Murphy wrote:
I agree, but I don't need it,
Wheres the script to turn if off?
Everone else has to figure that out themselves.
accessibilty.conf has no on=0\false switch.
If the F18 install I just did is any indication, the state it ships in
is as off
On Mon, 2012-10-01 at 10:23 +, Clyde E. Kunkel wrote:
The all authoritative and never wrong google search for ctrl-alt-bksp. :-)
Atually, it seemed to be confirmed when I tried the various methods
suggested in this thread and nothing worked until I set the xkbd option
using gsettings.
On Fri, 2012-09-28 at 16:05 +, Clyde E. Kunkel wrote:
On 09/27/2012 07:18 PM, Sergio wrote:
Maybe the traditional way of creating /etc/X11/xorg.conf.d/zap.conf with
Section “ServerFlags”
Option “DontZap” “false”
EndSection
?
No, this was disabled awhile ago and no longer
On 9/24/12 8:15 PM, John Reiser wrote:
If it is known that any Radeon card less than Radeon 9600 won't work
satisfactorily in the default Gnome3 desktop, then Fedora should
admit it up front, and raise the minimum stated requirements.
I'm sure the docs team takes patches.
But also: that's
On Mon, 2012-09-24 at 13:30 -0700, John Reiser wrote:
Do you have any old or new graphic hardware, working or not? Join this test
week and help us to hunt down driver bugs before Fedora 18 Beta release!
There is doubt about whether this particular test day is worth the time.
You're free
On Tue, 2012-09-04 at 19:22 -0500, kevin martin wrote:
Can't run X on my laptop anymore due to the IOPL error shown below.
I've also included lines from an strace of xinit that I did at this
same time. Anybody with any thoughts on how to get this fixed so I
can run X again?
The only reason I
On 8/30/12 4:35 AM, Noriko Mizumoto wrote:
I gave it try. It failed x startup and falled back to text mode.
It means, unfortunately, this can not be used for L10n test which is
planned on 6-Sep :-(
Can you attach the X log from attempting to start with this image? I
don't know what hardware
On Thu, 2012-08-23 at 15:40 +0100, Pedro Francisco wrote:
On Mon, Jul 23, 2012 at 6:59 PM, Pedro Francisco
pedrogfranci...@gmail.com wrote:
I'm testing SNA on an Intel Graphics card (...)
Does anyone here who is using Gnome fallback has lack of screen
refreshing (using Intel SNA)?
On 8/15/12 2:40 AM, Adam Williamson wrote:
We've discussed various ways to re-jig the structure in the past, but
something that simplistic certainly isn't it. We have specific
requirements for the Alpha, Beta and Final releases: they _must_ meet
those requirements in order to be shipped.
I
On 8/15/12 9:42 AM, Jaroslav Reznik wrote:
It would be far more honest to just call this alpha 1.
Sorry, I don't get it - is the problem calling Alpha gold, as it's
definitely not gold final release.
Calling alpha gold is a problem, sure.
Calling test composes something with alpha in the
On 8/13/12 10:33 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
It is a test compose of the Alpha. Alpha comes before Beta which comes
before Final. For each of Alpha, Beta and Final, we do test composes and
then release candidates. The first test compose of the Alpha is by
definition the earliest and most
On 7/17/12 12:50 PM, Felix Miata wrote:
This new way is akin to how Mandriva/Mageia (and IIRC *buntu) do it,
which is one area where I preferred what Anaconda did. I want my users
set up with my choice of UIDs/GIDs, which M/M wouldn't permit, and
presumably Anaconda now doesn't. I only create
On 7/17/12 2:58 PM, Felix Miata wrote:
On 2012/07/17 13:46 (GMT-0400) Adam Jackson composed:
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Anaconda/Kickstart#user
Thanks! That's nice, for people who use Kickstart. I don't, for a mix of
reasons.
I might be inclined to try Kickstart someday but for
http
On Wed, 2012-06-27 at 15:06 +, Andre Robatino wrote:
Kevin Martin ktmdms at gmail.com writes:
You may be running into the same problem that I have. Check out this
bugzilla:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=830916
Should have mentioned that my Rawhide is a VirtualBox
On Wed, 2012-06-27 at 16:10 +, Andre Robatino wrote:
Adam Jackson ajax at redhat.com writes:
Should have mentioned that my Rawhide is a VirtualBox 4.1.18 guest (which
uses the vesa driver).
Nope:
I booted in graphical mode, then when the black screen
On Tue, 2012-06-19 at 15:37 -0400, mwesten wrote:
[10432.323596] [drm] nouveau :01:04.0: PGRAPH - ERROR nsource:
DATA_ERROR nstatus: BAD_ARGUMENT
[10432.323612] [drm] nouveau :01:04.0: PGRAPH - ch 3/7 class 0x0697
mthd 0x0208 data 0x04050348
Driver bug. Probably best to follow up
On Sat, 2012-05-26 at 17:34 +0530, Pratyush Sahay wrote:
Hi Joachim,
On Sat, May 26, 2012 at 4:29 PM, Joachim Backes
joachim.bac...@rhrk.uni-kl.de wrote:
On 05/26/2012 10:56 AM, Pratyush Sahay wrote:
There are a couple of issues am facing with the gnome
screenshot
On Sat, 2012-05-26 at 20:22 -0700, John Reiser wrote:
Peter, how in general do you want to proceed where we have documented
cases of graphics mode setting failure in grub2? Do you want individual
bug reports for each affected bit of hardware? Downstream, upstream?
What kind of info should
On Sun, 2012-05-27 at 01:35 -0500, Mike Chambers wrote:
Got this new card today and it seems not to work with F17. I got it
installed and tried all the slots, which include HDMI, dvi, and nothing
worked. It does during BIOS boot and in windows, so it's installed
correctly. I also got it to
On Mon, 2012-05-21 at 07:42 -0400, Jonathan Kamens wrote:
On 05/21/2012 07:30 AM, Kamil Paral wrote:
I can't find anything in /var/log/messages, dmesg output,
~/.xsession-errors, or /var/log/Xorg.0.log to explain this.
I have auto-login configured, and if I reboot my machine, I _am_
On 5/15/12 3:53 AM, A.J. Werkman wrote:
I freshly installed F17-TC5, changed gfxpayload to text and added
nomodeset to the boot options. Then I rebuild the grub config-file with
grub2-mkconfig.
Indeed I now have a 80*25 text screen on the console when I boot.
In /sys/class/drm I do see
On 5/15/12 2:51 PM, Samuel Sieb wrote:
I don't know what his use case is, but I set this up recently as well. I
have an HP server with ILO with lets me remotely view the console.
However, they require a license if you want to view it in graphical
mode.
Someone at HP needs a stern talking to,
On 5/11/12 2:35 AM, A.J. Werkman wrote:
I noticed, that as soon as grub comes up in graphical mode, the
nomodeset boot option has no effect in F17.
Is this a bug or a feature or is there a new option I am not aware off?
You're going to need to be more specific than that. The kernel
On 5/3/12 7:36 AM, Adam Williamson wrote:
On Thu, 2012-05-03 at 13:21 +0200, Adam Pribyl wrote:
While I consider the latest development on gma500, present in many Atom
base netbooks, a great success and would like to say thank you to
developer(s),
When you say latest development, what exactly
On 5/1/12 6:09 PM, Tom Horsley wrote:
On Tue, 01 May 2012 15:51:08 -0400
Adam Jackson wrote:
- xulrunner maybe shouldn't assert PRIMARY ownership in this case
That's the point for me: What on earth in the bookmarks
sidebar needs or wants the selection? And it is a super
long delay just
On Tue, 2012-05-01 at 14:22 -0400, Tom Horsley wrote:
On Tue, 1 May 2012 14:11:15 -0400
Bill Nottingham wrote:
In my experience, extremely slow FF performance is usually due to
writing out either the assorted sqlite data files in the profile
directory, or the big javascript pile that is
On Sat, 2012-04-21 at 18:57 +0800, Frederic Muller wrote:
On 04/21/2012 11:53 AM, Tommy Pham wrote:
I'd like to have my VGA as primary and DVI as secondary. I can't seem
to adapt [1] to make fit my hardware above.
Create a text file which will go in /etc/X11/xorg.conf.d/ and will start
On Thu, 2012-04-19 at 13:01 +0200, Saulo Bonfim wrote:
Hi all, first post to the list.
Using FC17, recently updated (ran yum update yesterday) on a i3 2.13GHz
HP G62
First issue: as of its installation (3 weeks ago) noticed a high cpu
consumption of the gnome-shell process (circa 30%
On Sun, 2012-04-15 at 11:04 -0300, Fernando Cassia wrote:
When I launch any win32 app under WINE the screen flickers for about 2
seconds, but only on the 2nd display.
Then it returns to normal.
As soon as the win32 app launches, I can work with it just fine, move
it between displays, and
On 3/30/12 10:46 AM, stan wrote:
F17 boots using nouveau for my old Nvidia hardware (MX420). There are
two problems with this for me.
- nouveau doesn't allow different resolutions on consoles and gui.
Why do you want this? If the console text is unreadably small for you,
would simply
On Tue, 2012-03-27 at 08:25 -0400, Kamil Paral wrote:
There will be a GNOME Shell Software Rendering Test Day on Thursday!
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Test_Day:2012-03-29_Gnome_Shell_Software_Rendering
I've updated the How to test section with more details on exactly what
kind of coverage
On Sat, 2012-03-24 at 11:58 -0600, Jonathan Corbet wrote:
Here's a strange pathology that just bit me for the first time in a while,
though I've seen it before. I'm not sure where to file a bug on this
one...
There's several levels of X locked up pathology, let's see if I can
shed some light
On Thu, 2012-03-01 at 12:07 +0200, Zoltan Szecsei wrote:
Hi,
I heard that F17 will support multiseat, so I've just installed the alpha.
Is there a HOWTO for this, or do I just edit custom.conf in /etc/gdm and
create an xorg.conf in /etc/X11?
I have an Ubuntu (hence debian) background and
On Thu, 2012-03-01 at 13:01 -0500, mwesten wrote:
I set this up on the Alpha release and the results are below. I'm
assuming there's something wrong with that top entry, but I don't know
how to fix it.
Events: 50K cycles
55.99% gnome-shell perf-6425.map [.]
On Thu, 2012-02-23 at 09:21 +0100, Joachim Backes wrote:
Did somebody try to run acroread in F17? I did it and got as result:
acroread
/opt/Adobe/Reader9/Reader/intellinux/bin/acroread: error while loading
shared libraries: libcrypto.so.0.9.8: cannot enable executable stack as
shared
On Thu, 2012-02-23 at 08:44 -0500, mwesten wrote:
Fedora-17-Alpha-i686-Live-Desktop.iso (RC2) on USB
2.13GHz AthlonXP 2600+ / RV200 (Radeon 7500) / 1280x1024
Fallback mode is fine, but once the shell starts, it's a battle just to
get System Monitor open and to the Resources tab. Once
On Thu, 2012-02-23 at 16:00 -0500, Claude Jones wrote:
I'm trying to test Fedora 17 RC4 in a Virtual Box environment. I had
problems doing this with F16 as well. It is up and running, but
tortuously slow. I noticed that it complained when I was installing the
guest additions about the
On Tue, 2012-02-21 at 16:35 -0700, Michal Jaegermann wrote:
This particular one is a 64-bit (albeit quite old) processor:
vendor_id : AuthenticAMD
cpu family: 15
model : 5
model name: AMD Opteron(tm) Processor 142
stepping : 1
cpu MHz : 1600.062
On Mon, 2012-02-20 at 23:52 -0700, Michal Jaegermann wrote:
At https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/Gnome_shell_software_rendering
I am reading The standard Gnome 3 experience is now available on all
hardware. Is this a plan, a wish or this is supposedly describing the
current situation?
On Tue, 2012-02-21 at 12:08 -0500, mwesten wrote:
FYI - I can get the shell with this on RV200 in F17ARC2 (Live), but the
processor gets pegged at 100% continuously and it's not usable.
Performance reports for software gnome-shell need to include the CPU
speed and model to be informative.
On Tue, 2012-02-21 at 13:10 -0700, Michal Jaegermann wrote:
Running 'LIBGL_ALWAYS_SOFTWARE=1 gnome-shell --replace', as proposed by
drago01, indeed starts an intended mode gnome session, both before and
after installing these scratch packages, but results are spectacularly
useless.
On 2/7/12 1:25 PM, Adam Jackson wrote:
On 2/6/12 1:36 PM, Andre Robatino wrote:
See https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=785652 . This problem has
existed for months in Rawhide. It seems that the vesa driver (which
VirtualBox
uses) is broken.
I'm aware, vesa's actually broken on intel
On 2/6/12 1:36 PM, Andre Robatino wrote:
See https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=785652 . This problem has
existed for months in Rawhide. It seems that the vesa driver (which VirtualBox
uses) is broken.
I'm aware, vesa's actually broken on intel chips too. I've got one fix
that can
On 12/7/11 12:20 PM, Clyde E. Kunkel wrote:
On 12/06/2011 12:35 PM, Adam Jackson wrote:
On 12/6/11 11:27 AM, Clyde E. Kunkel wrote:
[ 428.783] Server terminated successfully (0). Closing log file.
This message is there for a reason. It means the X server is terminating
normally, ie, because
On 12/6/11 11:27 AM, Clyde E. Kunkel wrote:
[ 428.783] Server terminated successfully (0). Closing log file.
This message is there for a reason. It means the X server is
terminating normally, ie, because the session has gone away.
Check in ~/.xsession-errors for relevant messages, or in
On Wed, 2011-11-30 at 10:37 -0600, Kevin Martin wrote:
What's with the xserver-abi dependency problem (ie:
xorg-x11-drv-vesa-2.3.0-11.fc17.x86_64 requires: xserver-abi(ansic-2009)
= 0
-- Processing Dependency: xserver-abi(ansic-2009) = 0 for package:
On Mon, 2011-11-21 at 12:11 +0100, Gianluca Cecchi wrote:
On Fri, Nov 18, 2011 at 7:00 PM, Adam Jackson wrote:
If you debuginfo-install gnome-shell, attach with gdb instead of sending
SIGHUP, and run 'thread apply all backtrace', what do you get?
As MJ whould have said
On Mon, 2011-11-21 at 18:22 +0100, Gianluca Cecchi wrote:
On Mon, Nov 21, 2011 at 4:26 PM, Adam Jackson wrote:
[snip]
So my next intuition would be to gdb the X server and see what's up. If
you find it waiting patiently on a call to select(), then the second
case is more likely
On 11/18/11 9:44 AM, Gianluca Cecchi wrote:
Sometimes (latest days at least one time a day), the gnome session
goes unusable: I'm able to move mouse, but when selecting a menu item
it is greyed but no drop down of its options appears, no alt-tab or
alt-f2 possibility
Only way to come
On Tue, 2011-10-25 at 18:57 +0200, Joachim Backes wrote:
Hi,
I tried to play a RTSP video stream by vlc-1.1.12-1.fc16.x86_64, but did
not succeed:
vlc
http://www.rhrk.uni-kl.de/cgi-bin/mml/allfilms.ram?ram=http://www.rhrk.uni-kl.de/mml/galerie/Ram/neunzert_werth.ram;
main decoder
On Sat, 2011-10-22 at 03:10 -0700, Chuck Forsberg WA7KGX N2469R wrote:
Seems to be working at omen.com now after adjusting
for a few FLAG DAY changes.
The new Dovecot drops a few protocols that were in the
old one, so email clients have to be adjusted.
If you wanted this to be a useful
On Sat, 2011-10-15 at 09:05 +0200, Michael Schwendt wrote:
Bottom of ~/.xsession-errors:
Failed to play sound: File or data not found
JS LOG: GNOME Shell started at Sat Oct 15 2011 09:00:52 GMT+0200
(CEST)
failed to create drawable
After logging out and back in, desktop
On Sun, 2011-10-09 at 17:26 +0200, Michael Schwendt wrote:
Shortly before the Plymouth LUKS passphrase prompt, the screen turns black,
the monitor reports No signal and enters power-saving mode. The system
hasn't crashed, because instead of pressing Ctrl+Alt+Del I can also enter
the
On Mon, 2011-10-10 at 00:08 -0700, Chuck Forsberg WA7KGX N2469R wrote:
I tried an ATI card and a Matrox card without success.
ATI and Matrox have both made rather more than one card, so that's not
especially useful information.
- ajax
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed
On Tue, 2011-10-04 at 20:04 -0400, David wrote:
There are some users that have older monitors that to not identify
themselves so that the resolution is not properly set. With a true
install or an install in a VDI. *Most* of those can never be set to
higher resolutions because
On Wed, 2011-10-05 at 11:43 -0400, Matthias Clasen wrote:
On Wed, 2011-10-05 at 11:32 -0400, Adam Jackson wrote:
RANDR 1.2 has the ability to set arbitrary video modes at runtime. I
admit Gnome's display tool doesn't expose that, but I'm comfortable
saying that's Gnome's bug.
What does
On Mon, 2011-10-03 at 17:03 -0400, David wrote:
The 'advanced graphics' video feature in Virtualbox seldom works in
Rawhide and the current 'branched' package (currently Fedora 16) because
Virtualbox does not support alpha/beta/non-release versions of Xorg.
F16 has xserver 1.11.1. I don't
On Tue, 2011-10-04 at 20:54 +, JB wrote:
Hi,
I performed a simple home test, a comparison of startup and shutdown times of:
- Live-CD Fedora 16 beta - systemd parallel boot, GNOME 3
Cool story. Have you tried using systemd's built-in boot profiling
infrastructure to see where this time
On Thu, 2011-09-22 at 15:43 -0600, Jonathan Corbet wrote:
On Thu, 22 Sep 2011 23:05:28 +0200
Michael Schwendt mschwe...@gmail.com wrote:
IMO, it could be much more productive if you also
evaluated Fedora 16 development instead of Fedora 17 development.
Sigh.
I've been running Rawhide
On Fri, 2011-09-16 at 10:39 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
On Fri, 2011-09-16 at 09:57 -0600, Eric Blake wrote:
On 09/16/2011 09:56 AM, Adam Jackson wrote:
On Fri, 2011-09-16 at 10:33 +0200, Matej Cepl wrote:
Dne 15.9.2011 21:38, Adam Jackson napsal(a):
If someone wants to send me
On Thu, 2011-09-15 at 13:10 -0400, Bill Nottingham wrote:
Given that critpath is currently done solely by dependency resolution
of certain comps groups, 'excluding' a package isn't really possible.
If you look at the group, you'll note:
!-- Just the mandatory packages from base-x.
1 - 100 of 134 matches
Mail list logo
