Re: Validation test proposal: mediawriter testing table

On Sat, Apr 22, 2017 at 8:22 AM, Adam Williamson wrote: > The #expr stuff is basically a reinvention of the FedoraVersionNumber > template; that template transcludes CurrentFedoraVersion, so if we just > substitute FedoraVersionNumber (or FedoraVersion) it doesn't

Re: Validation test proposal: mediawriter testing table

On Fri, Apr 21, 2017 at 3:46 PM, Thomas Gilliard wrote: > I added download links and test results to this > https://fedoraproject.org/w/index.php?title=Template: > Installation_test_matrix=next=491518#Fedora_Media_Writer > Please edit these changes if this is in error > >

Re: Validation test proposal: mediawriter testing table

On Fri, 2017-04-21 at 14:16 +0200, Kamil Paral wrote: > On Wed, Apr 19, 2017 at 2:25 PM, Kamil Paral wrote: > > > > > That's the question though - is it required? I thought the test case would > > be marked as optional. We already require FMW in "Default boot and install" > >

Re: Validation test proposal: mediawriter testing table

On Fri, 2017-04-21 at 14:16 +0200, Kamil Paral wrote: > but I don't want the numbers > to change once it is converted to a standard install matrix, and I'm not > sure what method relval uses to do so. just for the record, relval / python-wikitcms per se don't do anything magic in this regard,

Re: Validation test proposal: mediawriter testing table

___ test mailing list -- test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to test-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: Validation test proposal: mediawriter testing table

On Fri, 2017-04-21 at 06:46 -0700, Thomas Gilliard wrote: > > I added download links and test results to this > https://fedoraproject.org/w/index.php?title=Template:Installation_test_matrix=next=491518#Fedora_Media_Writer > > Please edit these changes if this is in error Sorry, but yes, it is.

Re: Validation test proposal: mediawriter testing table

\ On 04/21/2017 05:16 AM, Kamil Paral wrote: On Wed, Apr 19, 2017 at 2:25 PM, Kamil Paral > wrote: That's the question though - is it required? I thought the test case would be marked as optional. We already require FMW in "Default boot

Re: Validation test proposal: mediawriter testing table

On Wed, Apr 19, 2017 at 2:25 PM, Kamil Paral wrote: > > That's the question though - is it required? I thought the test case would > be marked as optional. We already require FMW in "Default boot and install" > matrix, so Fedora is covered (we just don't know *what* Fedora

Re: Validation test proposal: mediawriter testing table

On Tue, Apr 18, 2017 at 6:13 PM, Adam Williamson wrote: > > We'll also probably want "Fedora 26" (Branched at that time) column. > > Eh, I intentionally left it out because we've always held that being > able to write images from the new release is much less

Re: Validation test proposal: mediawriter testing table

On Wed, 19 Apr 2017 06:51:00 +0200, Allan Mwenda wrote: Definitely split windows. I've had writer crash on 10 but not 7, trying to get a fedora spin (lxde) On 18 April 2017 15:50:06 GMT+03:00, Lukas Brabec wrote: On Fri, Jan 13, 2017 at

Re: Validation test proposal: mediawriter testing table

Definitely split windows. I've had writer crash on 10 but not 7, trying to get a fedora spin (lxde) On 18 April 2017 15:50:06 GMT+03:00, Lukas Brabec wrote: >On Fri, Jan 13, 2017 at 12:32 AM, Adam Williamson > wrote: >> Hi folks! So I finally got

Re: Validation test proposal: mediawriter testing table

On Tue, 2017-04-18 at 14:55 +0200, Kamil Paral wrote: > On Tue, Apr 18, 2017 at 2:50 PM, Lukas Brabec wrote: > > > > > Current media writer supports ARM, I would propose to add a row for > > it, so it could look like this: > > > > WindowsmacOS

Re: Validation test proposal: mediawriter testing table

On Tue, Apr 18, 2017 at 2:50 PM, Lukas Brabec wrote: > > Current media writer supports ARM, I would propose to add a row for > it, so it could look like this: > > WindowsmacOSFedora 24Fedora 25 > x86_64 iso > arm image > We'll also

Re: Validation test proposal: mediawriter testing table

On Fri, Jan 13, 2017 at 12:32 AM, Adam Williamson wrote: > Hi folks! So I finally got around to that 'think about USB test > coverage' item that's been on my todo list forever. > > I propose we add a table to the Installation Validation page. The > purpose is simply to

Re: Fedora Media Writer release schedule (was Re: Validation test proposal: mediawriter testing table)

On Mon, Jan 16, 2017 at 11:28:50AM +0100, Martin Bříza wrote: > new non-Fedora releases. There is no rigid process of getting the > releases to websites. The process now is I put up a new release and > ping dgilmore to compile it. He then, when he has time, compiles it > and puts it somewhere and

Re: Fedora Media Writer release schedule (was Re: Validation test proposal: mediawriter testing table)

On Mon, 16 Jan 2017 10:52:28 +0100, Kamil Paral wrote: This is related to validation tests, but different enough that I wanted a new thread. While we *can* release new versions of FMW on getfedora.org at Fedora GA, there's no reason to tie the two together — and really, some

Re: Fedora Media Writer release schedule (was Re: Validation test proposal: mediawriter testing table)

> This is related to validation tests, but different enough that I wanted > a new thread. While we *can* release new versions of FMW on > getfedora.org at Fedora GA, there's no reason to tie the two together — > and really, some good ones to *not* double up: > > * we can fix bugs without waiting

Re: Validation test proposal: mediawriter testing table

On Fri, Jan 13, 2017 at 2:36 AM, Kamil Paral wrote: >> > Well I don't really want to eat a hat, because I've had my fill for a >> > lifetime, but I'd eat my hat if FMW works on Windows 10 but does not >> > work on Windows 7. Or vice versa. >> > ... >> >> It does not work on

Re: Fedora Media Writer release schedule (was Re: Validation test proposal: mediawriter testing table)

On Fri, Jan 13, 2017 at 8:12 AM, Matthew Miller wrote: > This is related to validation tests, but different enough that I wanted > a new thread. While we *can* release new versions of FMW on > getfedora.org at Fedora GA, there's no reason to tie the two together — > and

Fedora Media Writer release schedule (was Re: Validation test proposal: mediawriter testing table)

This is related to validation tests, but different enough that I wanted a new thread. While we *can* release new versions of FMW on getfedora.org at Fedora GA, there's no reason to tie the two together — and really, some good ones to *not* double up: * we can fix bugs without waiting * we can add

Re: Validation test proposal: mediawriter testing table

On Thu, Jan 12, 2017 at 08:30:38PM -0700, Chris Murphy wrote: > API/ABI stability on Windows is pretty extreme. In order of market > share though, by a long shot it's Windows 7, then 10, and a distant > third is 8.1 and then 8(.0) barely registers. So weirdly enough, > chances are it'll work on

Re: Validation test proposal: mediawriter testing table

On Fri, 13 Jan 2017 11:07:13 +0100, Kamil Paral wrote: I'd consider focusing on using checkisomd5 as the main way to test if FMW works ok. First the offline one and then online one running from the flash drive before bootup. That's actually a very good advice for the

Re: Validation test proposal: mediawriter testing table

> I'd consider focusing on using checkisomd5 as the main way to test if FMW > works ok. First the offline one and then online one running from the flash > drive before bootup. That's actually a very good advice for the test case. As Martin showed me recently, running simply "checkisomd5

Re: Validation test proposal: mediawriter testing table

On Fri, 13 Jan 2017 00:32:06 +0100, Adam Williamson wrote: Hi folks! So I finally got around to that 'think about USB test coverage' item that's been on my todo list forever. I propose we add a table to the Installation Validation page. The purpose is simply to

Re: Validation test proposal: mediawriter testing table

> >> > Well I don't really want to eat a hat, because I've had my fill for a > >> > lifetime, but I'd eat my hat if FMW works on Windows 10 but does not > >> > work on Windows 7. Or vice versa. > >> > ... > >> > >> It does not work on Windows 7 for some folks. On my laptop with Win 7, > >> it > >>

Re: Validation test proposal: mediawriter testing table

> Hi folks! So I finally got around to that 'think about USB test > coverage' item that's been on my todo list forever. > > I propose we add a table to the Installation Validation page. The > purpose is simply to check that writing images is working with > mediawriter in the major supported

Re: Validation test proposal: mediawriter testing table

On Fri, 13 Jan 2017 10:36:37 +0100, Kamil Paral wrote: > Well I don't really want to eat a hat, because I've had my fill for a > lifetime, but I'd eat my hat if FMW works on Windows 10 but does not > work on Windows 7. Or vice versa. > ... It does not work on Windows 7 for

Re: Validation test proposal: mediawriter testing table

> > Well I don't really want to eat a hat, because I've had my fill for a > > lifetime, but I'd eat my hat if FMW works on Windows 10 but does not > > work on Windows 7. Or vice versa. > > ... > > It does not work on Windows 7 for some folks. On my laptop with Win 7, it > works. I've got a

Re: Validation test proposal: mediawriter testing table

On Fri, 13 Jan 2017 04:30:38 +0100, Chris Murphy wrote: On Thu, Jan 12, 2017 at 4:32 PM, Adam Williamson wrote: Hi folks! So I finally got around to that 'think about USB test coverage' item that's been on my todo list forever. I

Re: Validation test proposal: mediawriter testing table

On Thu, Jan 12, 2017 at 4:32 PM, Adam Williamson wrote: > Hi folks! So I finally got around to that 'think about USB test > coverage' item that's been on my todo list forever. > > I propose we add a table to the Installation Validation page. The > purpose is simply to