Re: [Test-Announce] Re: Fedora 26 Candidate Beta-1.3 Available Now!

[Adam Williamson]

On Wed, 2017-05-31 at 10:46 +0200, Christian Dersch wrote:
> As I'm its maintainer I also want to point out that Beta-1.3 is also
> missing the x86_64 build of the Astronomy Lab, there was some random (?)
> mirror issue, the Lab is not broken.
> 
> Snipped from anaconda-packaging.log:
> 
> 03:44:25,447 WARN packaging: Failed to download
> 'python3-xlrd-0.9.4-5.fc26.noarch.rpm': 3 - Status code: 408 for
> http://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org/compose/26/Fedora-26-20170530.0/compose/Everything/x86_64/os/Packages/p/python3-xlrd-0.9.4-5.fc26.noarch.rpm
> 03:44:25,448 WARN packaging: Failed to download
> 'python3-xlrd-0.9.4-5.fc26.noarch.rpm': 1 - No more mirrors to try - All
> mirrors were already tried without success
> 
> Lab just build fine on i386, also x86_64 built fine @daily f26 compose
> 
> Beta 1.3 Astronomy i386 (success):
> https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=19788000
> 
> Beta 1.3 Astronomy x86_64 (failed):
> https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=19787999
> 
> Daily build 20170529 x86_64 (success):
> https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=19766604
> 
> So I'd strongly prefer a 1.4 build as a random failure @build
> infrastructure (which is not the maintainers fault), should not block
> any build to be part of a (alpha/beta/final) release.

A 1.4 is in fact happening right now for unrelated reasons - let's hope
your spin shows up in it :) Sorry for the trouble.
-- 
Adam Williamson
Fedora QA Community Monkey
IRC: adamw | Twitter: AdamW_Fedora | XMPP: adamw AT happyassassin . net
http://www.happyassassin.net
___
test mailing list -- test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to test-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: [Test-Announce] Re: Fedora 26 Candidate Beta-1.3 Available Now!

[Adam Williamson]

On Wed, 2017-05-31 at 12:14 +0200, Kamil Paral wrote:
> On Wed, May 31, 2017 at 10:08 AM, Alessio Ciregia 
> wrote:
> 
> > 2017-05-31 9:50 GMT+02:00 Adam Williamson :
> > 
> > > On Wed, 2017-05-31 at 06:57 +, rawh...@fedoraproject.org wrote:
> > > > According to the schedule [1], Fedora 26 Candidate Beta-1.3 is now
> > > > available for testing. Please help us complete all the validation
> > > > testing! For more information on release validation testing, see:
> > > > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Release_validation_test_plan
> > > 
> > > Note that I messed up the compose request for this a bit and it's
> > > definitely missing some FEs that should've been in it and *may* be
> > > missing a blocker fix. So there may well be a 1.4. I'll update in the
> > > morning. Sorry!
> > 
> > 
> > Excuse me. Then it is pointless to test 1.3?
> > 
> 
> We have tested 1438046 
> with our ARM devices and it seems to work even with Beta 1.3. In that case
> it would be a viable candidate. Please help test, thanks.

Paul Whalen reported this:

 04:20:46> adamw, initial-setup-0.3.46-2.fc26 fixes tui.
0.3.45-1 doesnt include a password dialog (no indication you should
enter the password) and it is not suppressed (visible in plain text)

which doesn't really sound shippable, so if that's the case I think we
should probably focus on 1.4 when it arrives. It's composing now.
-- 
Adam Williamson
Fedora QA Community Monkey
IRC: adamw | Twitter: AdamW_Fedora | XMPP: adamw AT happyassassin . net
http://www.happyassassin.net
___
test mailing list -- test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to test-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: [Test-Announce] Re: Fedora 26 Candidate Beta-1.3 Available Now!

[Matthew Miller]

On Wed, May 31, 2017 at 10:46:10AM +0200, Christian Dersch wrote:
> So I'd strongly prefer a 1.4 build as a random failure @build
> infrastructure (which is not the maintainers fault), should not block
> any build to be part of a (alpha/beta/final) release.

I think ultimately we need a way to get these out of lockstep with the
main release. We should be able to build and publish Spins/Labs on
their own cycles (ideally without human intervention required from
rel-eng).

How much use do you see of the Astronomy Spin as bootable media or its
own install? For some, this really makes sense (the desktops, the
security lab) but it seems like maybe Astronomy might be better as a
curated software set in GNOME Software?

-- 
Matthew Miller

Fedora Project Leader
___
test mailing list -- test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to test-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: [Test-Announce] Re: Fedora 26 Candidate Beta-1.3 Available Now!

[Kamil Paral]

On Wed, May 31, 2017 at 10:08 AM, Alessio Ciregia 
wrote:

> 2017-05-31 9:50 GMT+02:00 Adam Williamson :
>
>> On Wed, 2017-05-31 at 06:57 +, rawh...@fedoraproject.org wrote:
>> > According to the schedule [1], Fedora 26 Candidate Beta-1.3 is now
>> > available for testing. Please help us complete all the validation
>> > testing! For more information on release validation testing, see:
>> > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Release_validation_test_plan
>>
>> Note that I messed up the compose request for this a bit and it's
>> definitely missing some FEs that should've been in it and *may* be
>> missing a blocker fix. So there may well be a 1.4. I'll update in the
>> morning. Sorry!
>
>
> Excuse me. Then it is pointless to test 1.3?
>

We have tested 1438046 
with our ARM devices and it seems to work even with Beta 1.3. In that case
it would be a viable candidate. Please help test, thanks.
___
test mailing list -- test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to test-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: [Test-Announce] Re: Fedora 26 Candidate Beta-1.3 Available Now!

[Alessio Ciregia]

2017-05-31 9:50 GMT+02:00 Adam Williamson :

> On Wed, 2017-05-31 at 06:57 +, rawh...@fedoraproject.org wrote:
> > According to the schedule [1], Fedora 26 Candidate Beta-1.3 is now
> > available for testing. Please help us complete all the validation
> > testing! For more information on release validation testing, see:
> > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Release_validation_test_plan
>
> Note that I messed up the compose request for this a bit and it's
> definitely missing some FEs that should've been in it and *may* be
> missing a blocker fix. So there may well be a 1.4. I'll update in the
> morning. Sorry!


Excuse me. Then it is pointless to test 1.3?

Ciao
A.
___
test mailing list -- test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to test-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Test-Announce] Re: Fedora 26 Candidate Beta-1.3 Available Now!

[Adam Williamson]

On Wed, 2017-05-31 at 06:57 +, rawh...@fedoraproject.org wrote:
> According to the schedule [1], Fedora 26 Candidate Beta-1.3 is now
> available for testing. Please help us complete all the validation
> testing! For more information on release validation testing, see:
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Release_validation_test_plan

Note that I messed up the compose request for this a bit and it's
definitely missing some FEs that should've been in it and *may* be
missing a blocker fix. So there may well be a 1.4. I'll update in the
morning. Sorry!
-- 
Adam Williamson
Fedora QA Community Monkey
IRC: adamw | Twitter: AdamW_Fedora | XMPP: adamw AT happyassassin . net
http://www.happyassassin.net
___
test-announce mailing list -- test-announce@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to test-announce-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org