Hi,
What kind of impression do you think people get when, after
hearing that Fedora defines itself as bleeding edge
technology, they are presented with an installer interface
designed and written more than ten years ago?
and the wheel was invented more than ten *thousand* years ago
is that
On Mon, 2012-09-10 at 14:07 -0700, Chuck Forsberg WA7KGX N2469R wrote:
Had a frustrating experience with the fat cow installer.
Something in one of the selections I made had a
missing dependency (or whatever). Missing dependencies
are a part of developmental installs.
What was most
On 09/11/2012 08:07 AM, David Lehman wrote:
On Mon, 2012-09-10 at 14:07 -0700, Chuck Forsberg WA7KGX N2469R wrote:
Had a frustrating experience with the fat cow installer.
Something in one of the selections I made had a
missing dependency (or whatever). Missing dependencies
are a part of
On Tue, Sep 11, 2012 at 7:24 PM, Chuck Forsberg WA7KGX N2469R
c...@omen.com wrote:
A processor upgrade usually demands a
fresh install.
No it doesn't.
--
test mailing list
test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
On 11/09/12 18:24, Chuck Forsberg WA7KGX N2469R wrote:
Then there is a question of prominently showing substandard
software to the public. We all know about first impressions
in social settings. In operating systems it is the installer that
makes the first impressions.
Chuck, it's
On 09/11/2012 10:28 AM, drago01 wrote:
On Tue, Sep 11, 2012 at 7:24 PM, Chuck Forsberg WA7KGX N2469R
c...@omen.com wrote:
A processor upgrade usually demands a
fresh install.
No it doesn't.
I have had enough times when upgrading CPU and motherboard
bricked a working system that I assume a
On Tue, Sep 11, 2012 at 7:48 PM, Chuck Forsberg WA7KGX N2469R
c...@omen.com wrote:
On 09/11/2012 10:28 AM, drago01 wrote:
On Tue, Sep 11, 2012 at 7:24 PM, Chuck Forsberg WA7KGX N2469R
c...@omen.com wrote:
A processor upgrade usually demands a
fresh install.
No it doesn't.
I have had
On Tue, 2012-09-11 at 10:24 -0700, Chuck Forsberg WA7KGX N2469R wrote:
On 09/11/2012 08:07 AM, David Lehman wrote:
On Mon, 2012-09-10 at 14:07 -0700, Chuck Forsberg WA7KGX N2469R wrote:
Had a frustrating experience with the fat cow installer.
Something in one of the selections I made had a
On 09/11/2012 10:58 AM, David Lehman wrote:
On Tue, 2012-09-11 at 10:24 -0700, Chuck Forsberg WA7KGX N2469R wrote:
On 09/11/2012 08:07 AM, David Lehman wrote:
On Mon, 2012-09-10 at 14:07 -0700, Chuck Forsberg WA7KGX N2469R wrote:
Had a frustrating experience with the fat cow installer.
Chuck, I don't know what you're trying to say/achieve here...
2012/9/11 Chuck Forsberg WA7KGX N2469R c...@omen.com
On 09/11/2012 10:58 AM, David Lehman wrote:
On Tue, 2012-09-11 at 10:24 -0700, Chuck Forsberg WA7KGX N2469R wrote:
On 09/11/2012 08:07 AM, David Lehman wrote:
On Mon,
On Tue, 2012-09-11 at 10:24 -0700, Chuck Forsberg WA7KGX N2469R wrote:
Then there is a question of prominently showing substandard
software to the public. We all know about first impressions
in social settings. In operating systems it is the installer that
makes the first impressions.
You
Had a frustrating experience with the fat cow installer.
Something in one of the selections I made had a
missing dependency (or whatever). Missing dependencies
are a part of developmental installs.
What was most frustrating is that the installer did not
indicate which selection was causing the
On 10 September 2012 15:07, Chuck Forsberg WA7KGX N2469R c...@omen.com wrote:
Had a frustrating experience with the fat cow installer.
Something in one of the selections I made had a
missing dependency (or whatever). Missing dependencies
are a part of developmental installs.
What was most
On Sep 10, 2012, at 3:07 PM, Chuck Forsberg WA7KGX N2469R wrote:
Had a frustrating experience with the fat cow installer.
http://imgur.com/r/funny/tSE5K
What was so wrong with the working installer that required
writing a new one from scratch?
14 matches
Mail list logo
