Asst'd Win32 failures [that should simply be skipped]

The following tests are all sh scripts that won't work on win32, we should exclude on non-sh supporting platforms; apache\acceptpathinfo.t 36 10 27.78% 9-10, 21-24, 33-36 The following test looks like we didn't follow our have apxs test results (we can't compile modules on win32

Re: Asst'd Win32 failures [that should simply be skipped]

On Sat, 22 Jun 2002, William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote: This one is just plain silly, looks like a semantics error... modules\include.t 516 11.76% 46-51 ok 36 ok 37 # Skipping XBitHack tests on this platform ok 38 # Skipping XBitHack tests on this platform ok 39 #