On Sat, 6 Sep 2003, Stas Bekman wrote:
> Randy Kobes wrote:
> > On Thu, 4 Sep 2003, Stas Bekman wrote:
> >
> >
> >>In the effort to remove some of the Win32 noise, I was
> >>thinking that we can write a generic function which gets a
> >>path as an argument and figures out internally if it needs
>
Randy Kobes wrote:
On Thu, 4 Sep 2003, Stas Bekman wrote:
In the effort to remove some of the Win32 noise, I was
thinking that we can write a generic function which gets a
path as an argument and figures out internally if it needs
to keep the argument as passed or mangle it. So it'll do
something
On Thu, 4 Sep 2003, Stas Bekman wrote:
> In the effort to remove some of the Win32 noise, I was
> thinking that we can write a generic function which gets a
> path as an argument and figures out internally if it needs
> to keep the argument as passed or mangle it. So it'll do
> something like:
>
>
