Re: testing apache 1.3 on windows

2004-03-17 Thread Randy Kobes
On Wed, 17 Mar 2004, Rodent of Unusual Size wrote: > Randy Kobes wrote: > > > > I couldn't find the _random or _srandom symbols in a > > system library, but changing these to rand() and srand() > > in mod_random_chunk.c seems to work OK. > > mm. i've ifdef'd those for WIN32 and will commit it; if

Re: testing apache 1.3 on windows

2004-03-17 Thread Stas Bekman
Rodent of Unusual Size wrote: Rodent of Unusual Size wrote: Geoffrey Young wrote: it all boils down to TestConfigParse::httpd_version() glad to know it's somewhat identified. that (or similar foo) will happen when you try to test first against 2.0 and then against 1.3, regardless of win32 vs unix

Re: testing apache 1.3 on windows

2004-03-17 Thread Rodent of Unusual Size
Rodent of Unusual Size wrote: > Geoffrey Young wrote: >> >> it all boils down to TestConfigParse::httpd_version() > > glad to know it's somewhat identified. > >> that (or similar foo) will happen when you try to test first against 2.0 and >> then against 1.3, regardless of win32 vs unix. at le

Re: testing apache 1.3 on windows

2004-03-17 Thread Rodent of Unusual Size
Randy Kobes wrote: > > I couldn't find the _random or _srandom symbols in a > system library, but changing these to rand() and srand() > in mod_random_chunk.c seems to work OK. mm. i've ifdef'd those for WIN32 and will commit it; if anyone cares to verify that s/rand() are universally suitable r

Re: testing apache 1.3 on windows

2004-03-17 Thread Randy Kobes
On Tue, 16 Mar 2004, Rodent of Unusual Size wrote: > and a 'perl t\TEST -config' blowes up trying to build mod_random_chunk > (unresolved symbols _random and _srandom). I couldn't find the _random or _srandom symbols in a system library, but changing these to rand() and srand() in mod_random_chun