On Jun 27, 2004, at 1:21 PM, Stas Bekman wrote:
Heh, sorry. Should have been easily do-able with patch -p1, though.
Ah, right, too many flags to remember :) it's easier when all patches
are in the same format :)
Yeah, -p is the only one I actually know, since I often get patches
generated from di
David Wheeler wrote:
On Jun 28, 2004, at 12:39 PM, Stas Bekman wrote:
Thanks, committed. David, in the future please create patches with
'cvs diff' so that they can be applied easily, thanks :)
Heh, sorry. Should have been easily do-able with patch -p1, though.
Ah, right, too many flags to rememb
On Jun 28, 2004, at 12:39 PM, Stas Bekman wrote:
Thanks, committed. David, in the future please create patches with
'cvs diff' so that they can be applied easily, thanks :)
Heh, sorry. Should have been easily do-able with patch -p1, though.
Regards,
David
David Wheeler wrote:
On Jun 25, 2004, at 4:49 PM, David Wheeler wrote:
Hrm, nope. I just installed the latest on another box and the
redirection still works properly. Odd...
So let's introduce some tests to see where it happens, hrm??
Thanks, committed. David, in the future please create patches
On Jun 25, 2004, at 4:49 PM, David Wheeler wrote:
Hrm, nope. I just installed the latest on another box and the
redirection still works properly. Odd...
So let's introduce some tests to see where it happens, hrm??
diff -Naur old/t/conf/extra.conf.in new/t/conf/extra.conf.in
--- old/t/conf/extra.co
On Jun 25, 2004, at 1:49 PM, David Wheeler wrote:
You could be right. I have the latest, 5.79, on that box, and 5.76 on
my other boxes. Seems like it might make sense to fix that before
releasing 1.12. I'll look at it later today if you don't beat me to
it. It'll be tomorrow at the soonest I can
On Jun 25, 2004, at 12:02 PM, Geoffrey Young wrote:
check the version of lwp - IIRC there was a behavior change in recent
versions.
You could be right. I have the latest, 5.79, on that box, and 5.76 on
my other boxes. Seems like it might make sense to fix that before
releasing 1.12. I'll look at
David Wheeler wrote:
> On Jun 25, 2004, at 8:31 AM, David Wheeler wrote:
>
>>> blarg. a revised candidate is in the same place. sorry about that.
>>
>>
>> Thanks, I'll try it later today.
>
>
> Works great for me! Only issue I'm seeing is that
> C 0> isn't working on one of my FreeBSD boxes,
On Jun 25, 2004, at 8:31 AM, David Wheeler wrote:
blarg. a revised candidate is in the same place. sorry about that.
Thanks, I'll try it later today.
Works great for me! Only issue I'm seeing is that
C 0> isn't working on one of my FreeBSD boxes,
which can break tests. Curious...I'll see about
On Jun 25, 2004, at 8:23 AM, Geoffrey Young wrote:
nope. I think apache.org has been having email issues - my announce
came 3
hours later, and a bunch of messages were duplicated. or maybe it was
just me.
No, I'm on the road and just found out that the network I'm on has
sendmail stuff locked
David Wheeler wrote:
> On Jun 25, 2004, at 6:21 AM, Geoffrey Young wrote:
>
>> if nobody reports anything new over the weekend I'll release on monday
>> so we
>> get the TestMB stuff out there.
>
>
> Um, did you get my last email?
nope. I think apache.org has been having email issues - my an
On Jun 25, 2004, at 6:21 AM, Geoffrey Young wrote:
if nobody reports anything new over the weekend I'll release on monday
so we
get the TestMB stuff out there.
Um, did you get my last email? Apache::TestMB isn't in the distribution
because it's not in MANIFEST.
Regards,
David
>> Commenting out lines 669 and 1696 make it work fine. I remember having
>> this discussion a few months back but did not find a solution.
>> Apparently it is still an issue.
>
>
> Yup, but it was an issue with previous A-T releases as well, so it's not
> a showstopper. Someone who can reproduc
William McKee wrote:
On Thu, Jun 24, 2004 at 02:35:39PM -0400, William McKee wrote:
On Thu, Jun 24, 2004 at 09:30:29AM -0400, Geoffrey Young wrote:
please take the time to excercise the candidate through all your existing
applications that use Apache-Test and report back successes or failures.
Look
On Thu, Jun 24, 2004 at 02:35:39PM -0400, William McKee wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 24, 2004 at 09:30:29AM -0400, Geoffrey Young wrote:
> > please take the time to excercise the candidate through all your existing
> > applications that use Apache-Test and report back successes or failures.
>
> Looks good
On Thu, Jun 24, 2004 at 09:30:29AM -0400, Geoffrey Young wrote:
> please take the time to excercise the candidate through all your existing
> applications that use Apache-Test and report back successes or failures.
Looks good for me.
William
--
Knowmad Services Inc.
http://www.knowmad.com
a release candidate for Apache-Test 1.12 is now available.
http://perl.apache.org/~geoff/Apache-Test-1.12-dev.tar.gz
please take the time to excercise the candidate through all your existing
applications that use Apache-Test and report back successes or failures.
--Geoff
Changes since 1.11:
17 matches
Mail list logo
