Re: [patch] s/...->trace/info

2002-01-06 Thread Doug MacEachern
On Sun, 6 Jan 2002, Stas Bekman wrote: > > That's not very good, because sometimes you want to -v to see all the > configure tracing, but in most cases we use -v for verbose testing > output, where we don't want any extra noise, but the debug prints from > the tests. ok. > > i don't think th

Re: [patch] s/...->trace/info

2002-01-06 Thread Stas Bekman
Doug MacEachern wrote: On Mon, 31 Dec 2001, Stas Bekman wrote: Currently there are two tracing mechanisms used in Apache::Test, the on/off turning if which is not consistent. This patch replaces the ->trace calls with Apache::TestTrace::info(). This patch makes things consistent through using the

Re: [patch] s/...->trace/info

2002-01-05 Thread Doug MacEachern
On Mon, 31 Dec 2001, Stas Bekman wrote: > Currently there are two tracing mechanisms used in Apache::Test, the > on/off turning if which is not consistent. This patch replaces the ->trace > calls with Apache::TestTrace::info(). > > This patch makes things consistent through using the Apache::Test

[patch] s/...->trace/info

2001-12-31 Thread Stas Bekman
Currently there are two tracing mechanisms used in Apache::Test, the on/off turning if which is not consistent. This patch replaces the ->trace calls with Apache::TestTrace::info(). This patch makes things consistent through using the Apache::TestTrace log levels. I suppose that by default the "l