Geoffrey Young wrote:
Stas Bekman wrote:
Rodent of Unusual Size wrote:
Stas Bekman wrote:
does this make any difference/
perl Makefile.PL -apxs K:/Coar/Apache/Server-1.3/bin/apxs.pl -httpd
K:/Coar/Apache/Server-1.3/bin/Apache.exe
yes, it made a difference -- but it still didn't work. it now
spe
William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
At 11:46 AM 3/22/2004, Stas Bekman wrote:
Rodent of Unusual Size wrote:
TestConfigC.pm was making the assumption that that '-llibhttpd -p'
was valid for all versions of the server on windows. conditionalised
and now it works. committed.
Good work, Ken!
in the future
At 11:46 AM 3/22/2004, Stas Bekman wrote:
>Rodent of Unusual Size wrote:
>
>>TestConfigC.pm was making the assumption that that '-llibhttpd -p'
>>was valid for all versions of the server on windows. conditionalised
>>and now it works. committed.
>
>Good work, Ken!
>
>in the future commits pleas
Stas Bekman wrote:
> Rodent of Unusual Size wrote:
>
>> Stas Bekman wrote:
>>
>>> does this make any difference/
>>>
>>> perl Makefile.PL -apxs K:/Coar/Apache/Server-1.3/bin/apxs.pl -httpd
>>> K:/Coar/Apache/Server-1.3/bin/Apache.exe
>>
>>
>>
>> yes, it made a difference -- but it still didn't w
Rodent of Unusual Size wrote:
Stas Bekman wrote:
does this make any difference/
perl Makefile.PL -apxs K:/Coar/Apache/Server-1.3/bin/apxs.pl -httpd
K:/Coar/Apache/Server-1.3/bin/Apache.exe
yes, it made a difference -- but it still didn't work. it now
specifies '-D APACHE1' correctly --
OK, so t
Stas Bekman wrote:
>
> does this make any difference/
>
> perl Makefile.PL -apxs K:/Coar/Apache/Server-1.3/bin/apxs.pl -httpd
> K:/Coar/Apache/Server-1.3/bin/Apache.exe
yes, it made a difference -- but it still didn't work. it now
specifies '-D APACHE1' correctly -- but it still specifies '-p'
On Wed, 17 Mar 2004, Rodent of Unusual Size wrote:
> Randy Kobes wrote:
> >
> > I couldn't find the _random or _srandom symbols in a
> > system library, but changing these to rand() and srand()
> > in mod_random_chunk.c seems to work OK.
>
> mm. i've ifdef'd those for WIN32 and will commit it; if
Rodent of Unusual Size wrote:
Rodent of Unusual Size wrote:
Geoffrey Young wrote:
it all boils down to TestConfigParse::httpd_version()
glad to know it's somewhat identified.
that (or similar foo) will happen when you try to test first against 2.0 and
then against 1.3, regardless of win32 vs unix
Rodent of Unusual Size wrote:
> Geoffrey Young wrote:
>>
>> it all boils down to TestConfigParse::httpd_version()
>
> glad to know it's somewhat identified.
>
>> that (or similar foo) will happen when you try to test first against 2.0 and
>> then against 1.3, regardless of win32 vs unix. at le
Randy Kobes wrote:
>
> I couldn't find the _random or _srandom symbols in a
> system library, but changing these to rand() and srand()
> in mod_random_chunk.c seems to work OK.
mm. i've ifdef'd those for WIN32 and will commit it; if anyone
cares to verify that s/rand() are universally suitable r
On Tue, 16 Mar 2004, Rodent of Unusual Size wrote:
> and a 'perl t\TEST -config' blowes up trying to build mod_random_chunk
> (unresolved symbols _random and _srandom).
I couldn't find the _random or _srandom symbols in a
system library, but changing these to rand() and srand()
in mod_random_chun
On Tue, 16 Mar 2004, Rodent of Unusual Size wrote:
> Randy Kobes wrote:
> >
> > There is an alpha port of apxs for Win32 for Apache/2.0;
> > grab the script
> >http://perl.apache.org/dist/win32-bin/install_apxs
> > and run it, which will fetch, configure, and install
> > it on your system.
>
>
Randy Kobes wrote:
>
> There is an alpha port of apxs for Win32 for Apache/2.0;
> grab the script
>http://perl.apache.org/dist/win32-bin/install_apxs
> and run it, which will fetch, configure, and install
> it on your system.
beauty. except a) i had to add 'use File::Spec;' to Configure.pl,
On Mon, 15 Mar 2004, William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
> At 02:51 PM 3/15/2004, you wrote:
> >On Mon, 15 Mar 2004, Rodent of Unusual Size wrote:
> >
> >> also, there apparently is no longer an apxs.pl for 2.0 windows --
> >> so what's the magic Makefile.PL argument to let the test modules
> >> be built?
At 02:51 PM 3/15/2004, you wrote:
>On Mon, 15 Mar 2004, Rodent of Unusual Size wrote:
>
>> also, there apparently is no longer an apxs.pl for 2.0 windows --
>> so what's the magic Makefile.PL argument to let the test modules
>> be built?
>
>There is an alpha port of apxs for Win32 for Apache/2.0;
>
On Mon, 15 Mar 2004, Rodent of Unusual Size wrote:
> also, there apparently is no longer an apxs.pl for 2.0 windows --
> so what's the magic Makefile.PL argument to let the test modules
> be built?
There is an alpha port of apxs for Win32 for Apache/2.0;
grab the script
http://perl.apache.org/
also, there apparently is no longer an apxs.pl for 2.0 windows --
so what's the magic Makefile.PL argument to let the test modules
be built?
in case there was any question, i hate development on windows,
i hate libtool, and i think i've discovered a special subtype
of 'male pattern baldness' -- ca
On Mon, Mar 15, 2004 at 09:04:32AM -0500, Rodent of Unusual Size wrote:
> explodes with the attempt to treat the 1.3 apxs.pl as 2.0, complete
> with the same -D APACHE2.
Ken,
I had a slightly different variation of sticky preferences problems over
the weekend. I found preferences stored in the fo
Geoffrey Young wrote:
>
> it all boils down to TestConfigParse::httpd_version()
glad to know it's somewhat identified.
> that (or similar foo) will happen when you try to test first against 2.0 and
> then against 1.3, regardless of win32 vs unix. at least that's been my
> experience.
>
> try f
Rodent of Unusual Size wrote:
> where does the perl framework get the -D APACHEn value?
it all boils down to TestConfigParse::httpd_version()
> i'm trying
> to run it against an installation of 1.3 on windows, and it keeps
> varfing by passing '-p' to the 1.3 apxs.pl. the same line shows
> '
20 matches
Mail list logo
