Re: libwww-perl 5.800 failures

2004-08-05 Thread Stas Bekman
Geoffrey Young wrote: Now, that was definitely not a showstopper, right. but since I had a few other things that I was tinkering with I thought it wouldn't hurt to hold off on the release. I specifically wanted to get the @PHP_MODULE@ substitution to match need_php() in the same release (which I

Re: libwww-perl 5.800 failures

2004-08-05 Thread Geoffrey Young
> What lwp_do was trying to do is to avoid the copying of 10MB strings > between the A-T code and LWP, feeding LWP in chunks. I suppose that 5.800 > dropped that functionality, but since it made content_ref settable, I've > used that as a workaround. cool. > Now, that was definitely not a shows

Re: libwww-perl 5.800 failures

2004-08-05 Thread Stas Bekman
Geoffrey Young wrote: hi all... I just upgraded to libwww-perl 5.800 and found that a few POST tests started failing where they didn't before, namely t/apache/post.t and t/http11/post.t. I think the underlying problem is this change in HTTP::Message: HTTP::Message will now allow an external 'co

libwww-perl 5.800 failures

2004-08-04 Thread Geoffrey Young
hi all... I just upgraded to libwww-perl 5.800 and found that a few POST tests started failing where they didn't before, namely t/apache/post.t and t/http11/post.t. I think the underlying problem is this change in HTTP::Message: HTTP::Message will now allow an external 'content_ref' to b