This one in particular:
* DNS lookup failures in any cause segfault.
Justin says: Wow. Why?
Aaron says: Is this still happening? It's been awhile.
I had few segfaults, but those were with flood-0.4 tarball. I've created
few ridiculus URL's today and tested them against curren
Hello,
I am sorry to bother you. I had downloaded and successfully compiled
the flood-0.4 -- to this point it is ok:) I would like to test one site
which requires user/password authentication. The problem is that I don't
know how to tell flood to use some user/password for the site and all
HTT
On Wed, 4 Sep 2002 11:30:07 +0200
Ales Privetivy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I am sorry to bother you.
No problemo. Flood needs testers, so feel free to post here any problem
you have observed.
> I had downloaded and successfully compiled
> the flood-0.4 -- to this point it is o
This fixed issue brought up recently. Here's a snippet from STATUS:
* We get an assertion failure when there is a regexp defined that
doesn't match in the response. Instead of relying on assertions,
we need to detect this case, print a fatal error message, and
quit.
...and here's
Well... we have that in STATUS:
* It would be nice if a url in a urllist could handle basic
authentication.
...and now looks like people really need that. So here's quick'n'dirty
patch for RBC. Following URL uses basic auth:
http://localhost:8080/auth
I can also prepare round-robin-a
On Wed, Sep 04, 2002 at 06:36:44PM +0200, Jacek Prucia wrote:
>
> This fixed issue brought up recently. Here's a snippet from STATUS:
>
> * We get an assertion failure when there is a regexp defined that
> doesn't match in the response. Instead of relying on assertions,
> we need
On Wed, Sep 04, 2002 at 02:06:41PM +0200, Jacek Prucia wrote:
> I had few segfaults, but those were with flood-0.4 tarball. I've created
> few ridiculus URL's today and tested them against current CVS (flood,
> apr, apr-util). No segv's at all. Could we ask the person that submited
> this bug to re
On Wed, Sep 04, 2002 at 02:01:15PM +0200, Jacek Prucia wrote:
> Right now flood starts always with Bingo farm. This is just simply
> hardcoded. I would like to change that and additionally add getopt
> parsing to flood. We could have arguments to run particular farmer
> (-f/--farmer), particular fa
On Wed, Sep 04, 2002 at 02:01:15PM +0200, Jacek Prucia wrote:
>
> Right now flood starts always with Bingo farm. This is just simply
> hardcoded. I would like to change that and additionally add getopt
> parsing to flood. We could have arguments to run particular farmer
> (-f/--farmer), particular
On Wed, Sep 04, 2002 at 06:40:39PM +0200, Jacek Prucia wrote:
> http://localhost:8080/auth
To me, this seems a fair enough compromise for right now as it
seems some people really want this feature now.
> I can also prepare round-robin-auth.xml, but it would then require
> public resource protecte
On Wed, Sep 04, 2002 at 10:29:54AM -0700, Justin Erenkrantz wrote:
> I think we actually tagged "1.0" when we were doing the OSCON
> presentation, but we never released it.
Yeah, we already tagged FLOOD_1_0, so let's put up what we have.
The install targets would be nice, but we already tagged 1.0
Right now flood starts always with Bingo farm. This is just simply
hardcoded. I would like to change that and additionally add getopt
parsing to flood. We could have arguments to run particular farmer
(-f/--farmer), particular farm (-r/--farm) and so on (no
collective/megaconglomerate yet). What i
12 matches
Mail list logo