count one bug out...

2002-09-04 Thread Jacek Prucia
This one in particular: * DNS lookup failures in any cause segfault. Justin says: Wow. Why? Aaron says: Is this still happening? It's been awhile. I had few segfaults, but those were with flood-0.4 tarball. I've created few ridiculus URL's today and tested them against curren

httpd-test/flood-0.4 question

2002-09-04 Thread Ales Privetivy
Hello, I am sorry to bother you. I had downloaded and successfully compiled the flood-0.4 -- to this point it is ok:) I would like to test one site which requires user/password authentication. The problem is that I don't know how to tell flood to use some user/password for the site and all HTT

Re: httpd-test/flood-0.4 question

2002-09-04 Thread Jacek Prucia
On Wed, 4 Sep 2002 11:30:07 +0200 Ales Privetivy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hello, > > I am sorry to bother you. No problemo. Flood needs testers, so feel free to post here any problem you have observed. > I had downloaded and successfully compiled > the flood-0.4 -- to this point it is o

[PATCH] flood: assertion failure

2002-09-04 Thread Jacek Prucia
This fixed issue brought up recently. Here's a snippet from STATUS: * We get an assertion failure when there is a regexp defined that doesn't match in the response. Instead of relying on assertions, we need to detect this case, print a fatal error message, and quit. ...and here's

[PATCH] flood: basic user auth

2002-09-04 Thread Jacek Prucia
Well... we have that in STATUS: * It would be nice if a url in a urllist could handle basic authentication. ...and now looks like people really need that. So here's quick'n'dirty patch for RBC. Following URL uses basic auth: http://localhost:8080/auth I can also prepare round-robin-a

Re: [PATCH] flood: assertion failure

2002-09-04 Thread Justin Erenkrantz
On Wed, Sep 04, 2002 at 06:36:44PM +0200, Jacek Prucia wrote: > > This fixed issue brought up recently. Here's a snippet from STATUS: > > * We get an assertion failure when there is a regexp defined that > doesn't match in the response. Instead of relying on assertions, > we need

Re: count one bug out...

2002-09-04 Thread Justin Erenkrantz
On Wed, Sep 04, 2002 at 02:06:41PM +0200, Jacek Prucia wrote: > I had few segfaults, but those were with flood-0.4 tarball. I've created > few ridiculus URL's today and tested them against current CVS (flood, > apr, apr-util). No segv's at all. Could we ask the person that submited > this bug to re

Re: where to start?

2002-09-04 Thread Justin Erenkrantz
On Wed, Sep 04, 2002 at 02:01:15PM +0200, Jacek Prucia wrote: > Right now flood starts always with Bingo farm. This is just simply > hardcoded. I would like to change that and additionally add getopt > parsing to flood. We could have arguments to run particular farmer > (-f/--farmer), particular fa

Re: where to start?

2002-09-04 Thread Aaron Bannert
On Wed, Sep 04, 2002 at 02:01:15PM +0200, Jacek Prucia wrote: > > Right now flood starts always with Bingo farm. This is just simply > hardcoded. I would like to change that and additionally add getopt > parsing to flood. We could have arguments to run particular farmer > (-f/--farmer), particular

Re: [PATCH] flood: basic user auth

2002-09-04 Thread Justin Erenkrantz
On Wed, Sep 04, 2002 at 06:40:39PM +0200, Jacek Prucia wrote: > http://localhost:8080/auth To me, this seems a fair enough compromise for right now as it seems some people really want this feature now. > I can also prepare round-robin-auth.xml, but it would then require > public resource protecte

Re: count one bug out...

2002-09-04 Thread Aaron Bannert
On Wed, Sep 04, 2002 at 10:29:54AM -0700, Justin Erenkrantz wrote: > I think we actually tagged "1.0" when we were doing the OSCON > presentation, but we never released it. Yeah, we already tagged FLOOD_1_0, so let's put up what we have. The install targets would be nice, but we already tagged 1.0

where to start?

2002-09-04 Thread Jacek Prucia
Right now flood starts always with Bingo farm. This is just simply hardcoded. I would like to change that and additionally add getopt parsing to flood. We could have arguments to run particular farmer (-f/--farmer), particular farm (-r/--farm) and so on (no collective/megaconglomerate yet). What i