status of the perl-framework

2003-12-08 Thread Geoffrey Young
hi all currently, the perl-framework for 1.3, 2.0, and cvs fail miserably for me, and have for some time. 1.3) Failed TestStat Wstat Total Fail Failed List of Failed --- apache/chunkinput.t

Re: status of the perl-framework

2003-12-08 Thread André Malo
* Geoffrey Young <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > modules/include.t 9 2304?? ?? % ?? what does this null information mean? > 2.1) > Failed Test Stat Wstat Total Fail Failed List of Failed > --- > --

Re: status of the perl-framework

2003-12-08 Thread Geoffrey Young
André Malo wrote: > * Geoffrey Young <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > >>modules/include.t 9 2304?? ?? % ?? > > > what does this null information mean? pretty much that the script died before it could complete. for 2.1, for instance, it's a result of this warning Use of

Re: status of the perl-framework

2003-12-08 Thread André Malo
* Geoffrey Young <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > André Malo wrote: > > * Geoffrey Young <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > >>modules/include.t 9 2304?? ?? % ?? > > > > > > what does this null information mean? > > pretty much that the script died before it could complete.

Re: status of the perl-framework

2003-12-08 Thread Geoffrey Young
>>Use of bare << to mean <<"" is deprecated at modules/include.t line 120. >> >>which is probably new to 5.8.2. > > > Interesting. << doesn't occur within include.t. So it happens within the > framework? hmm, perhaps. I was actually planning on getting down and dirty tomorrow :) but yes, it c

Re: status of the perl-framework

2003-12-08 Thread Stas Bekman
Geoffrey Young wrote: I'm not sure. IMHO we should leave the failures and coredumps until the module is fixed :-) well, my idea (at least) is to have a clean test suite for 1.3, 2.0, and 2.1. theoretically, there may be "broken" code in 2.0 indefinitely - places where the answer is "yes, we know

Re: status of the perl-framework

2003-12-08 Thread Cliff Woolley
On Mon, 8 Dec 2003, Geoffrey Young wrote: > >>Use of bare << to mean <<"" is deprecated at modules/include.t line 120. > >> > >>which is probably new to 5.8.2. > > > > > > Interesting. << doesn't occur within include.t. So it happens within the > > framework? > > hmm, perhaps. I was actually plan

Re: status of the perl-framework

2003-12-08 Thread Geoffrey Young
Cliff Woolley wrote: > On Mon, 8 Dec 2003, Geoffrey Young wrote: > > Use of bare << to mean <<"" is deprecated at modules/include.t line 120. which is probably new to 5.8.2. >>> >>> >>>Interesting. << doesn't occur within include.t. So it happens within the >>>framework? >> >>hmm,

Re: status of the perl-framework

2003-12-08 Thread Cliff Woolley
On Mon, 8 Dec 2003, Geoffrey Young wrote: > > Sounds like a cvs conflict marker. > duh. that was it. eesh. I only knew that because it happens to me all the time. ;) nbd. --JC