Re: mod_perl2.pm

2005-11-04 Thread Torsten Foertsch
On Thursday 03 November 2005 17:08, Geoffrey Young wrote: > > so, please try the attached patch to Apache::Test. hopefully this fixes > > things once and for all (without breaking more stuff :) > > Torsten, any luck with this? yep, it works: 0 [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~/work/libapreq-1.33$ perl Makefil

Re: mod_perl2.pm

2005-11-03 Thread Geoffrey Young
> so, please try the attached patch to Apache::Test. hopefully this fixes > things once and for all (without breaking more stuff :) Torsten, any luck with this? --Geoff

Re: mod_perl2.pm

2005-11-01 Thread Geoffrey Young
Torsten Foertsch wrote: > Hi, > > is this really necessary in mod_perl2.pm? I think the decision was made because a ton of legacy applications (like CGI.pm) would be looking for $mod_perl::VERSION to decide which generation they were after. whether this is a good idea or not... well, taking it