On Sat, 2015-05-02 at 18:05 +0200, Dorian Vegara wrote:
> I use both GNOME and KDE, but I encounter this problem only when I use
> the latter. I installed KDE Frameworks 5.9.0 and I use KDE Plasma 5.3.
Even though Plasma 5.3 is unreleased and is thus appropriate for this
list, the KDE Fedora list
On 26 July 2015 at 11:03, Carlos Morel-Riquelme
wrote:
> Hello Robert, well if you have enable=1 the update-testing repo try this:
>
> dnf clean all && dnf install
>
>
Please stop telling people to run 'dnf clean all', which will remove cached
packages that will often just be downloaded again. I
On Mon, 2014-09-08 at 10:35 -0400, Richard Ryniker wrote:
> >a naming scheme that doesn't suck.
>
> Please consider it desirable to implement a scheme with file names
> that, in lexical order, list oldest version first (or last). Newest
> version somewhere in the middle is a bad design.
+1 (but
On Fri, 2014-09-12 at 05:18 -0400, Robert P. J. Day wrote:
> what embarrassingly obvious step have i overlooked? thanks.
Well, asking on the right list would be a start. Unless this is a test
version of KVM (you don't give the version so I'm guessing it's not) you
should ask on the Users list.
On 17 December 2015 at 09:51, Russel Winder wrote:
> The latest release NVIDIA driver (358.16) works fine with the Debian
> 4.3 kernel, but the same driver on the same hardware does a weird thing
> with both the 4.3 and 4.4 kernels on Fedora. The combination is not
> broken per se, it just does s
On Thu, Dec 19, 2013 at 9:39 PM, Gavin Flower wrote:
> long time. It wasn't frozen. The update ran well last time. But I
> probably would run it when I had to be away from it anyway. You see,
> in America we have a saying: "A watched teapot never boils."
>
> It's an old English saying in fact :)
I got the original invitation several weeks ago and would have been happy
to receive a shirt, but the address form is only for US residents. If the
offer is restricted to the US it should say so. Otherwise the form should
be fixed. I've tried several times to have this clarified. So far no-one
has
On Mon, Jan 13, 2014 at 7:06 PM, Frank Murphy wrote:
> On Mon, 13 Jan 2014 18:51:59 +
> "Patrick O'Callaghan" wrote:
>
> > I got the original invitation several weeks ago and would have been
> > happy to receive a shirt, but the address form is only f
On Tue, Jan 14, 2014 at 8:47 AM, Gabriele Trombini
wrote:
> It isn't a automated part of the shipping process because on the other
> side of the monitor there's someone who read what you wrote.
>
I understand that now, but it might have been clearer just to have a text
box and ask the user to fi
On Wed, Feb 19, 2014 at 2:13 AM, Chuck Forsberg WA7KGX wrote:
> Updated my office machine to 3.13 via yum update.
What is "3.13"? Enquiring minds want to know.
poc
--
test mailing list
test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
On Wed, Feb 19, 2014 at 10:15 AM, Frank Murphy wrote:
>> What is "3.13"? Enquiring minds want to know.
>>
>> poc
>
> kernel
OK, obvious after the fact, but a Subject line of "3.13" is unlikely
to be found by anyone searching the archives for kernel issues.
poc
--
test mailing list
test@lists.fe
On Fri, 2014-03-14 at 08:50 -0700, Chuck Forsberg WA7KGX wrote:
> It's baaack. Today's Rawhide install gronks on Java again.
Why are you reporting it on the Users list?
poc
--
test mailing list
test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
On Tue, 2014-04-08 at 12:29 +0200, poma wrote:
> No problemos.
OT:
Notwithstanding The Governator, "problemo" is not a Spanish word. The
proper usage is "no hay problema". Note that problema is a masculine
noun despite the apparently feminine ending (because it's originally
from Greek before Lati
On Tue, 2014-04-08 at 11:08 +0100, Pedro Francisco wrote:
> Software:
> up-to-date Fedora 20.
Unless you're using test versions, it would be better to ask on the
Fedora Users list.
poc
--
test mailing list
test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/list
On Tue, Apr 15, 2014 at 2:31 PM, Fidel Leon wrote:
> I'm not sure how to report this one... After fully patching my Rawhide
Wrong list. Rawhide is unreleased software, so this comment is for the
Fedora Test list.
poc
--
test mailing list
test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe:
https://ad
On Tue, Apr 15, 2014 at 11:15 PM, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
>
> On Tue, Apr 15, 2014 at 2:31 PM, Fidel Leon wrote:
>
>> I'm not sure how to report this one... After fully patching my Rawhide
>
>
> Wrong list. Rawhide is unreleased software, so this com
I suggest you read and take note of the Guidelines document at
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
poc
On Fri, Apr 25, 2014 at 4:10 PM, Mickey wrote:
> Gentleman!!! when replying to a email LEAVE the contents of the orignal
> poster intact so the next person that reads the ema
On Fri, 2014-04-25 at 16:59 -0400, Mickey wrote:
> On 04/25/2014 03:39 PM, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
> > I suggest you read and take note of the Guidelines document at
> > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
> >
> > poc
> >
> > On
On Mon, 2014-04-28 at 10:42 +0200, Karel Volný wrote:
> > I believe Adam was referring to the OP using “Gentlemen” as
> salutation.
>
> well, it was "Gentleman!!!" actually ... so probably to one particular
> male
> person missent to list? :-)
Yet another oddity about English is that while "Gent
On 18 January 2017 at 07:07, Viorel Tabara wrote:
> The first issue has to do with 'man' tab completion not working when 'Lmod'
> package is installed. To debug I enabled expansion in the interactive
> shell on
> two systems -- a working one shown below as 'mha' and the broken one
> ('pc96'),
> b
On 20 January 2017 at 02:42, Viorel Tabara wrote:
> On Wed Jan 18 2017 05:45:17 GMT-0700 (MST) Patrick O'Callaghan
> wrote:
> > Since you're running F25, the appropriate forum is the Users list, not
> the
> > Test list.
>
> I'm not looking for user
On 4 October 2016 at 16:51, Adam Williamson
wrote:
> Running the update process inside a desktop just gives it all the more
> opportunity to crash somehow. If the terminal app crashes, the update
> crashes. If the desktop crashes, the update crashes.
>
> I don't want to get in the KDE folks' bad
On Tue, 2016-10-04 at 14:44 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
> On Tue, 2016-10-04 at 14:04 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
> >
> >
> > I'm gonna write up a blog post and spread the word about this a bit,
> > I'll send the link shortly; if people could spread it around that'd be
> > great.
>
> Blog po
On Sat, 2011-01-08 at 15:28 +, mike cloaked wrote:
> As I understand it NetworkManager makes connections according to the
> following priority order (but correct me if I am wrong!):
[...]
Is this a problem specific to F15 or Rawhide? If not, general questions
about Fedora should go to the User
On Sat, 2011-01-08 at 17:38 +, mike cloaked wrote:
> On Sat, Jan 8, 2011 at 4:44 PM, Patrick O'Callaghan
> wrote:
> > On Sat, 2011-01-08 at 15:28 +, mike cloaked wrote:
> >> As I understand it NetworkManager makes connections according to the
> >> follo
On Mon, 2011-01-17 at 15:52 +, Adam Williamson wrote:
> Hi, folks. Before I file a bug on this I was wondering if anyone else
> had seen it and hoping to get a better idea of exactly what's happening.
No offence, but am I the only one who's noticed a recent usurge in OT
messages on this list?
Please don't reply to digests as it messes up threading. Most mail
clients (including Thunderbird) can reply to the individual message
within the digest.
poc
--
test mailing list
test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
On Tue, 2011-03-29 at 08:41 -0500, Bruno Wolff III wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 29, 2011 at 00:40:07 -0700,
> Adam Williamson wrote:
> >
> > I agree 'supported' isn't quite the right word, but I think we need some
> > kind of adjective there. I'll try and think of something better.
>
> Something needs
On Wed, 2011-04-20 at 14:43 -0500, Michael Cronenworth wrote:
> When I create updates in the future should I make them hundreds of
> lines long like I'm in detention at school, too? I don't like
> resulting to sarcasm, but I don't see how you see this as not
> wasteful.
That would be "resorting to
1) Please don't reply to digests. Tweaking the message Subject line does
not make it OK.
2) Don't post to this list in HTML.
See the list Guidelines for more detail.
poc
--
test mailing list
test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
On Thu, 2011-04-28 at 10:09 +0800, Ed Greshko wrote:
> On 04/28/2011 09:52 AM, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
> > 1) Please don't reply to digests. Tweaking the message Subject line does
> > not make it OK.
> >
> > 2) Don't post to this list in HTML.
>
On Wed, 2011-04-27 at 23:14 -0400, Genes MailLists wrote:
> On 04/27/2011 11:11 PM, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
> ...
>
> >> You forgot the other old guideline for all mailing lists
> >>
> >> 3. Keep ones signature to a minimum.
> >>
>
On Sat, 2011-05-21 at 12:06 -0500, Steven Stern wrote:
> On 05/21/2011 11:31 AM, Michael Schwendt wrote:
> > Although /usr/libexec/packagekitd is running, and I've configured the
> > "Software Updates" to be checked "hourly", I'm not getting any
> > notification about updates being available. Whene
On Fri, 2014-12-26 at 13:35 -0800, Samuel Sieb wrote:
> I'm using the Fedora Server 21 netinstall iso on a USB flash drive.
> There was previously an F18 installation on the laptop. The first time
> I tried to do the install, on the software selection screen, there were
> the Fedora products at
On Mon, 2014-12-29 at 17:13 +1300, Gavin Flower wrote:
> > Glad to see you brilliant guy here in this list:)
> > As you may know,there are lots of nice professional engineers
> and
> > I'm sure you will learn a lot during your contribution.
> > Enjoy your time together with Fedor
No it isn't. Yes, but so what? And of course the ones that want a quick
idea of where we are appreciate seeing the context. The mobile clients
copied a broken model introduced by Microsoft precisely because their
users didn't have archived mailing lists. And so on.
(If this isn't all clear, maybe
On Mon, 2015-01-19 at 17:01 -0500, Jonathan Calloway wrote:
> The path /updates/PackageKit-1.0.4-1.fc21,libhif- cannot be found
The original message has a line break.
poc
--
test mailing list
test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
On Tue, 2015-04-14 at 10:55 -0400, Boris Derzhavets wrote:
> # yum grouplist
> doesn't show group available.
> # yum group install "GNOME Desktop" -y
> reports no such group.
> Same answer for "MATE Desktop"
Try "yum install gnome-desktop-environment".
This question should really be on the Users
On Tue, 2011-05-31 at 01:21 -0700, Chuck Forsberg WA7KGX N2469R wrote:
> KDE may be suitable, but none of the "get vncserver to use kde"
> how-tos seem to work on Fedora 15.
I had occasion to use VNC recently and it worked fine with KDE (on F14
admittedly) with no special configuration. Why would
On Wed, 2011-06-08 at 07:53 -0400, Genes MailLists wrote:
> On 06/08/2011 01:58 AM, Michael Cronenworth wrote:
> > On 06/08/2011 12:54 AM, Chuck Forsberg WA7KGX N2469R wrote:
> >> The headline says it all. They have to be started in rc.local
They don't.
> The best advice seems to be
>
> (
On Wed, 2011-06-08 at 08:54 -0400, Genes MailLists wrote:
> On 06/08/2011 08:31 AM, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
> > On Wed, 2011-06-08 at 07:53 -0400, Genes MailLists wrote:
> >> On 06/08/2011 01:58 AM, Michael Cronenworth wrote:
> >>> On 06/08/2011 12:54 AM,
On Thu, 2011-06-02 at 09:54 -0400, Vitezslav Humpa wrote:
> The way KDE application launcher handles this also provides nice
> example for a design solution to this problem. They use a
> "Generic" (e.g. Terminal) field to describe the application primarily
> and have the name of the actual binary (
On Thu, 2011-06-09 at 05:50 -0400, Vitezslav Humpa wrote:
> Are you referring to a situation in KDE(can't boot it now to check)?
Of course. I quoted a specific point i.e. that "The way KDE application
launcher handles this also provides nice example for a design solution
to this problem.". What I'
On Fri, 2011-06-24 at 05:49 -0400, Rick Leir wrote:
> I just installed f15 via BFO, onto a system with S3 PCI video.
> By default, the Xorg X11 S3 video driver is not installed. Was this
> intentional or should I file a bug? The S3 card is old, but I want my
> server to use less power.
>
> It is
On Mon, 2011-07-11 at 23:22 -0700, Rob Healey wrote:
> Is there a website that keeps an archive
> for this mailing list?
Look at the end of any message on the list, including your own and this
one.
poc
--
test mailing list
test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe:
https://admin.fedorapro
On Mon, 2011-08-01 at 18:54 -0400, Felix Miata wrote:
> It started to start, got into X, then got stuck (30+ minutes so far)
> "Examining storage devices". I used vmlinuz & initrd.img from
> 20110721/i386/os/isolinux, 15 July for vmlinuz 4.1M, 21 July initrd.img 121M.
> Target is 1G RAM P4/ICH4/
On Mon, 2011-08-01 at 19:35 -0400, Felix Miata wrote:
> > If you describe the problem in terms of package versions rather than
> the
> > dates of specific files it might be easier to follow this. As it is,
> I
> > can't even tell which version of Fedora you're talking about.
>
> This is the test l
On Mon, 2011-11-07 at 12:51 -0600, Michael Cronenworth wrote:
> Chuck Forsberg WA7KGX N2469R wrote:
> > I've switched off digest mode. Makes it easier to get past
> > looong posts about dependencies et al.
>
> Now just switch off HTML and top-posting and you'll be set.
+1
poc
--
test mailing
On 20 January 2016 at 23:10, Alexander Kolesnikov
wrote:
> I am trying to upgrade my F22 to F23 but have some error:
> [root@xps ~]# dnf system-upgrade download --releasever=23
> Error: Failed to synchronize cache for repo 'updates' from '
> http://download.fedoraproject.org/pub/fedora/linux/upda
On 23 January 2016 at 01:11, Rick Marshall wrote:
> I have noticed with Fedora that WiFi varies from fantastic to ordinary.
> Right now it is definitely 'ordinary'
>
Wrong list. Please post on the Users list as F23 is a released system.
poc
--
test mailing list
test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To u
On Sun, 2011-12-11 at 10:52 -0500, ergodic wrote:
> Matej I tip my hat to you for your comments! What a nice and precise
> reply to the request for help!
Please don't top-post on this list.
Both top-posting and using HTML are specifically mentioned in the list
Guidelines (see the footer of every
On Wed, 2012-02-01 at 16:33 +, Andre Robatino wrote:
> Frank Murphy gmail.com> writes:
>
> > > A built-in checksum is only useful for checking for natural corruption,
> > > not a
> > > deliberate fake (since in that case it's easy to change the checksum to
> > > the
> > > correct one for th
On Thu, 2012-04-19 at 02:20 -0700, Dan Mashal wrote:
> Was replying to the quote below, with some additional responses now.
Then avoid confusion by not top-posting, which you have done
persistently throughout this thread. Read the list Guidelines.
poc
--
test mailing list
test@lists.fedoraproje
On Sat, 2012-04-28 at 01:13 +0100, Adam Williamson wrote:
> It's a hot dog. It has always been a hot dog. The name is not an
> innuendo, it is not a double entendre. If anyone thinks it is, that's
> their problem, not ours. The whole beefy miracle thing is and _has
> always been_ about a food produ
On Fri, 2012-05-18 at 15:08 -0400, Jonathan Kamens wrote:
> On 05/18/2012 03:01 PM, Samuel Sieb wrote:
> > I just saw on a Windows 7 machine that the menu item is labeled
> > "Eject" for a USB drive, so Gnome is not actually doing anything
> > different.
> One difference is that on Windows 7, in ad
icedtea-web-1.2-2.fc17.x86_64 fails on the New York Times Acrostic
applet, accessed via both Google Chrome and Firefox. There is a fixed
version (icedtea-web-1.2-3.fc17.x86_64) on Koji, dated over two months
ago, which has not been pushed to updates-testing.
Maybe the new version has some other is
On Thu, 2012-11-29 at 09:37 -0700, Peter Gueckel wrote:
> I installed Fedora 18ß on both of my
> computers. A horrible long wait for about 20
> minutes before anything happened. When it
> finally started, a message about
> /etc/commandline or somethinglike that flew
> past.
>
> Other than tha
On Sun, 2012-12-23 at 18:35 -0200, Luiz Emediato wrote:
> Hi there,
>
> I am finding a lot of problems with Fedora 17. I have installed the
> DVD distribution
> and after a few days I got a kernel panic after an upgrade.
> Fortunately I could re-upgrade
> the kernel to a newer version. However man
On Mon, 2012-12-24 at 13:29 +0100, Karel Volný wrote:
> > > Should I wait for the new release 18? Would anyone please advise?
> >
> > Since F17 is a released system and you don't seem to be asking about
> > test versions of software, the appropriate place to ask about it is the
> > Users List.
>
On Sat, 2013-01-12 at 21:04 -0500, Marty Felker wrote:
> On 01/12/2013 10:36 AM, test-requ...@lists.fedoraproject.org wrote:
> > Actually, in this case, the kernel-headers and kernel-devel packages are
> > installed. Further, this appears to only happen with the 3.7 series of
> > the kernel.
> >
>
On Fri, 2013-02-15 at 10:56 -0500, Timothy Davis wrote:
> DVD installation can't upgrade previous versions
> Doesn't recognize my software raid or fake raid
> It does love my laptop tho.
Since F18 was released several weeks ago, the Test list is not the place
for this topic. Please post on the Use
On Mon, 2013-03-04 at 17:58 -0700, Lawrence Graves wrote:
> Does anyone know why vmware workstation won't compile? I am running the
> lastest kernel 3.8.1-201. It ran before the update of kernel.
> --
> All things are workable but don't all things work. Prov. 3:5 & 6
"won't compile" is too vague
On Tue, 2010-08-31 at 21:03 +0200, martin tack wrote:
>
>
> 2010/8/31 David
> The current Firefox 4.0 is beta 4 with beta 5 scheduled for
> release
> (Tentative) Sept 6, 2010.
>
> The current stable release of Firefox is 3.6.8 with the
> release f
Kindly do NOT reply to digests.
Especially, don't reply to digests and quote the *entire* digest all
over again. Your message of course will now be included in the next
digest, and suppose someone replies to that. See where I'm going with
this?
But even if you don't quote the entire contents, jus
On Tue, 2010-10-19 at 10:06 +0300, cornel panceac wrote:
> > unfortunately, in gnome it's not the caase, and it happened many
> times i
> losed files because the sync was not finished yet, even after a few
> seconds
> after "Safely ...".
I suspect that system-level buffering means that a user-lev
Trying to download TC1 right now but it's snail-slow. Has anyone put up
a torrent yet or do I have to bide my time till the official release? I
was hoping to do the update this weekend.
poc
--
test mailing list
test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailma
On 10/29/10 12:06 PM, Bruno Wolff III wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 29, 2010 at 09:14:19 -0430,
>Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
>> Trying to download TC1 right now but it's snail-slow. Has anyone put up
>> a torrent yet or do I have to bide my time till the official releas
On 10/29/10 1:35 PM, Bruno Wolff III wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 29, 2010 at 13:26:53 -0430,
>Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
>> On 10/29/10 12:06 PM, Bruno Wolff III wrote:
>>> On Fri, Oct 29, 2010 at 09:14:19 -0430,
>>>Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
>&g
On Sat, 2010-10-30 at 00:24 +0200, xcieja wrote:
> I have just joined the Fedora`s community
Welcome. For a fruitful and agreeable experience, the first thing is to
read this: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
particularly the part about not replying to digests.
poc
PS The gu
On Fri, 2010-10-29 at 19:26 -0400, Todd Zullinger wrote:
> Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
> > PS The guidelines don't go far enough. Replying to a digest even if
> > you change the Subject line is still going to annoy a lot of people
> > because it breaks list thr
On Sat, 2010-10-30 at 12:44 +0800, Ed Greshko wrote:
> Just because I *hate* speculation I subscribed my wife's email to the
> digest of the fedora's user mailing list. She uses T-Bird.
>
> For each message in the digest there is a separate
> mime-part/attachment
> and the list is shown in a fram
On Sat, 2010-10-30 at 13:44 -0430, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
> On Sat, 2010-10-30 at 12:44 +0800, Ed Greshko wrote:
> > Just because I *hate* speculation I subscribed my wife's email to the
> > digest of the fedora's user mailing list. She uses T-Bird.
> >
On Sat, 2010-10-30 at 22:35 -0400, Scott Robbins wrote:
> On Sun, Oct 31, 2010 at 08:20:49AM +0800, Ed Greshko wrote:
>
>
> > You haven't said what messages you aren't seeing. You are using gmail.
> > AFAIK, gmail tries to "help" you and doesn't show you the emails sent by
> > you.
>
> Yes, th
I just did a fresh install of F14-RC1 (i.e. the gold version, x86_64)
with default options and have no network. My F13 system on the same h/w
and net had no problems. This is a bog-standard wired Ethernet using
DHCP to a Belkin hub. The net itself is fine as other machines can
connect, but F14 is d
I just did a fresh install of F14-RC1 (i.e. the gold version, x86_64)
with default options and have no network. My F13 system on the same h/w
and net had no problems. This is a bog-standard wired Ethernet using
DHCP to a Belkin hub. The net itself is fine as other machines can
connect, but F14 is d
On Mon, 2010-11-01 at 00:07 +, M A Young wrote:
> On Sun, 31 Oct 2010, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
>
> > ...
> > connect, but F14 is dead. The "Edit Connections" dialogue is completely
> > normal, IPv4, DHCP for everything etc.
> >
> > The
On Sun, 2010-10-31 at 18:15 -0600, Michal Jaegermann wrote:
> On Sun, Oct 31, 2010 at 05:12:33PM -0430, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
> >
> > Attempting to run nm-applet gives a mysterious message about "Could not
> > get the session bus". It then dumps cor
On Sun, 2010-10-31 at 19:46 -0600, Michal Jaegermann wrote:
> On Sun, Oct 31, 2010 at 08:57:14PM -0430, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
> > On Sun, 2010-10-31 at 18:15 -0600, Michal Jaegermann wrote:
> > > You should have a better chance for some meaningfull feedback if you
>
On Sun, 2010-10-31 at 23:36 -0400, Gregory Woodbury wrote:
> Does the driver happen to be the e1000e intel driver?
Yes.
> I have an instability problem with that one.
That's odd because F13 has never given me any trouble. What kind of
instability and is there a fix?
poc
--
test mailing list
t
: Fresh install, no network
> Date:
> Sun, 31 Oct 2010 23:43:01 -0400
> (31/10/10 23:13:01)
>
>
> On Sun, Oct 31, 2010 at 11:38 PM, Patrick O'Callaghan
> > wrote:
>
> > On Sun, 2010-10-31 at 23:36 -0400, Gregory Woodbury wrote:
> > > Does
On Mon, Nov 1, 2010 at 12:56 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
> On Sun, 2010-10-31 at 20:16 -0430, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
>
> > BTW the Live CD has exactly the same problem. I don't understand why
> > people aren't screaming about this. It's a very ordinary m
On Mon, 2010-11-01 at 14:58 -0600, Michal Jaegermann wrote:
> On Sun, Oct 31, 2010 at 11:06:53PM -0430, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
> > On Sun, 2010-10-31 at 19:46 -0600, Michal Jaegermann wrote:
> >
> > > The first "sanity check" is to configure your netw
This just in: the problem fixed itself magically, Must be because yesterday
was Halloween since I have no other explanation, rational or otherwise. What
happened was this:
Despite no net, I wanted to recover some files from my backup NAS, so I
booted with the F13 (note, not F14) rescue disk, which
On 11/1/10 10:34 PM, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
> This just in: the problem fixed itself magically, Must be because
> yesterday was Halloween since I have no other explanation, rational or
> otherwise. What happened was this:
>
> Despite no net, I wanted to recover some file
On Tue, Nov 2, 2010 at 3:42 PM, Patrick O'Callaghan
wrote:
> On 11/1/10 10:34 PM, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
>
>> This just in: the problem fixed itself magically, Must be because
>> yesterday was Halloween since I have no other explanation, rational or
>>
On Wed, 2010-11-03 at 16:18 -0700, Antonio Olivares wrote:
> Could not report several bugs, will attach errors here:
Fedora 15? You must be in a timewarp.
poc
--
test mailing list
test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
On 11/3/10 10:21 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
> On Wed, 2010-11-03 at 21:33 -0430, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
>> > On Wed, 2010-11-03 at 16:18 -0700, Antonio Olivares wrote:
>>> > > Could not report several bugs, will attach errors here:
>> >
>>
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=649570
Just an update for the archives: the problem appears to have been in
dhclient and not the e1000e driver. dhclient-4.2.0-14.P1.fc14 fixes it.
poc
--
test mailing list
test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/
On Thu, 2013-05-30 at 08:16 -0400, Martin Holec wrote:
Kindly do NOT crosspost to multiple lists as it leads to chaos with
people replying in different threads.
poc
--
test mailing list
test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
On Fri, 2013-07-12 at 04:13 -0400, Joerg Lechner wrote:
Not an answer to your problem, but if you're new to Fedora lists you
might want to read the Guidelines at
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
In particular, please note:
1) Unless you're using *test* versions of software,
On 31 Jul 2013 20:43, "poma" wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> repoquery --enablerepo=updates --repoid=updates -i libgcrypt-1.5.3-1.fc19
> No packages marked for update/Nothing to do
>
> http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=438177
> Tagsf19-updates
> Completed Fri, 26 Jul 2013 …
> Today
On Fri, 2013-08-09 at 06:03 -0600, Lawrence Graves wrote:
> Thanks. I did send them the same information as I thought it was
> there
> problem. Just trying to learn where to send things when problems
> arise.
Actually, better to avoid replying to digests if possible, unless your
mail client suppo
On Fri, Sep 20, 2013 at 5:29 AM, Adam Williamson wrote:
> It's Nouveau. noUveau. no U veau. There are two Us in it, is what i'm
> trying to say.
>
+1 :-)
poc
--
test mailing list
test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
On Sat, Sep 28, 2013 at 11:01 PM, Gavin Flower <
gavinflo...@archidevsys.co.nz> wrote:
> How about:
> #fedora-ancient
>
Not against the idea, but the name is problematic. People might think it's
about old versions of Fedora.
poc
--
test mailing list
test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe:
On Wed, Nov 27, 2013 at 11:36 PM, Richard Vickery <
richard.vicker...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Being on the test kernel - or, more likely, using a more stable one from
> the list that is compiled - is probably the answer to the issue: how am I
> to watch a VOB file?
>
> Linux 3.11.9-300.fc20.x86_64 #1
On Thu, Nov 28, 2013 at 6:13 PM, Richard Vickery <
richard.vicker...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Addressing crossposting: no one lets the user know how others feel about
> it - until someone does it - nor that there is a rule about it;
The list Guidelines are available on the admin page, and are cited
On Wed, 2010-06-23 at 16:51 -0400, James Laska wrote:
> On Wed, 2010-06-23 at 16:34 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> > If this is policy, and not a mistake, I shall soon be unsubscribing.
>
> Thanks for your concerns and suggestions for improvement. :)
>
> The fedora-qa TRAC instance has been sending tic
On Wed, 2010-06-23 at 20:35 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
> On Wed, 2010-06-23 at 19:55 -0430, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
>
> > I don't object to this but I also did wonder what was going on. It might
> > have been a good idea to announce this change when it hap
On Wed, 2010-06-23 at 22:45 -0600, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> See:
>
> http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/test/2010-January/087820.html
Thanks, that's what I wanted to know. And of course having checked the
link I do now remember seeing it at the time.
poc
--
test mailing list
test@lists.fedo
On Tue, 2010-07-06 at 16:38 -0700, Rob Healey wrote:
> Greetings:
>
> Is there anything that can be used as a substitute for the flash
> player since Adobe refuses and alienates 64bit users?
>
> They either expect us to use i386 software for my 64bit!
Not sure what that sentence means, but I'm u
1 - 100 of 116 matches
Mail list logo
