My cubieboard2 does not have an rtc, so at boot time the clock is at the
epoche start. Once the network is up, then NTP sets the clock.
So I tried connecting to SSH after the install and got:
Read from socket failed: Connection reset by peer
systemctl status sshd.service, said something
with
that. That will more than likely get the system close enough for
services to start up better until NTP can get the current time.
On 08/15/2014 03:34 PM, Robert Moskowitz wrote:
My cubieboard2 does not have an rtc, so at boot time the clock is at
the epoche start. Once the network is up, then NTP
be other activities to still perform.
I just did an install of the same date, but the Minimal image. And SSH
is working just fine.
Still a problem with semanage. Separate note for that.
On 08/16/2014 05:45 AM, Daniel J Walsh wrote:
On 08/15/2014 03:34 PM, Robert Moskowitz wrote:
My
Just built a boot card for this image and so I could run semanage:
yum install policycoreutils-python --nogpgcheck
Which terminated with the error:
-- Processing Dependency: libapol.so.4 for package:
policycoreutils-python-2.3-7.1.fc21.armv7hl
-- Processing Dependency: checkpolicy for
On 08/25/2014 04:20 PM, Robert Moskowitz wrote:
Just built a boot card for this image and so I could run semanage:
yum install policycoreutils-python --nogpgcheck
Which terminated with the error:
-- Processing Dependency: libapol.so.4 for package:
policycoreutils-python-2.3-7.1.fc21.armv7hl
On a Cubietruck -
# yum install policycoreutils-python --nogpgcheck
One of the configured repositories failed (Fedora 21 - armhfp),
and yum doesn't have enough cached data to continue. At this point the
only
safe thing yum can do is fail. There are a few ways to work fix this:
I will
On 09/04/2014 11:15 AM, Peter Robinson wrote:
On Thu, Sep 4, 2014 at 3:33 PM, Robert Moskowitz r...@htt-consult.com wrote:
On a Cubietruck -
# yum install policycoreutils-python --nogpgcheck
All packages should now be signed so you can drop the --nogpgcheck
good.
One
On 09/04/2014 11:15 AM, Peter Robinson wrote:
On Thu, Sep 4, 2014 at 3:33 PM, Robert Moskowitz r...@htt-consult.com wrote:
On a Cubietruck -
# yum install policycoreutils-python --nogpgcheck
All packages should now be signed so you can drop the --nogpgcheck
One of the configured
Still no Ethernet working on my Cubietruck.
# systemctl -l status network.service
● network.service - LSB: Bring up/down networking
Loaded: loaded (/etc/rc.d/init.d/network)
Active: active (exited) since Fri 2014-09-05 11:43:19 EDT; 27s ago
Process: 1103 ExecStop=/etc/rc.d/init.d/network stop
On 09/05/2014 11:54 AM, Peter Robinson wrote:
On Fri, Sep 5, 2014 at 4:48 PM, Robert Moskowitz r...@htt-consult.com wrote:
Still no Ethernet working on my Cubietruck.
Minimal install works fine on mine
# systemctl -l status network.service
systemctl status NetworkManager.service
, Robert Moskowitz r...@htt-consult.com wrote:
Still no Ethernet working on my Cubietruck.
Minimal install works fine on mine
# systemctl -l status network.service
systemctl status NetworkManager.service
ip addr
ifup eth0
___
arm mailing list
One of the first things I do when setting up a new host is move the sshd
port. As stated now (finally!) in the /etc/ssh/sshd_config file:
# If you want to change the port on a SELinux system, you have to tell
# SELinux about this change.
# semanage port -a -t ssh_port_t -p tcp #PORTNUMBER
and it is being reconstructed with the correct
information on the second boot.? I don't know. :)
I know they are not there. If you want to deviant from defaults, you
have to build them yourself.
On Friday, September 5, 2014 12:35 PM, Robert Moskowitz
r...@htt-consult.com wrote:
So
I am working in the IEEE 802 Privacy Recommendations Study Group:
http://www.ieee802.org/PrivRecsg/
There will be matching work on this in the IETF, but the WorkGroup has
not been chartered (will be after the November IETF meeting).
Minimally we will be developing a Recommended Practice for
On 09/17/2014 10:39 PM, Chris Murphy wrote:
On Sep 17, 2014, at 10:55 AM, Gene Czarcinski gczarcin...@gmail.com wrote:
Have I missed some sort of announcement concerning the distribution packaging
changes starting with Fedora 21?
Where is the equivalent of this
I maintain local mirrors for the actgive versions I use here via rsync.
But now it is past time for me to test F21 x86 on a notebook I have
assigned to this task (a Lenovo x120e with a clean SSD). Where do I get
the OS and updates? If I pull them down, and build an dvd of the iso
netinstall,
Well I found some iso instructions and are downloading it and will see
what happens when I go and install from it.
On 11/16/2014 08:40 AM, Robert Moskowitz wrote:
I maintain local mirrors for the actgive versions I use here via
rsync. But now it is past time for me to test F21 x86
I seem to recall that there was a netinst iso, at least at some point?
I only now have the time for testing, and I don't see it on:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Test_Results:Fedora_21_Final_TC2_Installation?rd=Test_Results:Current_Installation_Test
I have downloaded the live iso and will
Well, I am now booted up with Live Workstation F21 TC4 on my Lenovo x120e.
But my first task I want to do is a Anaconda hard drive install. With no
real workstation install media, it seems that the server install media
is the way to go at this point.
My current Lenovo x120e running F20
Granted there are no updates at this time, but...
Using the Server Netinst x86_64 TC4, when I select my local repo, the
option to select a local update repo is greyed out. This was the case
in F20, but somehow I thought this was going to be improved in F21.
How would one install with
nvram problems with f21.
thank you.
On 11/25/2014 01:42 PM, Robert Moskowitz wrote:
Well, I am now booted up with Live Workstation F21 TC4 on my Lenovo
x120e.
But my first task I want to do is a Anaconda hard drive install. With
no real workstation install media, it seems that the server install
Well I DID get a warning dialog popping up that there was an error. I
should have written down the text; I don't see anything about it via
journalctl. I clicked on the OK button and installation continued.
System boot up as well as I can see, fine.
--
test mailing list
I had notes from doing this a year ago, but can't find them.
Where do I find what to add after press 'e' to activate the ethernet
with dhcp so it can find my local repo instead of waiting for the slow
download of the remote repodata, so then I can select my local repo?
This SHOULD have been
On 11/25/2014 05:02 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
On Tue, 2014-11-25 at 16:47 -0500, Robert Moskowitz wrote:
I had notes from doing this a year ago, but can't find them.
Where do I find what to add after press 'e' to activate the ethernet
with dhcp so it can find my local repo instead of waiting
If I provide the local repo url or not, the install stops on the
Installaion Summary screen with Installation Source and Destination grey
out with a message of 'Probing storage'.
The system IS bootable into F21 from the prior installation. But it has
been sitting here 'probing storage' for
On 11/25/2014 05:36 PM, Chris Murphy wrote:
On Tue, Nov 25, 2014 at 3:24 PM, Robert Moskowitz r...@htt-consult.com wrote:
If I provide the local repo url or not, the install stops on the Installaion
Summary screen with Installation Source and Destination grey out with a
message of 'Probing
On 11/25/2014 05:43 PM, Felix Miata wrote:
Robert Moskowitz composed on 2014-11-25 17:24 (UTC-0500):
If I provide the local repo url or not, the install stops on the
Installaion Summary screen with Installation Source and Destination grey
out with a message of 'Probing storage'.
The system
On 11/25/2014 05:53 PM, Chris Murphy wrote:
On Tue, Nov 25, 2014 at 3:50 PM, Robert Moskowitz r...@htt-consult.com wrote:
I will check this out on the next boot. Thing is, though, it did NOT hang
on the first install. I am trying to go through the install again and
figure out what Adam told
Into shell...
On 11/25/2014 05:51 PM, Chris Murphy wrote:
On Tue, Nov 25, 2014 at 3:41 PM, Robert Moskowitz r...@htt-consult.com wrote:
On 11/25/2014 05:36 PM, Chris Murphy wrote:
Maybe this bug:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=722
maybe.
Try to provide any information you
When viewing completed jobs, the time shown (this is for an HP8600 if
this matters) is Dec 1969. No hours or minutes, just this date.
But going to http://localhost:631/admin to view the completed jobs
report, the proper date is shown.
Only have Xfce installed, so can't check this out on
Using the new x86_64 F21 Final RC1 Netinst iso, I got past the finding
storage problem. I am now installing the new system (from my local repo).
So whichever bug: 722 or 1167959,
I seem to be good. This time I am installing the Ldxe desktop to give
it a quick run to choose either it or
On 11/28/2014 12:26 PM, Robert Moskowitz wrote:
Using the new x86_64 F21 Final RC1 Netinst iso, I got past the finding
storage problem. I am now installing the new system (from my local
repo).
So whichever bug: 722 or 1167959,
I seem to be good. This time I am installing the Ldxe
On 11/28/2014 06:24 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
On Fri, 2014-11-28 at 14:47 -0500, Robert Moskowitz wrote:
On 11/28/2014 12:26 PM, Robert Moskowitz wrote:
Using the new x86_64 F21 Final RC1 Netinst iso, I got past the finding
storage problem. I am now installing the new system (from my local
I have no experience with Xfce, let alone the panel sensors app, but it
seems simple.
I clicked on 'show' for one of the sensors, and nothing shows when I
close the app. Further, when I go back into it, this sensor is not
marked as 'show'.
I also tried to change the update interval and
On 11/30/2014 01:39 PM, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
On Sat, 29 Nov 2014 21:56:23 -0500
Robert Moskowitz r...@htt-consult.com wrote:
I have no experience with Xfce, let alone the panel sensors app, but
it seems simple.
I clicked on 'show' for one of the sensors, and nothing shows when I
close the app
On 11/30/2014 02:01 PM, drago01 wrote:
On Sun, Nov 30, 2014 at 7:55 PM, Kevin Fenzi ke...@scrye.com wrote:
On Sun, 30 Nov 2014 13:51:27 -0500
Robert Moskowitz r...@htt-consult.com wrote:
On 11/30/2014 01:39 PM, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
Try this update:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates
A new Authentication mode for 802.11 is coming.
It is part of 802.11s and is call: Simultaneous Authentication of Equals
(SAE). It is a 'Zero-Knowledge' method. The author is Dan Harkins of
Aruba; Dan is one of the original IKE (of IPsec) authors. We have
worked together on a number of
My Asus EE 700 has 490Mb available memory (or there abouts), and FC14
flashes across the screen about not enough memory and goes into
text-based install. I WANT the graphical install for the LVM features
in Disk Druid. Plus with the shorten screen, I have memorized the lower
part of the
On 11/16/2010 03:41 PM, cornel panceac wrote:
2010/11/16 Robert Moskowitz r...@htt-consult.com
mailto:r...@htt-consult.com
Plus with the shorten screen, I have memorized the lower
part of the screen and know which keystrokes to use to get through the
install.
since redhat
installs on more 'regular' hardware)
to use to work with it, assuming I would not see the dialog buttons
since they got moved to the bottom of the screen. Fortunately, I did
not need this.
On 01/06/2010 10:24 AM, Robert Moskowitz wrote:
I am doing another FC12 install on my ASUS 701ee
On 01/12/2011 02:10 PM, mike cloaked wrote:
On Wed, Jan 12, 2011 at 7:04 PM, Robert Moskowitzr...@htt-consult.com
wrote:
I just installed F14 on my Asus 701ee and ALL the screens I encountered
during the installation fit nicely on the 800x480 screen size.
I would like to thank the
I am in the IEEE 802.11ai session. This is 'Fast Initial Link' setup, a
new task group in 802.11.
We are looking at how we can accelerate a number of steps in wireless so
that people walking (or even driving) from one WiFi domain to another
will actually work. I am involved in two parts of
On 12/08/2011 01:26 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
On Thu, 2011-12-08 at 08:31 -0500, Robert Moskowitz wrote:
This is a FC16 x86_64 install, but perhaps it is also in the current
development and you might want to look into this...
This is my first FC16 install and I had skipped FC15
On 12/08/2011 04:14 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
On Thu, 2011-12-08 at 16:07 -0500, Robert Moskowitz wrote:
On 12/08/2011 01:26 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
On Thu, 2011-12-08 at 08:31 -0500, Robert Moskowitz wrote:
This is a FC16 x86_64 install, but perhaps it is also in the current
development
I requested this on the Network Manager list, but probably it has to be
implemented a bit deeper than there
This list is probably the closest I am to developers of Fedora.
The 802.11s standard is now published. Boy did that take long enough! :)
There is a new password authentication
+
Brian Morrison wrote:
On Tue, 06 Nov 2012 10:30:12 -0500
Robert Moskowitz wrote:
I am current on all updates with F16 as of last night.
Not sure if it applies to F16, but some updated NM rpms landed for
F17 this morning in the UK.
See here:
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id
I want to control the IPv6 suffix for my interfaces and let the prefix
be set with RA.
Currently I can either have the RA prefix with the MAC address for the
suffix, or I can specify a complete IPv6 address (and gateway) and
ignore RA.
The first approach causes problems with DNS if I change
Thanks. I will go over there. Just thought this was a new base feature
for FC that the NetworkManager would only be controlling
On 11/04/2010 12:02 PM, Chuck Anderson wrote:
On Thu, Nov 04, 2010 at 10:22:03AM -0400, Robert Moskowitz wrote:
I want to control the IPv6 suffix for my
The ee701 has a cutoff screen, and alt-mouse will not move main
screens around for install screens.
On the select repositories, I can manage to select my local repos, but I
cannot figure out how to get the 'customize now' option selected. Is
there a keyboard shortcut (like alt-m or some
On 01/23/2013 02:55 AM, Adam Williamson wrote:
On Wed, 2013-01-23 at 02:12 -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
Bill Nottingham nott...@redhat.com writes:
Tom Lane (t...@redhat.com) said:
(If the compatibility testing goes *really* smoothly, maybe we could
just drop the requirement for original mysql to
On 01/29/2013 08:17 PM, Neal Becker wrote:
I tried an install of f18 on a new bare metal machine today. My 1st try was
netinst.iso.
It sat 'installing' for well over an hour, giving _no feedback at all_ as to
what it was doing. I can only guess it was d/l stuff from an overloaded mirror.
I
On 01/30/2013 10:25 AM, Chuck Forsberg WA7KGX N2469R wrote:
I would like to see Fedora 19 with a server mail system
with coherent GUI controls to effectively block spam.
So you want the features you would get with:
Postfix/postfixadmin/mysql/amavis-new/clamav/spamassassin all rolled
into
I am working with the HIPL project: http://infrahip.net/ and I am the
creator of the HIP protocol (see RFC 5201 and ID 5201-bis).
On past Fedora releases, HIPL has relied on libipq, but the package
manager cannot find this in F18. He told me:
the problem is that Fedora 18 does not seem to
On 03/13/2013 08:45 AM, Michal Jaegermann wrote:
On Wed, Mar 13, 2013 at 08:07:14AM -0400, Robert Moskowitz wrote:
I am working with the HIPL project: http://infrahip.net/ and I am
the creator of the HIP protocol (see RFC 5201 and ID 5201-bis).
On past Fedora releases, HIPL has relied
Sorry to intrude here, but I am not getting this answered on the Fedora
Community list. I have dug through the installation guides (both f20
and 19) and have not found the answer...
I have learned that the OS repo location can be specified via repo=url,
but all attempts so far not shown a
On 12/20/2013 11:58 PM, Samuel Sieb wrote:
On 12/20/2013 12:02 PM, Robert Moskowitz wrote:
In the Installation Source dialog, the Updates option is checked and
greyed out. And even so, there is no place here to specify a url.
Should I be using Additional Repositories? BTW, I have local
Today was the day to install f20 on my Lenovo x120e. I had two drives
to work with: an old 320Gb HD and a new 240Gb SSD.
I thought I would be smart and hibernate my system with the current
drive (f17). Don't know why I did not just poweroff. Something major
went wrong and now that drive
Thanks for responding. Trimed down to things to reply to...
On 12/27/2013 02:59 AM, Adam Williamson wrote:
On Wed, 2013-12-25 at 18:11 -0500, Robert Moskowitz wrote:
If I selected my local repo, Updates became not an option. Regardless if
I used the DVD install (i386 and x86_64
Trimmed to lastest attempt.
On 12/27/2013 01:54 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
On Fri, 2013-12-27 at 08:42 -0500, Robert Moskowitz wrote:
Thanks for responding. Trimed down to things to reply to...
On 12/27/2013 02:59 AM, Adam Williamson wrote:
Sometimes when I selected LVM for the partitioning
On 12/31/2013 01:14 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
On Tue, 2013-12-31 at 12:49 -0500, Robert Moskowitz wrote:
If you have a copy of program.log (and ideally all the other logs...)
from one of those failures, we could try and figure it out.
Instructions on generating (or capturing) the logs
On 12/31/2013 02:50 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
On Tue, 2013-12-31 at 14:13 -0500, Robert Moskowitz wrote:
On 12/31/2013 01:14 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
On Tue, 2013-12-31 at 12:49 -0500, Robert Moskowitz wrote:
If you have a copy of program.log (and ideally all the other logs...)
from one
On 12/31/2013 04:46 PM, Chris Murphy wrote:
On Dec 31, 2013, at 1:25 PM, Robert Moskowitz r...@htt-consult.com wrote:
You got them. let me know if anything else is needed to get this working. It
takes ~ 2hrs to do a test.
I don't see any kernel configs for EFI that aren't already enabled
On 12/31/2013 07:18 PM, Chris Murphy wrote:
On Dec 31, 2013, at 4:39 PM, Robert Moskowitz r...@htt-consult.com wrote:
On 12/31/2013 05:00 PM, bugzi...@redhat.com wrote:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1006304
In additional info, include computer model and firmware revision
On 12/31/2013 07:34 PM, Chris Murphy wrote:
On Dec 31, 2013, at 5:27 PM, Robert Moskowitz r...@htt-consult.com wrote:
On 12/31/2013 07:18 PM, Chris Murphy wrote:
On Dec 31, 2013, at 4:39 PM, Robert Moskowitz r...@htt-consult.com wrote:
On 12/31/2013 05:00 PM, bugzi...@redhat.com wrote
On 12/31/2013 08:00 PM, Chris Murphy wrote:
On Dec 31, 2013, at 5:34 PM, Chris Murphy li...@colorremedies.com wrote:
Since you only have Fedora to boot, the simplest fix might be to delete all of
the NVRAM entries, and hope that in a reboot or two, it does sufficient garbage
collection that
Some testing today from f20 live x86_64 DVD
On 12/31/2013 08:00 PM, Chris Murphy wrote:
On Dec 31, 2013, at 5:34 PM, Chris Murphy li...@colorremedies.com wrote:
Since you only have Fedora to boot, the simplest fix might be to delete all of
the NVRAM entries, and hope that in a reboot or two,
I did the testing as you suggested and opened up a kernel bug report.
On 01/01/2014 04:26 PM, Chris Murphy wrote:
On Jan 1, 2014, at 1:07 PM, Chris Murphy li...@colorremedies.com wrote:
efibootmgr -c -w -L Fedora -d /dev/sda -p 1 -l \\EFI\\fedora\\shim.efi
And see if you get an error; and
On 01/03/2014 02:07 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
On Tue, 2013-12-31 at 20:23 -0500, Robert Moskowitz wrote:
On 12/31/2013 08:00 PM, Chris Murphy wrote:
On Dec 31, 2013, at 5:34 PM, Chris Murphy li...@colorremedies.com wrote:
Since you only have Fedora to boot, the simplest fix might
On 01/03/2014 02:27 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
On Fri, 2014-01-03 at 14:23 -0500, Robert Moskowitz wrote:
(disclaimer: never trust the monkey, I know a bit more about UEFI than
the average monkey but not everything.)
So why is the install failing?
We don't know yet, but Chris
On 01/03/2014 08:01 PM, Chris Murphy wrote:
On Jan 3, 2014, at 12:23 PM, Robert Moskowitz r...@htt-consult.com wrote:
So why is the install failing?
The install fails because the efibootmgr command to write to NVRAM via the
kernel fails. And the reason why the kernel is failing to write
On 01/04/2014 08:32 PM, Chris Murphy wrote:
On Jan 4, 2014, at 6:24 PM, Robert Moskowitz r...@htt-consult.com wrote:
Just tried to come out of suspend mode from over the sabbath, and the system
was hung. No response. So I powered off and rebooted. Nothing. Panic time;
did I brick it? I
On 01/04/2014 08:32 PM, Chris Murphy wrote:
On Jan 4, 2014, at 6:24 PM, Robert Moskowitz r...@htt-consult.com wrote:
Just tried to come out of suspend mode from over the sabbath, and the system
was hung. No response. So I powered off and rebooted. Nothing. Panic time;
did I brick it? I
On 01/05/2014 01:01 AM, Adam Williamson wrote:
On Sat, 2014-01-04 at 18:32 -0700, Chris Murphy wrote:
On Jan 4, 2014, at 6:24 PM, Robert Moskowitz r...@htt-consult.com wrote:
Just tried to come out of suspend mode from over the sabbath, and the system
was hung. No response. So I powered
On 01/03/2014 02:27 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
On Fri, 2014-01-03 at 14:23 -0500, Robert Moskowitz wrote:
(disclaimer: never trust the monkey, I know a bit more about UEFI than
the average monkey but not everything.)
So why is the install failing?
We don't know yet, but Chris
On 01/05/2014 04:04 PM, Chris Murphy wrote:
On Jan 5, 2014, at 1:33 PM, Robert Moskowitz r...@htt-consult.com wrote:
Just did a test and it failed. :(
I updated the firmware. Rebooted twice. Did NOT go into Bios setup. Booted
the f20 x86_64 netinstal CD and it failed at the same point
On 01/05/2014 04:04 PM, Chris Murphy wrote:
On Jan 5, 2014, at 1:33 PM, Robert Moskowitz r...@htt-consult.com wrote:
Just did a test and it failed. :(
I updated the firmware. Rebooted twice. Did NOT go into Bios setup. Booted
the f20 x86_64 netinstal CD and it failed at the same point
On 01/06/2014 02:27 PM, Chris Murphy wrote:
On Jan 6, 2014, at 8:40 AM, Robert Moskowitz r...@htt-consult.com wrote:
On 01/05/2014 04:04 PM, Chris Murphy wrote:
On Jan 5, 2014, at 1:33 PM, Robert Moskowitz r...@htt-consult.com wrote:
Just did a test and it failed. :(
I updated
On 01/06/2014 02:27 PM, Chris Murphy wrote:
On Jan 6, 2014, at 8:40 AM, Robert Moskowitz r...@htt-consult.com wrote:
On 01/05/2014 04:04 PM, Chris Murphy wrote:
On Jan 5, 2014, at 1:33 PM, Robert Moskowitz r...@htt-consult.com wrote:
Just did a test and it failed. :(
I updated
On 01/06/2014 05:57 PM, Chris Murphy wrote:
On Jan 6, 2014, at 2:40 PM, Robert Moskowitz r...@htt-consult.com wrote:
On reboot, it took some time with all sorts of messages. Failed on my swap
(though once running 'free' shows the swap space). selinux having to do its
thing and taking some
On 01/06/2014 06:22 PM, Chris Murphy wrote:
On Jan 6, 2014, at 4:08 PM, Robert Moskowitz r...@htt-consult.com wrote:
On 01/06/2014 05:57 PM, Chris Murphy wrote:
On Jan 6, 2014, at 2:40 PM, Robert Moskowitz r...@htt-consult.com wrote:
On reboot, it took some time with all sorts of messages
On 01/07/2014 01:18 PM, Chris Murphy wrote:
On Jan 7, 2014, at 11:03 AM, Chris Murphy li...@colorremedies.com wrote:
So we need another bug filed to see if anaconda team can do efibootmgr pretty
much dead last, because if it fails as the last thing done, there's still a
good chance the
On 01/06/2014 06:22 PM, Chris Murphy wrote:
On Jan 6, 2014, at 4:08 PM, Robert Moskowitz r...@htt-consult.com wrote:
On 01/06/2014 05:57 PM, Chris Murphy wrote:
On Jan 6, 2014, at 2:40 PM, Robert Moskowitz r...@htt-consult.com wrote:
On reboot, it took some time with all sorts of messages
On 01/07/2014 01:03 PM, Chris Murphy wrote:
On Jan 7, 2014, at 8:13 AM, Robert Moskowitz r...@htt-consult.com wrote:
Booting is a bit strange. It starts with the Penguin on top and a large font, and
then switches off the Penguin and a smaller font. I never get the Fedora logo that I
have
On 01/07/2014 05:49 PM, Michal Jaegermann wrote:
On Tue, Jan 07, 2014 at 02:49:13PM -0500, Robert Moskowitz wrote:
Jan 07 12:07:13 lx120e.htt-consult.com lvm[12503]:
/dev/fedora_19/swap: read failed after 0 of 4096 at 4096:
Input/output error
Jan 07 12:07:38 lx120e.htt-consult.com swapon[328
On 01/07/2014 06:59 PM, Chris Murphy wrote:
I already answered this, yesterday. It's probably the GPT swap bug listed in
CommonBugs.
Oh, I reread your earlier message, and see I missed that. I will go
back and read about it.
--
test mailing list
test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To
On 01/07/2014 07:26 PM, Michal Jaegermann wrote:
On Tue, Jan 07, 2014 at 06:08:58PM -0500, Robert Moskowitz wrote:
On 01/07/2014 05:49 PM, Michal Jaegermann wrote:
Are you sure that swap is not already in use? What 'swapon -s' has to
say?
]# swapon -s
FilenameType
On 01/08/2014 09:15 AM, Richard Ryniker wrote:
And no manpage for blkid.
There is a man page for blkid. It is part of:
util-linux-2.24-2.fc20.x86_64
If the man page is missing, perhaps other missing pieces contribute to
the problem. For example, swapon is also in util-linux.
ARGH!!!
I
On 01/08/2014 02:12 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
On Mon, 2014-01-06 at 16:40 -0500, Robert Moskowitz wrote:
The process to create a user in the 'firstboot' environment did not
allow for tagging the user to be an adminstrator. How do I do that?
Fedora's initial-setup, which you get anywhere
On 01/08/2014 02:14 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
On Tue, 2014-01-07 at 15:06 -0500, Robert Moskowitz wrote:
On 01/07/2014 01:03 PM, Chris Murphy wrote:
On Jan 7, 2014, at 8:13 AM, Robert Moskowitz r...@htt-consult.com wrote:
Booting is a bit strange. It starts with the Penguin on top
On 01/08/2014 02:42 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
On Wed, 2014-01-08 at 11:38 -0800, Adam Williamson wrote:
On Wed, 2014-01-08 at 14:29 -0500, Robert Moskowitz wrote:
On 01/08/2014 02:14 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
On Tue, 2014-01-07 at 15:06 -0500, Robert Moskowitz wrote:
On 01/07/2014 01:03
Perhaps a few of you remember my trials installing F20 on my Lenovo
x120e. NVRAM writing didn't, and with help here I got things working
but without NVRAM info and things are working perhaps a bit strange.
Anyway, I got tired with so hardware problems and saw another x120e for
only $149 (bad
A quick piece of review then on to day's failures.
Back in December? I was working on installing F20-64 on my Lenovo x120e
and could not update NVRAM. You here helped me get a working system.
now on to recent history =
Then the audio started getting flacky and
On 05/30/2014 03:53 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
On Fri, 2014-05-30 at 14:40 -0400, Robert Moskowitz wrote:
A quick piece of review then on to day's failures.
Back in December? I was working on installing F20-64 on my Lenovo x120e
and could not update NVRAM. You here helped me get a working
On 05/30/2014 04:00 PM, Robert Moskowitz wrote:
On 05/30/2014 03:53 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
On Fri, 2014-05-30 at 14:40 -0400, Robert Moskowitz wrote:
A quick piece of review then on to day's failures.
Back in December? I was working on installing F20-64 on my Lenovo
x120e
and could
On 05/30/2014 03:53 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
On Fri, 2014-05-30 at 14:40 -0400, Robert Moskowitz wrote:
A quick piece of review then on to day's failures.
Back in December? I was working on installing F20-64 on my Lenovo x120e
and could not update NVRAM. You here helped me get a working
On 05/30/2014 03:53 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
On Fri, 2014-05-30 at 14:40 -0400, Robert Moskowitz wrote:
Or I COULD do a rawhide install. Point me where to get the ISO image
and I am willing it give it a go. I DO at least have this system to
work from.
I updated https://fedoraproject.org
On 06/02/2014 02:34 AM, Adam Williamson wrote:
On Sun, 2014-06-01 at 18:35 -0400, Robert Moskowitz wrote:
On 05/30/2014 03:53 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
On Fri, 2014-05-30 at 14:40 -0400, Robert Moskowitz wrote:
Or I COULD do a rawhide install. Point me where to get the ISO image
and I am
I downloaded Fedora-Xfce-armhfp-21-20140722-sda.raw.xz and installed it
to a 16Gb microSD card by:
[root@lx120e ~]#
/home/rgm/fedora-arm-image-installer/fedora-arm-image-installer.sh
--image=/home/rgm/Fedora-Xfce-armhfp-21-20140722-sda.raw.xz
--target=Cubietruck --media=/dev/sdb
I am looking at:
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/tasks?state=allview=treemethod=applianceorder=-id
And do not see a gnome image for f21 arm (let alone any hardware). So
obviously I am missing how it is encoded in the description.
How do I find the right f21 armhfp image with gnome?
xfce
On 07/23/2014 01:31 PM, John Dulaney wrote:
Date: Wed, 23 Jul 2014 10:33:47 -0400
From: r...@htt-consult.com
To: test@lists.fedoraproject.org
Subject: gnome desktop image for arm?
I am looking at:
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/tasks?state=allview=treemethod=applianceorder=-id
And do not
1 - 100 of 206 matches
Mail list logo
