Re: DNF and broken upgrades
On Sun, 2017-08-06 at 14:21 -0400, Matthew Miller wrote: > On Sun, Aug 06, 2017 at 06:16:43PM +0100, Russel Winder wrote: > > > I think `dnf distro-sync` should do it. > > > > I tried that but can't remember the exact output. It didn't do > > anything > > positive though. :-( > > Maybe with --best and --allow-erasing? Just as closure for this thread: over the past few days I have had to do some erasing to get a best install build and the problem seems to have gone away. I have no concrete data as to what actually cleared the problem but it has gone away. :-) -- Russel. = Dr Russel Winder t: +44 20 7585 2200 voip: sip:russel.win...@ekiga.net 41 Buckmaster Roadm: +44 7770 465 077 xmpp: rus...@winder.org.uk London SW11 1EN, UK w: www.russel.org.uk skype: russel_winder signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part ___ test mailing list -- test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to test-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: DNF and broken upgrades
On Sun, Aug 06, 2017 at 06:16:43PM +0100, Russel Winder wrote: > > I think `dnf distro-sync` should do it. > I tried that but can't remember the exact output. It didn't do anything > positive though. :-( Maybe with --best and --allow-erasing? -- Matthew MillerFedora Project Leader ___ test mailing list -- test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to test-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: DNF and broken upgrades
On Sun, 2017-08-06 at 07:49 -0400, Matthew Miller wrote: > […] > I think `dnf distro-sync` should do it. I tried that but can't remember the exact output. It didn't do anything positive though. :-( -- Russel. = Dr Russel Winder t: +44 20 7585 2200 voip: sip:russel.win...@ekiga.net 41 Buckmaster Roadm: +44 7770 465 077 xmpp: rus...@winder.org.uk London SW11 1EN, UK w: www.russel.org.uk skype: russel_winder signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part ___ test mailing list -- test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to test-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: DNF and broken upgrades
On Sun, Aug 06, 2017 at 10:33:49AM +0100, Russel Winder wrote: > If there are one or two I remove the newest version manually and then > do the upgrade again. For 835 I am not about to even start this > process. "dnf remove --duplicates" refused to work because some of the > duplicates were protected. dnf and systemd in particular. OK so I can > handle doing those manually using the "--setopt=protected_package=" > options so as to be able to remove the newest version. So dnf and > systemd fully up to date. I think this is a bug. The protected-packages thing shouldn't block dupes from being removed, just make sure there's at least one functional package (of the primary architecture!). > I am thinking that "dnf remove --duplicates" isn't actually the right > way of fixing this sort of problem, that there is a better way of > handling barfed upgrades. I think `dnf distro-sync` should do it. -- Matthew MillerFedora Project Leader ___ test mailing list -- test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to test-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org