On Thu, Apr 5, 2018 at 2:36 PM, Kamil Paral <kpa...@redhat.com> wrote:
> This is related to KDE Live being oversize at Beta: > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1561763 > which should have been a blocker, but it was agreed that we will change > criteria instead. Here's a proposal for that change. > > Instead of current Beta criterion: > "The release-blocking images must meet current size requirements." > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_28_Beta_Release_Criteria#image-size- > requirements > > I propose to move that criterion to Final milestone instead, and use this > wording: > "The release-blocking images must meet current size requirements, as > documented at [Releases/28/ReleaseBlocking][1]." (the release number will > of course change in time) > > I chose [1] over [2], because [1] contains all important release-blocking > images (distinguished to individual .iso or .img level), while [2] only > contains spins and nothing else. In [1], we will add a new column labeled > "target size" and fill it out. It is enough to fill it out just for images > marked as release blocking. The nice thing is that in that table you can > easily see who is responsible for that image, and so it's clear who's > responsible for keeping the target size up-to-date (and also whom to ping > if it isn't). > > The reason to move this criterion to Final is that we no longer block on > optical images for Beta (that's quite a recent change), and with flash > drives you can always get a larger flash drive to fit the image on. So it's > no longer necessary to insist on perfect size for Beta. And being oversize > is honestly just a minor problem. > > Note that I haven't proposed any particular sizes for any particular > images. I believe that should be all the responsibility and decision of the > owning group (or perhaps FESCo, for some generic images), not QA. > > Thoughts? > This got pre-approved on latest QA meeting. I adjusted the wiki page and created a "target size" column: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Releases/28/ReleaseBlocking I was also tasked by contacting all the individual maintainers and ask them to consider the current target size and provide an up-to-date one. I've sent the requests here: https://pagure.io/fedora-workstation/issue/47 https://pagure.io/fedora-server/issue/4 https://pagure.io/cloud-sig/issue/285 https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/k...@lists.fedoraproject.org/thread/5OWPFHSFG4TJMLPTHZPOPSUMKWTTZPKU/ https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/a...@lists.fedoraproject.org/thread/U42LRU7BTYROGWVHLJXLCHUOQYDC7UM7/ https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/sp...@lists.fedoraproject.org/thread/EUWVRUTA7EQPGSNCT42FONZJCLL5AIYI/ Now it's waiting for the image owners to respond.
_______________________________________________ test mailing list -- test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to test-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
