On 2001-10-14 12:03:15 +0200, Berthold Crysmann wrote:
on CTAN anymore. Is there a way around downloading an entire TeX-Live image, if the
only thing one needs is
dvips 5.86d ???
DANTE members just got the latest TeXlive cd. :-)
Best regards
Martin
--
Le 08.10.01, Harald Hanche-Olsen a écrit :
Just a quick question to you all: Did any of you successfully use the
CM-super fonts with teTeX 1.07 (or dvips 5.86)?
I got the same problem; installing dvips 5.86d solves that problem.
--
Nico
I have been watching this thread and meant to respond sooner. Any dvips
which uses t1part for font subsetting is BROKEN with respect to font
subsetting. Use the latest dvips from TeX Live 6.0, which uses the writet1
module from pdftex to take care of susetting.
There are other bugs in dvips
+ Rolf Niepraschk [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
| Harald Hanche-Olsen wrote:
| [...]
| texc.prot1.enctexps.pro. sfti0900.pfb Second number not found in Char
|string of '/FontName'
|
|
| I have found a similar problem with dvips 5.86e and the brushscript font
| (the previous version). With
|
|
Just a quick question to you all: Did any of you successfully use the
CM-super fonts with teTeX 1.07 (or dvips 5.86)?
The font files seem to confuse the heck out of this version of
dvips. Since Vladimir runs dvips 5.86d and is unable to reproduce my
problem, it is my conjecture that it is indeed
i've put the new version of CM-Super package (two days ago) to
ftp://ftp.vsu.ru/pub/tex/font-packs/cm-super/
you could try the mirror if connection to vsu.ru is slow:
ftp://ftp.chg.ru/pub/TeX/RussianSupport/font-packs/cm-super/
Changes from previous version:
* Changed license from
At 11.42 +0200 2001-09-24, Giuseppe GhibÚ wrote:
The second question is. Is there a table about choosing the
UniqueID to be used for each of the Metafont fonts converted to PFB? If
not how about to write one?
I don't think that's a kosher idea. UniqueIDs exist to help a PS printer
cache the
GG == Giuseppe Ghibò writes:
GG BTW. Since you used TeXtrace, and FontLab, I would like to point
GG out about MF - Type1 conversion. There is another tool (although
GG it has several restrictions) called mf2pt1 (on CTAN:support)
GG allowing such kind conversion (resulting is more precise
yes, i know about mf2pt1, and it could not convert arbitrary METAFONT
fonts, because it uses METAPOST (which does not support some features
of METAFONT).
of course it is not a total automatic tool (and in most case
it is giving glyph totally messed up, if not converted at all), but it
could
On Mon, 24 Sep 2001, Lars [iso-8859-1] Hellström wrote:
At 11.42 +0200 2001-09-24, Giuseppe GhibÚ wrote:
The second question is. Is there a table about choosing the
UniqueID to be used for each of the Metafont fonts converted to PFB? If
not how about to write one?
I don't think that's a
10 matches
Mail list logo
