Hi Karsten,
backend names are. There was not much time to work it out, but my
first draft had a user level syntax
\usepackage [rm=palatino, sf=univers, tt=lettergothic] {corelpak}
This looks a bit like the syntacs of the upcoming ConTeXt release:
(Don't ask me for details of the
Tobias Burnus wrote:
\starttypescript [serif-antykwa-torunska] [ec]
\definefontsynonym [AntykwaTorunska-Regular] [zatr8t] [encoding=ec]
\definefontsynonym [AntykwaTorunska-Italic] [zatri8t] [encoding=ec]
\definefontsynonym [AntykwaTorunska-Bold][zatb8t] [encoding=ec]
Karsten == Karsten Tinnefeld [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
[...]
I've been thinking about a change when trying to adapt the
corelpak-fonts to our needs, but I came to another conclusion.
What we are in fact interested in is a flexible system on the
user level which hides the
I agree with this. The font naming system should now be changed. The 8+3
Yes! Please can we have the font naming system changed?
The font naming scheme,
and the equally important TDS, were the work of various ad hoc working
groups in the early/mid 90s.
I've been thinking about a
I agree with this. The font naming system should now be changed. The 8+3
Yes! Please can we have the font naming system changed?
The font naming scheme,
and the equally important TDS, were the work of various ad hoc working
groups in the early/mid 90s.
I've been thinking about a
