Re: biblist obsolete what else to use NonMember

2000-09-28 Thread Ken Smith

Someone will probably beat me in replying to this, and it's not a teTeX
question, but ...

migis garb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on
Thu, 28 Sep 2000 10:37:47 +0200 (MEST)

> Hi texies!

> I was just at dante and found out that biblist is obsolete, but
> what else should I use to produce a nice print of my whole database
> without typing millions of times \nocite{mr.x:98}.

\nocite{*}

> Thank you very much

Ken Smith




RPMs for Suse?

2000-09-28 Thread Martin Schröder

Hi,
does anybody have up to date rpms for Suse Linux? It still ships
with pdftex 0.13d :-(

Best regards
Martin



RPMs for Suse?

2000-09-28 Thread Martin Schröder

Hi,
does anybody have up to date rpms for Suse Linux? It still ships
with pdftex 0.13d :-(

Best regards
Martin

 PGP signature


Re: biblist obsolete what else to use NonMember

2000-09-28 Thread Mats Bengtsson

> Hi texies!
> 
> I was just at dante and found out that biblist is obsolete, but
> what else should I use to produce a nice print of my whole database
> without typing millions of times \nocite{mr.x:98}.

Please send general TeX questions to the newsgroup comp.text.tex, 
this list is only intended for teTeX-specific questions.
Anyway, try 
\nocite{*}


/Mats





Re: biblist obsolete what else to use NonMember

2000-09-28 Thread Thomas Ruedas

\nocite{*}
IIRC
-- 

Thomas Ruedas
Institute of Meteorology and Geophysics, J.W.Goethe University Frankfurt
e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.geophysik.uni-frankfurt.de/~ruedas/




True Type fonts

2000-09-28 Thread Jonathan . Melvin
Title: True Type fonts





I would like to use True Type fonts with teTeX 1.0. I intend to use FreeType and ttf2pk to generate pk fonts. Has anyone done this before with teTex and is there anything in particular I need to be careful of?



This e-mail may contain privileged and confidential information and should not be used by anyone who is not the original intended recipient(s). If you have received this e-mail in error, please notify us immediately by using the reply facility on your e-mail system.


Re: teTeX-1.0.6

2000-09-28 Thread David Kastrup

   Date: Thu, 28 Sep 2000 08:20:53 +0200
   From: Stefan Kost <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

   ... just to mention, I *read* the FAQ. The mail was more ment that it
   wont hurt to emphasize, that those variable can cause problems when are
   set. Anyway (to be at least a bit helpful), this is what the FAQ says in
   point 23

   First, make sure that your "environment" is ok and run
 texconfig confall
   This gives you an idea about which binaries are found along your
   PATH and if you have set some environment variables that might
   confuse teTeX's programs. If in doubt, unset all variables that
   are set in the last section of the output.
   The last section contains the searchpath for kpsepath not environment
   variables.

Ok, this seems to have changed since the FAQ was written (namely, the
environment variables section is no longer the last section).  So
Thomas, could you change the text in the FAQ entry to:

   If in doubt, unset all variables that are shown in the "environment
   variables" section of the output.

David Kastrup Phone: +49-234-32-25570
Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]   Fax: +49-234-32-14209
Institut für Neuroinformatik, Universitätsstr. 150, 44780 Bochum, Germany




biblist obsolete what else to use NonMember

2000-09-28 Thread migis garb

Hi texies!

I was just at dante and found out that biblist is obsolete, but
what else should I use to produce a nice print of my whole database
without typing millions of times \nocite{mr.x:98}.

Thank you very much

-- 
Sent through GMX FreeMail - http://www.gmx.net




Re: teTeX-1.0.6

2000-09-28 Thread David Kastrup

   Date: Wed, 27 Sep 2000 17:37:55 +0200
   From: Stefan Kost <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

   just a short note about behaviour of teTeX (1.0.6) on solaris.
   I encourage you to improve the verbosity of tetex (sorry for writing it
   lowercase). Today tetex stopped working. We needed hours to find out
   that it was about the env-variable TEXMF, TEXINPUT. After we've removed
   them it started working again. Why are they still there if not needed.
   Why can't tex tell me *where* it is searching for something, if it does
   not find it. Please don't answer, ' because it's not yet written'. It's
   been said that tex is quite mature (should be for its age).

   sorry for the harsh mail, but this wasn't neccessary...

The texconfig utility offers an entry "FAQ".  The documentation for
teTeX contains this selfsame FAQ.  Question 23 addresses your problem
and gives hints how to diagnose it.  If you fail to read the supplied
doc, it is you that are to blame.  teTeX itself does not set any
environment variables.  If you set some environment variables to
values belonging to an old installation, you are at fault.  Especially
if this is mentioned in the FAQ and you don't read it.

Sorry for the harsh mail, but this wasn't necessary...

David Kastrup Phone: +49-234-32-25570
Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]   Fax: +49-234-32-14209
Institut für Neuroinformatik, Universitätsstr. 150, 44780 Bochum, Germany