Mate Wierdl [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Perhaps one should collect the necessary defines from the .h files into a single one, and send it along with try2.c to the gcc developers so that they have a standalone test suite. That would be a good idea, but if you're using the RHL7 gcc, you should send the report to the RH folks, not the gcc folks. -- Alan Shutko [EMAIL PROTECTED] - In a variety of flavors! There's no such thing as pure pleasure; some anxiety always goes with it.
Mate Wierdl [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: If people verify this also with the original glibc (not the updated one), I'll submit a bugreport to gcc (and leave this list alone). Verified with updated libc... don't have the original handy. Please don't send it to GCC, send it to http://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/ . Red Hat is maintaining the compiler they shipped. If you don't want to hassle with Bugzilla, let me know and I'll do it. -- Alan Shutko [EMAIL PROTECTED] - In a variety of flavors! This sentence no verb.
Hmmm! # gcc -v Reading specs from /usr/lib/gcc-lib/i386-redhat-linux/2.96/specs gcc version 2.96 2731 (Red Hat Linux 7.0) And still: I think that your compiler is broken. RedHat GCC 2.96 cannot compile the kernel. Try using kgcc and see what comes up... DL -- The new century begins at the end of this month; let the celebrations be brought forth let the people rejoice God Bless the Queen!