Re: now I think this is a bug

2000-12-12 Thread Alan Shutko

Mate Wierdl [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:

 Perhaps one should collect the necessary defines from the .h files
 into a single one, and send it along with try2.c to the gcc
 developers so that they have a standalone test suite. 

That would be a good idea, but if you're using the RHL7 gcc, you
should send the report to the RH folks, not the gcc folks.  

-- 
Alan Shutko [EMAIL PROTECTED] - In a variety of flavors!
There's no such thing as pure pleasure; some anxiety always goes with it.




Re: isolated the problem

2000-12-12 Thread Alan Shutko

Mate Wierdl [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:

 If people verify this also with the original glibc (not the updated
 one), I'll submit a bugreport to gcc (and leave this list alone).

Verified with updated libc... don't have the original handy.  Please
don't send it to GCC, send it to http://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/
.  Red Hat is maintaining the compiler they shipped.

If you don't want to hassle with Bugzilla, let me know and I'll do it.

-- 
Alan Shutko [EMAIL PROTECTED] - In a variety of flavors!
This sentence no verb.




Re: now I think this is a bug

2000-12-12 Thread David Lloyd


Hmmm!

  # gcc -v
  Reading specs from /usr/lib/gcc-lib/i386-redhat-linux/2.96/specs
  gcc version 2.96 2731 (Red Hat Linux 7.0)
 
 And still: I think that your compiler is broken.

RedHat GCC 2.96 cannot compile the kernel. Try using kgcc and see what
comes up...

DL
-- 
The new century begins at the end of this month;
 let the celebrations be brought forth
 let the people rejoice
God Bless the Queen!