Re: Mathfrak-bug?

2002-11-04 Thread Harald Hanche-Olsen
+ Erik Frisk [EMAIL PROTECTED]: | below is a document that fails with teTeX-beta 20020530 (unfortunately I | have no possibility to try the latest beta). There seem to be some | problems with \mathfrak and AMSfonts since the text | [2002/01/19v2.2gAMSfontdefinitions] appears in the middle of the

Re: teTeX 1.0.7 doesn't install

2002-09-19 Thread Harald Hanche-Olsen
+ Magnus Mager [EMAIL PROTECTED]: | test -f /usr/local/bin/i586-pc-linux-gnu/texconfig \ | TEXMFMAIN=/usr/local/share/texmf | |PATH=/usr/local/bin/i586-pc-linux-gnu:/usr/local/bin/i586-pc-linux-gnu:/sbin:/bin:/usr/sbin:/usr/bin | | \ | /usr/local/bin/i586-pc-linux-gnu/texconfig init |


2002-05-29 Thread Harald Hanche-Olsen
Now that the latest tex-live release is practically on its way out the door, can we expect a corresponding teTeX release? (The relationship between tex-live and teTeX seems shady to me at best...) I currently run the latest teTeX beta personally, but don't dare expose more than a select few of

Re: CM-Super font package v0.2.0

2001-10-10 Thread Harald Hanche-Olsen
+ Rolf Niepraschk [EMAIL PROTECTED]: | Harald Hanche-Olsen wrote: | [...] | sfti0900.pfb Second number not found in Char |string of '/FontName' | | | I have found a similar problem with dvips 5.86e and the brushscript font | (the previous version

Re: CM-Super font package v0.2.0

2001-10-08 Thread Harald Hanche-Olsen
Just a quick question to you all: Did any of you successfully use the CM-super fonts with teTeX 1.07 (or dvips 5.86)? The font files seem to confuse the heck out of this version of dvips. Since Vladimir runs dvips 5.86d and is unable to reproduce my problem, it is my conjecture that it is indeed

Re: tex capacity exceeded

2001-06-15 Thread Harald Hanche-Olsen
+ Pieter Rijken [EMAIL PROTECTED]: | With openjade I'm generating a 1200 page large PDF document. | After about 600 pages pdfjadetex quits with the error that | it has run out of capacity. In this case it has run out of | the parameter 'number of strings' (about 52000). | | I figured out that

teTeX releases

2001-05-25 Thread Harald Hanche-Olsen
I know the question I am about to ask is one rarely answered, and for excellent reasons - but I ask it anyway: Is there a new teTeX release underway anytime soon? The present stable release is getting quite old. We certainly need amslatex version 2, for example. I also have the impression

Re: now I think this is a bug

2000-12-11 Thread Harald Hanche-Olsen
+ Mate Wierdl [EMAIL PROTECTED]: | So I decided to reinstall teTeX without doing any configuration: | | # rm -rf /usr/local/teTeX/ | # mkdir -p /usr/local/teTeX/share/texmf | # gzip -dc teTeX-texmf-1.0.tar.gz | (umask 0; cd /usr/local/teTeX/share/texmf; tar |xf -) | # gzip -dc